Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 4
Link Posted: 11/13/2018 3:28:02 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
I have never been able to figure this out.  The best thing I've heard so far is that you can divide both inches and feet by 2, 3 and 4, whereas I can only divide S.I. units by 2 and 5.
View Quote
Why the undying zeal for metric units?
Both are pretty much arbitrary, and you can always use decimal inches, decimal feet.
Machinists use decimal inches and surveyor use decimal feet all the time.

And even metric is generally screwed up by the users that think killogrqams is a weight.
Weight is in Newtons.
Mass id in kilograms.

In the most common US system weight is in pounds and mass is in slugs.
Link Posted: 11/13/2018 5:13:32 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Why the undying zeal for metric units?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Why the undying zeal for metric units?
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance...

Quoted:

Both are pretty much arbitrary,
Metric has one arbitrary unit:  The meter.  Liters and grams derive from this.

Quoted:

and you can always use decimal inches, decimal feet.
Machinists use decimal inches and surveyor use decimal feet all the time.
All right, what's 34.23' + 5.67"?  Off the top of my head, I have no idea.

But 3.24m + 2.31cm + 5.11mm = 3.24m + 0.0231m + 0.00511m = 3.26821m or 326.821cm or 3,268.21mm or whatever.

Quoted:

And even metric is generally screwed up by the users that think killogrqams is a weight.
Weight is in Newtons.
Mass id in kilograms.
I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.

Quoted:

In the most common US system weight is in pounds and mass is in slugs.
In the U.S. Customary System, mass is measured in pounds.  In fact, in the United States, a pound is legally defined as 0.45359237kg.
Link Posted: 11/15/2018 3:14:13 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.
View Quote
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
Link Posted: 11/15/2018 7:10:35 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
No, it means that we humans live in Earth and measure things in pounds here on Earth.

For all the endless arguments that imperial measurements are more intuitive and/or practical for day to day use, people sure can get esoteric and argue meaningless (for day to day practical use) nuance when defending their system.
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 3:07:24 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
View Quote
Well then write the NIST and tell them they're wrong.
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 4:16:35 AM EDT
[#6]
Why did you ask a question seeking input and then shit all over the input?  Metric makes SOME math slightly easier.  Not nearly enough to justify the absolutely insane cost it would be to convert from imperial, which is designed around being useful and intuitive as measures of things.
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 5:17:21 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

They were carpet tiles.  How many do I need?
View Quote
I don't care. Important measurements shouldn't be done in your head and no matter the measure you use there will be fractions of that measure.
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 7:14:31 AM EDT
[#8]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIWDVuHDpq0

Mallory: [stated with incredulity] "Metric!Who uses metric!"

Lana: "Every single country on the planet except for us, Liberia and Burma."

Archer: "Wow really?"

Lana: "Yup."

Archer: "Cause you never really think of those other two as having their shit together."

***

Cyril: "So as you can see, we are already down to 125 kilos of cocaine, which was worth about six million dollars. So"

Archer: "Heywait, how much is that in pounds?"

Cyril: "Forget pounds!we're doing kilos!"

Archer: "No I meant pounds"

Mallory: "Sterling!" (Sterling is Archer's first name)

Archer: "Exactly, as in Dr. Who money."
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 3:57:17 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I don't care. Important measurements shouldn't be done in your head and no matter the measure you use there will be fractions of that measure.
View Quote
But metric does let you do this in your head.
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 4:20:39 PM EDT
[#10]
no reason to change to socialist units
Link Posted: 11/17/2018 6:06:24 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
no reason to change to socialist units
View Quote
Link Posted: 11/20/2018 9:53:56 AM EDT
[#12]
Like that most cars are metric.
If I eyeball the size wrench I need, say 10mm and it is slightly too small, get a 11mm.
US measurement I would try a 3/8 and if it were slightly small do I go with 7/16 or 11/32.
How do I quickly visualize which is bigger, 7/16 or 11/32?
Much easier in metric, what is bigger, 10mm or 11mm?
Link Posted: 11/20/2018 12:49:01 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Like that most cars are metric.
If I eyeball the size wrench I need, say 10mm and it is slightly too small, get a 11mm.
US measurement I would try a 3/8 and if it were slightly small do I go with 7/16 or 11/32.
How do I quickly visualize which is bigger, 7/16 or 11/32?
Much easier in metric, what is bigger, 10mm or 11mm?
View Quote
If 10mm isn't enough, you should have a rifle.
Link Posted: 11/20/2018 1:04:26 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Simplicity, conciseness, elegance...

