I see where you're coming from, really I do.... but on the other hand, statements like
"If Indiana law doesn't specify that I would have to due obtain a 5th CCW", sort of make it sound like you're laying this all at Indiana's feet.... I get that you're fed up with shelling out the bucks, and I would be too, but if you want to carry in a given state, and that state has certain criteria that must be met such as background checks, etc. that involve a cost to the state, why should I have to pay, but not you?
As far as the vetting you've already been through for other states, if you ran a company flying freght and some dude from 7 states away applied for a pilot's position, would you be cool with him handing you a stack of paperwork and saying "I'm good to go bro, here's all my certs from Oklahoma"? And if you answer that with "Yes", my second question to you is do you accept those documents at face value, i.e. you do not check them for authenticity, or even to see if the issuer's criteria are as stringent as your own? If you answer, "Well, I at least gotta look into it", are you not now investing time and resources, a/k/a money?
With all that said, if there are regs saying you keep your original address of record, then I'm all for you not having to obtain an Indiana LTCH, no problem.
If you're going to use creds from another state, that brings another matter to the discussion, which is that Indiana has some interesting legal wording regarding out of state documentation. That's the short version. You may decide that getting an Indiana LTCH is a better option than dealing with an out of state and reciprocity, and, an Indiana LTCH
mayhave better reciprocity than what you have now.
( @Sig_OwnerP229 )
Quoted:
Just to clarify, IIRC the exact language is "according to the terms thereof" or something like that, which is often argued by legal experts that beg the question just what does that mean?
The safest interpretation I've heard is as follows: That the terms of the license in the issuing state must be followed. If it says right on the license that it is for concealed carry only that is a term of the license and must be adhered to even though IN permits OC. Furthermore, the terms of the license do not absolve one from following IN state laws. I think if Texas law permits one to carry into a K-12 school and somebody comes to IN and carries into one (presumably getting caught) the LEOs and DA/PA aren't going to say, "oh, he's from TX, he only has to abide by the laws in TX because of that pesky clause in the Indiana Code."
Now, don't paint me as a bad guy. I'm not a lawyer, I also used to tell people they had to follow the laws of their state. Then a lawyer pointed out that "terms" doesn't mean the same thing as "laws" and that it's a dangerous recommendation to tell somebody they don't have to follow IN law because of that clause. There is no court case that I know of that tested the meaning of that clause, I wouldn't want somebody to be that test-case based on info given here...
View Quote