User Panel
[#1]
Quoted:
I have never been able to figure this out. The best thing I've heard so far is that you can divide both inches and feet by 2, 3 and 4, whereas I can only divide S.I. units by 2 and 5. View Quote Both are pretty much arbitrary, and you can always use decimal inches, decimal feet. Machinists use decimal inches and surveyor use decimal feet all the time. And even metric is generally screwed up by the users that think killogrqams is a weight. Weight is in Newtons. Mass id in kilograms. In the most common US system weight is in pounds and mass is in slugs. |
|
[#2]
Quoted:
Why the undying zeal for metric units? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Both are pretty much arbitrary, Quoted: and you can always use decimal inches, decimal feet. Machinists use decimal inches and surveyor use decimal feet all the time. But 3.24m + 2.31cm + 5.11mm = 3.24m + 0.0231m + 0.00511m = 3.26821m or 326.821cm or 3,268.21mm or whatever. Quoted:
And even metric is generally screwed up by the users that think killogrqams is a weight. Weight is in Newtons. Mass id in kilograms. Quoted:
In the most common US system weight is in pounds and mass is in slugs. |
|
[#3]
Quoted:
I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage. I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force. View Quote Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). |
|
[#4]
Quoted:
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use. Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage. I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force. Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). For all the endless arguments that imperial measurements are more intuitive and/or practical for day to day use, people sure can get esoteric and argue meaningless (for day to day practical use) nuance when defending their system. |
|
[#5]
Quoted: Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use. Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). View Quote |
|
[#6]
Why did you ask a question seeking input and then shit all over the input? Metric makes SOME math slightly easier. Not nearly enough to justify the absolutely insane cost it would be to convert from imperial, which is designed around being useful and intuitive as measures of things.
|
|
[#7]
|
|
[#8]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIWDVuHDpq0
Mallory: [stated with incredulity] "Metric!Who uses metric!" Lana: "Every single country on the planet except for us, Liberia and Burma." Archer: "Wow really?" Lana: "Yup." Archer: "Cause you never really think of those other two as having their shit together." *** Cyril: "So as you can see, we are already down to 125 kilos of cocaine, which was worth about six million dollars. So" Archer: "Heywait, how much is that in pounds?" Cyril: "Forget pounds!we're doing kilos!" Archer: "No I meant pounds" Mallory: "Sterling!" (Sterling is Archer's first name) Archer: "Exactly, as in Dr. Who money." |
|
[#9]
|
|
[#11]
|
|
[#12]
Like that most cars are metric.
If I eyeball the size wrench I need, say 10mm and it is slightly too small, get a 11mm. US measurement I would try a 3/8 and if it were slightly small do I go with 7/16 or 11/32. How do I quickly visualize which is bigger, 7/16 or 11/32? Much easier in metric, what is bigger, 10mm or 11mm? |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
Like that most cars are metric. If I eyeball the size wrench I need, say 10mm and it is slightly too small, get a 11mm. US measurement I would try a 3/8 and if it were slightly small do I go with 7/16 or 11/32. How do I quickly visualize which is bigger, 7/16 or 11/32? Much easier in metric, what is bigger, 10mm or 11mm? View Quote |
|
[#14]
Quoted:
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance... Metric has one arbitrary unit: The meter. Liters and grams derive from this. View Quote It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value. |
|
[#15]
Quoted:
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second." It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance... Metric has one arbitrary unit: The meter. Liters and grams derive from this. It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value. The meter is arbitrary. Arbitrary does not mean, “undefined.” |
|
[#16]
Quoted: Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second." It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value. View Quote Now it's true that SI has replaced metric and that the SI units are now based on entirely universal concepts (goes into effect next year). But when it comes to design and rationale, the meter is the base unit, and the only one that is arbitrarily defined. |
|
[#17]
Quoted:
Half retarded meth heads that roof houses every single day do with imperial units in thier head, what you claim "falls apart". Your arguments are retarded. View Quote The EPA needs to know RFN if the refit at the plant is going to kill the endangered snowflake fish they just discovered in the river in the summer or they will shit down a construction site costing tens of thousands of dollars an hour whether working at full capacity or sitting there doing nothing. You have been given the increase in temperature that is acceptable to let the fish get enough oxygen, the average flow and volume of the river, and the average summer temperatures. Whip out your HP15C, calculate the power output of the reactor, amount wasted as heat, the additional heat from using the water as coolant, how much you need to pump in for cooling, the temperature as it is pumped back out into the river, how much that raises the temperature of the river, Then go back to what you were working on when you were interrupted, Which involves the properties of steel, concrete, earth, decay, distance, half life, storage capacities, etc. Let me know how those go in furlongs, cables, square poles, gills, stones, and slugs. We prefer inches, pounds, gallons, miles, F degrees, etc. because we grew up with them and that is how we think- it is like our native language. For everyday life changing over would be like that uncomfortable phase where you have leaned a foreign language and speak and read it, but are constantly translating in your mind what you are going to say, and what you have heard to your native language because you don’t think in it year, have never dreamed in it yet, etc. |
|
[#18]
It snowed today in Boise. I took several measurements. The peak accumulation level was 10.2 cm and now it's down to 8.2 cm. I'll check again tomorrow morning, but as cold as it is now, I'm expecting it to not be below 7.0 cm.