Metric has one arbitrary unit:  The meter.  Liters and grams derive from this.
View Quote
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."

It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value.
Link Posted: 11/20/2018 3:49:59 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."

It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Simplicity, conciseness, elegance...

Metric has one arbitrary unit:  The meter.  Liters and grams derive from this.
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."

It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value.
A Kilogram is derived from the meter (and, I suppose, the second, if you really want to get technical - EDIT, may not have gone into effect yet: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46143399).

The meter is arbitrary. Arbitrary does not mean, “undefined.”
Link Posted: 11/20/2018 6:24:11 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."

It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value.
View Quote
I said that metric has one arbitrary unit: the meter.  And I am quite correct.  You, since you seem oblivious, are referring to SI.

Now it's true that SI has replaced metric and that the SI units are now based on entirely universal concepts (goes into effect next year).  But when it comes to design and rationale, the meter is the base unit, and the only one that is arbitrarily defined.
Link Posted: 12/2/2018 2:18:43 AM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Half retarded meth heads that roof houses every single day do with imperial units in thier head, what you claim "falls apart".

Your arguments are retarded.
View Quote
Calculating the surface area of a roof could be done in units of “abouts as long as a case of natty light” and not really matter.

The EPA needs to know RFN if the refit at the plant is going to kill the endangered snowflake fish they just discovered in the river in the summer or they will shit down a construction site costing tens of thousands of dollars an hour whether working at full capacity or sitting there doing nothing.

You have been given the increase in temperature that is acceptable to let the fish get enough oxygen, the average flow and volume of the river, and  the average summer temperatures.
Whip out your HP15C, calculate the power output of the reactor, amount wasted as heat, the additional heat from using the water as coolant, how much you need to pump in for cooling, the temperature as it is pumped back out into the river, how much that raises the temperature of the river,

Then go back to what you were working on when you were interrupted,
Which involves the properties of steel, concrete, earth, decay, distance, half life, storage capacities, etc.

Let me know how those go in furlongs, cables, square poles, gills, stones, and slugs.

We prefer inches, pounds, gallons, miles, F degrees, etc. because we grew up with them and that is how we think- it is like our native language.
For everyday life changing over would be like that uncomfortable phase where you have leaned a foreign language and speak and read it, but are constantly translating in your mind what you are going to say, and what you have heard to your native language because you don’t think in it year, have never dreamed in it yet, etc.
Link Posted: 12/2/2018 10:07:24 PM EDT
[#18]
It snowed today in Boise.  I took several measurements.  The peak accumulation level was 10.2 cm and now it's down to 8.2 cm.  I'll check again tomorrow morning, but as cold as it is now, I'm expecting it to not be below 7.0 cm.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 1:31:20 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

All right, what's 34.23' + 5.67"?  Off the top of my head, I have no idea.
View Quote
You cannot multiply by 12 or divide by 12 to get matching units?

Must suck to be you.  Sorry.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 2:27:38 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You cannot multiply by 12 or divide by 12 to get matching units?

Must suck to be you.  Sorry.
View Quote
I can, but why should I?

EDIT: Why should you, for that matter?
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 3:04:14 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It snowed today in Boise.  I took several measurements.  The peak accumulation level was 10.2 cm and now it's down to 8.2 cm.  I'll check again tomorrow morning, but as cold as it is now, I'm expecting it to not be below 7.0 cm.
View Quote
But what temperature is it?

