User Panel
Posted: 3/25/2020 3:13:38 PM EDT
https://kstp.com/news/governor-walz-to-order-shelter-in-place-wednesday-/5684114/
Title edited Looks like it's in effect from midnight 3-27 to 5pm 4-10. Lots of exceptions. |
|
[#3]
No he didn’t I fact he said that a shelter in place wouldn’t do any good. He asked people to stay home but also said
“During those two weeks, Minnesotans are able to leave their homes for health and safety activities, outdoor activities, gathering necessary supplies, essential travel, the care of others and relocation purposes.“ |
|
[#4]
So pretty much what we've been doing for the past week.
I heard about the press conference while stocking back up in the local liquor store. The owner was worried that they would be shut down. Local grocery store had plenty of food, but rather thin on the bread, soup, and rice shelves. Forgot to check the TP isle. |
|
[#5]
|
|
[#6]
This interesting little clause is built right in to the new EO.
"Any person who willfully violates such an order or rule is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction must be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 90 days." Also, during the presser, Walz slipped up a bit and said something to the effect of: based on cell phone data we can tell less people are traveling." ...So, a form of proof that they're tracking cell phones of the citizenry. |
|
[#7]
I heard an official of some sort (an Iowa county, I think) bragging on the radio about how based on "cell phone tower tracking" the travel in the county had dropped by half (some %?) in the last week.
Yes, your cell phone is tracking you and others have access to that data. ETA: I think the official named the company that was doing the tracking and analysis, but I don't remember it and Google isn't helping. |
|
[#8]
Quoted: This interesting little clause is built right in to the new EO. "Any person who willfully violates such an order or rule is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction must be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 90 days." View Quote Also, elsewhere in the EO it says "essential travel only", but later states that pleasure driving is allowed. ??? The EO is contradictory in many ways and a complete mess, leading to the confusion that everyone is arguing about. |
|
[#9]
Quoted: This interesting little clause is built right in to the new EO. "Any person who willfully violates such an order or rule is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction must be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 90 days." Also, during the presser, Walz slipped up a bit and said something to the effect of: based on cell phone data we can tell less people are traveling." ...So, a form of proof that they're tracking cell phones of the citizenry. View Quote I noticed that also. |
|
[#10]
Quoted: And yet in the same paragraph it says the order to stay home is voluntary. So which is it? Also, elsewhere in the EO it says "essential travel only", but later states that pleasure driving is allowed. ??? The EO is contradictory in many ways and a complete mess, leading to the confusion that everyone is arguing about. View Quote Driving to the park to go for a walk is essential travel. You’re right makes no sense. I’d wonder what a court would say about it, oh wait we don’t have those anymore. |
|
[#11]
I heard in the radio today that the cops are looking for guidance on how to enforce this. The statement on the radio was that they are considering just pulling people over and asking them where they are gong. Fucking scumbags.
|
|
[#12]
It's absolutely unenforceable.
That said, everyone should be staying the fuck at home. All these flu bros spreading this shit around are just going to result in everyone else having to stay home longer. |
|
[#13]
Quoted: It's absolutely unenforceable. That said, everyone should be staying the fuck at home. All these flu bros spreading this shit around are just going to result in everyone else having to stay home longer. View Quote Thankfully I've been able to use this EO as a club to beat my boss over the head. He's finally going to allow us to start working from home even though we are classed as "essential" |
|
[#14]
Minnesota Critical Businesses List:
https://mn.gov/deed/assets/naics-critical-list_tcm1045-424829.pdf |
|
[#15]
Quoted: Also, during the presser, Walz slipped up a bit and said something to the effect of: based on cell phone data we can tell less people are traveling." ...So, a form of proof that they're tracking cell phones of the citizenry. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Also, during the presser, Walz slipped up a bit and said something to the effect of: based on cell phone data we can tell less people are traveling." ...So, a form of proof that they're tracking cell phones of the citizenry. @Eagle_19er Found it: https://www.unacast.com/covid19/social-distancing-scoreboard https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/03/24/social-distancing-maps-cellphone-location/ Efforts to track public health during the coronavirus pandemic are a reminder of the many ways phones reveal our personal lives, both as individuals and in the aggregate. Unacast’s location data comes from games, shopping and utility apps that tens of millions of Americans have installed on their phones — information the company normally analyzes for retailers, real estate firms and marketers. It’s part of a shadowy world of location tracking that consumers often have little idea is going on. It’s not alone. Google also collects and shares where we go. Long before the coronavirus, the Google Maps app has included a live read of how busy popular destinations are, based on location data. Facebook’s Instagram, too, lets you see other people who’ve recently shared updates from places. Both tools are useful for anyone who wants to practice social distancing and avoid spaces that are busy for a jog or fresh air during shelter-in-place orders. |
|
[#16]
Quoted: I heard in the radio today that the cops are looking for guidance on how to enforce this. The statement on the radio was that they are considering just pulling people over and asking them where they are gong. Fucking scumbags. View Quote What station and what department(s)? Highly doubt this will occur or is being thought of. |
