I wrote this up in response to some local inquiries. (Started with info I found here, then dug in a little more.)
On proposal 20-1, I tried reading through it and couldn't make much sense of what the changes would be. I was going to vote no, but then I found out that the Sierra Club wants people to vote no, and M.U.C.C. supports it (link ->
https://mucc.org/ ).
If anyone doesn't remember, M.U.C.C put up half of the legal expense money back in 2000-2001 to fight Granholm's attempt to block the CPL bill in court. (She lost, and we got the Concealed Pistol law on the books.)
MUCC also went to court over Whitmer's motorboat ban, etc.
On prop 20-2, it's a clear yes. A principled conservative legislator named Jim Runestad has been trying to get this into the Michigan Constitution for a while. It's about making it illegal for police (or anyone else) to be able
to scan and search the cell phones of anyone driving by, without a warrant or anything except the equipment. They can collect contacts, messages, calling records, etc. with what's commonly called a "Stingray" cell tower impersonator.
I think it will be a safe yes result; Ballotpedia couldn't find anyone to speak against it:
https://ballotpedia.org/Michigan_Prop2https://apnews.com/article/technology-constitutions-michigan