User Panel
Posted: 1/24/2021 2:34:16 AM EDT
They wasted no time on this one. I'm sure it will pass with bipartisan support.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22hr1%22%5D%7D&r=1&s=1 Summary: Internet voter registration. Automatic voter registration. Same day voter registration. Voting by mail Allowing sworn written statements as ID for voter application Ballot drop boxes Curbside voting |
|
[#1]
So both parties can register anyone now and have anyone vote any where they want as many times as they want?
Next Presidential election: 500 million votes cast! |
|
[#2]
What?
No option for: "Honk once for X, honk twice for Z" at intersections? |
|
[#5]
|
|
[#6]
Quoted: So both parties can register anyone now and have anyone vote any where they want as many times as they want? Next Presidential election: 500 million votes cast! View Quote Except good regular people don’t want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. |
|
[#7]
Quoted: Except good regular people don't want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So both parties can register anyone now and have anyone vote any where they want as many times as they want? Next Presidential election: 500 million votes cast! Except good regular people don't want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. It's ok though because they thought of that should any ineligible persons be "accidentally" registered. (a) Protections For Errors In Registration.An individual shall not be prosecuted under any Federal or State law, adversely affected in any civil adjudication concerning immigration status or naturalization, or subject to an allegation in any legal proceeding that the individual is not a citizen of the United States on any of the following grounds: (1) The individual notified an election office of the individual's automatic registration to vote under this part. (2) The individual is not eligible to vote in elections for Federal office but was automatically registered to vote under this part. (3) The individual was automatically registered to vote under this part at an incorrect address. (4) The individual declined the opportunity to register to vote or did not make an affirmation of citizenship, including through automatic registration, under this part. |
|
[#8]
Quoted: It's ok though because they thought of that should any ineligible persons be "accidentally" registered. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So both parties can register anyone now and have anyone vote any where they want as many times as they want? Next Presidential election: 500 million votes cast! Except good regular people don't want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. It's ok though because they thought of that should any ineligible persons be "accidentally" registered. (a) Protections For Errors In Registration.An individual shall not be prosecuted under any Federal or State law, adversely affected in any civil adjudication concerning immigration status or naturalization, or subject to an allegation in any legal proceeding that the individual is not a citizen of the United States on any of the following grounds: (1) The individual notified an election office of the individual's automatic registration to vote under this part. (2) The individual is not eligible to vote in elections for Federal office but was automatically registered to vote under this part. (3) The individual was automatically registered to vote under this part at an incorrect address. (4) The individual declined the opportunity to register to vote or did not make an affirmation of citizenship, including through automatic registration, under this part. JFC |
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
I was hoping I could have a few, or three weeks to vote... That didn't get in?!
What if I can't stop shitting election day? What if I don't have a mailbox, or have a car to drive to a drop box cause I pay my bills with my maxed out card on my expensive phone! Those bastards! |
|
[#11]
|
|
[#12]
|
|
[#13]
Quoted: Except good regular people don't want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So both parties can register anyone now and have anyone vote any where they want as many times as they want? Next Presidential election: 500 million votes cast! Except good regular people don't want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. |
|
[#14]
|
|
[#16]
India cryptographic smart cards. Each citizen's vote is digitally signed as being provably from them and them only.
They shit in the streets...and have the most secure election system on the planet. |
|
[#17]
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So both parties can register anyone now and have anyone vote any where they want as many times as they want? Next Presidential election: 500 million votes cast! Except good regular people don't want to risk prison time for fraudulent voting. If we start doing it you can bet your ass that commissions and task forces will be formed and violators will have their lives destroyed. They cheat, lie, harvest ballots, make up numbers during the count and nobody gives a fuck or will ever do anything about it. Voting is done. It has failed. It's ok though because they thought of that should any ineligible persons be "accidentally" registered. (a) Protections For Errors In Registration.An individual shall not be prosecuted under any Federal or State law, adversely affected in any civil adjudication concerning immigration status or naturalization, or subject to an allegation in any legal proceeding that the individual is not a citizen of the United States on any of the following grounds: (1) The individual notified an election office of the individual's automatic registration to vote under this part. (2) The individual is not eligible to vote in elections for Federal office but was automatically registered to vote under this part. (3) The individual was automatically registered to vote under this part at an incorrect address. (4) The individual declined the opportunity to register to vote or did not make an affirmation of citizenship, including through automatic registration, under this part. JFC That also seems to allow illegals to vote. |
|
[#18]
The easiest way to vote is to just have the candidate do it for you.
