User Panel
Posted: 10/1/2020 7:32:26 PM EDT
Look at the "Made in Belgium" rollmarks on the right side of the slide.
1. I've never seen all caps on the "made in Belgium" rollmarks 2. It looks like the letter M and A are smaller 3. It looks like the lettering was engraved, not rollmarked....and looks in the white as well. 4. Left side looks suspect as well. |
|
Check the serial number. It will tell you a lot what, does 245 mean? What year was it made? What year did the change from Made in B to Assembled in P. See if slide has been machined. Look at a real MIB and see if they are identical in font and location. The front and rear of the ejection port are buffed all to hell. I wouldn’t buy it.
|
|
Quoted: Check the serial number. It will tell you a lot what does 245 mean? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes It will literally tell you nothing. 245 is just the serial number prefix. What year was it made? Don't care, its not relevant to my question. What year did the change from Made in B to Assembled in P. Again, not relevant. Only the Hi Powers imported by Browning have "Assembled in Portugal" rollmarks. Cant see the detail well enough to See if slide has been machined. Fuzzy photos for sure, but the fonts are wrong. Look at a real MIB and see if they are identical in font and location. I have over a dozen HP's and none have that style of lettering. |
|
|
|
Quoted: It will literally tell you nothing. 245 is just the serial number prefix. Don't care, its not relevant to my question. Again, not relevant. Only the Hi Powers imported by Browning have "Assembled in Portugal" rollmarks. Fuzzy photos for sure, but the fonts are wrong. I have over a dozen HP's and none have that style of lettering. View Quote If you know so much, and don't care about questions relevant to the validity of the piece, why'd you ask? |
|
|
Quoted: If you know so much, and don't care about questions relevant to the validity of the piece, why'd you ask? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It will literally tell you nothing. 245 is just the serial number prefix. Don't care, its not relevant to my question. Again, not relevant. Only the Hi Powers imported by Browning have "Assembled in Portugal" rollmarks. Fuzzy photos for sure, but the fonts are wrong. I have over a dozen HP's and none have that style of lettering. If you know so much, and don't care about questions relevant to the validity of the piece, why'd you ask? I didn't ask a question about the serial # did I? When someone posts: Quoted: Check the serial number. It will tell you a lot what does 245 mean? "It will tell you a lot" followed by "what does 245 mean?"...............indicates |
|
Well, you pointed out all the issues you saw wrong with it. Stevie Wonder could see them. I was trying to help. Good luck. JFC.
Oh. And by the way. 1976-1997. In 1975 Browning standardized its serial number identification which it followed until 1998. 1. Hi-Power Type: 245=9mm. 2.May 14, 2008 You know BHP made in 30 cal for European and S American market, and 40 cal for a while, right? |
|
I think it's an assembled in Portugal gun that was scrubbed and cold blued.
|
|
Just looked at mine, it is like this:
MADE IN BELGUIM ASSEMBLED IN PORTUGAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: The all with the Portugal markings is utter crap! Here is my HP that I bought NIB years ago. View Quote You misunderstand. 1. Not all FN/Browning Hi Powers are marked "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal" because it wasn't until the 1971 that FN began using its facility in Portugal to do final assembly. That assembly facility cranked out HP's for decades before someone at Browning thought it a good idea to add "assembled in Portugal. 2. While those imported by Browning were the only ones "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal", those not imported by Browning were still assembled in Portugal. 3. Plenty of Browning HP's were assembled in Portugal but not rollmarked Assembled in Portugal. 4. FN made runs of slides by the thousands, storing them until needed, so rollmarks may have been made years before the frame and vice versa. |
|
Quoted: Well, you pointed out all the issues you saw wrong with it. Stevie Wonder could see them. I was trying to help. Good luck. JFC. Oh. And by the way. 1976-1997. In 1975 Browning standardized its serial number identification which it followed until 1998. 1. Hi-Power Type: 245=9mm. 2.May 14, 2008 You know BHP made in 30 cal for European and S American market, and 40 cal for a while, right? View Quote No shit Sherlock. I've been collecting Hi Powers since around 1980. Again, my question has fuck all to do with the serial# or caliber. |
|
To me, the pictures look like an FEG Browning Hi Power clone that has had the slide sanded, refinished, and remarked. I've owned a few FEG's, but don't have one now to compare, but I remember the stock grips being prouder / thicker than the browning version, and those pics look like the thicker, cheaper FEG wood grips. The checkering on the grips is also lower quality than what I've typically seen on Hi Powers. I'd pass.
