Posted: 7/12/2018 7:23:18 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote History Quoted:
You're right, in the sense that I have more than that loaded.
But I don't agree if that premise is really based on the thought that "otherwise one day some bad guy might kill you" while you are out of loaded magazines. Unless one's arms room is intended to support multiple people with multiple weapons, 50 loaded magazines for emergency use represents a rationale that is pretty far from reality, to the point of SHTF fantasy. - 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents more M4 magazines than an entire US Army 9-man infantry squad carries into combat.
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents more than 7 times what a US soldier individually carries into combat.
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents more than 10 times what the M4 is designed to fire at once in rapid succession. Per Ground Precautionary Message ACALA #97-03: "FIRING 140 ROUNDS, RAPIDLY AND CONTINUOUSLY, WILL RAISE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE BARREL TO THE COOK-OFF POINT." Will that happen every time? No, but it happens enough to warrant recognizing you are exceeding the design of the weapon- and exceeding it by 10x is almost certain to lead to disaster. Watch what happens here- after about a dozen magazines (and I'm certain he would have had cook-offs if the rounds had been left chambered without immediately firing them, too). While the reporting on incidents like Wanat and others is not very accurate and intentionally inflammatory, there is a core nugget of truth there- NO individual assault rifle (much less our civilian not-an-assault rifle) is designed or capable of that level of mass firing over a short period of time. 12-15 rounds per minute is the sustained rate of fire- which equates to well over an hour-and-a-half of constant firing with those 1,500 rounds. I guess you could fire up the WayBack Machine and head to Rourke's Drift for that scenario...
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world would mean 1,500 rounds fired individually on a two-way live fire range. If you think you have a 99.9 to 0.1 outcome advantage over your adversaries, even those odds catch up you before you get through 1,500 rounds. And unless you're facing one-at-a-time, single file, slow moving adversaries armed with pointy sticks you will never enjoy a 99.9 to 0.1 outcome advantage in an engagement.
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents 50 more magazines than would be in an emergency ammunition resupply to unit in contact that is black on ammo. Even the mil does not believe in stocking and providing mass quantities of loaded magazines. I've seen ammo crates rolled out of helicopters under those circumstances- and the receiving unit used that ammo, on stripper clips, to reload the on-hand magazines. Pre-loaded magazines just aren't a priority or need.
Don't get me wrong- I absolutely believe in stocking ammo and magazines. I certainly do myself. I carry more than the issued 7 when overseas, for that matter. But believing you must have mass quantities of loaded magazines ready for instant use for repelling boarders or any other SHTF scenario is just not reasonable or reality-based. Most folks would be better off spending time, money, space, and energy on other things long before that point in terms of their own SHTF preps.
You do you, no problem, and no adversarial feelings or conflict on this end. I simply wanted to point out a counter argument for the possible benefit of others in this thread View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
50 loaded 30-rd mags really ain't that many mags. You're right, in the sense that I have more than that loaded.
But I don't agree if that premise is really based on the thought that "otherwise one day some bad guy might kill you" while you are out of loaded magazines. Unless one's arms room is intended to support multiple people with multiple weapons, 50 loaded magazines for emergency use represents a rationale that is pretty far from reality, to the point of SHTF fantasy. - 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents more M4 magazines than an entire US Army 9-man infantry squad carries into combat.
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents more than 7 times what a US soldier individually carries into combat.
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents more than 10 times what the M4 is designed to fire at once in rapid succession. Per Ground Precautionary Message ACALA #97-03: "FIRING 140 ROUNDS, RAPIDLY AND CONTINUOUSLY, WILL RAISE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE BARREL TO THE COOK-OFF POINT." Will that happen every time? No, but it happens enough to warrant recognizing you are exceeding the design of the weapon- and exceeding it by 10x is almost certain to lead to disaster. Watch what happens here- after about a dozen magazines (and I'm certain he would have had cook-offs if the rounds had been left chambered without immediately firing them, too). While the reporting on incidents like Wanat and others is not very accurate and intentionally inflammatory, there is a core nugget of truth there- NO individual assault rifle (much less our civilian not-an-assault rifle) is designed or capable of that level of mass firing over a short period of time. 12-15 rounds per minute is the sustained rate of fire- which equates to well over an hour-and-a-half of constant firing with those 1,500 rounds. I guess you could fire up the WayBack Machine and head to Rourke's Drift for that scenario...
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world would mean 1,500 rounds fired individually on a two-way live fire range. If you think you have a 99.9 to 0.1 outcome advantage over your adversaries, even those odds catch up you before you get through 1,500 rounds. And unless you're facing one-at-a-time, single file, slow moving adversaries armed with pointy sticks you will never enjoy a 99.9 to 0.1 outcome advantage in an engagement.
- 50 loaded magazines in the real world represents 50 more magazines than would be in an emergency ammunition resupply to unit in contact that is black on ammo. Even the mil does not believe in stocking and providing mass quantities of loaded magazines. I've seen ammo crates rolled out of helicopters under those circumstances- and the receiving unit used that ammo, on stripper clips, to reload the on-hand magazines. Pre-loaded magazines just aren't a priority or need.
Don't get me wrong- I absolutely believe in stocking ammo and magazines. I certainly do myself. I carry more than the issued 7 when overseas, for that matter. But believing you must have mass quantities of loaded magazines ready for instant use for repelling boarders or any other SHTF scenario is just not reasonable or reality-based. Most folks would be better off spending time, money, space, and energy on other things long before that point in terms of their own SHTF preps.
You do you, no problem, and no adversarial feelings or conflict on this end. I simply wanted to point out a counter argument for the possible benefit of others in this thread And then there are other school of thought - entirely feasible, entirely rational.
' Why you need 1000 Loaded Mags.'
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5J3Jm8HbHKU
Makes my 50 look like, ah, 3 ... Word to the wise.
|