

The stamped receivers hold up better than the milled? Interesting. Impressive steel collection.
![]() |
|
|
Originally Posted By wav3form:
The stamped receivers hold up better than the milled? Interesting. Impressive steel collection. ![]() View Quote Well, to be fair, the Century milled C39 receivers have lasted but all of the barrels lost their headspace. They were on the line for quite some time but now we have three waiting to be repaired sitting in a weapons rack. I initially was suspect of the Century milled AK receivers but they have lasted. The barrels are from the initial release of C39's before chrome-lining was offered. I haven't paid much attention about the choices now but I did see they offer them with chrome-line barrels now. V/R Ron |
|
|
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
The one thing I can say about the AK's is that they hold up MUCH BETTER than the RPD's. I thought for sure that RPD's would last so much longer because of the milled receivers but the receivers only last about half the life (if that) of a Romanian WASR. View Quote What part of the receivers wear out? Seems like that would be the last thing to wear out, milled or stamped. |
|
|
What variants do you test? Can you rate them?
|
|
|
Nice pile of steel.
Haven't seen you guys post over here in quite some time, good to see you back. |
|
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement. |
Who makes the best barrels? By best I mean longest lasting.
|
|
|
Here are some answers to the questions...
- Every single stamped receiver has suffered from a cracked trunion. This includes Saiga, Arsenal (Bulgarian), Norinco (Chinese), Arsenal (Russian stamped), WASR, Hungarian, Polish (vintage kits), Yugo (vintage and PAP-series) and new Polish (from Royal Tiger imports). - We have every type of AK available to shoot except for Cuban, Vietnamese or North Korean. - US (Century), Bulgarian and Chinese milled receivers have yet to fail. - Stamped receivers split at the angle of the upper rail and the side wall. N-PAP's have literally cracked in have perpendicular the length of the rifle. The receivers cracked just posterior the front trunion (between center bushing and the trunion). - We have yet to shoot out a factory WASR barrel. The barrels on three of our C39's started to keyhole and were pulled. - We have WASR's on the line that have last OVER two and half years and the barrels are NOT shot out and they continue to run. We installed new bolts to bring headspace back up but they keep running. - The Draco-C's that we converted over three years ago are finally down to the last unit. Most have cracked trunions but one of the barrels right past the gas block literally cracked off. The portion of the barrel with the threads cracked right off while shooting. I will see if I still have pics on my phone. V/R Ron |
|
|
After how many rounds do they usually go to shit?
Which FA weapon is typically the most reliable over time and round count? What is the most popular rental? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Mosin762:
After how many rounds do they usually go to shit? Which FA weapon is typically the most reliable over time and round count? What is the most popular rental? View Quote - This may sound crazy but it's fair to say that they finally suffer a catastrophic failure (cracked trunion) at 80,000-100,000 rounds. Also, we have WASR's that have suffered a catastrophic failure and we just pull out the old trunion and barrel, grab one from a parts kit, re-rivet, re-barrel and get them up and running. - The AK is the most reliable but after seeing how many have broke over the last two and half years on the range, it's not the indestructible weapon everybody talks about (and I always thought it was). What makes is reliable is it's simplicity. My guys clean/service 4-5 AK's for every M4 or MP5. The Uzi it's just as simple but you wouldn't believe how often components of the top cover fail. We purchased 75 kits about a year ago and we have gone through so many top covers. We will lose an extractor here and there but not often enough to complain about. - The three most popular rentals are the AK47, MP5 and Uzi. People want to shoot the AK because they are so popular from the news and movies but then want to shoot the Uzi because of the name and then finally shoot the MP5 because it's so smooth and no recoil. V/R Ron |
|
|
