Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Posted: 11/26/2007 4:19:24 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 11/26/2007 4:25:51 AM EDT by LtDirector]
How are the UTG railed fore ends at holding zero?
Link Posted: 11/26/2007 8:06:14 AM EDT
Link Posted: 11/26/2007 2:43:24 PM EDT

Originally Posted By shotar:
Not good. The forend would be fine for a light, but not a good choice for an optic that needs to hold zero.

Thanks. Now I wish there was a local place that sold decent rail scope mounts
Link Posted: 11/26/2007 3:15:48 PM EDT

I've had no problems with the UTG foreend on my WASR-3... about 1800 rounds now with an Aimpoint clone with no problems... and it's been riding in the back of my Jeep Grand Cherokee for many months.
Link Posted: 11/27/2007 6:02:13 AM EDT
Link Posted: 11/27/2007 6:06:12 AM EDT
My UTG is fine at holding zero. I ran a M2 mounted on it in an ARMS mount through a LAV AK class with no problems whatsoever. The UTG is far from my favorite mount, but my issues arent with losing zero.
Link Posted: 11/29/2007 1:00:19 PM EDT
I would still have mine if it fit my MAK90. The 478 version fist most AKs and the new 479 fits the chinese guns. I don't know if the 479 is out yet though. For the $$$ the UTG isn't a bad set up.
Link Posted: 12/1/2007 7:40:20 PM EDT
I can vouch for that, after buying a UTG rail for my friend and seeing it wasn't plastic, I ordered myself one the next day. Can't beat um for the price.
Link Posted: 12/5/2007 3:49:41 AM EDT
I've got the UTG on a Romanian and on a Mak 90. Both hold zero. Mount is rock solid. Anyone who tells you different doesn't have one and never will.
Top Top