I cannot believe some of the BS I just read here. I have these G2 and G3 rails on calibers with a hell of a lot more recoil than the 5.56, namely .458 SOCOM and .475 TREMOR among others, and they don’t go walk about, EVER! Yes, I use the adhesive, one drop on each side. One drop on each side, OH MY GOD, THE SKY IS FALLING! It’s pure BS that it makes it difficult to remove the rail. Well, maybe it does if tying your shoes poses a problem. You simply reverse the clamp screws, put a penny between the rail clamp halves, tighten down a screw against the penny spreading the rail slightly which breaks the adhesive bond. Then wiggle off the rail. If that’s too much trouble then all I can say is, Good grief Charlie Brown, maybe crochet would suit you better. Yes, the new Combat rail is the bee’s knees but there is nothing wrong with the G2 or G3 if you’re smarter than a rock and install them correctly. I use MI rails on everything these days which includes many wildcats based on the .458 SOCOM and the 6.8 SPC. MI rails are more than strong enough for any kind of use most people would ever subject them to. Maybe they won’t make a very good jack handle for a tank, I’ll never know, but there’s way too much BS about MI rails being weak from people who have never used them. If one of the super expensive fan boy companies used adhesives on their rails then these people would be praising the use of an adhesive which makes the rail more bullet proof, but when MI did it then they scream the sky is falling and proclaim MI rails are inferior. BS.