User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 8:08:23 AM EDT
[#1]
YES - M92 Krink.
my vote. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 8:11:17 AM EDT
[#2]
Yes, I vote for rpk74.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 10:29:59 AM EDT
[#3]
anything but the M92. sorry they just don't do it for me. mmk
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 11:34:28 AM EDT
[#4]
Yugo's have dark bore's
Krinks and RPK's would be to spendy So for me that leavs the Polish |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 1:00:11 PM EDT
[#5]
Depends on price!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 1:06:52 PM EDT
[#6]
rpk
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 1:11:49 PM EDT
[#7]
RPK74 would be cool but being that KVAR has gouged the price on their "recent finds" I wonder what the cost would be? Could it be done on a real RPK reciever? Gotta have bulges.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 1:46:10 PM EDT
[#8]
I voted for the M70 Yugo, although either Yugo would interest me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 1:51:49 PM EDT
[#9]
My vote is for the M92, but if not that then the RPK would be my second choice. Regular M70's mostly all have dark bores anyway. My .02!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 2:02:32 PM EDT
[#10]
If the Polish kits are underfolders, I'm not personally interested.
How about a SEAK built up from from one of the Romanian kits that are coming in? A nice basic gun for a lower price, you know? Just throwing out some other ideas...  Scott |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 2:26:54 PM EDT
[#11]
The Yugo M-70s that I'm chasing are brand new, never assembled.
The RPK-74 kits you can easily count on being over $1200. The Yugo M-92s are brand new. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 4:16:56 PM EDT
[#12]
I'd want one on the condition that there were a NY legal version and it's gonna have to fire a caliber(7.62) that I can actually afford and find so that I can actually USE the rifle.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 4:25:59 PM EDT
[#13]
Yes, Yugo M-70 or Polish or M-92. In that order of preference. I'll take one anyway.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 4:50:46 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
The RPK-74 kits you can easily count on being over $1200.  .....Kit alone? A little above my budget.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 6:05:34 PM EDT
[#15]
How much would a 7.62 RPK cost if its too much my vote is for polish.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 7:46:45 PM EDT
[#16]
POLSKA!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 7:51:48 PM EDT
[#17]
Here' s what we have to do.
No matter what the SEAKIII ends up being, we have to call it a "Whatever Whatever...6920." It will drive the guys on the AR side out of their minds. WTF is a Colt 6920?? They talk about it over there like it is the "Holy Graile" of Ar-15's. Man im so glad i discovered this side of the board!! KyARGuy |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 8:02:03 PM EDT
[#18]
LOL, know what'ya mean.
"Colt is the ONLY brand all other's are garbage! blahblahblah" is all I hear over there. How about the "neverheardofit 6920"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 9:26:54 PM EDT
[#19]
I like bushmaster better. Its a better rifle IMO.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 9:49:28 PM EDT
[#20]
RRA all the way!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 10:01:41 PM EDT
[#21]
is this an AR bashing thread or SEAK info thread???
I would like the m-92 or m-70 (if they are the unissued ones,if they exist) |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 10:53:44 PM EDT
[#22]
Wheres the bulgarian krink?
 Wish i hadnt missed the boat on those. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 11:20:03 PM EDT
[#23]
I hate Yugos! Their receivers have that thing going on near the front trunion and they have that ugly gas shutoff! And RPK's are nice, but don't belong as a SEAK. Go Polish.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 11:43:40 PM EDT
[#24]
7.62x39.mm . No SBR paperwork . Other than that I don't care .
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/15/2005 11:53:11 PM EDT
[#25]
I would be interested in the Polish Series.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 2:24:56 AM EDT
[#26]
The Krink would NOT need to be SBR'd if supplied with a 'can' - which I imagine would be the plan for most of us. Front 'Can' in the 'white'.  Finished 'Can' on my Bulgarian Krink. No SBR needed.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 2:26:05 AM EDT
[#27]
M92's DON'T have the front bulge. STD receiver needed.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 4:04:00 PM EDT
[#28]
Looks like some people feel that a third SEAK project is not required.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 4:39:36 PM EDT
[#29]
Um, only about 30%, and they don't have to buy. How could you NOT want to get in on the last batch of imported AK's? I would be in for whatever, but I would definately prefer a PMKMS. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 5:05:24 PM EDT
[#30]
I agree, if we can get a head count... and finialize a design.... |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 5:39:18 PM EDT
[#31]
Probably the growing number of 15 year olds on the site. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 5:52:27 PM EDT
[#32]
I'm waiting to vote til I see more details.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 6:06:31 PM EDT
[#33]
This thread may need to be locked and filed.
I don't see enough interest here in a Special Edition AK. KF |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 6:13:19 PM EDT
[#34]
bummer
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 6:48:57 PM EDT
[#35]
I'd be very interested, I'm just not sure what to vote for. I think I would lean towards a Tantal with the correct reciever/safety switch.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/16/2005 7:06:55 PM EDT
[#36]
That stinks. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2005 4:59:14 AM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2005 5:38:30 AM EDT
[#38]
Guess we will wait and see what develops....
I'll give the poll some more time to determine what the majority feels they prefer for SEAK III |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2005 6:32:30 AM EDT
[#39]
POLISH!!!! ETA: I would love a M92 as well 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2005 6:50:50 AM EDT
[#40]
gimme a good price on a krink so I can SBR it later.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2005 6:57:13 AM EDT
[#41]
Where do we stand on this? I know things take time, but I am getting antzy for a new toy. Keep us posted with developments.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/17/2005 1:24:30 PM EDT
[#42]
I would be interested in either an M92 or Polish Underfolder. Thanks
Ron |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2005 10:08:33 AM EDT
[#43]
If the Krink is reasonably priced, I'll take it, but the kits are double that of the Polish.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/18/2005 1:55:48 PM EDT
[#44]
I think we need to start finializing this... someone needs to make an executive decision.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2005 11:01:14 AM EDT
[#45]
Yes we should have a SEAK III, but $1200 is way too much. Just because 30% of the people don't want one doesn't mean we shouldn't.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2005 11:11:46 AM EDT
[#46]
The $1200 estimate is for the RPK-74 kit alone. If we go with the RPK-74 as SEAK III, the complete weapon will be considerably more.
I'm thinking the M-92 or the M-70 may be the most cost effective way to go, and still utilize brand new kits to build from. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2005 11:17:13 AM EDT
[#47]
M70 if from new kits, otherwise M92.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2005 12:32:17 PM EDT
[#48]
I've been wanting an AK for ages, all I have is an SKS for now and I don't wanna buy a cheap wasr-10. I'd really like to seen an M-70 and would love to spend my money on the guys here. and get a good quality one.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2005 12:53:19 PM EDT
[#49]
So can we all agree, M92 it is?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/19/2005 10:47:12 PM EDT
[#50]
Being Polish....LOL. I would prefer a POL type rifle. One request that I have. If ORF makes this SEAKIII please dont use the Blark finish. I didnt particularly like it. It started to turn orange on me  .Parkerized under GUNKOTE would be sweet. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