|
|
Quoted: You misunderstand. 1. Not all FN/Browning Hi Powers are marked "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal" because it wasn't until the 1971 that FN began using its facility in Portugal to do final assembly. That assembly facility cranked out HP's for decades before someone at Browning thought it a good idea to add "assembled in Portugal. 2. While those imported by Browning were the only ones "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal", those not imported by Browning were still assembled in Portugal. 3. Plenty of Browning HP's were assembled in Portugal but not rollmarked Assembled in Portugal. 4. FN made runs of slides by the thousands, storing them until needed, so rollmarks may have been made years before the frame and vice versa. View Quote Ok, run my serial number I believe it is from the 1980's. Should it not say assembled in Portugal? ETA: Looked it up 1987 |
|
Quoted: OP, I’m not sure what “answer” you’re hoping for, View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes I was wondering who had seen an HP with that same/similiar markings. Here’s the font/size/placement on my 245 prefix HP though. Definitely looks way different. I know. Thats normal. |
|
Quoted: Ok, run my serial number I believe it is from the 1980's. Should it not say assembled in Portugal? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You misunderstand. 1. Not all FN/Browning Hi Powers are marked "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal" because it wasn't until the 1971 that FN began using its facility in Portugal to do final assembly. That assembly facility cranked out HP's for decades before someone at Browning thought it a good idea to add "assembled in Portugal. 2. While those imported by Browning were the only ones "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal", those not imported by Browning were still assembled in Portugal. 3. Plenty of Browning HP's were assembled in Portugal but not rollmarked Assembled in Portugal. 4. FN made runs of slides by the thousands, storing them until needed, so rollmarks may have been made years before the frame and vice versa. Ok, run my serial number I believe it is from the 1980's. Should it not say assembled in Portugal? Read what I wrote. Again, only Browning Arms HP's have the "Assembled in Portugal" rollmarks.....but no were did I write that ALL Browning Arms HP's have them. |
|
Quoted: Here’s the font/size/placement on my 245 prefix HP though. Definitely looks way different. I know. Thats normal. Yeah, normal for 1993. But what advantage would someone have in remarking one as if it were a 1980 manufacture? Aren't there actual rare dates that would have had more of a reason to reproduce? |
|
Quoted: Yeah, normal for 1993. But what advantage would someone have in remarking one as if it were a 1980 manufacture? Aren't there actual rare dates that would have had more of a reason to reproduce? View Quote No idea. Its obviously not an attempt to "fake" a rare or collectible pistol because it so damn crudely done. I wonder if it was a generic slide from who knows where and the importer decided he need to mark it to get it in the US. |
|
Quoted: No idea. Its obviously not an attempt to "fake" a rare or collectible pistol because it so damn crudely done. I wonder if it was a generic slide from who knows where and the importer decided he need to mark it to get it in the US. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yeah, normal for 1993. But what advantage would someone have in remarking one as if it were a 1980 manufacture? Aren't there actual rare dates that would have had more of a reason to reproduce? No idea. Its obviously not an attempt to "fake" a rare or collectible pistol because it so damn crudely done. I wonder if it was a generic slide from who knows where and the importer decided he need to mark it to get it in the US. Maybe it started out saying FN Manufacturing Imported by Century Arms, in a dot-matrix font? |
|
Quoted: Read what I wrote. Again, only Browning Arms HP's have the "Assembled in Portugal" rollmarks.....but no were did I write that ALL Browning Arms HP's have them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You misunderstand. 1. Not all FN/Browning Hi Powers are marked "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal" because it wasn't until the 1971 that FN began using its facility in Portugal to do final assembly. That assembly facility cranked out HP's for decades before someone at Browning thought it a good idea to add "assembled in Portugal. 2. While those imported by Browning were the only ones "Made in Belgium Assembled in Portugal", those not imported by Browning were still assembled in Portugal. 3. Plenty of Browning HP's were assembled in Portugal but not rollmarked Assembled in Portugal. 4. FN made runs of slides by the thousands, storing them until needed, so rollmarks may have been made years before the frame and vice versa. Ok, run my serial number I believe it is from the 1980's. Should it not say assembled in Portugal? Read what I wrote. Again, only Browning Arms HP's have the "Assembled in Portugal" rollmarks.....but no were did I write that ALL Browning Arms HP's have them. Ok, misunderstood your statement. That said I wonder why some are marked like that and some like mine are not within the same time span? |
|
Well Einstein, you said the 245 means nothing, it’s just a prefix. I showed where it means 9mm since they were made in other calibers. Are you ok? Put down the crack pipe, or go to bed or something. You’re just trying to be a hard ass. Just go back down in the basement and lighten up.
|
|
Quoted: Well Einstein, you said the 245 means nothing, it’s just a prefix. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes It is. I showed where it means 9mm since they were made in other calibers. Yet there are literally millions of 9mm Hi Powers in 9mm that do not have the 245 prefix. See why i said it was meaningless in the context of this thread. Are you ok? Put down the crack pipe, or go to bed or something. GTFO You’re just trying to be a hard ass. But, I'm not a dumb ass. Just go back down in the basement and lighten up. I'm in Texas, we ain't gots basements. |
|
Oh a couple of years ago I recall reading of FEG faked bhp's, so likely that is what we are looking at with this specimen.
|
|
|
Quoted: About that... https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/12179/image-1617723.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/12179/0C476208-4E7A-4161-AB74-4F7B0564FA44-1617731.jpg View Quote Again, the only Hi Powers you will find with "Assembled in Portugal" on the slide are those imported by Browning Arms. It doesn't mean all Hi Powers imported by Browning Arms have "Assembled in Portugal" because that clearly is not the case. It means the FN HP's imported by Cassi, Howco, FNMI and others DO NOT have or ever had "Assembled in Portugal" stamped on them. |
|
Quoted: To me, the pictures look like an FEG Browning Hi Power clone that has had the slide sanded, refinished, and remarked. I've owned a few FEG's, but don't have one now to compare, but I remember the stock grips being prouder / thicker than the browning version, and those pics look like the thicker, cheaper FEG wood grips. The checkering on the grips is also lower quality than what I've typically seen on Hi Powers. I'd pass. View Quote That's was what I was thinking when I saw that auction before this thread. I've never seen one of the supposed "fake" Hi Powers, but the font and size of the roll marks on this gun are what kept me from bidding on it. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.