Quoted:
I have a TNVC PVS-14 and I'm looking to upgrade to a binocular system with my next purchase.
The two listed in the subject are the ones I'm looking at and I was wondering how the two devices compare. I noticed the Bravo 3 is a little heavier, but appears to have better battery life.
Are there significant differences between the two in image quality or otherwise that I'm missing?
View Quote
@Little_Bo_Peep
Sorry for the delay. We've been slammed this week.
Of course as you're probably aware, the Mod3B can be separated into two separate monoculars whereas the BNVD1531 cannot. Unless you have a truly legitimate need to do that, pass on that idea. The reality is that every Mod3B buyer thinks they'll use it but the majority do not.
The Mod3Bs run time is higher due to the CR123A versus a single AA. If you get the full kit BNVD1531 it comes with a battery pack and will get you more run time than the Mod3B.
Performance-wise, with the 2376+ FOM BNVD1531 you are guaranteed high spec tubes within the standard lead time, whereas with the MOD3B (or RNVG/DTNVS) you will need to request those specs (for no additional charge), which may increase your lead time. As long as the specs are equal there will be no difference in image quality and they both use PVS-14 optics.
Feel free to PM me if you have more questions.