Quote History Quoted:
Is the plastic media sufficient for production of mags?
It would need to be ridged and resistant to heat from the action.
View Quote
Barely good enough for range mags.
There are different types of plastic used to produce commonly available things. One big distinction is thermoset and thermoplastic. By the very nature of how 3D printing works, the filament is the type of plastic you can melt and reshape and it'll harden and cool down. You can repeatedly heat it and let it cool to harden.
Now go pick up any rugged quality plastic AR accessory and try to heat it to the point of melting. It will burn and turn into a smelly smoke but it will not soften up. This thermoset plastic is what you'd want to print your magazines out of, but you can't due to 3D printers using thermoplastic.
On top of that, many rugged plastic items like protective cases, shells, housings, magazines, AR grips, and other things which require strength are reinforced with fiberglass. A certain percent of fiberglass is added to the plastic while it is still gooey. When it cools and dries, the fiberglass makes the plastic stronger. this sort of fiberglass reinforcement is not available for 3D printer filament.
And then theres the part where 3D printing inherently creates weak sections. All those thousands of points where the layers are stuck together are weaker than solid plastic. Think of them like wood grain. When you break a board, it wants to break along the grain. When you print a part, it will be easier to break at the layers. I'm not saying you cannot design and print a magazine that will function. I'm saying that it would just be a "look what i did" project. Your printed magazine would not be 1/10 as sturdy as the cheapest and shittiest promag ever made.