Quote History Quoted:
Suposidly you cannot.
However Ive been asking the question why not? Because the way I read it, the verbage only covers "manufacturing" of magazines. Just because I repair my magazine does not mean Im manufacturing one. If I put a new water pump on my car Im not manufacturing a new car.
Anyway, Ive been putting the question out there and literally no one has an answer.
That or the answer is obvious in another part of the bill, Ive overlooked it and no one's answering me because I look like a tard.
View Quote
I don’t have time right now to go into a lengthier explanation so I will give a quick TL/DR version.
First: nothing in this post should be considered qualified legal advice. It is incumbent upon anyone reading this post to seek their own council.
ESSB 5078 as passed modifies RCW 9.41.010 et al however remains silent to the specific act of “repair”. A thorough reading of both ESSB 5078 and the portions of RCW 9.41.010 that it modifies will show that the word “repair” does not come up when discussing “large capacity magazines”.
When we look at Page 5, lines 14 - 16: “(20) "Manufacture" means, with respect to a firearm or large capacity magazine, the fabrication or construction of a firearm or large capacity magazine.” Does the act of repairing a large capacity magazine qualify as construction or fabrication? Was 5078 intentionally silent on the matter of repair?
Now we move on to:
32 (36) "Large capacity magazine" means an ammunition feeding device
33 with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition, or any
34 conversion kit, part, or combination of parts, from which such a
35 device can be assembled if those parts are in possession of or under
36 the control of the same person, but shall not be construed to include
37 any of the following:
Now the language of the bill changed from “construction” or” manufacture” to “assemble”. Again, there is no “carve out” or exemption for repair, thus does the prohibition of assembling include repair? One would have to disassemble a magazine in order to repair it and subsequently one must reassemble said magazine in order to complete the repair.
Summation: so even if one were to purchase a number of 30 round followers prior to the 01 July 2022 effective date, would repairing a magazine after that date be a violation of the law? What is your own tolerance for risk?
This post is far from my best work, however circumstances constrain my ability to craft a better response at this time. I see also where some of the matter has been addressed by other posters. Great contributions all!