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Here are some answers to the questions... - Every single stamped receiver has suffered from a cracked trunion. This includes Saiga, Arsenal (Bulgarian), Norinco (Chinese), Arsenal (Russian stamped), WASR, Hungarian, Polish (vintage kits), Yugo (vintage and PAP-series) and new Polish (from Royal Tiger imports). - We have every type of AK available to shoot except for Cuban, Vietnamese or North Korean. - US (Century), Bulgarian and Chinese milled receivers have yet to fail. - Stamped receivers split at the angle of the upper rail and the side wall. N-PAP's have literally cracked in have perpendicular the length of the rifle. The receivers cracked just posterior the front trunion (between center bushing and the trunion). - We have yet to shoot out a factory WASR barrel. The barrels on three of our C39's started to keyhole and were pulled. - We have WASR's on the line that have last OVER two and half years and the barrels are NOT shot out and they continue to run. We installed new bolts to bring headspace back up but they keep running. - The Draco-C's that we converted over three years ago are finally down to the last unit. Most have cracked trunions but one of the barrels right past the gas block literally cracked off. The portion of the barrel with the threads cracked right off while shooting. I will see if I still have pics on my phone. V/R Ron View Quote You said the milled RPD guns failed before the stamped guns earlier. |
|
|
Originally Posted By wav3form:
You said the milled guns failed before the stamped guns earlier. View Quote I meant the milled RPD's failed before the stamped AK's. I always expected the RPD to be such a stronger weapon considering it's the same caliber as the AK and much thicker receiver. V/R Ron |
|
|
I would like to know more about how the trunnions typically crack, if there is a pattern to it.
I used to read stories about early Type 2/3 milled receivers sometimes cracking locking lugs due to fatigue, which was supposed to be an improvement that was a result of the stamped receiver flex and isolation of the breech block... Supposedly heat treating on those receivers were poor. Good to know the modern production receivers don't have that problem. When youy say the barrels are losing headspace, is this due to wear on trunnion/bolt locking contact surfaces, or is the barrel gradually egging the barrel pin channel with use and allowing it to move? High round count issues are always interesting, especially with this thread going on that basically claims most AKs will fall apart in a couple thousand rounds. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1749140_.html&r=53613467 |
|
|
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
I meant the milled RPD's failed before the stamped AK's. I always expected the RPD to be such a stronger weapon considering it's the same caliber as the AK and much thicker receiver. V/R Ron View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By wav3form:
You said the milled guns failed before the stamped guns earlier. I meant the milled RPD's failed before the stamped AK's. I always expected the RPD to be such a stronger weapon considering it's the same caliber as the AK and much thicker receiver. V/R Ron Ah ok I gotcha. Just the RPDs failed? |
|
|
Originally Posted By mancat:
I would like to know more about how the trunnions typically crack, if there is a pattern to it. I used to read stories about early Type 2/3 milled receivers sometimes cracking locking lugs due to fatigue, which was supposed to be an improvement that was a result of the stamped receiver flex and isolation of the breech block... Supposedly heat treating on those receivers were poor. Good to know the modern production receivers don't have that problem. When youy say the barrels are losing headspace, is this due to wear on trunnion/bolt locking contact surfaces, or is the barrel gradually egging the barrel pin channel with use and allowing it to move? High round count issues are always interesting, especially with this thread going on that basically claims most AKs will fall apart in a couple thousand rounds. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1749140_.html&r=53613467 View Quote I am not the expert when it comes to issues of headspace but I believe it's due to wear on the bolt locking surfaces and the barrel face. When the headspace gets towards the acceptable level, the armorers will swap bolts until they get good headspace. The milled C39's that have excessive headspace couldn't be "fixed" by installing new bolts. They are going to try and press the barrel in slightly (and I mean the armorers pressing it 1000th's of inch) and oversizing the barrel pin on one C39 and see what happens. V/R Ron |
|
|
Good stuff, thanks for taking the time to answer some questions. Kinda hard to get this kind of feedback on such high round count performance.
|
|
|
Someone with more patience should start a running tally of parts breakage and approx round counts.
