Quote History Quoted:
Yeah, and you should ban guns too because they’re dangerous and someone could get hurt. That’s a slippery slope you’re asking to go down. “People can’t be trusted and we need the government to save them from themselves” isn’t a philosophy I believe in.
View Quote
I'm sure nearly every single person on this board knows someone who has done something irresponsible or stupid with a firearm; ND, general safety, etc. I hope and expect every gun owner to be responsible with their firearms, mainly so we all don't get painted by the same brush when it comes to people doing dumb things with a gun.
I also hope and expect people to be good citizens when it comes to using and enjoying the land we all share, e.g. National Forests. No one has a right to blatantly ignore common sense safety precautions when it comes to fire. As Smokey says, "Only you can prevent forest fires". He is absolutely correct. It really pisses me off when an irresponsible person, who should absolutely know better, causes a fire due to their ignorance or wanton stupidity. I don't think the Forest Service decision to close certain areas due to a incredibly high danger of fire is a bad idea, nor does it come close to government overreach. It is good risk management.
Is it disappointing? Yes. I would like to go camping sometime this summer near Stoneman Lake. I had reservations to go to Fossil Creek starting tomorrow, and now I can't. But I understand the decision to close the area, and I agree with it.
Is fire good the forest? Yes, it is...but not a constant annual event that burns thousands and thousands of acres needlessly. A lightning strike is one thing, negligence is quite another.