Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 1/27/2021 1:37:24 PM EDT
It seems that every gun control bill focuses at 10 rounds. Why not 8, 9 or 11? What is so magical about 10? Personally, the limit should be, well there shouldn't be a limit.

I seem to remember that 10 came from the lobbying  efforts of Bill Ruger. Bill didn't want to compete with all of the "new" polymer guns with 15 or 17 rounds as all of the Ruger's had 10 round mags. So good ol Bill used the power of legislation to cap it to 10 rounds.

Does anyone have any articles or info sources that speak to the subject?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:38:11 PM EDT
[#1]
Just retards who make rules with no knowledge. Simple as that.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:39:38 PM EDT
[#2]
They want us to all use 1911s or revolvers?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:39:41 PM EDT
[#3]
You expect government regulations to make sense?  Here's another one: Why are rifles limited to sixteen inches and shotguns eighteen?  Hint: it has to do with lobbying efforts by one of the most popular rifle manufacturers of the early twentieth century...
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:39:45 PM EDT
[#4]
VA's proposed bill last year was 12. IIRC NY's SAFE was 7 originally.

I think they roll a d20.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:40:16 PM EDT
[#5]
Don’t know. But I do know I will continue using 15, 17, 30, 40, 60 round mags. I’ll use a thousand round mag if I want. I’m done listening to their bullshit.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:40:41 PM EDT
[#6]
That excludes the majority of rimfires.   I'll bet the numbers on how many of those out there are insanely high.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:41:13 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Don’t know. But I do know I will continue using 15, 17, 30, 40, 60 round mags. I’ll use a thousand round mag if I want. I’m done listening to their bullshit.
View Quote

1000 round mag sounds interesting.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:41:39 PM EDT
[#8]
Just a guess, but maybe 10 is an easier pill to swallow than 5, which would come later, followed by 1 and finally 0.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:43:59 PM EDT
[#9]
Good point. Six rounds should be enough for any citizen. After all, law enforcement officers were well-served by revolvers for many years. Six rounds it is.

No...wait. Three rounds is enough. We can't place more importance on the lives of waterfowl than people. Three rounds it is.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:44:24 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

1000 round mag sounds interesting.
View Quote


I couldn't afford to feed it, much less own it, but damn if it shouldn't be available for purchase next to the hammers, screwdrivers, and nail guns.


Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:51:54 PM EDT
[#11]
10 fingers, high as they can count
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:55:08 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
10 fingers, high as they can count
View Quote

NY tried limiting magazines to 7 rounds but that was too much even for Cuomo...
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 1:58:08 PM EDT
[#13]
*click* @ counting
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:01:25 PM EDT
[#14]
Just get rid of magazines, make everything belt fed...
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:02:27 PM EDT
[#15]
Same reason we use base 10 numbers? 10 fingers on a human.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:02:46 PM EDT
[#16]
Because it is a nice, arbitrary number that is divisible by both 5 and 2. It will capriciously change to 5 once 10 is enacted.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:02:51 PM EDT
[#17]
10 was based on Ruger's statements way back when. Beyond that its meaningless except to create a new loophole to close with a lower amount. Once they can set the first arbitrary limit, the rest are easy.  NYC uses 5.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:03:25 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You expect government regulations to make sense?  Here's another one: Why are rifles limited to sixteen inches and shotguns eighteen?  Hint: it has to do with lobbying efforts by one of the most popular rifle manufacturers of the early twentieth century...
View Quote

What's the story?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:04:16 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Just a guess, but maybe 10 is an easier pill to swallow than 5, which would come later, followed by 1 and finally 0.
View Quote




Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:06:01 PM EDT
[#20]
Bill Ruger was so worried more people would buy a 17 round GLOCK instead of his 15 round P-series 9mm - that he actually liked the idea of legally limiting pistol magazine capacity to 15 rounds.

When the very idea of 10 round magazine restrictions became a thing - he hoped to curry favor from politicians by stating publicly that. "Real men only need 10 rounds."

ETA:  Correction, he said   "No honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun."

https://www.nhregister.com/connecticut/article/Magazine-limits-were-first-proposed-by-11435654.php
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:06:03 PM EDT
[#21]
Colorado law says 15 is the magic number


"arbitrary and capricious"
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:07:51 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You expect government regulations to make sense?  Here's another one: Why are rifles limited to sixteen inches and shotguns eighteen?  Hint: it has to do with lobbying efforts by one of the most popular rifle manufacturers of the early twentieth century...
View Quote

Rifles were originally 18" as well, the NFA was amended to allow 16" so surplus M1 carbines could be sold.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:09:32 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

NY tried limiting magazines to 7 rounds but that was too much even for Cuomo...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
10 fingers, high as they can count

NY tried limiting magazines to 7 rounds but that was too much even for Cuomo...


Pretty sure Cuomo signed off on it. A judge said 7 was arbitrary....but 10 isn’t?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:09:39 PM EDT
[#24]
I wonder how many 10rd pistol mags would fit in a custom cross chest bandolier rig?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:10:52 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
It seems that every gun control bill focuses at 10 rounds. Why not 8, 9 or 11? What is so magical about 10? Personally, the limit should be, well there shouldn't be a limit.

