User Panel
[#1]
Quoted: A sane person would never think it's ok to murder their neighbors, regardless of their sanity. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Sane people can have insane neighbors. If you don't know that, hope you never discover it first hand. A sane person would never think it's ok to murder their neighbors, regardless of their sanity. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying |
|
[#3]
Quoted: Video seems to be gone? Anywhere else to view it? View Quote The link in the original post is to the poster's feed, not the video. If you scroll up in that feed, the video is still there. This link might work: https://t.me/NineMilSMG/237 |
|
[#4]
Quoted: Not so sure about that. Communists want to(and will given the chance) murder their Non-Communist neighbors. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Sane people can have insane neighbors. If you don't know that, hope you never discover it first hand. A sane person would never think it's ok to murder their neighbors, regardless of their sanity. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying Agreed. I actually applaud the battered woman for finally cutting the cancerous abuser out of society when she was driven to taking his life. It really is too bad the law makes it so she has to go through a torturous process thorough enough to satisfy our LEGAL system to make that happen instead of doing what needs to be done after the first time he beats her to within an inch of her life. There are more examples of how normally sane people are driven to take the life of another like: the husband / father / brother of a rape victim after the LEGAL system gives the rapist a slap on the wrist. |
|
[#5]
Quoted: The link in the original post is to the poster's feed, not the video. If you scroll up in that feed, the video is still there. This link might work: https://t.me/NineMilSMG/237 View Quote Thanks. Yup, brutal. |
|
[#6]
Quoted: Not so sure about that. Communists want to(and will given the chance) murder their Non-Communist neighbors. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying View Quote So your argument is that communists who want to murder non-communist neighbors are sane? Interesting position. |
|
[#7]
|
|
[#8]
Quoted: So your argument is that communists who want to murder non-communist neighbors are sane? Interesting position. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Not so sure about that. Communists want to(and will given the chance) murder their Non-Communist neighbors. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying So your argument is that communists who want to murder non-communist neighbors are sane? Interesting position. That's not what I said and you damn well know it. Next time, include the entire quote tree. |
|
[#9]
Quoted: That's not what I said and you damn well know it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Not so sure about that. Communists want to(and will given the chance) murder their Non-Communist neighbors. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying So your argument is that communists who want to murder non-communist neighbors are sane? Interesting position. That's not what I said and you damn well know it. I would argue that by conventional definitions, they are in fact sane. They know what their goals are and are taking logical steps to achieve those goals. Now, those goals are certainly abhorrent in a free society where people respect each other and can have philisophical differences that are also respected, but these people do in fact know what they are proposing and do know the difference between right and wrong. |
|
[#10]
Quoted: I would argue that by conventional definitions, they are in fact sane. They know what their goals are and are taking logical steps to achieve those goals. Now, those goals are certainly abhorrent in a free society where people respect each other and can have philisophical differences that are also respected, but these people do in fact know what they are proposing and do know the difference between right and wrong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Not so sure about that. Communists want to(and will given the chance) murder their Non-Communist neighbors. Survival might require a preemptive strike when the shirt starts flying So your argument is that communists who want to murder non-communist neighbors are sane? Interesting position. That's not what I said and you damn well know it. I would argue that by conventional definitions, they are in fact sane. They know what their goals are and are taking logical steps to achieve those goals. Now, those goals are certainly abhorrent in a free society where people respect each other and can have philisophical differences that are also respected, but these people do in fact know what they are proposing and do know the difference between right and wrong. |
|
[#11]
I am curious what the bunched panties crowd thinks of the battered wives killing husbands in their sleep, etc.
