Caukins Case.
Just our take so far and we’re not lawyers!
Judge heard case and issued TRO “as applied” which means applies to named plaintiffs.
Judge deliberated and gave a final ruling that the lack of equal protections under the law are “facially unconstitutional”. He DID NOT rule the lack of equal protections was unconstitutional only ‘as applied’ to the plaintiffs - which in our opinion means the ruling applies to everyone. But, since the ISP is now weaponized and AG has always been that way, they are saying otherwise. They are operating from their own interpretations. They appear to be targeting the already greatly reduced number of FFL dealers who are now at extreme risk of losing their dealer license if they violate the ISP directives. We are of the opinion, until we get a ruling in federal court or IL Supreme Court, they will continue to do this.
To me, the ugly part (by design) is that the democrats passed the hideous “gun dealer license” so the ISP has their boots on the throat of FFLs. While this ruling should allow them to do regular business, ISP can chose to ignore the court ruling and shut down FFLs until final Supreme Court ruling thus destroying their business. These are bad actors the democrats have as their puppets.
Resistance…Because if we fight we might lose but if we don’t fight, we have already lost.
Mike
IllinoisCarry.com