User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 7:40:06 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Fetterman is a leftists wet dream candidate Oz is pretty much a shithead. (Seriously this is the best candidate that Pennsylvania conservatives could come up with?) The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. I don’t give a fuck about the fact that some bald retard knows how to pick up a gun. Do you actually think that sending that marble-mouthed sack of flour to the Senate would be a win for gun rights when they can piss on the filibuster and ram the stubby chode of the state up our collective ass? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 7:40:34 PM EDT
[#2]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 7:42:45 PM EDT
[#3]
Oz was a horrifically bad choice. Don't ever rely on Donald for staffing decisions.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 7:42:54 PM EDT
[#4]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 7:49:38 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I mean it’s snake oil oz. Don’t know why anyone would vote for either. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Republicans have candidates so shitty that a demon looking turnip can beat them. That's the real news.  I mean it’s snake oil oz. Don’t know why anyone would vote for either. Trump endorsed Oz instead of Kathy Barnett |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 7:51:54 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Fetterman is a leftists wet dream candidate Oz is pretty much a shithead. (Seriously this is the best candidate that Pennsylvania conservatives could come up with?) The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. DU is <---- that way |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:01:11 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: DU is <---- that way |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:04:55 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Dude looks like a mechanic or a garbage man trying to dress up. Dude you can’t afford a suit? LOL. My understanding is he's a trust fund kid who started his rise through the ranks in an abandoned town that his dad bought for him to be mayor in. Never worked a job. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:07:51 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why? He's 1000% correct. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: DU is <---- that way Being you agree with him 1000%, perhaps YOU can share John Fettermans "real" positions on guns. Openly shilling for democrat candidates. There's a fucking shock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:12:39 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why? He's 1000% correct. Oh yeah? He “effectively ran a city”? What a fucking joke. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:14:34 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Being you agree with him 1000%, perhaps YOU can share John Fettermans "real" positions on guns. Openly shilling for democrat candidates. There's a fucking shock. The open trolling during the election cycles is so fucking tiring. Dudes like Theo will NEVER be banned for it tho. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:21:15 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Being you agree with him 1000%, perhaps YOU can share John Fettermans "real" positions on guns. Openly shilling for democrat candidates. There's a fucking shock. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: DU is <---- that way Being you agree with him 1000%, perhaps YOU can share John Fettermans "real" positions on guns. Openly shilling for democrat candidates. There's a fucking shock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:21:29 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. He ran that city into the ground. And some retard chasing a guy down the street with a shotgun (regardless of race) is nothing to brag about. Dems are pieces of shit for being all torn up about Ahmaud Arbery and bringing this story up in a defense of how he's a 'real 2a guy' or some shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:24:01 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The open trolling during the election cycles is so fucking tiring. Dudes like Theo will NEVER be banned for it tho. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Being you agree with him 1000%, perhaps YOU can share John Fettermans "real" positions on guns. Openly shilling for democrat candidates. There's a fucking shock. The open trolling during the election cycles is so fucking tiring. Dudes like Theo will NEVER be banned for it tho. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:28:50 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have zero love for Fetterman, but he's going to end up winning because Oz is such an objectively terrible candidate. Fetterman has a much better resume when compared to Oz and he is going to capture the people in the middle that will be the people that matter. Now, do I want Fetterman to be senator? No, I absolutely do not, but that has nothing to do with his likelihood of winning. You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:31:05 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I have zero love for Fetterman, but he's going to end up winning because Oz is such an objectively terrible candidate. Fetterman has a much better resume when compared to Oz and he is going to capture the people in the middle that will be the people that matter. Now, do I want Fetterman to be senator? No, I absolutely do not, but that has nothing to do with his likelihood of winning. You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:37:23 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's a limousine communist trying to put on a "working man" costume. I don't know. It looks like he's got the communist drab uniform/fatigues look down. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:39:43 PM EDT
[#18]
Jesus, some of you are dense.