I seem to remember that 10 came from the lobbying  efforts of Bill Ruger. Bill didn't want to compete with all of the "new" polymer guns with 15 or 17 rounds as all of the Ruger's had 10 round mags. So good ol Bill used the power of legislation to cap it to 10 rounds.

Does anyone have any articles or info sources that speak to the subject?
View Quote


Ten is a nice round number, that also eliminates all double stack pistols of the 1980's. The democrat party sent out feelers about a 7rd limit, 6rd limit, and some sneaky bastards wanted a 5rd limit, which would have eliminated most revolvers (this was also the time that the democrats were focused on "saturday night specials" which were pretty much all handguns)

Bill Ruger, contrary to 87chans desire to defend democrats, had nothing to do with actual legislation, was trying to save his recently introduced P-series pistols by "compromising" at a 15rd limit. Now, his antics certainly were not helpful, but the combo of mag limits and feature bans was already set.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:11:21 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Same reason we use base 10 numbers? 10 fingers on a human.
View Quote


This. It's just a natural number for folks to latch onto
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:11:22 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Colorado law says 15 is the magic number


"arbitrary and capricious"
View Quote


Naw, can’t be just arbitrary...they’re just following the science, that’s the ticket, like social distancing-masks, climate, genders, etc (well, 2 out of 3)
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:12:06 PM EDT
[#28]
Even anti-gun shitpeople respect the SMLE.  
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:13:33 PM EDT
[#29]
Didn't the VA Tech killer use 10 round mags?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:14:30 PM EDT
[#30]
Because they plan on sending 20 commies.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:14:40 PM EDT
[#31]
Humans like round numbers. We use a base-10 number system, so 10 is a round number.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:15:00 PM EDT
[#32]
Because they think 10 rounds sounds "reasonable" to "most" people.

Once they get 10, they will push for 7, then 5 etc
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:15:19 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Didn't the VA Tech killer use 10 round mags?
View Quote

He did. So did the Parkland shooter.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:15:57 PM EDT
[#34]
The goal is zero rounds
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:24:41 PM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
It seems that every gun control bill focuses at 10 rounds. Why not 8, 9 or 11? What is so magical about 10? Personally, the limit should be, well there shouldn't be a limit.

I seem to remember that 10 came from the lobbying  efforts of Bill Ruger. Bill didn't want to compete with all of the "new" polymer guns with 15 or 17 rounds as all of the Ruger's had 10 round mags. So good ol Bill used the power of legislation to cap it to 10 rounds.

Does anyone have any articles or info sources that speak to the subject?
View Quote

Uhhm no. I know for a fact p98's came with 15 rounders.
Mini's did ship with 5's though.
I owned two p89's at one time.
Bill just liked the cock I think.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:35:58 PM EDT
[#36]
Because that is what most 22lr detatchable magazines hold.

That is the last one they plan to take away. They will just continue to chip away at all of them until thats all thats left. Yhen they will scoop up that one last.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:37:24 PM EDT
[#37]
After 10 round limit passes and 10 round mags are used in a shooting then they will push for 5 rounds.

Nobody needs 10 rounds to kill a deer!
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:39:01 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Just retards who make rules with no knowledge. Simple as that.
View Quote


This. And they think 10 is more palatable temporarily. They really want 1 or none.

I honestly think they don't realize 10 would neuter most modern semi-auto rifles and handguns.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:40:30 PM EDT
[#39]
It is a random number to use until the next, more restrictive law is passed.  Why 16" for an SBR or 18" for SBS?  Just pick a random number.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:41:00 PM EDT
[#40]
It's to set the stage for a subsequent bill with a 5 round limit, then the next one with a 1 round limit, then they'll find a way to do zero.

Not kidding.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:41:28 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

1000 round mag sounds interesting.
View Quote

And heavy
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:42:36 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Pretty sure Cuomo signed off on it. A judge said 7 was arbitrary....but 10 isn’t?
View Quote


NY law allowed you to own magazines capable of holding 10 rounds, but you were only allowed to actually load 7, which is pretty obviously ridiculously arbitrary.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:45:56 PM EDT
[#43]
Bill Ruger sure sounds like a winner, not...
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:47:46 PM EDT
[#44]
Because it inches them closer to their end goal number of zero.

Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:50:45 PM EDT
[#45]
https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/senate-bill/386/text
2-9-89

(26) The term `large-capacity magazine' means a box, drum or other container
 which holds more than ten rounds of ammunition to be fed continuously into
 a semiautomatic firearm, or a magazine which can be readily converted into
 a large-capacity magazine.

Notice the date. Ruger making an ass of himself happened after that date
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:52:44 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Just retards who make rules with no knowledge. Simple as that.
View Quote


Yep. Arbitrary based on their feelings just like everything else they do. No surprise.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:53:22 PM EDT
[#47]
What a dumb question.

I thought everybody knew you can't hurt somebody with the first ten rounds in a magazine. They're just noisemakers.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:55:13 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
10 fingers, high as they can count
View Quote

This is probably the truth.

I can count to 21 though.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:55:19 PM EDT
[#49]
It’s just a number and they can’t think of an actual reason.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 2:56:05 PM EDT
[#50]
Because feelings.  When the entire premise is flawed bullshit, i.e. there's no logical basis behind it, the only thing left is to make shit up.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top