|
|
[#19]
|
|
[#20]
|
|
[#21]
Quoted:
It snowed today in Boise. I took several measurements. The peak accumulation level was 10.2 cm and now it's down to 8.2 cm. I'll check again tomorrow morning, but as cold as it is now, I'm expecting it to not be below 7.0 cm. View Quote How many kpg do you get using 4WD vs 2WD? What would that be in mpL or kpL? |
|
[#22]
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use. Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage. I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force. Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). There is nothing intuitive about US customary units. The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life. Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier. |
|
[#24]
In the machine trades its a PIA to do both simultaneously everyday.
I wish we just had one unit, I don't care what it is as long as it's the same as all our customers and vendors. |
|
[#25]
Quoted: If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid. There is nothing intuitive about US customary units. The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life. Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier. View Quote The difference between weight and mass in metric is just as confusing. I can use any of them without even blinking. |
|
[#26]
|
|
[#27]
Only rocket surgeons need metric, leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
|
|
[#28]
Quoted:
Not really. Try and use kg to compute Kinetic Energy and get back to us. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid. There is nothing intuitive about US customary units. The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life. Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier. Try and use kg to compute Kinetic Energy and get back to us. Try again. |
|
[#29]
|
|
[#30]
Quoted: Not really. The difference between weight and mass in metric is just as confusing. I can use any of them without even blinking. View Quote |
|
[#32]
The diameter of the Milky Way galaxy is 105,700.0834 lightyears. That comes out to 1.000000000 zettameters (Zm).
I hereby declare that SI units are God's units. DISCLAIMER: |
|
[#33]
I’ll tell you what. I do quite a bit of cooking/baking and holy fuck is it soo much nicer using a good quality kitchen scale I can setup in grams. Fuck cups and floz etc
|
|
[#34]
Quoted:
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second." It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance... Metric has one arbitrary unit: The meter. Liters and grams derive from this. It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value. It was latter redefined as an ARBITRARY number of cycles of a particular wavelength (color) of light. |
|
[#35]
My degree in physics required me to work in both Imperial and SI units. Never had any problems calculating in either one. It's best to use whichever system your audience is most familiar with and is applicable.
If you really want to warp your mind, try figuring out how a 2x4 isn't really a 2x4 anymore, but was in the past. Even worse, go see some old construction with real 2x4s and they will look weird to you. |
|
[#36]
|
|
[#37]
Quoted: So your WEIGHT in the metric system is in Newtons? Of course all those spring scales that rely on weight are calibrated in kilograms for body weight. Not body mass. Better leave them on earth. View Quote Scales simply use weight to determine mass. This possible so long as earth's gravity remains relatively constant. |
|
[#38]
Systems based on powers of 2 and 3 are more intuitive than systems based on powers of 10.
