Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 12/5/2018 5:33:37 PM EDT
Does anyone know of a source to get G7 BC's for Sierra bullets, they only list G1's on their website?

Bullet
142 gr. HPBT TMK

Dia. (inches)
.264

Weight (grains)
142

Sectional Density
.291

Ballistic Coefficients and Velocity Ranges
.626 @ 2850 fps and above
.611 between 2400 and 2850 fps
.606 between 2050 and 2400 fps
.581 @ 2050 and below
Link Posted: 12/5/2018 5:48:33 PM EDT
[Last Edit: AKSnowRider] [#1]
Ab list it as .295 G7 in my kilo 2400 library..It only list it as the 142 grain Match King though.. For the pointed 142 grain Match king it list as .311  G7...
Link Posted: 12/5/2018 5:59:51 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Ironmaker] [#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AKSnowRider:
Ab list it as .295 G7 in my kilo 2400 library..It only list it as the 142 grain Match King though.. For the pointed 142 grain Match king it list as .311  G7...
View Quote
I am looking for these three bullets:

Sierra SMK 0.264 123 gr
Sierra TMK 0.264 130 gr
Sierra SMK 0.264 142 gr

Thanks

edit: formatting tables sucks!
Link Posted: 12/5/2018 6:28:14 PM EDT
[#3]
I forgot about my AB app.  It doesn't have the TMK's though.

Sierra SMK 0.264 123 gr  0.260
Sierra TMK 0.264 130 gr
Sierra SMK 0.264 142 gr  0.301
Link Posted: 12/5/2018 6:29:52 PM EDT
[#4]
Link Posted: 12/5/2018 7:13:51 PM EDT
[#5]
AB shows the Tipped Match King 130 grain @ .273 G7....
Link Posted: 12/6/2018 11:56:29 AM EDT
[#6]
the 142 is around .313
Link Posted: 12/6/2018 1:25:27 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Reorx] [#7]
FWIW, JBM puts the 142SMK @ .301 G7BC.  The TMK will be a little higher...  I'd go with TR's suggestion...



I've also heard (no first hand experience) from a Sierra rep (when I asked about G7BCs) that Sierra has some sort of ballistic software that lists G7 BCs...  LINK

Call Sierra for more precise details.
Link Posted: 12/6/2018 7:30:38 PM EDT
[#8]
Thanks, this is what I am filling out.  I used my AB app.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 12/6/2018 11:12:22 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Ironmaker:
Thanks, this is what I am filling out.  I used my AB app.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/57471/8157205B-799B-4612-A054-F9F2CB2DC12C_jpeg-763117.JPG
View Quote
OP, your numbers don't seem right...7.5mil of drop at 1K with 1.4 Mil of wind?

Running that thru bullet drop I get 14.1 MIL and 4.9 mil @ 1K... for your first (123 grain )load....
Link Posted: 12/7/2018 6:40:25 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AKSnowRider:
OP, your numbers don't seem right...7.5mil of drop at 1K with 1.4 Mil of wind?

Running that thru bullet drop I get 14.1 MIL and 4.9 mil @ 1K... for your first (123 grain )load....
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AKSnowRider:
Originally Posted By Ironmaker:
Thanks, this is what I am filling out.  I used my AB app.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/57471/8157205B-799B-4612-A054-F9F2CB2DC12C_jpeg-763117.JPG
OP, your numbers don't seem right...7.5mil of drop at 1K with 1.4 Mil of wind?

Running that thru bullet drop I get 14.1 MIL and 4.9 mil @ 1K... for your first (123 grain )load....
Help me figure out what I’m doing wrong

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 12/7/2018 8:25:48 AM EDT
[Last Edit: AKSnowRider] [#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Actually you are close enough...I input the G7 BC instead of the G1 BC.....And used my last weather info..

Attachment Attached File


Attachment Attached File


ETA..Thats pretty good numbers OP..my 300rum throwing a 230 Berger@3220 @ 1K with your weather shows 5.3 mil drop and 1.2 mil windage @ 2073 fps and 2194 for energy...
Link Posted: 12/7/2018 4:41:09 PM EDT
[#12]
I use Brian Litz's book as a reference.
Link Posted: 12/7/2018 7:45:18 PM EDT
[#13]
The best thing for you to do is start with the G1 and work yourself up a chart based on that.

JBM is an excellent resource that will allow you to input all the variables.

http://www.jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.1.cgi

Once you shoot it at distance, check the bullet impacts vs. what's on your dope chart.  Amend as needed.

