User Panel
Posted: 5/8/2022 9:20:34 PM EDT
Hi, i'm going to start off by saying my experience with mounting optics is red dots and pre-mounted prisms...thus I did not do an adequate job of mounting a mil PST2 3-15x and a PST2 1-4x on two rifles. It turns out using a flat surface to parallel my reticle off of is not a successful idea.
What kit do you suggest I use to level the reticle? The Wheeler has mixed reviews and nothing on Amazon looks remotely like it stands a chance of being able to level itself from the reviews. Defensive Edge's kit looks like some of the homebrew kits I've seen on YouTube, but (as money has gotten quite tight recently) i'm hesitant to spend that kind of money on something that might be crap, and will be used about six times in my life. TIA for your tips and suggestions. |
|
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission...- Ayn Rand
|
[#1]
|
|
|
[#2]
As long as your scope has a flat surface parallel to a flat surface on the mount and/or rifle...
This has treated me well and is pretty foolproof: https://arisakadefense.com/optic-leveler-combo/ |
|
|
[#3]
Originally Posted By fks4l: As long as your scope has a flat surface parallel to a flat surface on the mount and/or rifle... This has treated me well and is pretty foolproof: https://arisakadefense.com/optic-leveler-combo/ View Quote When it fits , this is the only answer |
|
|
[Last Edit: 50-140]
[#4]
If your scope has a flat bottom and you have a rail or scope base, the old feeler gauge method will get you damn close, when used in conjunction with a plumb bob you're good to go.
|
|
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.
Ben Franklin. |
[#5]
I use a small 2" electronic level and a stringline....
Attached File This is a good test to verify its right... Scope Tracking: Tall Target Test | Applied Ballistics with Bryan Litz |
|
|
[#6]
I'm happy with the arisaka kit.
|
|
It"s not the severity of punishment,but the certainty of it that checks crime nowadays. Judge Parker
|
[#7]
Where it works, the fix-it-sticks leveler is pretty damn good.
|
|
“A true patriot will defend his country from its government.” Thomas Jefferson
NRA Benefactor Member 2nd Amendment Foundation Life Member Madison Society Foundation Life Member VCDL member |
[#8]
I mount the rings where they need to be on the rail and then use an old small level I got years ago on the rail to level the rifle then set the scope into rings and level the scope with level on elevation knob and slowly tighten rear ring watching level. Then pop the front ring cap on and check on a plumb but haven't had one off yet.
|
|
|
[#10]
Originally Posted By Reorx: If you plan to use the rifle to shoot any medium to long range targets, you should probably put a level on your scope tube as well. https://drwzpk38qkpfb.cloudfront.net/www.hollandguns.com/uploaded/images/Categories/scope%20level-700.jpg When you mount the scope, you don't need a precise level. Mount what looks right and feels reasonably comfortable. THEN, use the plumb line to set the bubble level before you tighten it down. And don't forget to check that the bubble level is set correctly AFTER you have tightened it down... View Quote Are you saying mount the scope loose and then before tightening the rings use the plumb to level the reticle and then tighten rings and then mount the mounted scope level to the same level using the plumb? Reads kind of odd. |
|
|
[#11]
I have both the Arisaka leveler kit and Fix-it-Sticks Scope Jack. Both are far superior to any other method when mounting on a single-piece picatinny rail. If you don’t have a single-piece top rail to index the scope turret bottom off of, then I would recommend something like the Fix-it-Sticks bubble level kit.
Or the Defensive Edge kit you looked at. That said, I would note that front-to-rear/Z-axis leveling of the weapon is irrelevant to leveling a scope, and Defensive Edge’s #3 level insert is arguably a waste of your money if you’re concerned about the cost. |
|
|
[Last Edit: Reorx]
[#12]
Originally Posted By Rob01: Are you saying mount the scope loose and then before tightening the rings use the plumb to level the reticle and then tighten rings and then mount the mounted scope level to the same level using the plumb? Reads kind of odd. View Quote |
|
|
[#13]
Originally Posted By Reorx: Not exactly. I usually mount the scope "by eye" to be pretty close but "comfortable" - it's usually within a few degrees of "perfectly square". Then with the scope mounted and rings tightened to torque spec., I level the reticle (by adjusting the rifle cant) and then set the bubble level to read "level" and then torque it down to spec as well... The result is that the bubble and the reticle are exactly leveled to each other but not necessarily to the rifle (exactly) - I mean it's pretty close just not necessarily "perfect". View Quote Ok. I must be missing something but not sure why you wouldn't level the scope properly and then install the level at proper level as well. Why have something close but not perfect on the set up? |
|
|
[#14]
Thanks everyone.
