Utah woman 'humiliated' after being ordered by judge to hand over her NUDE 'boudoir album' to ex-husband in divorce - and she now plans to hold a 'burning party' to destroy it after handing over edited copy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11253379/Utah-woman-ordered-judge-hand-NUDE-boudoir-album-ex-husband-memorys-sake.html

A Utah woman has told of her shock at being ordered by a judge to hand over a photo album of her 'boudoir style' nude photos to her ex-husband, after he requested them as part of their divorce.
Lindsay Marsh said that she commissioned the photos in the early years of her marriage, and wrote 'loving' and intimate messages to him inside the album.
But, when she filed for divorce in April 2021 after 25 years together, her ex-husband Chris Marsh said that he wanted to keep the album, for the memories.

'It's violating and it's incredibly embarrassing and humiliating,' she said.
'The only way I can hopefully protect someone else from going through the same situation is to tell my story and expose that these are the types of things that he thinks are OK.'

Marsh said she was shocked when her ex requested the book of photos, and protested.
But Judge Michael Edwards, sitting in the 2nd district court, sided with her ex-husband.
As a gesture, he said Marsh should take the book back to the original photographer, and have a copy made, with her body edited out.
Marsh went to the photographer, but the photographer refused, arguing that the images were art which should not be altered.

The judge then ruled, in August this year, that Marsh must hand the album to a third party, who would themselves edit the images.
'That person is to do whatever it takes to modify the pages of the pictures so that any photographs of [Lindsay Marsh] in lingerie or that sort of thing or even without clothing are obscured and taken out,' he wrote in a ruling shared with The Salt Lake Tribune.
'But the words are maintained for memory's sake.'

Marsh said the thought of handing the book over to a stranger was even more traumatic, and rang the judge's clerk to ensure she hadn't misunderstood the ruling.
'I just want to clarify,' she recalled saying. 'The judge has ordered me to give nude photos of my body to a third party that I don't know without my consent?'

Lindsay Marsh is legally required to keep the originals until December, in case her ex objects to any of the edits.
She then plans to hold a burning party, and throw them into the fire.
'It's going to be amazing,' she said.

Chris Marsh told The Tribune the books were full of memories, inscriptions and photos, stressing they were not 'inappropriate-type books.'

Attached File

Attached File

Attached File

We live in a fucked up world.

I want to pop that dude in the face, just by the looks of him. DGAF about his ex-wife or the book. Punch.

They were a gift to him. He should have it unedited.

So it was given to him as a gift.

Kind of like those engagement rings the woman gets to keep.

Ill be the third party for that silver fox

I’d keep pictures of her.

That said, if you don’t want nude photos of yourself going places you don’t want, don’t take any.

Shes so outraged that DM somehow was easily able to find other revealing pics of her!

Wow, for once I agree with the chick.

What a bizarre story.  

Apparently the inscriptions and the words are what were ordered to remain and the photos can be edited out.  Can't just make copies of the words and put them in their own book?

She may be concerned he's wanting to keep them so he can use them in some sort of revenge fashion.  Surely he's not so whipped that he's making a fool of himself fighting to keep them.  

Hahahaha

And when will these be leaked on the inter webs? For research purposes only…

This right here. One ugly lookin' sumbitch.

.
the husband or the judge?

both pics seem to qualify
.

Someone should introduce that guy to internet porn.....no need to keep pictures of the ex.

Nice tits for an old hag. I want the album.

This

OP knows the rules and did his one job.

Husband looks like he would rather have "boudoir" pics of the judge.

He already has the photos. He wants the book so he can wank to both.

Possibly the most punchable face I have ever seen.
Dude just looks like a fuckin' creep.

I bet she was smokin in her younger years.

I would never keep an engagement ring if the marriage never happened.  Looks like it's considered a conditional gift most of the time and the law sides with returning it in most states.  

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/returning-engagement-ring-30198.html?utm_campaign=cj_affiliate_sale&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_source=cj&utm_content=5250933&utm_term=12360908&cjevent=001401993e6d11ed806b55370a1c0e0e&PCN=Microsoft+Shopping+%28Bing+Rebates%2C+Coupons%2C+etc.%29&PID=100357191&CID=5250933&cjdata=MXxOfDB8WXww

That is my take. She gave him the album freely--in fact made it just for him--and thus it became his property, I would think, right then and there.

Where do you think they're headed?

She has a vagina between her boobies?

But most importantly, how many thousands of dollars did a couple of lawyers make litigating over a photo album?  

One complete

Article title is intentionally misleading.  She was not ordered to hand over a nude album to her ex-husband.

"The judge then ruled, in August this year, that Marsh must hand the album to a third party, who would themselves edit the images.
'That person is to do whatever it takes to modify the pages of the pictures so that any photographs of [Lindsay Marsh] in lingerie or that sort of thing or even without clothing are obscured and taken out,' he wrote in a ruling shared with The Salt Lake Tribune.
'But the words are maintained for memory's sake.' "

I have no idea why a guy would want to go through a court process to basically keep some love notes, from a woman whom no longer loves him.  What's he going to do, sit around and read them...remembering "when"?

She is allowed to edit her body out?  Seems to be a bit of click bait fake news. Nice body though.

Ex and judge are creepy ass crackers.

An ex once demanded her nude pics I had retained because "she didn't want them to turn up somewhere else."

I grudgingly complied. I had the negatives as well so I just had them reprinted after a few weeks. She wasn't the sharpest pencil.

First I was like



but then I was like



but then I was like



but I was really like

Holy fuck
Holy fucking fuck
Her body is absurd

The ex husband bares a resemblance to David Chipman

Looks like you win the internet for correctness.

i spy an under boob chandelier

If I print a picture of something - anything - my hairy chest or a rock in the yard - and give it to someone, does it not become their property?

Aren't courts supposed to protect property rights, as their most basic function?

Are gifts given in the context of marriage revocable if the marriage fails?

Divorce in Utah is a dice roll. It’s almost like they make it up as they go.

She divorced him…… Wonder why?  

I am literally looking forward to death. This shit has gotten too crazy for me. I'm over all of this.

Nothing I read in this world makes sense anymore.

Looks like the photo above might have been a while ago or on a better day.



ETA: Or touched up.

Husband, wife, and the Judge all look creepy and made of plastic.

I suspect he demanded it to embarrass her by making her nudie album a subject of discussion in court.  And she took the bait by fighting it.  They are both idiots.

Tattoo in between tits, do not want.

Considering the photos either she turned over to the media for the story or they got through fair use from her public postings I highly doubt she's embarrassed about any of it.  

Whole thing is weird and stupid.