Quote History Quoted:
Well, faster is superior.
I don't know what other metric you'd prefer to use over speed when reliability is the same.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
IMO what is even worse is trying to prove that one technique or another is superior by performing drills on a square range with a shot timer.
Well, faster
is superior.
I don't know what other metric you'd prefer to use over speed when reliability is the same.
Define "faster" in the context of the unpredictable nature of a fluid, dynamic gunfight. IMO, "faster" as measured in tenths of seconds is negligible.
If we both shoot to slide lock and someone is 50% "faster" than me with their reload (regardless of what technique they're using) it will probably make a difference whereas if someone is only 5% or 10% faster than me then it won't as we'll both likely get our follow up shots off.
I firmly believe that one will reach a point of diminishing returns for all the time, effort and cost of ammo striving for sub one second reloads and presentations, etc. as there are a number of other issues that are far more important considering the skill level of even moderately trained shooters vs. the common street thug and the typical distances involved.
OTOH, if an ammo company was willing to sponsor me with 1K of free ammo a week and my family didn't mind my 3 to 4 times a week at the gun range then it might be worth the effort.
I'm not saying "faster" is bad. Simply suggesting it is all too often "over-valued". An IPSC grand master? Absolutely. The typical gun owner concerned with self defense? Questionable.
To the OP, adopt a slide release technique that you find most reliable and ergonomically "fumble free" with respect to your specific handgun and practice it until you achieve "unconscious competence".