User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 2:08:55 PM EDT
 Not sure why they went with the weird milling on the back that takes out the sight notch. I mean we all know the current MOS system is a joke, but what's so hard about just milling a pocket with an RMR cut? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 3:15:18 PM EDT
[#1]
Unless is this spec-ed for a specific contract, I don’t understand it. How many people are clamoring to mount a DPP on a Glock, and for those who are, there are plenty of decent plates to use with the current MOS system.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 4:05:44 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Unless is this spec-ed for a specific contract, I don’t understand it. How many people are clamoring to mount a DPP on a Glock, and for those who are, there are plenty of decent plates to use with the current MOS system. Word on the street is there will be an rmr cut as well. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 4:08:04 PM EDT
[#3]
Since plate systems are mostly a joke, this makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 4:14:56 PM EDT
[#4]
I have a Sig M17 with the Leupold reddot. It has a pretty high profile compared to other reddots.
The DPP has a slot for a Leupold optional rear sight. It seems like a big sight for a midsize Glock. I have RMRs on two of my Glock MOS.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 5:56:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Who asked for this? LOL
Seriously though, if they do release an RMR version then that would prove that Glock is actually listening to the civilian market. I really can't see them not releasing a Trijicon foot print variant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 7:58:52 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted: Not sure why they went with the weird milling on the back that takes out the sight notch. I mean we all know the current MOS system is a joke, but what's so hard about just milling a pocket with an RMR cut? Nothing to add, other than I'm interested in seeing how this changes things. BUT - you're fellow Jedi Alum? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 9:50:52 PM EDT
[#7]
There are posts and pics of these from almost two years ago on GlockTalk, both the MOS3 DPP and MOS5 RMR version.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/15/2021 9:55:59 PM EDT
[#8]
And typical of Glock, they miss the mark.
All they had to do was do a proper cut and leave their rear dovetail in place. Now, this creates other issues for those of us that want BUIS. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2021 12:35:06 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And typical of Glock, they miss the mark. All they had to do was do a proper cut and leave their rear dovetail in place. Now, this creates other issues for those of us that want BUIS. It’s for a DPP. The BUIS mounts to the optic. What’s the problem? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2021 1:10:16 PM EDT
[#10]
I love everything about the MOS system except the OEM plate and FCD has solved that problem.
The recent release of the RMRcc and it's proprietary footprint demonstrates exactly why I DO NOT want a direct milled gun. Optics mounted on carry guns is still in it's infancy and the MOS is basically future proof. I don't want to buy a new gun every time an optics company changes their specs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2021 1:30:47 PM EDT
[#11]
The front sight that matches up with that is going to be rediculous.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2021 3:07:26 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It's for a DPP. The BUIS mounts to the optic. What's the problem? If the RMR cut looks anything like that, thatll be disappointing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/16/2021 3:33:19 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Because the rear sight doesn't have to mount to the red dot. If the RMR cut looks anything like that, thatll be disappointing. It doesn’t have to, but it’s better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/18/2021 10:37:07 AM EDT
[#14]
I'm sorry. But that's just butt ass ugly.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/18/2021 11:40:28 AM EDT
[#15]
Hahaha. Terrible. I'd rather have a gen 5 MOS with the FCD plate over this.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/18/2021 12:57:17 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It doesn't have to, but it's better. Ill keep my RMR's and separate sights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/18/2021 1:04:39 PM EDT
[#17]
Our local sheriff's office just bought all new guns. Glock Model 45's cut for the RMR straight from the Glock factory. It may be an offered option in the near future. At this point I was told agency orders only. No individual orders.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/18/2021 4:21:57 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Our local sheriff's office just bought all new guns. Glock Model 45's cut for the RMR straight from the Glock factory. It may be an offered option in the near future. At this point I was told agency orders only. No individual orders. Did you get to see one yet? I'm curious if they are doing the weird rear sight thing with the RMR. I'm really doubting they are, and am guessing it's just a DPP thing. I wonder what the price difference will be between the traditional MOS and a precut slide. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/18/2021 10:06:32 PM EDT
[#19]
Holy shit just settle on a standard footprint already
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/19/2021 10:25:47 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Did you get to see one yet? I'm curious if they are doing the weird rear sight thing with the RMR. I'm really doubting they are, and am guessing it's just a DPP thing. I wonder what the price difference will be between the traditional MOS and a precut slide. I have a picture someplace, I'll see if I can find it. I don't know if I have any detailed pictures of the cut. The gun is a Glock Model 45. The sights are Trijicon front and rear. Tritium vials with no marking rings. The light is a Streamlight TLR-1 HL. Everything else is stock. I tried to get one to test, and was told no. They are so backed up on orders that they would only talk to me if I was putting in a mass order. At this point I'm having issues just getting optics to test. Everyone is sold out and or has a waiting list. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/19/2021 10:31:25 AM EDT
[#21]
 Forgive the poor photo, it was the only one on my phone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/19/2021 10:38:32 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/668/epso_g45a-1831869.jpgForgive the poor photo, it was the only one on my phone. Thanks. I figured the funky rear sight thing was only a DPP deal. Glock will sell a boat load of those, if they sell to the civilian market. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/19/2021 3:35:50 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The front sight that matches up with that is going to be rediculous. I expect it'd look a lot like this one. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/20/2021 3:32:14 PM EDT
[#24]
They are just copying Sig.
"New MOS 3, with even MORE retarded." Quote HistoryQuoted: Holy shit just settle on a standard footprint already |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/20/2021 6:43:26 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They are just copying Sig. "New MOS 3, with even MORE retarded." Quote HistoryQuoted: They are just copying Sig. "New MOS 3, with even MORE retarded." Quoted: Holy shit just settle on a standard footprint already I guess I don't get the negativity. A lot of people don't want plates to mount optics, they want the slide cut to their optics footprint. So glock comes out with a DPP cut slide which I think is what the .mil is running a lot of, and a RMR cut which the vast majority of the civilian market wants. Glock doesn't make optics, so they really can't dictate any optics footprint. Getting more options to mount optics isn't a bad thing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/7/2021 2:36:46 AM EDT
[#26]
I’m assuming they stemmed from a contract associated with these guns-
      |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/7/2021 9:16:14 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I guess I don't get the negativity. A lot of people don't want plates to mount optics, they want the slide cut to their optics footprint. So glock comes out with a DPP cut slide which I think is what the .mil is running a lot of, and a RMR cut which the vast majority of the civilian market wants. Glock doesn't make optics, so they really can't dictate any optics footprint. Getting more options to mount optics isn't a bad thing. I doubt many people care WHAT the footprint is, just pick ONE footprint. Every manufacture doesn't need their own "special" footprint to show how cool they are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/7/2021 9:36:43 AM EDT
[#28]
no thanks...
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/7/2021 10:40:53 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/668/epso_g45a-1831869.jpgForgive the poor photo, it was the only one on my phone. Is there a gap behind the RMR? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/7/2021 9:32:31 PM EDT
[#30]
We have in USAF inventory, DPP mounted G19s and 17s that are milled. The way the rear sight is integrated sems harmless enough but I much prefer my iron sight in front of the optic.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/10/2021 6:54:29 PM EDT
[#31]
With a competent steel MOS plate for DPP, the user retains the use of the rear sight (a Dawson rear, for instance). The rear sight module for the DPP isn't great, better to have the rear sight on the slide that's not secured with two tiny set screws.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