That bit about 'being true pro 2-A' because he chased a guy while armed was tongue in cheek. Until the latest round of school shootings his gun politics were significantly more moderate. He *does* have his CCW...which isn't much of an accomplishment in PA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Fetterman#Mayor_of_Braddock_(2006%E2%80%932019) How the fuck did he run Braddock into the ground? Serious question; I lived in PA until July of this year, but never got out much, between work and the plague. He won his mayoral elections quite handily. For the 5 years he was mayor, there were no firearm related homicides; he credits that partially to handing control of the police back over to the Chief of Police, from the Mayor's office. He deliberately started a gentrification, which is objectively better than the previous loss of jobs, to include the hospital [largest employer in area] closing. But finally - the choice is between Fetterman and fucking Oz. That's no choice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:41:16 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Lol You'd have to be a complete retard to vote for Fetterwoman. OZ isn't a great conservative, but he's better than that tard. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:42:09 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I have zero love for Fetterman, but he's going to end up winning because Oz is such an objectively terrible candidate. Fetterman has a much better resume when compared to Oz and he is going to capture the people in the middle that will be the people that matter. Now, do I want Fetterman to be senator? No, I absolutely do not, but that has nothing to do with his likelihood of winning. You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. Why are you being evasive? You said you agreed 100%, so again, tell me how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:42:51 PM EDT
[#21]
At least Biden won't feel so lonely with another brain damaged man with him in DC
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:48:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. one guy is a doctor. the other needs to see a doctor. i'm on the opposite side of the country so i don't have a say in this race but i'm struggling to see how the physically and mentally handicapped communist is a better candidate. oz seems like an run of the mill, empty suit politician. would likely fit in quite well with today's gop. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:50:44 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Jesus, some of you are dense. That bit about 'being true pro 2-A' because he chased a guy while armed was tongue in cheek. Until the latest round of school shootings his gun politics were significantly more moderate. He *does* have his CCW...which isn't much of an accomplishment in PA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Fetterman#Mayor_of_Braddock_(2006%E2%80%932019) How the fuck did he run Braddock into the ground? Serious question; I lived in PA until July of this year, but never got out much, between work and the plague. He won his mayoral elections quite handily. For the 5 years he was mayor, there were no firearm related homicides; he credits that partially to handing control of the police back over to the Chief of Police, from the Mayor's office. He deliberately started a gentrification, which is objectively better than the previous loss of jobs, to include the hospital [largest employer in area] closing. But finally - the choice is between Fetterman and fucking Oz. That's no choice. Lol. So he has a CCW so his gun views are 'moderate'?! Obviously you are into him. But championing someone for no firearm homicides him a town of <2000 persons like it's an accomplishment is silly. Oz may be a shit candidate but being a fanboy of a post-stroke shill is also fucking stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:54:09 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Jesus, some of you are dense. That bit about 'being true pro 2-A' because he chased a guy while armed was tongue in cheek. Until the latest round of school shootings his gun politics were significantly more moderate. He *does* have his CCW...which isn't much of an accomplishment in PA. How the fuck did he run Braddock into the ground? Serious question; I lived in PA until July of this year, but never got out much, between work and the plague. He won his mayoral elections quite handily. Braddock had all of about 2500 people and now has 1700. According to his own campaign ads, Braddock is a violent shithole where a middle aged white man is not safe to spend two hours in. Pretending to be a cop and chasing black men through the streets with a shotgun is something to joke about? Getting a LTCF in PA is a major accomplishment? We should vote for Fetterman because he was able to fill out a form and pay $20? I changed my address on my drivers license. Can I be an Earl? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:56:13 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I have zero love for Fetterman, but he's going to end up winning because Oz is such an objectively terrible candidate. Fetterman has a much better resume when compared to Oz and he is going to capture the people in the middle that will be the people that matter. Now, do I want Fetterman to be senator? No, I absolutely do not, but that has nothing to do with his likelihood of winning. You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. Your word salad and talking in circles to avoid actually answering the questions, but thinking you appear like you are, would make kamala blush. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 8:59:56 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryThe guy just oozes loser. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:07:12 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Lol You'd have to be a complete retard to vote for Fetterwoman. OZ isn't a great conservative, but he's better than that tard. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Lol You'd have to be a complete retard to vote for Fetterwoman. OZ isn't a great conservative, but he's better than that tard. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:09:44 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why are you being evasive? You said you agreed 100%, so again, tell me how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. ETA: If I lived in Pennsylvania and was forced to choose between these two idiots, I would obviously vote for Oz, but I would take a shower after I did it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:12:30 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: On paper to moderates and sw. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Why are you being evasive? You said you agreed 100%, so again, tell me how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. On paper to moderates and sw. Answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:13:37 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why are you being evasive? You said you agreed 100%, so again, tell me how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. On paper to moderates and sw. Answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:15:31 PM EDT
[#31]
Nearly ALL of the misnamed "never trumpers" have looong histories of being anti-republican and we are going to see all of them transition (no pun intended) to shilling for democrat candidates.
