

Posted: 12/12/2020 12:00:49 PM EST
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/12/11/polymer80-kits/?fbclid=IwAR1_PoRlmGHMnmiFDAnNT0UhJ1wFoeDgkhZoqIlcGkUTkxLhEq3fu5vtOcw
|
|
|
"The Polymer80 kit known as the Buy Build Shoot kit comes with all the parts, tools and jigs needed to build a working firearm."
Emphasis added by me. Those that bought lowers only, cash, face-to-face are still ghosts Learn the way of the gray (man). |
|
|
[Last Edit: 12/12/2020 10:27:09 PM EST by bdy83]
There's a couple of threads in GD about this.
https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/ATF-seizing-P80-kits-from-buyers-/5-2401363/ https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/BREAKING-ATF-RAIDS-P80-IN-NEVADA/5-2401008/ it sounds like the issues are with the buy, build, shoot kits. Where everything is that is needed is sold as a complete kit. Though granted there isn't a lot of information. Right now it sounds like its a wait an see situation, to see what happens next. eta: i'm not sure what's going on. I'm seeing companies sell the frames and jigs separately now. |
|
|
I'm curious if others agree. My understanding (he'll I've argued here before) is that polymer 80 is legal in Washington. What's everyone else's thoughts?
This Website argues they're banned as undetectable , but my understanding of WA is that a firearm has to be able to fire a projectile. Thus if it had a metal slide its not undetectable |
|
|
I knew this was going to happen sooner, rather than later. It was to obvious, like how if you have a AR and M16 trigger parts, even though they don’t just drop in, there mere possession is considered intent and you will be charged for a unlicensed machinegun. I also see this happening sooner than later on pistol stocks, circumventing the NFA on SBR’s.
|
|
How much crack did you have to smoke to reach that conclusion, a $20 rock or Whitney Houston level shit?
”Guitargod1985” |
Originally Posted By bdy83: I'm curious if others agree. My understanding (he'll I've argued here before) is that polymer 80 is legal in Washington. What's everyone else's thoughts? This Website argues they're banned as undetectable , but my understanding of WA is that a firearm has to be able to fire a projectile. Thus if it had a metal slide its not undetectable View Quote I agree, but the AG won’t clarify the law in his effort to stop firearms they can’t register through the DOL. |
|
How much crack did you have to smoke to reach that conclusion, a $20 rock or Whitney Houston level shit?
”Guitargod1985” |
|
|
|
Has the written request come from someone he shall answer?
IIRC the AG has to give an official opinion when asked for one from a legislator, CLEO, Mayor, ??? I think their are a few other shall answer too |
|
|
|
|
|
[Last Edit: 12/15/2020 12:39:28 AM EST by 161Infantry]
Local bimart has three complete factory P80s for sale, $469.00. I didnt know they'd entered the actual firearm market.
|
|
|
View Quote From the AG website Who is entitled to request an Attorney General Opinion? Members of the Washington State Legislature. So any registered voter, as per Washington State Constitution ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS SECTION 1 POLITICAL POWER. All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights. Statewide elected officials. Appointed heads of state agencies, boards, or commissions. County prosecuting attorneys. Who is not entitled to request an Attorney General Opinion? Private citizens. I figure this is a non-registered voter Federal officers and employees. Officers and employees of county, municipal, and other local governments (except county prosecuting attorneys). State agency employees. |
|
|
Originally Posted By mstennes: I knew this was going to happen sooner, rather than later. It was to obvious, like how if you have a AR and M16 trigger parts, even though they don’t just drop in, there mere possession is considered intent and you will be charged for a unlicensed machinegun. I also see this happening sooner than later on pistol stocks, circumventing the NFA on SBR’s. View Quote No it is not intent. The mere possession of certain machine gun parts is illegal , has nothing to do with intent. |
|
|
Originally Posted By 223to45: No it is not intent. The mere possession of certain machine gun parts is illegal , has nothing to do with intent. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By 223to45: Originally Posted By mstennes: I knew this was going to happen sooner, rather than later. It was to obvious, like how if you have a AR and M16 trigger parts, even though they don’t just drop in, there mere possession is considered intent and you will be charged for a unlicensed machinegun. I also see this happening sooner than later on pistol stocks, circumventing the NFA on SBR’s. No it is not intent. The mere possession of certain machine gun parts is illegal , has nothing to do with intent. Did you not read what I posted? It IS intent, and you WILL be charged for a illegal unlicensed machinegun. 🤦♂️ |
|
How much crack did you have to smoke to reach that conclusion, a $20 rock or Whitney Houston level shit?
”Guitargod1985” |
|
|
|
https://blog.princelaw.com/2020/12/16/atf-to-institute-rulemaking-regarding-stabilizing-braces-and-require-registration-of-currently-owned-braces/amp/
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world’s largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2021 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.