Then tack the thread. |
|
|
Originally Posted By azoutdoorsman:
Someone with more patience should start a running tally of parts breakage and approx round counts. Then tack the thread. View Quote That's something we've talked about in the shop. Some of the other guys have kept a box of all the broken parts that one would never expect to break. Slant brakes splitting in half, gas pistons snapping at the base where they screw into the carrier, spot welds failing on the lower rails, lugs shearing off the bolts and carrier bodies cracking. As for AK-74's, the thin bolt "stem" has cracked on various bolts and cracked trunions. V/R Ron |
|
|
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense: That's something we've talked about in the shop. Some of the other guys have kept a box of all the broken parts that one would never expect to break. Slant brakes splitting in half, gas pistons snapping at the base where they screw into the carrier, spot welds failing on the lower rails, lugs shearing off the bolts and carrier bodies cracking. As for AK-74's, the thin bolt "stem" has cracked on various bolts and cracked trunions. V/R Ron View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HendersonDefense: Originally Posted By azoutdoorsman: Someone with more patience should start a running tally of parts breakage and approx round counts. Then tack the thread. That's something we've talked about in the shop. Some of the other guys have kept a box of all the broken parts that one would never expect to break. Slant brakes splitting in half, gas pistons snapping at the base where they screw into the carrier, spot welds failing on the lower rails, lugs shearing off the bolts and carrier bodies cracking. As for AK-74's, the thin bolt "stem" has cracked on various bolts and cracked trunions. V/R Ron How is reliability in between parts failures? |
|
|
RIP: LTC D. Cabrera and SGT C. Newman-29OCT11-OEF
![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() |
Very informative.
|
"Everybody gotta die sometime Red"
|
Originally Posted By mancat:
I would like to know more about how the trunnions typically crack, if there is a pattern to it. I used to read stories about early Type 2/3 milled receivers sometimes cracking locking lugs due to fatigue, which was supposed to be an improvement that was a result of the stamped receiver flex and isolation of the breech block... Supposedly heat treating on those receivers were poor. Good to know the modern production receivers don't have that problem. When youy say the barrels are losing headspace, is this due to wear on trunnion/bolt locking contact surfaces, or is the barrel gradually egging the barrel pin channel with use and allowing it to move? High round count issues are always interesting, especially with this thread going on that basically claims most AKs will fall apart in a couple thousand rounds. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1749140_.html&r=53613467 View Quote You might be interested to know that the man who started the great AFRCOM GD AKs-shoot-themselves-apart-myth once belonged to a different website which is devoted to AKs. He posted pictures of indigenous people firing AKs. Those pictures included a Type 1, several type 2s and AKMs. The "newest" weapon was a 74 ... which had no finish. All were in working order. I also note that no one in GD who claims that AKs shoot themselves apart has managed to capture a photo of even one broken weapon. I guess they move too fast when wounded. OTOH you might want to look at some credible data like the tests conducted by the Polish military with the "Tantal". IIRC the test weapons lasted 15,000 to 20,000 shots - which included launching grenades. ![]() |
|
|
Does the nature of the stamped guns be that the receiver flexes and gives as to its ability to take more than the Milled receivers not giving?
|
|
|
Don't be afraid to paint, it's only krylon
![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() |
In speaking to variations do you have any DDR guns online?
If so how have they held up? |
Support the People's Front of Judea!