everything short of that is voter suppression. |
|
[#19]
Quoted: It also criminalizes publicly questioning the legitimacy of an election. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: JFC Are you basing that off of the language saying within 60 days of an election knowingly making a false statement about the election is to be a crime? |
|
[#20]
Quoted: Are you basing that off of the language saying within 60 days of an election knowingly making a false statement about the election is to be a crime? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: JFC Are you basing that off of the language saying within 60 days of an election knowingly making a false statement about the election is to be a crime? Which section was that in? |
|
[#21]
Quoted: Are you basing that off of the language saying within 60 days of an election knowingly making a false statement about the election is to be a crime? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: JFC Are you basing that off of the language saying within 60 days of an election knowingly making a false statement about the election is to be a crime? Who defines what true and false? |
|
[#22]
And here it is:
Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood SEC. 2201. FINDINGS RELATING TO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATEHOOD. Congress finds the following: (1) The 705,000 District of Columbia residents deserve voting representation in Congress and local self-government, which only statehood can provide. (2) The United States is the only democratic country that denies both voting representation in the national legislature and local self-government to the residents of its Nation’s capital. (3) There are no constitutional, historical, fiscal, or economic reasons why the Americans who live in the District of Columbia should not be granted statehood. (4) Since the founding of the United States, the residents of the District of Columbia have always carried all of the obligations of citizenship, including serving in all of the Nation’s wars and paying Federal taxes, but have been denied voting representation in Congress and freedom from congressional interference in purely local matters. (5) The District of Columbia pays more Federal taxes per capita than any State and more Federal taxes than 22 States. (6) The District of Columbia has a larger population than 2 States (Wyoming and Vermont), and 6 States have a population under one million. (7) The District of Columbia has a larger budget than 12 States. (8) The Constitution of the United States gives Congress the authority to admit new States (clause 1, section 3, article IV) and reduce the size of the seat of the Government of the United States (clause 17, section 8, article I). All 37 new States have been admitted by an Act of Congress, and Congress has previously reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States. (9) On June 26, 2020, by a vote of 232–180, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, which would have admitted the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth from the residential portions of the District of Columbia and reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States to the United States Capitol, the White House, the United States Supreme Court, the National Mall, and the principal Federal monuments and buildings. View Quote I thought citizens in D.C. could already vote for President? Is that not the case? |
|
[#23]
|
|
[#24]
Quoted: And here it is: I thought citizens in D.C. could already vote for President? Is that not the case? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: And here it is: Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood SEC. 2201. FINDINGS RELATING TO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATEHOOD. Congress finds the following: (1) The 705,000 District of Columbia residents deserve voting representation in Congress and local self-government, which only statehood can provide. (2) The United States is the only democratic country that denies both voting representation in the national legislature and local self-government to the residents of its Nation’s capital. (3) There are no constitutional, historical, fiscal, or economic reasons why the Americans who live in the District of Columbia should not be granted statehood. (4) Since the founding of the United States, the residents of the District of Columbia have always carried all of the obligations of citizenship, including serving in all of the Nation’s wars and paying Federal taxes, but have been denied voting representation in Congress and freedom from congressional interference in purely local matters. (5) The District of Columbia pays more Federal taxes per capita than any State and more Federal taxes than 22 States. (6) The District of Columbia has a larger population than 2 States (Wyoming and Vermont), and 6 States have a population under one million. (7) The District of Columbia has a larger budget than 12 States. (8) The Constitution of the United States gives Congress the authority to admit new States (clause 1, section 3, article IV) and reduce the size of the seat of the Government of the United States (clause 17, section 8, article I). All 37 new States have been admitted by an Act of Congress, and Congress has previously reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States. (9) On June 26, 2020, by a vote of 232–180, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, which would have admitted the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth from the residential portions of the District of Columbia and reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States to the United States Capitol, the White House, the United States Supreme Court, the National Mall, and the principal Federal monuments and buildings. I thought citizens in D.C. could already vote for President? Is that not the case? They can. They get 3 electors. They do not, however, get congress critters that can actually vote. |
