The test Lucky Gunner did is not a scientific or valid study. It only shows what happens when you rapidly fire certain .223 cartridges through certain AR-15s. To be honest with you, it was a torture test that subjected the rifles to wear beyond what just a bimetal jacket will cause. Much of the damage done can be attributed to the guns being abused and run hot. If this is how you treat your weapons, then that is what you can expect to happen. Perhaps you can expect similar results in different calibers and weapons, but there are just too many variables to make this one test the be-all-end-all definitive answer to the bi-metal jacket issue.
Bi-metal jackets are nothing new. They have been around and in widespread use since well before WWII. If they were that bad for a barrel, no one would use them...
The US adopted bi-metal jackets during WWII due to raw material shortages, calling them "alternate". Testing showed only a slight increase in barrel wear compared to the standard gilding metal jacket.
There is no doubt that bi-metal jackets cause more wear than gilding metal jackets, but their effects are greatly exaggerated...
There are other variables to consider besides the projectile material. The powder type, the powder charge volume, the rate of fire, the velocity of the cartridge, how hot the gun gets and for how long. you can't pin barrel wear on the jacket material alone. Plenty of barrels have been shot out with ammunition using gilding metal jacketed projectiles...
1DD