Visit my photo collection - http://www.flickr.com/photos/the-dorsal-fin |
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
- This may sound crazy but it's fair to say that they finally suffer a catastrophic failure (cracked trunion) at 80,000-100,000 rounds. Also, we have WASR's that have suffered a catastrophic failure and we just pull out the old trunion and barrel, grab one from a parts kit, re-rivet, re-barrel and get them up and running. - The AK is the most reliable but after seeing how many have broke over the last two and half years on the range, it's not the indestructible weapon everybody talks about (and I always thought it was). What makes is reliable is it's simplicity. My guys clean/service 4-5 AK's for every M4 or MP5. The Uzi it's just as simple but you wouldn't believe how often components of the top cover fail. We purchased 75 kits about a year ago and we have gone through so many top covers. We will lose an extractor here and there but not often enough to complain about. - The three most popular rentals are the AK47, MP5 and Uzi. People want to shoot the AK because they are so popular from the news and movies but then want to shoot the Uzi because of the name and then finally shoot the MP5 because it's so smooth and no recoil. V/R Ron View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By Mosin762:
After how many rounds do they usually go to shit? Which FA weapon is typically the most reliable over time and round count? What is the most popular rental? - This may sound crazy but it's fair to say that they finally suffer a catastrophic failure (cracked trunion) at 80,000-100,000 rounds. Also, we have WASR's that have suffered a catastrophic failure and we just pull out the old trunion and barrel, grab one from a parts kit, re-rivet, re-barrel and get them up and running. - The AK is the most reliable but after seeing how many have broke over the last two and half years on the range, it's not the indestructible weapon everybody talks about (and I always thought it was). What makes is reliable is it's simplicity. My guys clean/service 4-5 AK's for every M4 or MP5. The Uzi it's just as simple but you wouldn't believe how often components of the top cover fail. We purchased 75 kits about a year ago and we have gone through so many top covers. We will lose an extractor here and there but not often enough to complain about. - The three most popular rentals are the AK47, MP5 and Uzi. People want to shoot the AK because they are so popular from the news and movies but then want to shoot the Uzi because of the name and then finally shoot the MP5 because it's so smooth and no recoil. V/R Ron Sort of off topic but how have the MP5's held up? Our's were service queens after 15,000-20,000 rounds but the sample size was two so..... |
|
|
Thanks for posting this, HD. It's rare that we can see what true high round count guns go through.
|
|
"Nothing says 'come to my tree stand for a good cornholing' more than a Browning Buckmark sticker on your oversized truck." - dport
"Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list. |
Originally Posted By Finslayer83:
In speaking to variations do you have any DDR guns online? If so how have they held up? View Quote The only factory DDR guns we have are the three full-auto MPi-69's chambered in .22LR. We've had them on the line EVERY SINGLE DAY (except for Christmas) over the last two and half years and they continue to run flawlessly. We've only lost a few extractors and spring along the way and changed out the recoil springs just as a preventative maintenance (they didn't fail). The magazine springs have been changed at least twice since opening but other than that, those weapons have unbelievable. V/R Ron |
|
|
I doubt I'll ever put 80-100K rounds through any of my guns. If that's the typical breaking point I think I'll be okay.
![]() |
|
|
Have you tested Veprs? If so, how do they hold up?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Blofeld:
Sort of off topic but how have the MP5's held up? Our's were service queens after 15,000-20,000 rounds but the sample size was two so..... View Quote We have MP5's that have well over 500,000 rounds through them. The receivers crack at the fold/pinch point where the trunion and internal rail meet. We go through extractor springs like you wouldn't believe. When they start to chug, we install over-size rollers (I think they do this twice) and when they start to chug again, we install a new barrel. We've never had a catastrophic issue with a MP5. Barrels either start to key hole and we replace them or the bolt gap is so so far gone and the barrel gets replaced. Extractors and firing pins will break every now and then but they are pretty damn reliable. The top "tube" portion of the bolt carrier will crack right at the point where it hangs over the main body (I believe there are few broken carries on a bench) but we reweld them and put them back in service. We also tig the areas of the receiver where they crack but it's the same place where the factory puts a small amount of tig weld. An example of use.... last Saturday alone, we went through 14,000 rounds of 9mm. Not all of it was through MP5's (9mm M16's, Uzi's, Glock's, Sig's, etc) but figure close to half of that goes through the MP5's. V/R Ron |
|
|
Originally Posted By merdenom5:
Have you tested Veprs? If so, how do they hold up? View Quote We haven't tested any VEPR's. The only Russian AK's we have are some Saiga's that I converted back to a military configuration about 3-4 years ago. We have customers from around the world come in and they ONLY WANT TO SHOOT A RUSSIAN Kalashnikov. They want to see the receiver and verify that it was made in Russia and they are happy as can be. The only reason we haven't used VEPR's is because the WASR's have been so reliable there's never been a reason to spend more money on the VEPR and then have to bring it back to a military configuration. V/R Ron |
|
|
That's impressive to see.