I called it |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:15:43 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The swing voters in the middle will choose Pennsylvania's next Senator. Pennsylvania is absolutely full of moderate republicans and swing voters thst fsn go either way. That's the reason Fetterman is likely going to win. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Lol You'd have to be a complete retard to vote for Fetterwoman. OZ isn't a great conservative, but he's better than that tard. Which makes OZ more appealing to them, since he's much more of a sane moderate. A radical communist fraudster who trys to portray a false image of being a working man, while reality is he is a do nothing who lived on a allowance from his parents. I'm sure all of those people in the middle love the idea of having criminals sent after them while being disarmed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:16:03 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote Historylooks like an inmate photograph
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:18:18 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Which makes OZ more appealing to them, since he's much more of a sane moderate. A radical communist fraudster who trys to portray a false image of being a working man, while reality is he is a do nothing who lived on a allowance from his parents. I'm sure all of those people in the middle love the idea of having criminals sent after them while being disarmed. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Lol You'd have to be a complete retard to vote for Fetterwoman. OZ isn't a great conservative, but he's better than that tard. Which makes OZ more appealing to them, since he's much more of a sane moderate. A radical communist fraudster who trys to portray a false image of being a working man, while reality is he is a do nothing who lived on a allowance from his parents. I'm sure all of those people in the middle love the idea of having criminals sent after them while being disarmed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:20:38 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I answered your question multiple times. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why are you being evasive? You said you agreed 100%, so again, tell me how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. On paper to moderates and sw. Answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. Not once did you answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. You evaded the subject. Evading the subject numerous times is not "answering the question multiple times", it's called "evading the question multiple times". Do you need a link to the post that you agreed 1000% to? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:20:47 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Nearly ALL of the misnamed "never trumpers" have looong histories of being anti-republican and we are going to see all of them transition (no pun intended) to shilling for democrat candidates. I called it |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:21:16 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The numbers don't bear that out so far. Oz comes across as an imposter and a carpetbagger. I hope you are right that he wins, serves a single term, and is replaced with someone who isn't a shitbag. I don't see him winning, though. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: He's terrible on guns and I don't want him to win, but what the poster said his correct. He is objectively the better candidate. I didn't take that to mean that the person saying it supported him. I took it to mean that on paper, he is the better candidate and will likely win with Pennsylvania voters, which is correct. Lol You'd have to be a complete retard to vote for Fetterwoman. OZ isn't a great conservative, but he's better than that tard. Which makes OZ more appealing to them, since he's much more of a sane moderate. A radical communist fraudster who trys to portray a false image of being a working man, while reality is he is a do nothing who lived on a allowance from his parents. I'm sure all of those people in the middle love the idea of having criminals sent after them while being disarmed. What do these numbers have to do with reality? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:22:06 PM EDT
[#38]
My favorite part of the hardworking man image is the allowance he was getting from parents as late as 2015.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:27:13 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've never shilled for a democrat in my life. I am, however, very against the segment of the Republican Party that is anti-fiscal conservative and that is anti-second amendment. For me, Oz is the opposite of what a good Republican candidate should be, and I'm not afraid to say that. I'm also not afraid to call out Republicans like Trump who are liars and who backtrack on the basic values that need to be a central part of the Republican Party. This is a thread about John Fetterman. The socialist running for senator Donald Trump is not running for senator. You agreed 1000% about a pro- Fetterman post and you're evading answering why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:29:56 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This is a thread about John Fetterman. The socialist running for senator Donald Trump is not running for senator. You agreed 1000% about a pro- Fetterman post and you're evading answering why. