Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 6/15/2019 10:06:02 AM EDT
I’m sure this subject has probably been covered to death but a search didn’t turn up much. I’m starting to look for a scope and there’s seems to be quite a price difference between first and second focal plane scopes. I understand it’s where the reticle is relative to the magnification of the scope and depending the reticle will change size with power changes. Is there an advantage to one over the other? Is it more a function of the distances one is shooting?
Link Posted: 6/15/2019 10:17:32 AM EDT
[#1]
With a FFP scope the graduations inside the reticle are true at all magnification levels. This is useful for hold offs/overs or range estimation. On a SFP this is only possible at one magnification setting, typically the highest.

SFP is fine on a low powered scope (say 1-4x through 1-6)
or a hunting type scope with a duplex or other hunting reticle.

FFP is a must on any type of serious precision scope.
Link Posted: 6/15/2019 10:55:50 AM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 6/16/2019 2:57:17 PM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 6/16/2019 5:59:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Thanks for the replies everyone. I think first focal plane will be the right choice for me.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top