Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
9/19/2017 7:27:10 PM
Posted: 1/22/2006 7:01:10 AM EDT
My SAM7 carbine stock is too short for me. So I plan to change the buttstock to either a sidefolder or a standard NATO length stock. I see that KVAR offers two diferent types of buttstocks: the regular style, and the in-line style (seen here: http://www.k-var.com/shop/product.php?productid=16713&cat=283&page=1) What are your thoughts on the in-line buttstock? What are its handling properties compared to a regular stock? Thanks for any advice you can offer.
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 7:05:26 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 7:15:34 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 7:18:28 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 1/22/2006 7:18:58 AM EDT by Newaza]
Thanks for attaching the picture.

Why don't you care for them? Do they drop your line of sight down too low?
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 7:18:55 AM EDT
Is that the wing of a Cadillac?
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 7:19:33 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 7:21:27 AM EDT
You're right. It does look like a Cadillac wing. I'll stick with a traditional buttstock. Thanks, guys.
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 9:32:26 AM EDT
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 12:40:10 PM EDT
I like the AK for it's traditional commie appeal. That particular stock has none of that, and is somewhat 'brokeback', IMO.

If you want a contemporary, modern weapon, there may be some better choices out there. If you want an AK... get an AK.
Link Posted: 1/22/2006 12:43:33 PM EDT
Top Top