Quote History Quoted:
Can anyone provide the info for the enhanced permit vs the online permit?
When I got my enhanced permit I read at the time it was the only one that allowed open carry and allowed me to conceal carry in other states.
Buddy has the online permit and he said he can carry in other states as well and from what I read online online permits can open carry as well.
Since they passed constitutional carry I haven’t been able to find anything showing that the enhanced permit grants reciprocity.
View Quote
Concealed permit holders can now carry openly when in areas that it is legal to carry under the state permitless carry law, but they are doing so under the permitless carry law, not their permit. If they enter an area where permitless carry is not allowed, they have to conceal, since they are then carrying under the laws concerning their permit.
Enhanced permit holders are not required to conceal, as that is how the laws concerning the original handgun carry permit (renamed to 'enhanced', when the 'concealed only' permit was created) were written - no requirement for how the (enhanced) permit holder carries.
Somewhere on the state website, there is a chart showing which states acknowledge the Tennessee carry permits. Last time I checked, there were a few that acknowledge the enhanced permit but do not acknowledge the concealed only permit.
There would be a lot less confusion, if the useless 'concealed only' law had never been passed.
ETA: The 'concealed only' permit is a bit of a sore spot, for me.
It's main purpose for existing, was to delay passage of a Constitutional Carry law in TN (it succeeded in delaying passage for a year or so).
It was also passed with a campaign of lies. When the NRA started openly supporting it and asking members to contact their reps to voice support, they had a list of selling points for the bill, that were taken from the original bill before any amendments were made to it. As I recall, all but one of their selling points had been removed from the bill, months before they started their campaign to generate support for the bill. But why worry about the details, when we could pass a bill creating a carry permit that had no fees (free) and no training requirement? ...except that the bill had already evolved to one that had fees and a training requirement (but the bill sponsor gave up on trying to explain the training requirement and said the state department of safety would have to figure out the details of the training requirement, since they would be issuing the permits).
It also created confusion, by leaving out a few details on where carry was legal - one or two of the laws that had removed carry restrictions on permit holders in previous years, were written to state that the carry permit (now the 'enhanced' carry permit) was an exception to the prohibition against guns in certain areas, but those particular laws were not further amended to include the 'concealed only' permit as an exception. We already had enough of a headache over restrictions on 'park carry' (and the quagmire of what is legally considered a park), without piling on more to the legal patchwork.