Quote History Originally Posted By Genin:
I find that a sturdy 1.75" belt, and a high quality holster works very well. If you cheap out on either a study high quality belt or holster, things sag, and the sagging makes the pistol feel much heavier than it is. A spare magazine or two on the opposite side of the piston will help balance things out. I can't stress enough how big of a difference a stiff 1.75" belt makes in distributing the weight better. The wider belt also doesn't feel as much like it is cutting into you.
Horsehide belts seem stiffer for any given thickness than cow or steer hide. Double thicknesses of horse, cow, or steer hide will also help, but many holsters or belt loops won't accommodate a belt that thick.
View Quote
This is also what works best for me when carrying a fullsize 1911. The 1.75” wide belt works much better for handling the weight than my 1.5” belt, with the exception of Mean Gene Leather’s 1.5” belt. The problem, though, is that it may be difficult to find a good, comfortable, concealable holster that fits a 1.75” wide or thick 1.5” belt.
My favorite IWB holster is TTGunleather’s “Mike’s Special” at 3:00 to 4:30. I don’t need a 1.75” or ultra thick 1.5” belt for that combo.
For OWB, my favorite is Don Hume’s 721OT pancake holster. It’s comfortable and keeps the grip tighter to the body than any other OWB holster I’ve tried. But I prefer a wider or thicker belt to handle the weight of a heavy gun with any OWB holster. The trouble is that without filing and cutting the holster’s belt slots, it’s hard to fit that Don Hume holster even though it supposedly fits 1.75” belts. So I sacrificed a 1791 OWB pancake holster by cutting and filing its belt slots to fit my thicker Mean Gene belt. It’s just that my 1791 holster doesn’t tuck the grip in as much as the Don Hume holster.