Quote History Originally Posted By John_H:
You know, I'm really trying hard not to respond to you, but you make it just too damn enticing and easy.
The minute you start spouting about "fake VA study" tells me that you're getting your medical information from conspiracy-related social media sources, rather than actual medical professionals.
The only medical advice that I gave you was to not completely rely on your own preconceived notions, and to consult with the medical professionals if and when you actually get sick for the best treatment options. You know. The ones that have years of study and experience in the medical field. The ones that have gotten advance degrees in the various medical fields related to infectious diseases. Not people who get all their so-called knowledge from Google.
And no where did I attempt to politicize anything in this thread. And if by "dangerous rhetoric", you mean me telling you to consult with those with actual knowledge, rather than relying on the internet... well, then I guess I'm guilty of that. I prefer to get my medical advice from medical professionals that way. I didn't know that made me dangerous as well. I feel empowered now.
Going back through this thread, I'm trying to figure out (apart from disagreeing with your preconceived ideas), what I did to set you off. All that I can find is my tin foil reference. I figure that must have been what caused you to be such a snowflake. I'm guessing that it's been used on your before. So I will never use that term with you again, despite any lunacy that you spout.
View Quote
I can tell you have not read the VA study. Nor the comments on it. Yet here you are trying to dubunk the peer review.
Let me know if you can follow this.
The VA study took people who had severe symptoms for 14 days and decided that was the HC group. They took people who had only mild symptoms and decided that was the control group. The medical professionals who looked at the study called it preselecting the groups to give a preselected outcome.
A real study would have, on both sides, an equal number of people with mild, moderate, and severe symptoms. As well as equal numbers of other comorbidity factors: high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, etc...
Are you following so far?
The link you posted from New York was similar to the VA study. Only people with severe symptoms were given HC. It is not really a study because there was again not an equal study pool of mild, moderate, and severe symptoms on both sides of the study group. Nor was it actually a study at all, it was just a collection of data gathered from New York.
Does that make sense?
It is dangerous for you to post debunked studies and call them fact. Other real studies have shown a 98% percent success rate. Someone who is sick with Coronavirus might read the fake info that you and others are posting, not take life saving medication, and might die because of it. -- That is something I have a problem with.
I never asked for your opinion to start with. If I want medical advise, there are plenty of doctors treating the virus with HC and having great success.