Draw a square on a piece of paper. Then draw lines to divide it into 10 equal area parts. It's a lot easier to divide it into halves, quarters, eights, sixteenths, or any power of two. Even twelfths is better. SI is better for science and engineering. But 95% of the population will never need to know how many decagrams of deionized water there are in a cubic decimeter. |
|
[#39]
Quoted:
I'd go for 10 hours in a day, 10 minutes in an hour, and 100 seconds in a minute. But we should probably just have a day defined as a full rotation of the earth, and then millidays and so forth. 360 is evenly divisible by a great many things. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
While you're at it, can anyone present a rational, sane argument for having 60 seconds in a minute, and 60 minutes in an hour, and 24 hours in a day, as opposed to, say, 100 and 100 and 100? Quoted:
Or why there are 360 degrees in a circle? Radians FTW... |
|
[#40]
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Its all really a moot point these days with computers, its mind numbingly easy to switch units these days. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter |
|
[#41]
Quoted:
Yes, this is sound methodology. Water is the most abundant substance by area on the planet and the most accessible liquid. Specifially, the volume of one cubic meter was 1,000 liters, and the mass of one liter was 1,000 grams. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: You know that other parts of 'conventional' are based on weights of water. Specifially, the volume of one cubic meter was 1,000 liters, and the mass of one liter was 1,000 grams. |
|
[#42]
Ever notice that it's always the 10mm socket that's missing?
Over here in 'Merica land, we call that a clue. Metric is not to be trusted. When that commie 10mm abandons it's post you slap a 7/16's socket on that fastener and ram it home. Waller it out be damned. We get things done round these parts. |
|
[#43]
Quoted:
The Fahrenheit scale is objectively better for every day use as it gives a higher degree of precision to the range we work with most. Weather in most of the US fluctuates between 0 F and 100 F. That's 100 units with which to state the temperature. In Celsius, that ranges from -18 C to 38 C. That means they can only state average temperature with about half the precision of the our system AND need to go negative to do it. Also, for every high school physics teacher telling kids they need metric to work in STEM fields, there is a crusty Mechanical Engineering professor still giving all of his problems in slugs. View Quote |
|
[#44]
Quoted:
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance... Metric has one arbitrary unit: The meter. Liters and grams derive from this. All right, what's 34.23' + 5.67"? Off the top of my head, I have no idea. But 3.24m + 2.31cm + 5.11mm = 3.24m + 0.0231m + 0.00511m = 3.26821m or 326.821cm or 3,268.21mm or whatever. I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage. I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force. In the U.S. Customary System, mass is measured in pounds. In fact, in the United States, a pound is legally defined as 0.45359237kg. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why the undying zeal for metric units? Quoted:
Both are pretty much arbitrary, Quoted: and you can always use decimal inches, decimal feet. Machinists use decimal inches and surveyor use decimal feet all the time. But 3.24m + 2.31cm + 5.11mm = 3.24m + 0.0231m + 0.00511m = 3.26821m or 326.821cm or 3,268.21mm or whatever. Quoted:
And even metric is generally screwed up by the users that think killogrqams is a weight. Weight is in Newtons. Mass id in kilograms. Quoted:
In the most common US system weight is in pounds and mass is in slugs. |
|
[#45]
Quoted:
Like that most cars are metric. If I eyeball the size wrench I need, say 10mm and it is slightly too small, get a 11mm. US measurement I would try a 3/8 and if it were slightly small do I go with 7/16 or 11/32. How do I quickly visualize which is bigger, 7/16 or 11/32? Much easier in metric, what is bigger, 10mm or 11mm? View Quote |
|
[#46]
Quoted:
If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid. There is nothing intuitive about US customary units. The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life. Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage. I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force. Weight is a force. F=ma. The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity). m = F/g In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug. That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct. It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds). There is nothing intuitive about US customary units. The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life. Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier. |
|
[#47]
Quoted:
LOL. Really? You'd rather be working with pounds than kg when performing a calculation based on mass? Try again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid. There is nothing intuitive about US customary units. The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life. Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier. Try and use kg to compute Kinetic Energy and get back to us. Try again. |
|
[#49]
Quoted:
So when you say how much you weigh, do you answer 95 (or whatever) kilos? Or 1000 (or whatever) Newtons? View Quote Although now that you mention it, I'm going to start answering that question in Newtons just to sound like a flaming nerd. "What, you wanted to know how much I weigh." EDIT: I weigh 1,200 Newtons. but it's easier to just think of myself as weighing 1.2 kN. Looks much lighter that way. |
|
[#50]
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.