User Panel
Posted: 3/30/2021 9:11:54 PM EDT
Hello gents,
Picked up a Kimber LW Nightstar 1911 in 9mm about two months ago. After a slight adjustment to the extractor the pistol has run 100% in approx 500 rounds. Very accurate and very easy to shoot. When I disassembled the pistol I noticed the internals were not of the same "quality" of say my Colts - or a SA (All have MIM parts). Pistol runs great, but you can tell there is a difference in quality. Does Kimber have an "economy line" of 1911's, like the Nightstar - and a "higher quality" line too ? Are all of the internals the same in their 1911's ? Thanks ! |
|
I don't believe Kimber offers better internals or fitting on their higher priced lines, just more bling. If somebody actually knows and can set me straight I'd appreciate it.
I have 3 Kimber pistols that have been reliable and accurate and will run against the conventional wisdom here to say that the lower end of line is a good value. The few malfunctions I had early on were solved by switching to Wilson, CMC, and Metalform magazines. All 3 have had the plastic MSH replaced, and the only 5" gun of the bunch has a GI type recoil spring guide and plug instead of the FLGR it came with. I don't carry any of them. If something does break at some point I'll replace with better quality parts. FWIW, the pistols are a Stainless II, a Pro Carry II, and a Pro Carry HD II in .38 super. |
|
My Kimber internals lasted over 12,000 rounds before I started to get creep in the trigger.
pre series II. All Kimber parts come from the same bins they just swap parts till they find one that fits correctly. At one time you could not even be sure if you had blackend Cress or blued steel parts till you went to get the gun reblued and found out the hard way. |
|
On my series 1 pistol I have changed the rear sight twice, plunger tube once and slide stop once. On the plus side the slide to frame fit is 2nd to none and is extremely accurate. Won't be buying another because of the poorly built rear target sight and the proprietary dovetail. Not all bad since I have owned it since 98.
|
|
Kimber IS the economy line. The price just doesn’t reflect that
|
|
I have two Kimbers. 5" TLE/RL and a Pro TLE/RL. Both have been great. I am happy with them.
|
|
Our Kimber's have run perfectly, including the Solo. The Solo just required some mag tweaking, the gun itself runs great.
Kimber went through a bad period with their QC which soured a lot of people but that was then and this is now. Unfortunately, just like Pepperidge Farms, the internet doesn't forget so people keep repeating what they heard. |
|
I like them but I think Kimber should staff up their quality department with some genuine 1911 experts who can help them drive consistency in the small details like extractor tension, barrel lower lug profiling, etc.
It seems like they are OK with a certain level of issues going out the door and that can make them look amateurish compared to Springfield who can crank out flawless mil specs that people snap up to build into nice customs. |
|
Quoted: I like them but I think Kimber should staff up their quality department with some genuine 1911 experts who can help them drive consistency in the small details like extractor tension, barrel lower lug profiling, etc. It seems like they are OK with a certain level of issues going out the door and that can make them look amateurish compared to Springfield who can crank out flawless mil specs that people snap up to build into nice customs. View Quote Last two Springfields I had, both had issues and had to go back several times. I got tired of sending them back. They never resolved the issue. Constant jamming and last round would not lock slide back. So they are going the way of Kimber. Issue was fixed by replacing the Slide stop with a Wilson bulletproof. Easy fix, they just never even looked at them and by then I was just wasting their money on shipping back and forth. |
|
I have a Kimber CDP II Ultra that’s been my EDC for several years. I had problems with the original Kimber mags. Switched to Wilson Combat and haven’t had a problem since.
|
|
I have a Kimber Custom II and a Warrior, both run as well as my Springfield's and Colt's ..... however None of my 1911's have many stock internals left in them.
|
|
I really like my Kimber LW - just the "quality" issue.
Any opinions on replacing the hammer, sear, disconnector, sear spring with Wilson Combat ? Fitting parts is not an issue. |
|
I had a CDP ,the hammer would follow the slide down bought new sent back gone now , a Cust Tac 2 that never ran right gone , I have 1 st week out Warrior that I kept and never sent back for any thing . I look at many of the new ones but don`t buy .
|
|
Quoted: I really like my Kimber LW - just the "quality" issue. Any opinions on replacing the hammer, sear, disconnector, sear spring with Wilson Combat ? Fitting parts is not an issue. View Quote not really, but I would got with EGW parts and a Colt sear spring or just keep your existing sear spring. the hard sear may need to be stoned some and some slight tweaks to the sear spring to get that glass rod 4.5 lb trigger. |
|
I can see most of you fuckers never had the pleasure of owning a Team Match 2 with their external extractor and it shows.