How many kpg do you get using 4WD vs 2WD?  What would that be in mpL or kpL?
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 4:35:21 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

But what temperature is it?

How many kpg do you get using 4WD vs 2WD?  What would that be in mpL or kpL?
View Quote
The temperature was roughly 273.2° K.  As far as the truck goes, I didn't use it yesterday.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 4:53:35 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid.

There is nothing intuitive about US customary units.  The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life.  Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 4:57:44 PM EDT
[#24]
In the machine trades its a PIA to do both simultaneously everyday.
I wish we just had one unit, I don't care what it is as long as it's the same as all our customers and vendors.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 5:00:00 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid.

There is nothing intuitive about US customary units.  The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life.  Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier.
View Quote
Not really.

The difference between weight and mass in metric is just as confusing.

I can use any of them without even blinking.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 5:03:21 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

They were carpet tiles.  How many do I need?
View Quote
To go be poor somewhere else?

Actually, in this case go be French somewhere else.  Fucking Napoleon supposedly lost the war.  We shouldn't have to still be hearing about his damned metric system.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 5:09:55 PM EDT
[#27]
Only rocket surgeons need metric, leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 5:11:09 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not really.

Try and use kg to compute Kinetic Energy and get back to us.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid.

There is nothing intuitive about US customary units.  The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life.  Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier.
Not really.

Try and use kg to compute Kinetic Energy and get back to us.
LOL.  Really?  You'd rather be working with pounds than kg when performing a calculation based on mass?

Try again.
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 7:45:33 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Only rocket surgeons need metric, leave the rest of us the fuck alone.
View Quote
The original question I posed was:  What do you see in them?

So...why do you like the U.S. system so much?
Link Posted: 12/3/2018 7:49:43 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Not really.

The difference between weight and mass in metric is just as confusing.

I can use any of them without even blinking.
View Quote
Well, in SI, mass is always (kilo)grams and weight is Newtons.  Depending on which kind of pounds you're talking about, you could be talking about mass or weight.
Link Posted: 12/4/2018 12:46:30 AM EDT
[#31]
It's been three pages and I have yet to see a convincing argument.  So I made this for all of you, that you may read it and be delivered.  You no longer have to dwell in the darkness of non-utilitarian inefficiency and ass-backwards conversions.  Behold!  You now have the ability to make previously complex tasks simple.

Now go, and be saved!

Link Posted: 12/15/2018 12:10:57 AM EDT
[#32]
The diameter of the Milky Way galaxy is 105,700.0834 lightyears.  That comes out to 1.000000000 zettameters (Zm).

I hereby declare that SI units are God's units.

DISCLAIMER:  
Link Posted: 12/15/2018 12:39:47 AM EDT
[#33]
I’ll tell you what. I do quite a bit of cooking/baking and holy fuck is it soo much nicer using a good quality kitchen scale I can setup in grams.   Fuck cups and floz etc
Link Posted: 12/15/2018 4:53:50 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."

It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Simplicity, conciseness, elegance...

Metric has one arbitrary unit:  The meter.  Liters and grams derive from this.
Nope. The Meter is defined as "The meter is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."

It is the Kilogram that is an arbitrary value.
The meter was originally one ten-millionth of the meridian between the North pole and the equator that passed though Paris, France.

It was latter redefined as an ARBITRARY number of cycles of a particular wavelength (color) of light.
Link Posted: 12/20/2018 9:11:40 PM EDT
[#35]
My degree in physics required me to work in both Imperial and SI units.  Never had any problems calculating in either one.  It's best to use whichever system your audience is most familiar with and is applicable.

If you really want to warp your mind, try figuring out how a 2x4 isn't really a 2x4 anymore, but was in the past.  Even worse, go see some old construction with real 2x4s and they will look weird to you.
Link Posted: 12/21/2018 5:04:20 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Well, in SI, mass is always (kilo)grams and weight is Newtons.  
View Quote
So your WEIGHT in the metric system is in Newtons?

