Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Site Notices
Posted: 12/29/2002 1:42:12 AM EST
Most of what I see for sale are Romanian, Bulgarian, and Chinese. They look the same to me.

Any differences in the three? Quality? Materials? Design?

TIA
Link Posted: 12/29/2002 3:53:04 AM EST
Link Posted: 12/29/2002 6:01:58 AM EST
Other than cosmetics and price they all seem to feed rounds.
Link Posted: 12/29/2002 10:44:06 AM EST
If the magazines are military, they should all work, period.

As has been stated, Chinese magazines lack the "reinforcement" ridge on the back of the magazine.

European magazines do differ in fit and finish.

The Romanian magazines that I've seen and used are generally the poorest finished, with a matte blue and rough edges all over the place.

Bulgarian magazines and some Hungarian magazines are the best finished in a black enamel. No rough edges on these either.

East German magazines are usually blued, in a gloss, and are very high quality as well.

Russian magazines can be either blue or painted.

I haven't run across enough Polish magazines to comment, but they are usually black phosphated/enameled too.
Link Posted: 12/29/2002 2:47:00 PM EST
Thanks for the excellent info!
Link Posted: 1/5/2003 9:44:26 AM EST
Tate:

See my post with pix of Bulg, Hung, EG, and Rom 30s, and the differences here:

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=4&f=55&t=53643&page=1

HTH,

Noah
Link Posted: 1/5/2003 1:10:27 PM EST
Top Top