|
|
[#12]
|
|
[#13]
Quoted: I want to threaten and bully people with no repercussions? No, I am polite to a fault. I understand perfectly fine that if you threaten violence toward others they might pull out a gun and shoot you. This guy safely went back into his home, came back out with a handgun shot two people, safely went back into his home, went back out with a rifle and executed them when they posed no threat. My issue is you said "He did nothing wrong". View Quote Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. |
|
[#14]
|
|
[#15]
Quoted: Famous Type 3 Assholes In History Adolph Hitler Unrepentant Thief On The Cross with Christ Pharaoh of Egypt Ramses II Thomas Beckett Stalin Pol Pot Che Guevara Jack The Ripper Jim Bakker John McCain Mitt Romney Lyndon Johnson Barbara Bush Jane Fonda Nancy Pelosi Green River Killer Richard Ramirez (Nightstalker) The Reverend Jim Jones David Koresh Vasily Blokhin Rasputin Mao All North Korean leaders named "Kim" something Why would you put Thomas Beckett on that list? View Quote |
|
[#16]
Quoted: Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I want to threaten and bully people with no repercussions? No, I am polite to a fault. I understand perfectly fine that if you threaten violence toward others they might pull out a gun and shoot you. This guy safely went back into his home, came back out with a handgun shot two people, safely went back into his home, went back out with a rifle and executed them when they posed no threat. My issue is you said "He did nothing wrong". Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? |
|
[#17]
Quoted: I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I want to threaten and bully people with no repercussions? No, I am polite to a fault. I understand perfectly fine that if you threaten violence toward others they might pull out a gun and shoot you. This guy safely went back into his home, came back out with a handgun shot two people, safely went back into his home, went back out with a rifle and executed them when they posed no threat. My issue is you said "He did nothing wrong". Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? Your constant what if's and why's are repetitive, and irrelevant. No one here has ESP, so we cannot know for certain what was in the mind of the shooter. |
|
[#18]
Quoted: Your constant what if's and why's are repetitive, and irrelevant. No one here has ESP, so we cannot know for certain what was in the mind of the shooter. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I want to threaten and bully people with no repercussions? No, I am polite to a fault. I understand perfectly fine that if you threaten violence toward others they might pull out a gun and shoot you. This guy safely went back into his home, came back out with a handgun shot two people, safely went back into his home, went back out with a rifle and executed them when they posed no threat. My issue is you said "He did nothing wrong". Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? Your constant what if's and why's are repetitive, and irrelevant. No one here has ESP, so we cannot know for certain what was in the mind of the shooter. What if's and why's? On video we see him go back into his house and come out with a pistol and shoot two people. Perhaps he felt threatened enough by their demeanor and words to think his life was in danger. Alright, I can understand that and maybe see his justification. But then he goes back into his home and comes out with a different gun and puts anchor shots to people laying in the street bleeding to death. And you think that's okay because we don't know what he was his mindset was? The fact that he shot himself in the head afterward lends me to think he knew he did something wrong. |
|
[#19]
Quoted: What if's and why's? On video we see him go back into his house and come out with a pistol and shoot two people. Perhaps he felt threatened enough by their demeanor and words to think his life was in danger. Alright, I can understand that and maybe see his justification. But then he goes back into his home and comes out with a different gun and puts anchor shots to people laying in the street bleeding to death. And you think that's okay because we don't know what he was his mindset was? The fact that he shot himself in the head afterward lends me to think he knew he did something wrong. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I want to threaten and bully people with no repercussions? No, I am polite to a fault. I understand perfectly fine that if you threaten violence toward others they might pull out a gun and shoot you. This guy safely went back into his home, came back out with a handgun shot two people, safely went back into his home, went back out with a rifle and executed them when they posed no threat. My issue is you said "He did nothing wrong". Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? Your constant what if's and why's are repetitive, and irrelevant. No one here has ESP, so we cannot know for certain what was in the mind of the shooter. What if's and why's? On video we see him go back into his house and come out with a pistol and shoot two people. Perhaps he felt threatened enough by their demeanor and words to think his life was in danger. Alright, I can understand that and maybe see his justification. But then he goes back into his home and comes out with a different gun and puts anchor shots to people laying in the street bleeding to death. And you think that's okay because we don't know what he was his mindset was? The fact that he shot himself in the head afterward lends me to think he knew he did something wrong. All we know is that he seemed to be an intelligent person. As an intelligent person, he knew that once he shot them with the pistol, his life as a free person was over. Right or wrong has nothing to do with it. Once he started down that path, he was committed. Since he wasn’t carrying a reload, he went in the house and grabbed more gun. He finished what he started. Nothing complicated on the video. He snapped. They asked for it and he gave it to them. As an intelligent person, he chose to not live in a cage for the rest of his life, while those two scum bags continue to breathe. I don’t condone what he did. I merely accept what he did as a likely reaction to being verbally abused and physically threatened. |
|
[#20]
The entire video is unbelievable. Especially how the woman is still mouthing off and waving her hand while the dude was shooting at her husband. What a very strange and disturbing event.
|
|
[#21]
Quoted: Quoted: Famous Type 3 Assholes In History Adolph Hitler Unrepentant Thief On The Cross with Christ Pharaoh of Egypt Ramses II Thomas Beckett Stalin Pol Pot Che Guevara Jack The Ripper Jim Bakker John McCain Mitt Romney Lyndon Johnson Barbara Bush Jane Fonda Nancy Pelosi Green River Killer Richard Ramirez (Nightstalker) The Reverend Jim Jones David Koresh Vasily Blokhin Rasputin Mao All North Korean leaders named "Kim" something Why would you put Thomas Beckett on that list? Did Henry II write the list? |
|
[#22]
Quoted: The entire video is unbelievable. Especially how the woman is still mouthing off and waving her hand while the dude was shooting at her husband. What a very strange and disturbing event. View Quote Yes, all three were whackadoodles. Very bizarre and tragic over fucking snow that will melt. Numb nuts shooter should get over bad words off his property. If they trespass and make threats then maybe different. But they were on their own property and public street. The couple ranting were out of control. Even after he starts shooting they keep at it and try to record it?! FFS. Our society has lost so much sense of basic civility. What did they hope to accomplish other than to anger the neighbor? Either party could have de-escalated. All chose to lurch over the cliff into the abyss. |
|
[#23]
Quoted: I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? View Quote They weren't a threat before he shot them. They were yelling in the street. |
|
[#24]
To summarize the lessons learned here. DON"T BE AN ASSHOLE. There may well be someone who has just had enough of your assholish behavior that nothing else matters to them anymore than stopping it. Not being an asshole is always the better course of action and has a much higher probability of achieving better outcomes in all facets of life.