Thank you for posting that information. |
|
Chaos, confusion, despair....my work is done here. Murphy
Did you just realize the closest you'll ever be to becoming a hero is wearing your underwear outside your pants? Madcap72 |
Do you guys do anything to the gas piston on the WASR rifles? Century screws them in tight so there is no wobble at all then welds the retainer pins in and I was wondering if that had any adverse effects with the high firing schedule your rifles see.
|
|
|
It looks like your WASR is full auto? Can't tell if that's the bare Y stamp or there is a third pin there.
|
|
|
Hey Ron, I appreciate your stories and input in other threads! You mentioned that the n-paps were cracking much earlier than other guns like wasrs. Do you employ opaps also? If so, how did they fare? How long did the npaps last before being deadlined? Did the gunsmiths try any mods to make the rifles run better like new recoil springs? There is some question in the yugo specific forums around the net about some quality issues prevalent in these rifles. It seems it could be a heat treat issue or an issue like a short recoil spring in these rifles.
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By riceshooter:
Hey Ron, I appreciate your stories and input in other threads! You mentioned that the n-paps were cracking much earlier than other guns like wasrs. Do you employ opaps also? If so, how did they fare? How long did the npaps last before being deadlined? Did the gunsmiths try any mods to make the rifles run better like new recoil springs? There is some question in the yugo specific forums around the net about some quality issues prevalent in these rifles. It seems it could be a heat treat issue or an issue like a short recoil spring in these rifles. View Quote I posted quite a bit of information regarding our experiences with the N-PAP on the AOUL 47-74's Facebook page but I can't seem to find it. We only used the N-PAP's on the range and they failed miserably in a short amount of time. It appears, in my opinion, that the receivers were not heat-treated correctly and they cracked. The receiver cracked vertically between the trunion and center bushing. I had one of my staff with me when I was posting on the Facebook post and he was helping me remember all the issues we had with them. We actually rewelded the first one and thought it was a fluke but another receiver soon cracked and they found a stress crack upon further inspection of another. We destroyed the receivers (and removed them from the NFA Registry) and sold them off as parts kits. They were good looking rifles but not worth the liability of keeping them on the line. V/R Ron |
|
|
Would it be possible for you guys to post the serial numbers of the failed NPAP rifles? I think some people are starting to wonder if this was a batch issue, or an issue that affected all Serbian receivers. The guys at AK Operators Union posted the serial of the failed NPAP they tested, it may be a good idea to start collecting them to see how close they are in series.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By ratfink57:
Good stuff, thanks for taking the time to answer some questions. Kinda hard to get this kind of feedback on such high round count performance. View Quote Same here Ron. I think I speak for everyone when I say thank you for this type of very specific contribution. Like ratfink57 above said. It's very hard to receive this kind of high round count info from anywhere. Thanks for sharing, openbolt |
|
|
Have you ever tried a recoil buffer? I wonder if they actually work.
|
|
|
Awesome info all of it, seems like good ol' WASR FTW, lol. Thanks so much for posting HD, this is good stuff. Sorry to hear about the Npap's and wondering if the other Serb guns are similarly troubled?
Would love to see how the Vepr holds up, it's mega-tough and I couldn't help but think it would really shine. |
|
Proud member of AKM (Arfkom Krylon Maniacs).
|
Thanks for answering my question about how the receivers fail.
I'd be interested to hear what you think of this claim, posted about your OP in another thread: Another thing about the full auto rental range.