|
|
Quoted: I like them but I think Kimber should staff up their quality department with some genuine 1911 experts who can help them drive consistency in the small details like extractor tension, barrel lower lug profiling, etc. It seems like they are OK with a certain level of issues going out the door and that can make them look amateurish compared to Springfield who can crank out flawless mil specs that people snap up to build into nice customs. View Quote I agree with this. Maybe they could get baer to show them how to profile lower barrel lug, lol. |
|
Quoted: I have two Kimbers. 5" TLE/RL and a Pro TLE/RL. Both have been great. I am happy with them. View Quote All that is said to say that what percent of the Kimber hate that isn't just "I read on XYZ forum" and what percent isn't "people just have no clue how to shoot a 1911" comes down to mass production issues. You rarely hear the oh my X brand Y product is great! You always hear the horror stories. |
|
The Custom Tac 2 I had was a beautiful looking 1911 it had the external extractor , it never would run . I just looked at a 4 in Kimber today bull barrel type , I just could not buy it . maybe it would run maybe not .
|
|
Well you guys did it to me ,I was at a shop Fri and they had a new Ultra Carry two tone with like rose wood grips , I took it home grabbed a few Wilson mags cleaned and oiled it up , we will see how she runs , worked the slide about 100 times and left action open , today we will see .
|
|
Quoted: The Custom Tac 2 I had was a beautiful looking 1911 it had the external extractor , it never would run . I just looked at a 4 in Kimber today bull barrel type , I just could not buy it . maybe it would run maybe not . View Quote Avoid external extractor kimbers, those were built during Cohens time. If you still have that tac2, kimber will replace topend with an internal extractor(traditional) topend. |
|
Quoted: Avoid external extractor kimbers, those were built during Cohens time. If you still have that tac2, kimber will replace topend with an internal extractor(traditional) topend. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: The Custom Tac 2 I had was a beautiful looking 1911 it had the external extractor , it never would run . I just looked at a 4 in Kimber today bull barrel type , I just could not buy it . maybe it would run maybe not . Avoid external extractor kimbers, those were built during Cohens time. If you still have that tac2, kimber will replace topend with an internal extractor(traditional) topend. They still doing that? |
|
I've owned several series 1 and series 2 Kimbers. They were fine guns.
|
|
|
What I mean is I went and got another Kimber after years of not buying them , they look so nice but I would pass , the only one that never needed a thing was a first week out and after waiting for weeks to get it was a warrior I got years ago . I picked up the ultra carry 2 Fri cleaned and lubed ready to go ,will shoot it today for a try out .
|
|
Quoted: Our Kimber's have run perfectly, i Kimber went through a bad period with their QC which soured a lot of people but that was then and this is now. Unfortunately, just like Pepperidge Farms, the internet doesn't forget so people keep repeating what they heard. View Quote Pretty much THIS. The external extractor debacle and Ron Cohen's brief stint were a really bad time. Once they gave Ron the boot, QC went up exponentially. And that was a long time ago now. Their factory mags are sub par, but that's fairly true across the industry. |
|
Four Kimbers in my safe.
One in a drawer of my kitchen island and one right next to me now. All of mine have worked from round one. |
|
I would take any Kimber without with Swarz (sp) firing pin safety, their stock parts while not the greatest I would get the most of use out of as I could and then replace with tool steel parts later.
There is no workaround with the Rube Goldberg Swarz safety in the Series II models and I honestly would rather have a Rock Island Armory or a Turkish 1911 than one of those |
|
Quoted: I would take any Kimber without with Swarz (sp) firing pin safety, their stock parts while not the greatest I would get the most of use out of as I could and then replace with tool steel parts later. There is no workaround with the Rube Goldberg Swarz safety in the Series II models and I honestly would rather have a Rock Island Armory or a Turkish 1911 than one of those View Quote Yeah, pull the rear sight off and remove the fp safety and spring. The biggest issue I've saw on the swartz safety is fp safety block no moving up in the slide, causing the slide to stop 1/16" from fully rtb. I have saw where the frame mounted plunger/grip safety bar wore and would cause a no fire issue. The fp safety block wouldn't move enough to release the fp. If the fp safety block is removed, it eliminates both possible issues. It is equivalent to removing 80 series slide parts and using a frame slot filler. The frame mounted cam needs to be retained, as it fills the space next to sear, but it doesn't do anything else besides move up when grip safety is depressed. I might get flamed, but the swartz(if properly machined and fitted) is no better or worse than a series 80. I think the window of fitment on the swartz is narrower than a colt series 80, but it also doesn't effect trigger pull any. I have a 1985 ss colt officer that I redid, undercut wilson beavertail, novak front.....I kept the series 80 parts, in fact kept all the fire control parts except grip safety and thumb safety. Trigger pull is a nice crisp 3.75lb pull, I did stone the sear nose, but the series 80 parts didn't really cause any trigger break grittiness or excess weight. |
|
All my Kimbers run at 100%. I will admit, one of them needed an extractor tuning when new. 1911’s are a different animal from most modern designs so, keep them lubed properly and they will run fine, including Kimbers.
|
|
|
Yep to above. Dw is only company that sends good mags with 1911s.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.