Of course all those spring scales that rely on weight are calibrated in kilograms for body weight.  Not body mass.

Better leave them on earth.
Link Posted: 12/21/2018 5:29:23 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

So your WEIGHT in the metric system is in Newtons?

Of course all those spring scales that rely on weight are calibrated in kilograms for body weight.  Not body mass.

Better leave them on earth.
View Quote
Weight is a specialization of force.  SI measures force in Newtons.

Scales simply use weight to determine mass.  This possible so long as earth's gravity remains relatively constant.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:25:49 PM EDT
[#38]
Systems based on powers of 2 and 3 are more intuitive than systems based on powers of 10.

Draw a square on a piece of paper. Then draw lines to divide it into 10 equal area parts. It's a lot easier to divide it into halves, quarters, eights, sixteenths, or any power of two. Even twelfths is better.

SI is better for science and engineering. But 95% of the population will never need to know how many decagrams of deionized water there are in a cubic decimeter.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:27:36 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'd go for 10 hours in a day, 10 minutes in an hour, and 100 seconds in a minute.  But we should probably just have a day defined as a full rotation of the earth, and then millidays and so forth.

360 is evenly divisible by a great many things.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

While you're at it, can anyone present a rational, sane argument for having 60 seconds in a minute, and 60 minutes in an hour, and 24 hours in a day, as opposed to, say, 100 and 100 and 100?
I'd go for 10 hours in a day, 10 minutes in an hour, and 100 seconds in a minute.  But we should probably just have a day defined as a full rotation of the earth, and then millidays and so forth.

Quoted:

Or why there are 360 degrees in a circle?

Radians FTW...
360 is evenly divisible by a great many things.
12 is evenly divisible by more numbers than 10. And 16 is even better.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:37:25 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Its all really a moot point these days with computers, its mind numbingly easy to switch units these days.
One would think.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Climate_Orbiter
The fact that someone failed to do it does not mean it isn't easy.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:38:24 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yes, this is sound methodology.  Water is the most abundant substance by area on the planet and the most accessible liquid.

Specifially, the volume of one cubic meter was 1,000 liters, and the mass of one liter was 1,000 grams.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

You know that other parts of 'conventional' are based on weights of water.
Yes, this is sound methodology.  Water is the most abundant substance by area on the planet and the most accessible liquid.

Specifially, the volume of one cubic meter was 1,000 liters, and the mass of one liter was 1,000 grams.
Salt water, actually. But metric is based on pure water. Why is that?
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:41:53 PM EDT
[#42]
Ever notice that it's always the 10mm socket that's missing?

Over here in 'Merica land, we call that a clue. Metric is not to be trusted.

When that commie 10mm abandons it's post you slap a 7/16's socket on that fastener and ram it home. Waller it out be damned. We get things done round these parts.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:44:24 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Fahrenheit scale is objectively better for every day use as it gives a higher degree of precision to the range we work with most. Weather in most of the US fluctuates between 0 F and 100 F. That's 100 units with which to state the temperature. In Celsius, that ranges from -18 C to 38 C. That means they can only state average temperature with about half the precision of  the our system AND need to go negative to do it.

Also, for every high school physics teacher telling kids they need metric to work in STEM fields, there is a crusty Mechanical Engineering professor still giving all of his problems in slugs.  
View Quote
Exactly. 0 degrees F is fucking cold. 100 degrees F is fucking hot. more than 100 is really really hot. Fewer (less?) than 0 is really really cold.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:46:47 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance...

Metric has one arbitrary unit:  The meter.  Liters and grams derive from this.

All right, what's 34.23' + 5.67"?  Off the top of my head, I have no idea.

But 3.24m + 2.31cm + 5.11mm = 3.24m + 0.0231m + 0.00511m = 3.26821m or 326.821cm or 3,268.21mm or whatever.

