User Panel
Quoted: And contrary to his grandiose opinion of himself, he is NOT Carl Sagan The remake of the original Cosmos was a disgraceful parody of a masterpiece. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzS39oghcnY View Quote Carl Sagan was a better Red than Dead commie sympathizer who knowingly promoted the fiction of nuclear winter. |
|
|
Quoted: Carl Sagan was a better Red than Dead commie sympathizer who knowingly promoted the fiction of nuclear winter. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And contrary to his grandiose opinion of himself, he is NOT Carl Sagan The remake of the original Cosmos was a disgraceful parody of a masterpiece. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzS39oghcnY Carl Sagan was a better Red than Dead commie sympathizer who knowingly promoted the fiction of nuclear winter. Sadly, most of the people in that field are hardcore leftists (my relative included). They are smart as fuck but brainwashed by the academic community. |
|
The steak-umm name is vaguely familiar, but after this and the posting of the ingredient list, I'm going to have to seek them out.
Well done Steak-Umm! Well done! But reserve the right to change that to medium rare. |
|
|
Science deemed the negroid race inferior just 80 years ago. The Science is settled!
|
|
Quoted: And they're right. This "believe the science" idiocy is spouted only by people who don't know the first thing about what "science" is. It's a method, not a result. They're the same people that spew out stuff like "only a theory" because they don't know what one of those is either. The scientific method is the only way that what is true can be discovered but the part nincompoops won't admit to themselves is, it takes a long time to get there and on the way all we will ever have is a model which can be tested. Thinking scientifically is as much about maintaining detached skepticism as it is about employing skillful deductive reasoning or measuring things with great precision. View Quote I disagree. The "believe the science" people and "it's only a theory" people are on opposite ends of the same spectrum. One side requires faith in science. No questions, zero skepticism. The other side requires you to reject science. No discussions, 100% skepticism. Ultimately, both sides require zero critical examination, because the conclusions dovetail nicely with or are at odds with, they're pre-existing world views. |
|
Science IS true.
We just don't know it yet, perhaps - whatever a particular "truth" is, I mean. And surely, NDT knows the scientific method; what it is/is not and what it proves/does not. Too bad he's really just a paid shill now, as opposed to an unbiased scientist on a quest for "truth". |
|
Quoted: Is this theory factually true? We know it is not. However, it was useful because it made successful predictions. UNLIKE, say, the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming. View Quote Outstanding. Tyson and Sagan were proponents of the same epistemically incompetent faith. Asserting metaphysical materialism is not the same as an explanation of the material sciences. |
|
|
I kinda like this tweet from NGT:
Neil deGrasse Tyson @neiltyson In the past 48hrs, the USA horrifically lost 34 people to mass shootings. On average, across any 48hrs, we also lose… 500 to Medical errors 300 to the Flu 250 to Suicide 200 to Car Accidents 40 to Homicide via Handgun Often our emotions respond more to spectacle than to data. 1:58 PM · Aug 4, 2019 |
|
Quoted: And they're right. This "believe the science" idiocy is spouted only by people who don't know the first thing about what "science" is. It's a method, not a result. They're the same people that spew out stuff like "only a theory" because they don't know what one of those is either. The scientific method is the only way that what is true can be discovered but the part nincompoops won't admit to themselves is, it takes a long time to get there and on the way all we will ever have is a model which can be tested. Thinking scientifically is as much about maintaining detached skepticism as it is about employing skillful deductive reasoning or measuring things with great precision. View Quote Why I have always considered Neil a fraud. |
|
Quoted: One of my relatives is well respected in that science community. Tyson is viewed as a clown. Sagan (who he met numerous times) was the real deal. View Quote At times even Carl was a legend in his own mind, more and more of a tv personality than a real scientist. His simplistic arguments about nuclear global winter and failed predictions of global cooling from all the well fires after gulf war I undermined his reputation. He was a super pot smoker as well. |
|
Quoted: Sadly, most of the people in that field are hardcore leftists (my relative included). They are smart as fuck but brainwashed by the academic community. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: And contrary to his grandiose opinion of himself, he is NOT Carl Sagan The remake of the original Cosmos was a disgraceful parody of a masterpiece. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzS39oghcnY Carl Sagan was a better Red than Dead commie sympathizer who knowingly promoted the fiction of nuclear winter. Sadly, most of the people in that field are hardcore leftists (my relative included). They are smart as fuck but brainwashed by the academic community. Leftist intelligentsia are ever so pious - are they doing real science, or confirming their bias? |
|
And.... just like that.
My Wife: I'm headed to the store, need anything? Me: Go ahead and get a cart full of Steak-Umms. Drop most of it off at the homeless shelter, but save a few boxes for the dogs. |
|
sad when Steak-Umms sandwich meats brand owns the intellectual argument in this country..
|
|
Good thing I stocked up on steak-umms earlier
Now if only I could find a half-decent roll out here to make a sandwich with |
|
World: You're going to have a hard time finding employment with a degree in ancient philosophy.
Me: lands job as steak-umm social media rep. |
|
As strange as it feels to type this out, Steam-Umm's is actually correct here.
|
|
Quoted: Leftist intelligentsia are ever so pious - are they doing real science, or confirming their bias? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: And contrary to his grandiose opinion of himself, he is NOT Carl Sagan The remake of the original Cosmos was a disgraceful parody of a masterpiece. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzS39oghcnY Carl Sagan was a better Red than Dead commie sympathizer who knowingly promoted the fiction of nuclear winter. Sadly, most of the people in that field are hardcore leftists (my relative included). They are smart as fuck but brainwashed by the academic community. Leftist intelligentsia are ever so pious - are they doing real science, or confirming their bias? Astro physics is just math. So there isn't much room for bias. |
|
Haven't had them for years. Was my Ma's substitute for a real cheesesteak on a busy day in PA. My kids have never had them but that will change this week.
|
|
View Quote Too easy |
|
|
There are a bunch of "tweets" missing, is it Steak Umms tweets ?
|
|
|
|
Quoted: And they're right. This "believe the science" idiocy is spouted only by people who don't know the first thing about what "science" is. It's a method, not a result. They're the same people that spew out stuff like "only a theory" because they don't know what one of those is either. The scientific method is the only way that what is true can be discovered but the part nincompoops won't admit to themselves is, it takes a long time to get there and on the way all we will ever have is a model which can be tested. Thinking scientifically is as much about maintaining detached skepticism as it is about employing skillful deductive reasoning or measuring things with great precision. View Quote Believe nature. Science only knows as much as the last peer reviewed journal. And those can be fooled by computer generated papers. Kharn |
|
Quoted: Astro physics is just math. So there isn't much room for bias. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: And contrary to his grandiose opinion of himself, he is NOT Carl Sagan The remake of the original Cosmos was a disgraceful parody of a masterpiece. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzS39oghcnY Carl Sagan was a better Red than Dead commie sympathizer who knowingly promoted the fiction of nuclear winter. Sadly, most of the people in that field are hardcore leftists (my relative included). They are smart as fuck but brainwashed by the academic community. Leftist intelligentsia are ever so pious - are they doing real science, or confirming their bias? Astro physics is just math. So there isn't much room for bias. Remember that space guy a few years back who wore a '50's style pinup shirt (a gift from a female friend) at some 'big news everyone' conference and got mega cancelled? That poor guy. |
|
Fuck NDT. He's wrong on Pluto, he's wrong on Star Wars droid designs, and he's wrong here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.