|
[#25]
Quoted: They can. They get 3 electors. They do not, however, get congress critters that can actually vote. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And here it is: Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood SEC. 2201. FINDINGS RELATING TO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATEHOOD. Congress finds the following: (1) The 705,000 District of Columbia residents deserve voting representation in Congress and local self-government, which only statehood can provide. (2) The United States is the only democratic country that denies both voting representation in the national legislature and local self-government to the residents of its Nation’s capital. (3) There are no constitutional, historical, fiscal, or economic reasons why the Americans who live in the District of Columbia should not be granted statehood. (4) Since the founding of the United States, the residents of the District of Columbia have always carried all of the obligations of citizenship, including serving in all of the Nation’s wars and paying Federal taxes, but have been denied voting representation in Congress and freedom from congressional interference in purely local matters. (5) The District of Columbia pays more Federal taxes per capita than any State and more Federal taxes than 22 States. (6) The District of Columbia has a larger population than 2 States (Wyoming and Vermont), and 6 States have a population under one million. (7) The District of Columbia has a larger budget than 12 States. (8) The Constitution of the United States gives Congress the authority to admit new States (clause 1, section 3, article IV) and reduce the size of the seat of the Government of the United States (clause 17, section 8, article I). All 37 new States have been admitted by an Act of Congress, and Congress has previously reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States. (9) On June 26, 2020, by a vote of 232–180, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, which would have admitted the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth from the residential portions of the District of Columbia and reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States to the United States Capitol, the White House, the United States Supreme Court, the National Mall, and the principal Federal monuments and buildings. I thought citizens in D.C. could already vote for President? Is that not the case? They can. They get 3 electors. They do not, however, get congress critters that can actually vote. Well fuck it. Maybe DC should become ARFlandia. Let's get 50-100k to move there and vote in Cruz/Boebert on steroids. Lots of you have a crush on Virginia, let's step it up! DC Senators constantly pushing pro-gun bills might get the message across... |
|
[#26]
Quoted: Well fuck it. Maybe DC should become ARFlandia. Let's get 50-100k to move there and vote in Cruz/Boebert on steroids. Lots of you have a crush on Virginia, let's step it up! DC Senators constantly pushing pro-gun bills might get the message across... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: And here it is: Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood SEC. 2201. FINDINGS RELATING TO DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATEHOOD. Congress finds the following: (1) The 705,000 District of Columbia residents deserve voting representation in Congress and local self-government, which only statehood can provide. (2) The United States is the only democratic country that denies both voting representation in the national legislature and local self-government to the residents of its Nation’s capital. (3) There are no constitutional, historical, fiscal, or economic reasons why the Americans who live in the District of Columbia should not be granted statehood. (4) Since the founding of the United States, the residents of the District of Columbia have always carried all of the obligations of citizenship, including serving in all of the Nation’s wars and paying Federal taxes, but have been denied voting representation in Congress and freedom from congressional interference in purely local matters. (5) The District of Columbia pays more Federal taxes per capita than any State and more Federal taxes than 22 States. (6) The District of Columbia has a larger population than 2 States (Wyoming and Vermont), and 6 States have a population under one million. (7) The District of Columbia has a larger budget than 12 States. (8) The Constitution of the United States gives Congress the authority to admit new States (clause 1, section 3, article IV) and reduce the size of the seat of the Government of the United States (clause 17, section 8, article I). All 37 new States have been admitted by an Act of Congress, and Congress has previously reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States. (9) On June 26, 2020, by a vote of 232–180, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 51, the Washington, D.C. Admission Act, which would have admitted the State of Washington, Douglass Commonwealth from the residential portions of the District of Columbia and reduced the size of the seat of the Government of the United States to the United States Capitol, the White House, the United States Supreme Court, the National Mall, and the principal Federal monuments and buildings. I thought citizens in D.C. could already vote for President? Is that not the case? They can. They get 3 electors. They do not, however, get congress critters that can actually vote. Well fuck it. Maybe DC should become ARFlandia. Let's get 50-100k to move there and vote in Cruz/Boebert on steroids. Lots of you have a crush on Virginia, let's step it up! DC Senators constantly pushing pro-gun bills might get the message across... 100k will only move the needle a little. Biden beat Trump there by almost 300k votes. He got 93%. |