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I've never shilled for a democrat in my life. I am, however, very against the segment of the Republican Party that is anti-fiscal conservative and that is anti-second amendment. For me, Oz is the opposite of what a good Republican candidate should be, and I'm not afraid to say that. I'm also not afraid to call out Republicans like Trump who are liars and who backtrack on the basic values that need to be a central part of the Republican Party. This is a thread about John Fetterman. The socialist running for senator Donald Trump is not running for senator. You agreed 1000% about a pro- Fetterman post and you're evading answering why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:30:26 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My favorite part of the hardworking man image is the allowance he was getting from parents as late as 2015. That's part of his outstanding resume. That and him (allegedly) being able to fill out a form and write a check for $20. That's like Oppenheimer level genius. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:32:48 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Kinda looks like Karl Childers with really bad facial hair. Yep, mmmhhhmmm, alright then. I wonder if he likes French fried taters? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:33:09 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What do these numbers have to do with reality? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:35:43 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You are trying to paint what it said as supporting Fetterman, which I do not. The poster I was responding to said that he was objectively the better candidate because he is actually from Pennsylvania, he has some experience in government (even if he did a poor job) and he has successfully blunted Oz on guns. Does that mean I want Fetterman to win? No. Does it mean that I support Fetterman? No. He blunted Oz on guns? How? Allegedly filling out a form and paying $20? Pretending to be a cop and chasing a black man at gunpoint? Calling for gun bans? He governed a violent shithole that had a substantial decrease in population and is, by his own words, unsafe for a middle aged white man to be in for two hours? Why would that possibly be something that you agreed with 1000%? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:36:07 PM EDT
[#45]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:39:16 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: He blunted Oz on guns? How? Allegedly filling out a form and paying $20? Pretending to be a cop and chasing a black man at gunpoint? Calling for gun bans? He governed a violent shithole that had a substantial decrease in population and is, by his own words, unsafe for a middle aged white man to be in for two hours? Why would that possibly be something that you agreed with 1000%? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:44:06 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Asked and answered multiple times. Not once did you answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. You evaded the subject. Evading the subject numerous times is not "answering the question multiple times", it's called "evading the question multiple times". It's also called "shilling for the democrat candidate" |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:46:35 PM EDT
[#48]
Again, this is a thread about John Fetterman.
Notice how the democrat shills keep trying to slide it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:49:46 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not once did you answer why you agreed 1000% about how John Fetterman ran Braddock (not a city) effectively, tell me his real views on guns, tell me why chasing a black man over hill and dale with a shotgun is good, and tell me what is so good about his resume. It's not hard. You agreed 1000%. You evaded the subject. Evading the subject numerous times is not "answering the question multiple times", it's called "evading the question multiple times". It's also called "shilling for the democrat candidate" Now if you believe having an honest conversation about candidates and analyzing how voters will respond to them is "shilling", I can't help you. I don't want Fetterman to win and I don't support him in any way, shape or form. You can twist it however you like, but I've been very clear about what I'm saying. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2022 9:53:10 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I have zero love for Fetterman, but he's going to end up winning because Oz is such an objectively terrible candidate. Fetterman has a much better resume when compared to Oz and he is going to capture the people in the middle that will be the people that matter. Now, do I want Fetterman to be senator? No, I absolutely do not, but that has nothing to do with his likelihood of winning. You stated that you agreed with this 100%: The only reason Oz is the nominee is because he gargled Trump's balls - figuratively, I hope. He doesn't live in PA; he's using his in-laws address despite being a resident of NJ. Fetterman has a lot going in his favor, objectively. He does know how to run a city, effectively. You may *also* want to look up what his real views are on guns - particularly that time he grabbed a gun and chased down a black dude on his street. What does Fetterman have going in his favor? He ran a "city" effectively? How? What are his "real" views on guns? What's his "better resume"? Having his dad support him into his 40's? Running for Lieutenant governor specifically to release murderers? You said you agreed 1000%. So, tell me why. Fester has the media on his side. The idiot voters in this state believe it all. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File