|
[#17]
Quoted: Also, during the presser, Walz slipped up a bit and said something to the effect of: based on cell phone data we can tell less people are traveling." ...So, a form of proof that they're tracking cell phones of the citizenry. View Quote Companies are tracking cellphone data, this has been done for close to a decade or more. Many large companies here in MN and throughout the world use private companies to get data on cellphones and public posts to run metrics and get content from say concerts, events so on and so forth. An article was released with cellphone data showing which states/counties/cities were staying home and rated them throughout the US a few days ago. |
|
[#18]
|
|
[#19]
Quoted: I heard in the radio today that the cops are looking for guidance on how to enforce this. The statement on the radio was that they are considering just pulling people over and asking them where they are gong. Fucking scumbags. View Quote So who is the term F-ing Scumbags directed at, the people on the radio who are making statements, or the Cops? CY6 Greg Sullivan "Sully" SLR15 Rifles TheDefensiveEdge.com (763) 712-0123 |
|
[#20]
Disturbing in many ways. |
|
[#21]
Quoted: So who is the term F-ing Scumbags directed at, the people on the radio who are making statements, or the Cops? CY6 Greg Sullivan "Sully" SLR15 Rifles TheDefensiveEdge.com (763) 712-0123 View Quote Anybody that would pull someone over to ask where they are going. |
|
[#22]
Quoted: Anybody that would pull someone over to ask where they are going. View Quote Well, you'll be happy to know that the direction from the attorney general sent out to all agencies in the state is that a reason is still needed to pull someone over. You'd be happy to know that most law enforcement officers had enough common sense to come to that conclusion on their own prior to receiving guidance. |
|
[#23]
Quoted: Well, you'll be happy to know that the direction from the attorney general sent out to all agencies in the state is that a reason is still needed to pull someone over. You'd be happy to know that most law enforcement officers had enough common sense to come to that conclusion on their own prior to receiving guidance. View Quote Your emphasis how how I’d be happy isn’t misplaced. Leading two sentences with the same phase however is kind of a bummer. |
|
[#25]
Spoke with a local rural cop this evening. He said the local/county LE don't want to pull anyone over unless they have to. They're afraid of catching the bug just like everyone else.
|
|
[#26]
Here come the bug
Here come the bug Better watch out, cuz here come the bug |
|
[#27]
Quoted: Spoke with a local rural cop this evening. He said the local/county LE don't want to pull anyone over unless they have to. They're afraid of catching the bug just like everyone else. View Quote before everyone freaks out, read this. SOP are there repercussions to this, sure but I think most here are worried about over reach of LE while this is the norm. |
|
[#28]
Quoted: before everyone freaks out, read this. SOP are there repercussions to this, sure but I think most here are worried about over reach of LE while this is the norm. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Spoke with a local rural cop this evening. He said the local/county LE don't want to pull anyone over unless they have to. They're afraid of catching the bug just like everyone else. before everyone freaks out, read this. SOP are there repercussions to this, sure but I think most here are worried about over reach of LE while this is the norm. This is of course the exact situation where a local cop tells someone one thing and the Feds./State/Co. decide to do something else. Right now my local cop doesn't have any instructions to over reach -- in my neighborhood he more than likely never will. HOWEVER, there's no way I'd expect the same from any MPLS/STP or state officer. |
|
[#29]
Quoted: This is of course the exact situation where a local cop tells someone one thing and the Feds./State/Co. decide to do something else. Right now my local cop doesn't have any instructions to over reach -- in my neighborhood he more than likely never will. HOWEVER, there's no way I'd expect the same from any MPLS/STP or state officer. View Quote Every LE agency from the top down in Minnesota received guidance from the Attorney General. |
|
[#30]
|
|
[#31]
Quoted: Quoted: Every LE agency from the top down in Minnesota received guidance from the Attorney General. Muslim Attorney General I'm sure you'll be right along with an explanation as to how that's relevant in a way that shouldn't at least warrant editing your post, right? |
|
[#32]
|
|
[#33]
Quoted: Why edit it? If you mean something enough to let the internet know about it then have the stones to leave it. View Quote Because, while I completely agree with the independent merits of your statement, part of the responsibility for moderating this forum (in particular and as a whole) is trying to prevent posts which reflect on the community as a whole in a negative manner. I certainly have no problem with individuals who elect to advertise their prejudices, but I have no desire to be associated with those prejudices myself (I'd rather come by them honestly on my own). |
|
[#34]
Quoted: I'm sure you'll be right along with an explanation as to how that's relevant in a way that shouldn't at least warrant editing your post, right? View Quote Matthew 7:6 “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.” |
|
[#35]
I generally try to do moderator things as little as possible in here, but much of that is predicated on everyone presenting themselves as well-adjusted adults who can use a hair of discretion in the way they convert their opinions into words.
I had hoped that it was abundantly clear that it's unacceptable to insult or make derogatory comments towards a group of people based off nothing other than their employment, religion, etc. This sort of stuff is well-known on this site, and is pretty clearly spelled out in the CoC. Things are stressful and difficult enough right now. If someone would like to start a new thread on this subject, feel free to do so. I'd appreciate everyone exercising a little bit more personal editorial control. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.