|
|
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission...- Ayn Rand
|
[Last Edit: BuckeyeRifleman]
[#15]
Originally Posted By Rob01: Ok. I must be missing something but not sure why you wouldn't level the scope properly and then install the level at proper level as well. Why have something close but not perfect on the set up? View Quote I think what he’s saying is mounting the scope to rifle “level” (having the crosshairs perfectly level to let’s say the picitanny rail) isn’t necessary for precision at range. However a precise scope to scope level (IE making sure the crosshairs are exactly level when the level mounted to the scope is level) is what is critical when shooting at distance. I’m OCD about both, but what he’s saying is correct. |
|
|
[#16]
Originally Posted By BuckeyeRifleman: I think what he’s saying is mounting the scope to rifle “level” (having the crosshairs perfectly level to let’s say the picitanny rail) isn’t necessary for precision at range. However a precise scope to scope level (IE making sure the crosshairs are exactly level when the level mounted to the scope is level) is what is critical when shooting at distance. I’m OCD about both, but what he’s saying is correct. View Quote I know there are people like FClass shooters or high power guys who have a canted rifle for their body position and have the scope level and it works but I am not overly OCD but if doing it and getting it set up right I just don’t see the advantage to just eyeing the scope to rifle and then get the reticle to level level. You can do all very easily. Takes me about 10 min to mount a scope with everything level. |
|
|
[#17]
Originally Posted By Rob01: I know there are people like FClass shooters or high power guys who have a canted rifle for their body position and have the scope level and it works but I am not overly OCD but if doing it and getting it set up right I just don’t see the advantage to just eyeing the scope to rifle and then get the reticle to level level. You can do all very easily. Takes me about 10 min to mount a scope with everything level. View Quote I have a friend who has his rifle canted to the scope and level, he does it because of the shape of his shoulders and how the gun fits into his shoulder..if he levels everything the butt pad digs in at one spot and is painful... |
|
|
[#18]
Originally Posted By AKSnowRider: I have a friend who has his rifle canted to the scope and level, he does it because of the shape of his shoulders and how the gun fits into his shoulder..if he levels everything the butt pad digs in at one spot and is painful... View Quote As I said I understand that and if a reason but not just because. |
|
|
[#19]
Originally Posted By Rob01: As I said I understand that and if a reason but not just because. View Quote |
|
|
[#21]
some info for you re/ scope mounting takes time but well worth it.
https://ridgelineshooting.com/precision-rifle-set-up-part-iii/ Regards, PeterNNH |
|
|
[#22]
Originally Posted By Arnery: I'm in the same boat. Not a precision shooter, just trying to get it mounted & leveled. The pros may scoff at this & call me a jackass, but it's simple & good enough for starters. I first tried the usual stuff: rifle leveled & held tight upright, plumb-bob outside 50 or so feet away to be in-focus, waiting for wind to die down, constant re-aiming/twiddling to get it right. Then, by pure coincidence, stumbled into a method that that could be done indoors without buying any expensive "specialty" tools, and never even have to look thru the scope. Rifle propped up & leveled via bipod on dining table, plumb-bob hanging on a white/light color wall/door/other 4-6' behind scope, strong LED flashlight pointed down the scope, reticle is project onto surface. Turn scope until reticle/stadia parallel to plumb-bob line, cinch down. Hardest part is holding the flashlight aligned to scope bore. I'm working on a coupling tube for hands-off. http://www.nullTime.com/NAR/SLx/projected-reticle.jpg View Quote Awesome! Basic home brew of this. Real Avid |
|
|
[#23]
Originally Posted By UnaStamus: I have both the Arisaka leveler kit and Fix-it-Sticks Scope Jack. Both are far superior to any other method when mounting on a single-piece picatinny rail. If you don’t have a single-piece top rail to index the scope turret bottom off of, then I would recommend something like the Fix-it-Sticks bubble level kit. Or the Defensive Edge kit you looked at. That said, I would note that front-to-rear/Z-axis leveling of the weapon is irrelevant to leveling a scope, and Defensive Edge’s #3 level insert is arguably a waste of your money if you’re concerned about the cost. View Quote Yeah I pretty much just use the Arisaka leveling kit. That gets everything right on point. If I can't use the kit (distance between top of pic rail/bottom of scope is too tight then I just use two levels - one on the pic rail and one on top of the elevation turret. |
|
|
[Last Edit: rpoL98]
[#24]
I use the Badger Ordnance scope leveler (Brownells)
and a bubble level on top of the turret. I'm having to do it often enough that it was worth the initial outlay. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.