Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 12/14/2014 1:57:26 PM EDT
I'm thinking it is only 120 pounds needs to be 100 or larger to shoot.  I would like to get a bigger one but this is the first I have seen in my area.  To late for this year but would like to be able judge size better.  What weight would you estimate it being.

photobucket link

http://s464.photobucket.com/user/mikeh357/library/?sort=3&page=1

snowman357


Link Posted: 12/14/2014 2:15:13 PM EDT
[#1]
Tough to tell...He is in good shape and pretty slick. I think 120# is a bit light...Probably closer to 200-225#'s...??
Link Posted: 12/15/2014 12:09:41 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By rhoaco:...Probably closer to 200-225
View Quote

Link Posted: 12/15/2014 12:13:55 AM EDT
[#3]
Yeah he's got to be over 100. 100 is a tiny bear, I think you'd know.



Link Posted: 12/15/2014 12:41:26 AM EDT
[#4]
I would guess 200-250, a 100lb bear would look like a cub
Link Posted: 12/16/2014 8:03:48 PM EDT
[#5]
Hard to tell without something to scale, my guess is 250ish.
Link Posted: 12/17/2014 1:23:44 AM EDT
[#6]
OP..I would say he is over 125 pds..but what we do for sizing is tie marking tape in the trees at "x" distance from ground(which for our grizzles we use 48")..we do it on all trees within camera view.....that way no matter where he is at you have a marker close to judge off.....
Link Posted: 12/17/2014 11:40:21 AM EDT
[Last Edit: ATACORION] [#7]
the last picture is a dead giveaway, hes healthy, def well over 150lbs, as folks stated earlier it wouldnt be stretching it to say 200 easy.
Link Posted: 12/20/2014 9:13:31 PM EDT
[#8]
I would guess 150ish. the ears are huge.

Link Posted: 1/14/2015 9:56:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: lionslayer] [#9]
This isn't a very big bear --- might go 120 lbs...??? Its ears are fairly large, its legs long and overall appearance sort of "rangy", and its head/face fairly long and  narrow (vs. round and pig-like), all indications of a fairly small, still immature bear. I'd put this in the "catch and release" category, and hold out for a bigger specimen. In any case, bears are scored by the size of their skulls, not by weight or stretched out measurements their hides, so weight isn't a very important measure of size --- Jackie Gleason wouldn't have been a trophy specimen of homo sapiens, despite his heft, and an overweight bear ain't necessarily a trophy... Google "black bear girth/weight chart" for lots of info on estimating weight by measuring bear's girth,length, etc. --- let us know if you have any luck getting them to hold still...
Link Posted: 2/8/2015 12:43:59 AM EDT
[#10]
looks as tall as a 100+ pound deer I took last year.  so it's gotta weigh substantially more
Link Posted: 2/8/2015 1:18:46 AM EDT
[#11]

I would call that at 200-225 lbs.
Link Posted: 3/14/2015 3:05:11 PM EDT
[#12]
200 to 225.
Link Posted: 3/18/2015 4:54:05 AM EDT
[#13]
Having shot two black bears and a Kodiak Brown Bear and have seen a few in the wild, my guess for that bear is under 150. He's a young lanky lad.
Link Posted: 3/25/2015 1:55:06 PM EDT
[#14]
Well,  I'm guessing >100 lbs and definately <200 lbs.  Having seen several bears killed, two myself I'm basing that on what I've seen.  

1) A true 350+ lb bear (I've only seen a couple of them) are seriously massive.

2) A bear in the 225-250 lb range is no slouch, but are still big and pretty rare around here.  (I've seen a few and helped drag a couple).

3) A bear in the 150 range (what this looks like) is the most common around here and both bears I have killed have been in that vicinity, were 3-4 years old, and I was proud to get them.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 12:01:38 AM EDT
[#15]
Out of curiousity (why else?), I took a look at this older thread, to see what respondents had  to offer, and given the mostly inaccurate, unsupported  estimates of  the subject bear's weight, I wondered whether I might not have misinterpreted the post title as a command rather than a question, but after rereading the OP, came back to my original supposition that the query was for evidence/experience - based, informed estimates of the subject bear's weight. The post title was accurate,asking for help to judge size for somebody who has never seen a black bear, not bysomebody who never has... Yet another reminder to value internet forum advice at its cost...
Link Posted: 4/26/2015 10:10:16 PM EDT
[#16]
big bears tend to have a longer wider snout. Id say that bear is about 250
Link Posted: 5/31/2015 8:12:43 PM EDT
[#17]
175#
Link Posted: 7/6/2015 4:18:16 PM EDT
[Last Edit: rfb45colt] [#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By dmtsc:
175#
View Quote


I'll agree with this. Maybe 200, no more. Likely 3 yrs old.

In the trail cam video from our 2010 hunt below, the bear going into the bait hole field-dressed out at 372lbs, on an "unofficial" 500lb deer scale (likely over 400lb live weight). The one in the rear (under my buddy's treestand, a little to the bear's left and behind him) was about 50lbs lighter. At the 29th second, of this 30 second video (a trail cam was 'on', perfectly timed by pure luck), you'll see the bullet from a .300WSM pass through the bigger bear. He ran about 75yds. Took 4 of us, 5 hours, to get him out of the woods.

Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top