I'm not compromising on this. I'm saying write a legitimate law that is enforceable, yet has strict criteria to be met in order for it's use. I do not see anything to trade here, just making an existing law, realistic from Our stance on the issue.
As far as compromise or trades right now, outside of moving suppressors off the NFA, I just wanna hold the line right now. We will worry about getting any BS things undone a little later down the road. RIGHT NOW, I just do not want to lose anymore. We all know how hard it is going to be to get things undone, less we have to undo the better.
I honestly believe that by making it a requirement for agencies, or whomever to report the things that need to be reported, so that NICS can do what it is supposed to do (reference the Texas church shooter here). And making it so that LE agencies can confiscate weapons "more easily". I use that term loosely here as I refer to the Parkland shooter, there is NO FUCKING WAY, that he should have still had those weapons. But, I believe that is more an issue with BCSO. I have read in a thread in GD, where several LEO's said they had seen enough to have done it, and I wanna believe, and do believe that would not have been the case here in Washington. Of the several WSP officers, 2 local PD and a Sheriff Deputy I know, I do not think it would have happened the way it did. This is not too mention the FBI or the School District, either. How in the fuck Scott Israel is still the Sherriff down there is beyond my comprehension.
Suppressors are not even a firearm, a goddamn muzzle brake really, I mean as in not even having do a 4473 on them, that is done when you PURCHASE A FIREARM. I may be slightly wrong, but in the "socialist" EU, you are encouraged to buy them so as to not contribute to noise pollution.