I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.

In the U.S. Customary System, mass is measured in pounds.  In fact, in the United States, a pound is legally defined as 0.45359237kg.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Why the undying zeal for metric units?
Simplicity, conciseness, elegance...

Quoted:

Both are pretty much arbitrary,
Metric has one arbitrary unit:  The meter.  Liters and grams derive from this.

Quoted:

and you can always use decimal inches, decimal feet.
Machinists use decimal inches and surveyor use decimal feet all the time.
All right, what's 34.23' + 5.67"?  Off the top of my head, I have no idea.

But 3.24m + 2.31cm + 5.11mm = 3.24m + 0.0231m + 0.00511m = 3.26821m or 326.821cm or 3,268.21mm or whatever.

Quoted:

And even metric is generally screwed up by the users that think killogrqams is a weight.
Weight is in Newtons.
Mass id in kilograms.
I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.

Quoted:

In the most common US system weight is in pounds and mass is in slugs.
In the U.S. Customary System, mass is measured in pounds.  In fact, in the United States, a pound is legally defined as 0.45359237kg.
So when you say how much you weigh, do you answer 95 (or whatever) kilos? Or 1000 (or whatever) Newtons?
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:48:41 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Like that most cars are metric.
If I eyeball the size wrench I need, say 10mm and it is slightly too small, get a 11mm.
US measurement I would try a 3/8 and if it were slightly small do I go with 7/16 or 11/32.
How do I quickly visualize which is bigger, 7/16 or 11/32?
Much easier in metric, what is bigger, 10mm or 11mm?
View Quote
How many places on your car use an 11/32 wrench that you have ever actually loosened or tightened?
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:51:11 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid.

There is nothing intuitive about US customary units.  The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life.  Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

I suppose, but this isn't going to affect most people in day-to-day usage.  I prefer to think of Newtons as measuring force.
Try and compute kinetic energy using pounds (weight) and get back to use.

Weight is a force.
F=ma.

The a in this case is g (the acceleration of gravity).

m = F/g

In the US conventional system that unit is called a slug.

That the very definition of the pound has been expressed in kilograms does not make it correct.

It means an idiot confused a mass unit (kilograms) with a force unit (pounds).
If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid.

There is nothing intuitive about US customary units.  The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life.  Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier.
Do you know off the top of your head your weight in Newtons? I bet most people in the world don't.
Link Posted: 2/19/2019 3:51:58 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
LOL.  Really?  You'd rather be working with pounds than kg when performing a calculation based on mass?

Try again.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If the idiots that define the units can't even get it straight, one might call that a "sign" that your system of units is stupid.

There is nothing intuitive about US customary units.  The only reason it is "easier" to you is because you've used it all your life.  Virtually every facet of the metric system is objectively easier.
Not really.

Try and use kg to compute Kinetic Energy and get back to us.
LOL.  Really?  You'd rather be working with pounds than kg when performing a calculation based on mass?

Try again.
Who, other than STEM, needs to perform calculations based on mass?
Link Posted: 3/3/2019 11:30:20 PM EDT
[#48]
We are hamstrung by having 5 digits (normally) on each hand.
Link Posted: 4/8/2019 7:04:51 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

So when you say how much you weigh, do you answer 95 (or whatever) kilos? Or 1000 (or whatever) Newtons?
View Quote
Pffft. I just say "whatever 122 kg is in pounds."

Although now that you mention it, I'm going to start answering that question in Newtons just to sound like a flaming nerd.

"What, you wanted to know how much I weigh."

EDIT: I weigh 1,200 Newtons. but it's easier to just think of myself as weighing 1.2 kN. Looks much lighter that way.
Link Posted: 4/8/2019 7:08:37 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

How many places on your car use an 11/32 wrench that you have ever actually loosened or tightened?
View Quote
Oh no no no, now that wasn't his point at all.
Page / 4
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top