Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 1/21/2021 3:11:32 PM EDT
As we all know, many on the right are now being labeled as domestic terrorist, for even something as simple as showing up to the Capitol on a specific date without otherwise breaking any laws. Many would argue that protesting is still protected by the 1st Amendment.

Some people, myself included, took an Oath to Defend the Constitution blah blah blah. We were forced to take this Oath by the Government we serve(d).
Some of the actions by those in charge, including members of law enforcement, are clearly not in accordance with the Constitution.

At what point does this Oath protect you from these violations? At what point could one legally consider a Politician a tyrant and not be criminally convicted of removing said tyrant by any means necessary?

I think this Oath many swore to uphold has no legal weight, thus offers nothing that could help. I might be wrong.


Lets assume that a group of Politicians wanted to abolish the 13th Ammendment, and no matter how hard the opposition fought through the soap box, ballot box and jury box, they could stop it. Would there ever be a time that it was legally acceptable for that group of Politicians to be forcefully made to stop consuming oxygen?
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:12:26 PM EDT
[#1]
When you win.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:12:27 PM EDT
[#2]
It would have to happen after the constitution actually had meaning again.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:12:43 PM EDT
[#3]
You didn’t really swear an oath to the constitution.  You swore an oath to your betters to do as they bid you to.  

It’s just a small misunderstanding on your part.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:13:20 PM EDT
[#4]
Oaths are only to hold you accountable
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:13:38 PM EDT
[#5]
If the Oath violates Constitutional Rights.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:16:09 PM EDT
[#6]
If you are truly innocent there is an answer but I believe this is a trap.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:16:13 PM EDT
[#7]
The only time an oath will protect you, is if your side wins.

When your side loses, all bets are off and everything is on the table.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:16:49 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When you win.
View Quote

FPNI

If you strike the king, don't miss.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:18:04 PM EDT
[#9]
Wizardali is that you???

Should I page the mod that banned you a couple of days ago??????
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:22:36 PM EDT
[#10]
"We were forced to take this Oath"

Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:24:15 PM EDT
[#11]
Being a member of a uniformed military would probably help you out if you're captured on a battlefield by a foreign power...
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:24:32 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:25:48 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
When you win.
View Quote


I think you are right.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:27:13 PM EDT
[#14]
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:27:38 PM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:27:40 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Being a member of a uniformed military would probably help you out if you're captured on a battlefield by a foreign power...
View Quote



Right, but what about the "AND DOMESTIC" part?
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:29:42 PM EDT
[#17]
wrong button
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:29:43 PM EDT
[#18]
Only when those in power over your sentencing agree that your actions were in accordance to you oath.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:30:38 PM EDT
[#19]
FPMFNI
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:32:24 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You think anyone with a (D) after their name gives a flying fuck about the Constitution and our laws?

How quaint.
View Quote


Well, to be fair, not many of the people with the (R)'s after their name seem to care either apparently.

I think the the Rep./Sen. part is the greater issue.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:42:56 PM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:44:57 PM EDT
[#22]
Oaths go back to simpler times when people thought breaking an Oath had repercussions for their soul.  People are secular these days and DGAF about such things anymore.

Basically they are nothing more than a ritual these days.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:45:52 PM EDT
[#23]
FPNI.

Uncanny.
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 3:51:16 PM EDT
[#24]
What is the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist?
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 4:18:16 PM EDT
[#25]
Link Posted: 1/21/2021 4:42:01 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Oaths go back to simpler times when people thought breaking an Oath had repercussions for their soul.  People are secular these days and DGAF about such things anymore.

Basically they are nothing more than a ritual these days.
View Quote


This is along the lines of something I wanted to say, but couldn't figure out how to say it.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top