

As long as you're popping primers you're good. I don't mess with springs but I do stone the sides of everything inside my revolvers.
|
|
"If you cant do something smart, do something right"
|
Originally Posted By 03RN: As long as you're popping primers you're good. I don't mess with springs but I do stone the sides of everything inside my revolvers. View Quote Yeah I was a little hesitant A little goes a LONG ways on that mainspring I never touched my 586 springs and one day it just straight stopped popping primers. I remember I pulled it out with my carry load and got like 5 clicks and only 2 bangs. I tried a wilson spring kit after that on it and it would still occasionally get light strikes. Ive had a hard time trusting that gun ever since to be honest. I suppose it could be as simple as the pro shop or whatever maybe took too much off a strain screw when tuning it too but it didnt crop its head for several years of ownership. I think thats why Im also a little curious if there are any spec floors out there for the trigger pull. Easy to pop a gauge on it every few months to ensure the above doesnt happen to me again. I was shooting for 9# but landed at the 8.5#. Ive also seen the weight can vary greatly by where you 'pull' the trigger on the gauge so Im assuming most everyone measures from the bottom of the trigger. |
|
"Somewhere in the midst of my coke-fueled orgy I decide life wasn't so bad after all."
|
It is pretty easy to see which surfaces inside a S&W revolver would benefit from being polished.
I don't like the ideas of cutting springs, changing the angle of the sear, or reducing sear engagement, but polishing is easy to do, and makes a huge difference. Auto parts stores usually stock 400, 600, 1000, 1200, 1500 and 2000 grit abrasive paper. When cut into smaller pieces, a sheet of each grit will last a long time. I have heard of people using toothpaste as an alternative to abrasive paper, but I have never tried it. ETA: While I haven't seen any proof of the idea, I have heard that some folks test firing pin power by holding a penny over the firing pin hole, and if the firing pin puts a dent in Lincoln's head, there is sufficient power in the hammer strike. Another idea I haven't tested myself though, but it seems interesting. |
|
|
Originally Posted By chase45: Yeah I was a little hesitant A little goes a LONG ways on that mainspring I never touched my 586 springs and one day it just straight stopped popping primers. I remember I pulled it out with my carry load and got like 5 clicks and only 2 bangs. I tried a wilson spring kit after that on it and it would still occasionally get light strikes. Ive had a hard time trusting that gun ever since to be honest. I suppose it could be as simple as the pro shop or whatever maybe took too much off a strain screw when tuning it too but it didnt crop its head for several years of ownership. I think thats why Im also a little curious if there are any spec floors out there for the trigger pull. Easy to pop a gauge on it every few months to ensure the above doesnt happen to me again. I was shooting for 9# but landed at the 8.5#. Ive also seen the weight can vary greatly by where you 'pull' the trigger on the gauge so Im assuming most everyone measures from the bottom of the trigger. View Quote Back when PPC was popular with police competitors some crazy light DA pulls in the five pound range were possible but then the caveats of only use federal primers etc. I would say you are pretty close to as low as you should go. A quick trick to check that 586 ( or any strain screw equipped gun) that misfires is to take a spent small pistol primer pop out the anvil and sandwich it between the tip of the strain screw and mainspring sort of like a cap on the tip of the screw. If misfires go away, you have two choices- leave it that way or get a longer strain screw. I have had a bunch of S&W’s over the years that I shot with that primer cup strain screw cap |
|
|
Originally Posted By captain127: Back when PPC was popular with police competitors some crazy light DA pulls in the five pound range were possible but then the caveats of only use federal primers etc. I would say you are pretty close to as low as you should go. A quick trick to check that 586 ( or any strain screw equipped gun) that misfires is to take a spent small pistol primer pop out the anvil and sandwich it between the tip of the strain screw and mainspring sort of like a cap on the tip of the screw. If misfires go away, you have two choices- leave it that way or get a longer strain screw. I have had a bunch of S&W’s over the years that I shot with that primer cup strain screw cap View Quote Thanks I think Ill give that a shot. Got a whole lotta dead primers so that should be pretty easy to test. |
|
"Somewhere in the midst of my coke-fueled orgy I decide life wasn't so bad after all."
|
Originally Posted By 03RN: As long as you're popping primers you're good. I don't mess with springs but I do stone the sides of everything inside my revolvers. View Quote A lot of folks go right at the springs, but getting everything that rubs on anything else nice and smooth reduces a lot of resistance and effectively makes your springs feel lighter. I actually polish the surfaces with Flitz. Good lubrication helps too. |
|
|
Guns I carry do not go under 8 pounds and can fire off any primer every time (to date).
My competition guns range from 6 to 8 pounds and are very reliable with Federal primers. |
|
|
NEVER mess with the mainspring or the strain screw. Clip about 1 (one) loop off of the trigger return spring. That's how I was taught. Sure, you can loosen the strain screw, but don't start grinding on it.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By JSG: Guns I carry do not go under 8 pounds and can fire off any primer every time (to date). My competition guns range from 6 to 8 pounds and are very reliable with Federal primers. View Quote Thanks! Ill throw a gauge on it here and there to see if it loses tension over time |
|
"Somewhere in the midst of my coke-fueled orgy I decide life wasn't so bad after all."
|
I polished the bearing surfaces of moving parts (except the sears) in the manner described in the Kuhnhausen manual and show on YouTube. I also installed lighter springs. I have a lighter main spring, and installed the lightest return spring that would work reliably. I think I got the Wilson spring kit.
My double action pull measured around 8 pounds, and my single action pull measured 2.5 pounds. The double action pull is VERY smooth. |
|
What's the difference between a nuclear weapon and a grenade launcher? I don't own a nuclear weapon.
|
These are what Nelson Ford has come up with for factory ammo. The weights are measured by pulling back on the hammer, with the scale, rather than the trigger. He says these will definitely pop hard primers, but you could potentially go a little lighter.
![]() |
|
"Everything popular is wrong."
-Oscar Wilde |
Originally Posted By BillythePoet: These are what Nelson Ford has come up with for factory ammo. The weights are measured by pulling back on the hammer, with the scale, rather than the trigger. He says these will definitely pop hard primers, but you could potentially go a little lighter. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/160767/20230822_121609_jpg-2958289.JPG View Quote Neat Ill give that a measure and see where mine are stacking up I appreciate the info as that really helps to give me a baseline |
|
"Somewhere in the midst of my coke-fueled orgy I decide life wasn't so bad after all."
|
"Everything popular is wrong."
-Oscar Wilde |
I wonder why Ford's chart differentiates pre-96 and post-96?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By dmk0210: I wonder why Ford's chart differentiates pre-96 and post-96? View Quote I asummed hammer weight/ design change Is that when they changed the hammers from the oldschool ones with the nose that was replaceable to the new design with a hammer and a sprung firing pin |
|
"Somewhere in the midst of my coke-fueled orgy I decide life wasn't so bad after all."
|
Originally Posted By chase45: I asummed hammer weight/ design change Is that when they changed the hammers from the oldschool ones with the nose that was replaceable to the new design with a hammer and a sprung firing pin View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By chase45: Originally Posted By dmk0210: I wonder why Ford's chart differentiates pre-96 and post-96? I asummed hammer weight/ design change Is that when they changed the hammers from the oldschool ones with the nose that was replaceable to the new design with a hammer and a sprung firing pin Yeah, the newer frame mounted firing pins need a firmer smack. Additional friction, maybe the basic mechanics of hitting a floating object against a fixed object? I'm not sure exactly. |
|
"Everything popular is wrong."
-Oscar Wilde |
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2023 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.