We might see a repeat of what happened in New Hampshire and Nevada in 2016.
In both states, moderate GOP Senate candidates refused to support Trump, and some of their followers then refused to support Trump. In retaliation, some Trump voters refused to support the GOP senate candidates. End result? Both Trump and the Republicans lost those states by narrow margins.
If you will recall, New Hampshire and Nevada were critical wins to the "field goal as time expires" scenario espoused by many as "Trump's only path to 270 EV". Fortunately, Trump's midwest strategy was successful, otherwise, 30000 votes in NH and Nevada would have cost us the election.
A similar situation is setting up here in Florida: the two marquee races will feature a solid conservative in one race, and someone who conservatives are less than thrilled with in the other race. It is really important to vote for both, and avoid an intra-party fight with voters not supporting candidates that are "too conservative" or "not conservative enough".
Let's get a Republican Senator to help Trump for the next 2 (hopefully 6) years, a Republican governor to advance a conservative RKBA agenda, and a Republican state house and senate to help the governor and control redistricting after the 2020 census-- 5 US House seats are at stake.
The alternative is to wind up like the Virginia GOP, which is in shambles right now. Democrats at all statewide offices, including 2 US Senators. And the GOP nearly lost the state house during last year's election. That was prevented by a coin toss (literally).