Quoted: Reading a lot in the ammo forum has shown me quite a trend. I'd say the majority of shooters view M/XM193 as THE ammo of choice for shooting AR's, and all other ammo is judged against it. What I don't understand is WHY? Mil spec is 62 gr, yet M/XM855 gets no mention, even as a SHTF ammo. Even for blasting people seem to favor the 55gr stuff even though 62gr is readily available at the same price.
Am I missing something? I prefer the 62gr stuff for its balistics and that it seems to run better in my rifle.
|
Well, I personally like M855. With that being said, I've never once shot it in my life so it's not from experience that I like it.
But, you say it's just as cheap as M193 and I don't have that experience. I see this PD stuff floating around and that might be as cheap but I don't know if I'd buy that stuff. Maybe it's fine. In any event, any boxed stuff I've seen is always more expensive than M193 of any sort. But, as of late, the M193 spec stuff has been getting more expensive. So, the gap is closing.
M193 is more popular with the shooters because #1 it usually is cheaper, #2 there's usually more of it (like I said though, in the last year the norm has been changing), #3 it is reported to have more fragmentation out to a little bit longer distances than M855 by very knowledgeable people and #4 everyone who shoots an AR has a soft spot for Vietnam Era Weapons and ammo. (I'm sort of kidding about that last one, although with many, the M193 had a very good reputation for making a mess of the enemy, whereas M855 gets more of a bad rap, much of which I take with a grain of salt)
I hope this helps.
Hey USAF, my M9 is shooting low, do you have any suggestions?