Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 1/19/2021 2:16:12 PM EDT
I was looking through a bag of 38 spcl ammo that is maybe 50's or 60's vintage

It's a mix of UMC, Peters and Western

I thought the variety of crimps was interesting

The top round with no crimp is recent manufacture

Attachment Attached File


Link Posted: 1/19/2021 2:54:33 PM EDT
[#1]
No wadcutters,  no care.  
Link Posted: 1/19/2021 3:00:41 PM EDT
[#2]
I have always wondered why they added the extra crimps or cannelures in the cases down the side of the case.

You are correct no modern ammo has these additional crimps or grooves.
Link Posted: 1/19/2021 3:01:12 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No wadcutters,  no care.  
View Quote


Why are you looking specifically for wadcutters?
Link Posted: 1/19/2021 3:17:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I have always wondered why they added the extra crimps or cannelures in the cases down the side of the case.

You are correct no modern ammo has these additional crimps or grooves.
View Quote


That bottom one is odd

That's the Peters

Link Posted: 1/19/2021 3:53:28 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


That bottom one is odd

That's the Peters

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have always wondered why they added the extra crimps or cannelures in the cases down the side of the case.

You are correct no modern ammo has these additional crimps or grooves.


That bottom one is odd

That's the Peters




Those are reloads?

I am thinking the bottom one was originally a wadcutter case.  Maybe not.
Link Posted: 1/19/2021 4:16:28 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Those are reloads?

I am thinking the bottom one was originally a wadcutter case.  Maybe not.
View Quote


I don't think so, but I can't say for sure




Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:02:36 PM EDT
[#7]
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:15:18 PM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 1/22/2021 11:46:45 AM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 1/22/2021 3:08:20 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Is that old or new stuff?

View Quote


That’s probably 2015ish. It wasn’t limited to a few rounds either. It was case after case.

ETA: That’s not an example of how it was supposed to be. It was poor QC.
Link Posted: 1/22/2021 4:45:25 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


That’s probably 2015ish. It wasn’t limited to a few rounds either. It was case after case.

ETA: That’s not an example of how it was supposed to be. It was poor QC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Is that old or new stuff?



That’s probably 2015ish. It wasn’t limited to a few rounds either. It was case after case.

ETA: That’s not an example of how it was supposed to be. It was poor QC.


Wow

Is it safe to shoot?

Link Posted: 1/22/2021 8:38:27 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Wow

Is it safe to shoot?

View Quote


It didn’t cause any safety issues, but it was very inaccurate and unpredictable past about 15 yards. We sent about 10k back and used the rest for close range practice.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top