It's one thing to have people come in and rent a mag or two and dump them. Very few assault rifles will malf in that type of shooting. Take the same gun through a course of fire on semi auto throughout the day, heating it up, cooling it, heating...cooling, heating..cooling, outside in the conditions, whether they be sand, dust, rain, mud, snow and ice, and you start to see problems. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1749140_Inside_The_AK_74___LV_Video.html&page=5 View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By Dragynn:
Awesome info all of it, seems like good ol' WASR FTW, lol. Thanks so much for posting HD, this is good stuff. Sorry to hear about the Npap's and wondering if the other Serb guns are similarly troubled? Would love to see how the Vepr holds up, it's mega-tough and I couldn't help but think it would really shine. View Quote As someone who owns an AES-10B I'm sort of curious how any of the RPK based rifles hold up. The whole thing being seriously overbuilt, I wonder if the same trunnion failures happen. It is funny to see the lowly Romanians being the battle horses of the group, especially the barrels. |
|
|
Here's a pic that demonstrates where we initially welded the receiver. I thought it was just a hot round that caused it to crack. There were no signs of over pressure or burning on the bolt, carrier or trunion area but after running the range for the last two and half years, nothing will surprise you. We used the plasma cutter to demil the weapon before removing it from the NFA registry.
After the other N-PAP's had issues we pulled them all. I am in no way saying that all Serbian weapons are prone to this or the older Yugos are of the same quality. I just know what happened to our rifles and we can't risk the liability of a catastrophic failure on the range. I know Century imports them and don't cast any fault on them either because all of the WASR's we get from them have all been home-run's. If any of you guys are ever in Vegas and want to see the backside of the operation here at Battlefield Vegas, email me at [email protected]. We've brought back many Arfcommers for a tour of the back and how we keep this play moving. ![]() V/R Ron |
|
|
Damn, makes we want to buy another WASR.
|
|
|
Very cool OP.
|
|
You are a hard guy to dislike. Goddamnit. - sd0324
Honorary Black Person - conservativeblkfem Rest easy kyfortean Teener Crew For Life |
i forgot to ask, any testing on century receivers such as the ones on yugo m70ab1 or 2?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense: That's something we've talked about in the shop. Some of the other guys have kept a box of all the broken parts that one would never expect to break. Slant brakes splitting in half, gas pistons snapping at the base where they screw into the carrier, spot welds failing on the lower rails, lugs shearing off the bolts and carrier bodies cracking. As for AK-74's, the thin bolt "stem" has cracked on various bolts and cracked trunions. V/R Ron View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HendersonDefense: Originally Posted By azoutdoorsman: Someone with more patience should start a running tally of parts breakage and approx round counts. Then tack the thread. That's something we've talked about in the shop. Some of the other guys have kept a box of all the broken parts that one would never expect to break. Slant brakes splitting in half, gas pistons snapping at the base where they screw into the carrier, spot welds failing on the lower rails, lugs shearing off the bolts and carrier bodies cracking. As for AK-74's, the thin bolt "stem" has cracked on various bolts and cracked trunions. V/R Ron |
|
|
|
Don't be afraid to paint, it's only krylon
![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() |
Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
The only factory DDR guns we have are the three full-auto MPi-69's chambered in .22LR. We've had them on the line EVERY SINGLE DAY (except for Christmas) over the last two and half years and they continue to run flawlessly. We've only lost a few extractors and spring along the way and changed out the recoil springs just as a preventative maintenance (they didn't fail). The magazine springs have been changed at least twice since opening but other than that, those weapons have unbelievable. V/R Ron View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By HendersonDefense:
Originally Posted By Finslayer83:
In speaking to variations do you have any DDR guns online? If so how have they held up? The only factory DDR guns we have are the three full-auto MPi-69's chambered in .22LR. We've had them on the line EVERY SINGLE DAY (except for Christmas) over the last two and half years and they continue to run flawlessly. We've only lost a few extractors and spring along the way and changed out the recoil springs just as a preventative maintenance (they didn't fail). The magazine springs have been changed at least twice since opening but other than that, those weapons have unbelievable. V/R Ron would you say similar quality would apply to the DDR AKM & AK74 variants - our would they show similar failures in your opinion? |
Support the People's Front of Judea!
Visit my photo collection - http://www.flickr.com/photos/the-dorsal-fin |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.