Make sure to shoot a few through the chrono that day and log the weather.  Elevation and air temperature are critical.

Depending on your location and types of powder you use, you may find the need to develop winter and summer loads.  Something that was zeroed in August may not be the same zero in February.  Critically a load that was hot, but safe in winter, may NOT be safe in the summer.  Powders like RL17 are notorious for this.

Sierra correctly provides the differing BCs, as it varies depending on speed.

Fast loads (Say 3,400 + FPS) are better served initially working off a G1 BC.  Slower stuff like a 6.5 Grendel (say 2,400 FPS) you should use the G7 BC.
Link Posted: 12/8/2018 11:34:54 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nick1983:
The best thing for you to do is start with the G1 and work yourself up a chart based on that.

JBM is an excellent resource that will allow you to input all the variables.

http://www.jbmballistics.com/cgi-bin/jbmtraj-5.1.cgi

Once you shoot it at distance, check the bullet impacts vs. what's on your dope chart.  Amend as needed.

Make sure to shoot a few through the chrono that day and log the weather.  Elevation and air temperature are critical.

Depending on your location and types of powder you use, you may find the need to develop winter and summer loads.  Something that was zeroed in August may not be the same zero in February.  Critically a load that was hot, but safe in winter, may NOT be safe in the summer.  Powders like RL17 are notorious for this.

Sierra correctly provides the differing BCs, as it varies depending on speed.

Fast loads (Say 3,400 + FPS) are better served initially working off a G1 BC.  Slower stuff like a 6.5 Grendel (say 2,400 FPS) you should use the G7 BC.
View Quote
BC changes with speed, but using G1 vs G7 has to do with bullet shape and has nothing to do with MV.
Link Posted: 12/9/2018 8:02:19 PM EDT
[#15]
What difference does it make? The bullet is what it is and using a different B.C. scale does nothing to change it.

Using either scale will get you very close to final elevation at distance provided you have accurate velocity and atmospheric imputs.

Once on target your final zeroes are always adjusted to center. It's very rare to mathematically be on target using either scale.
Link Posted: 12/9/2018 8:20:21 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TeeRex:
BC changes with speed, but using G1 vs G7 has to do with bullet shape and has nothing to do with MV.
View Quote
Assuming same bullet shape, isn't G7 more precise for distances after transonic?
Link Posted: 12/10/2018 9:19:38 AM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HighpowerRifleBrony:
Assuming same bullet shape, isn't G7 more precise for distances after transonic?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HighpowerRifleBrony:
Originally Posted By TeeRex:
BC changes with speed, but using G1 vs G7 has to do with bullet shape and has nothing to do with MV.
Assuming same bullet shape, isn't G7 more precise for distances after transonic?
G7 is less velocity dependant, so more accurate over a wider range of velocities......when using G7 form factor bullets like most long range boat tail bullets(though they are getting sleeker).

Nobody with any sense is using G1 form factor bullets for long range if they have a choice. So why not use a BC that better matches your bullet shape.

With a G7 and accurate inputs it is rare that your firing solution will be wrong. If it is wrong the user input inaccurate data.

Most of my stuff goes well into transonic and my solver predictions match actual POIs.
Link Posted: 12/10/2018 9:25:04 AM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By borderpatrol:
What difference does it make? The bullet is what it is and using a different B.C. scale does nothing to change it.

Using either scale will get you very close to final elevation at distance provided you have accurate velocity and atmospheric imputs.

Once on target your final zeroes are always adjusted to center. It's very rare to mathematically be on target using either scale.
View Quote
If you are shooting competitively and don't get to use sighters you want to be able to predict where that bullet is going to be to the best of your ability.  Over the next few years we will see more drag model stuff which will be really nice. There are a few companies doing some pretty cool stuff when it comes to ballistics.
Link Posted: 12/10/2018 11:13:00 AM EDT
[#19]
I learned to dope wind by looking at conditions, flags, mirage, etc. Twenty years before Kestrel. Practice, lots of it, even when not shooting, helps to develop an eye for conditions.

Elevation come-ups are remembered or recorded based on past experience. Going to a match and winging it is going to backfire. All President 100 and NTI matches are no sighter tournaments.

It helps in dicey conditions to wait until everyone else's first shot gets marked before squeezing yours off. If everyone underestimates or over compensates you'll see their first rounds all left or right of center. It lets you know the wind is more or less than it appears.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top