|
|
[#25]
Quoted: A sane person would never think it's ok to murder their neighbors, regardless of their sanity. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Sane people can have insane neighbors. If you don't know that, hope you never discover it first hand. A sane person would never think it's ok to murder their neighbors, regardless of their sanity. Mental illness, much like many other illnesses, can be communicable in some cases. This is one. |
|
[#26]
Quoted: Why would you put Thomas Beckett on that list? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Famous Type 3 Assholes In History Adolph Hitler ... Thomas Beckett Stalin ... All North Korean leaders named "Kim" something Why would you put Thomas Beckett on that list? From WIkipedia: "A rift grew between Henry and Becket as the new archbishop resigned his chancellorship and sought to recover and extend the rights of the archbishopric. This led to a series of conflicts with the King, including that over the jurisdiction of secular courts over English clergymen, which accelerated antipathy between Becket and the king. Attempts by Henry to influence the other bishops against Becket began in Westminster in October 1163, where the King sought approval of the traditional rights of the royal government in regard to the church.[1] This led to the Constitutions of Clarendon, where Becket was officially asked to agree to the King's rights or face political repercussions." Basically, he was asserting that he and the Catholic Church were above the law, (sound familiar?), and kept pushing it until he talked himself into getting assassinated - kinda like the dumpster defender and the snow shovelers. |
|
[#27]
Quoted: They weren't a threat before he shot them. They were yelling in the street. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? They weren't a threat before he shot them. They were yelling in the street. They were yelling threats, and throwing tools. You really need to up your posting game. |
|
[#28]
Quoted: I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I want to threaten and bully people with no repercussions? No, I am polite to a fault. I understand perfectly fine that if you threaten violence toward others they might pull out a gun and shoot you. This guy safely went back into his home, came back out with a handgun shot two people, safely went back into his home, went back out with a rifle and executed them when they posed no threat. My issue is you said "He did nothing wrong". Pits that kill and mutilate people pose no threat, up until they eat their first toddler? I'm not disagreeing with your point, just your logic. You have a neighbor standing in the street screaming for the world to hear he's going to kick your ass and make your life hell...... warrant lethal force, legally? Of course not. "No threat"? You're splitting hairs to justify your position. I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? What did he have to lose at that point? What did he have to gain? I think at that point he had nothing to lose and accomplished his goal. The cost was probably going to be the same at that point if we went back for another gun or stopped. |
|
[#29]
Quoted: I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? View Quote They were still going to be threats had he left them alive. |
|
[#30]
|
|
[#31]
Quoted: I said they weren't a threat after he had already shot them with a pistol. That woman bleeding out in the middle of the street posed such imminent danger to him he had leave his home with a rifle, approach her, and shoot her point blank? View Quote When it comes to him returning, the historical build up of the conflict was likely the deciding factor, and the end of his tale that day was going to be the same regardless of the anchor shots or not, so as others have said....in for a penny, in for a pound. |
|
[#32]
Quoted: The fact that he shot himself in the head afterward lends me to think he knew he did something wrong. View Quote Legally yes, there is no doubt that finding a legal justification based on current laws would be damn near impossible if not impossible. ( I leave the very remote possibility of a jury acquittal just because it's theoretically possible 8^) I don't think there are too many arguing the "legality" of the actions, perhaps a couple of 'hair splitters' like yerself that want to argue fringe 'what ifs' |
|
[#33]
Is that audio real? WTF?
It'd be better if they had Maine accents. |
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
Long running feud...Now I get it. I've been living near someone whose presence I can barely tolerate and then one day
I woke up and trained my mind to focus on other things, takes a lot of will power and focus but it can be done. Thats a tragedy right there. |
|
[#37]
Quoted: Just finding out about this. Damn, that husband wife team was a real piece of work. Sounds like they've been pushing that guys buttons for a long time. Kinda fucked up to make work for someone else, call them names and threaten them when asked not to do that. I wonder what the shooter did to provoke them though? Is all he did was complain about their snow sholveling? Did he pile snow on them too? Just by the verbal abuse dished out by the wife/husband leads me to believe they were bullies. If theres anything a bully finally learns is the little guy is going to snap some day. https://media1.tenor.com/images/f6787ee7b96afc1a01b2154c6495ebfd/tenor.gif?itemid=16671360 View Quote The answers you seek |
|
[#38]
Still no employment information about the Goys. I believe they were moochers and assholes and they got exactly what they deserved they asked for this.
|
|
[#39]
Quoted: The entire video is unbelievable. Especially how the woman is still mouthing off and waving her hand while the dude was shooting at her husband. What a very strange and disturbing event. View Quote |
|
[#40]
Quoted: We can look at this as a horrible double murder that shocks the conscience ... or, instead, look at it as a celebration of Goy's lives. By all accounts, they died doing what they loved. Can we not find some solace in that? I mean, say what you want about the tenets of being asshole neighbors, at least it's an ethos. View Quote Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
|
[#41]
Quoted: The answers you seek View Quote Well then, lol, fuck the goys. The worlds a better place now. Its to bad the shooter snapped the way he did. He coulda used that engineer brain of his and Ken McElroy'd them both at a later time. By the sounds of it someone would have eventually. |
|
[#42]
I bet the Goys drove with their high beams always on and didn't use turn signals.
|
|
[#43]
A few hundred years ago, no one would bat an eye at this.
Nowadays, the shooter has to be "insane" to have killed the bully/loud-mouths - the people who got off on berating and antagonizing others, probably their whole lives (and got away with it until they didn't). I respectably submit that Homo Sapiens have not evolved into a more civilized species, but (the majority) have been conditioned to be more docile - and, once in awhile, when properly stimulated, our inner-primative-savage is unleashed. I empathize with the shooter and, although I'd like to think I wouldn't have responded as he did, I feel sorry he felt the need to end his own life after taking out the trash. That's the real tragedy to this story, IMHO. In a truly just world, his neighbors would have celebrated, thrown a party in his honor and the town mayor would've pinned a medal on his chest. That would send a powerful message to other would-be thugs and bullies. Of that you can be sure. |
|
[#44]
|
|
[#45]
Quoted: Well then, lol, fuck the goys. The worlds a better place now. Its to bad the shooter snapped the way he did. He coulda used that engineer brain of his and Ken McElroy'd them both at a later time. By the sounds of it someone would have eventually. View Quote He should have fucked with them 4chan style. That would have provided many hours of entertainment. Then again, he probably knew that any anonymous revenge he dished out would only be transferred to the treatment of their special needs kid and other innocents so instead he let the fire inside burn until it broke him. |
|
[#46]
Quoted: A few hundred years ago, no one would bat an eye at this. Nowadays, the shooter has to be "insane" to have killed the bully/loud-mouths - the people who got off on berating and antagonizing others, probably their whole lives (and got away with it until they didn't). I respectably submit that Homo Sapiens have not evolved into a more civilized species, but (the majority) have been conditioned to be more docile - and, once in awhile, when properly stimulated, our inner-primative-savage is unleashed. I empathize with the shooter and, although I'd like to think I wouldn't have responded as he did, I feel sorry he felt the need to end his own life after taking out the trash. That's the real tragedy to this story, IMHO. In a truly just world, his neighbors would have celebrated, thrown a party in his honor and the town mayor would've pinned a medal on his chest. That would send a powerful message to other would-be thugs and bullies. Of that you can be sure. View Quote Imho he probably had good parents that raised him to be a decent and good person and shielded him from the dregs of society. Then when the dregs of society moved in across the street and started fucking with him, he had no idea what to do about it. So the pressure started building....... |
|
[#47]
Quoted: The entire video is unbelievable. Especially how the woman is still mouthing off and waving her hand while the dude was shooting at her husband. What a very strange and disturbing event. View Quote That said, how long have they been fucking with the shooter? This didn't occur overnight. That was months or even years of rage coming out at once... There's a hell of a lot more to this story, and I have a feeling that no party was anywhere near innocent. |
|
[#48]
Quoted: A few hundred years ago, no one would bat an eye at this. Nowadays, the shooter has to be "insane" to have killed the bully/loud-mouths - the people who got off on berating and antagonizing others, probably their whole lives (and got away with it until they didn't). I respectably submit that Homo Sapiens have not evolved into a more civilized species, but (the majority) have been conditioned to be more docile - and, once in awhile, when properly stimulated, our inner-primative-savage is unleashed. I empathize with the shooter and, although I'd like to think I wouldn't have responded as he did, I feel sorry he felt the need to end his own life after taking out the trash. That's the real tragedy to this story, IMHO. In a truly just world, his neighbors would have celebrated, thrown a party in his honor and the town mayor would've pinned a medal on his chest. That would send a powerful message to other would-be thugs and bullies. Of that you can be sure. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.