|
[#27]
Quoted: (a) Protections For Errors In Registration.An individual shall not be prosecuted under any Federal or State law, adversely affected in any civil adjudication concerning immigration status or naturalization, or subject to an allegation in any legal proceeding that the individual is not a citizen of the United States on any of the following grounds: That text does not appear anywhere in the linked document. |
|
[#28]
Here's a good one though, all the way at the end of the document, they are going to force Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates to submit their tax returns for the previous 10 years to the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission:
TITLE X—PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE PRESIDENTIAL TAX TRANSPARENCY (1) IN GENERAL.— (A) CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT.—Not later than the date that is 15 days after the date on which an individual becomes a covered candidate, the individual shall submit to the Federal Election Commission a copy of the individual’s income tax returns for the 10 most recent taxable years for which a return has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service. (B) PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT.—With respect to an individual who is the President or Vice President, not later than the due date for the return of tax for each taxable year, such individual shall submit to the Federal Election Commission a copy of the individual’s income tax returns for the taxable year and for the 9 preceding taxable years. (C) TRANSITION RULE FOR SITTING PRESIDENTS AND VICE PRESIDENTS.—Not later than the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this section, an individual who is the President or Vice President on such date of enactment shall submit to the Federal Election Commission a copy of the income tax returns for the 10 most recent taxable years for which a return has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service. (2) FAILURE TO DISCLOSE.—If any requirement under paragraph (1) to submit an income tax return is not met, the chairman of the Federal Election Commission shall submit to the Secretary a written request that the Secretary provide the Federal Election Commission with the income tax return. (3) PUBLICLY AVAILABLE.—The chairman of the Federal Election Commission shall make publicly available each income tax return submitted under paragraph (1) in the same manner as a return provided under section 6103(l)(23) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section). (4) TREATMENT AS A REPORT UNDER THE FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT OF 1971.—For purposes of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, any income tax return submitted under paragraph (1) or provided under section 6103(l)(23) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section) shall, after redaction under paragraph (3) or subparagraph (B)(ii) of such section, be treated as a report filed under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. (c) Disclosure Of Returns Of Presidents And Vice Presidents And Certain Candidates For President And Vice President.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 6103(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(23) DISCLOSURE OF RETURN INFORMATION OF PRESIDENTS AND VICE PRESIDENTS AND CERTAIN CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—Upon written request by the chairman of the Federal Election Commission under section 10001(b)(2) of the For the People Act of 2021, not later than the date that is 15 days after the date of such request, the Secretary shall provide copies of any return which is so requested to officers and employees of the Federal Election Commission whose official duties include disclosure or redaction of such return under this paragraph. “(B) DISCLOSURE TO THE PUBLIC.— “(i) IN GENERAL.—The chairman of the Federal Election Commission shall make publicly available any return which is provided under subparagraph (A). “(ii) REDACTION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION.—Before making publicly available under clause (i) any return, the chairman of the Federal Election Commission shall redact such information as the Federal Election Commission and the Secretary jointly determine is necessary for protecting against identity theft, such as social security numbers.”. View Quote |
|
[#29]
WTF? States have to accept registrations from people who aren't even allowed to vote yet? Fortunately, it's not trying to force them to allow minors to vote, as the next paragraph says as much.
Section 1094 (1) IN GENERAL.—A State may not refuse to accept or process an individual’s application to register to vote in elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual is under 18 years of age at the time the individual submits the application, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time. View Quote ETA: Section 1401 restores federal voting rights to felons who are not currently incarcerated. |
|
[#30]
Quoted: WTF? States have to accept registrations from people who aren't even allowed to vote yet? Fortunately, it's not trying to force them to allow minors to vote, as the next paragraph says as much. View Quote I can kind of see that one. If someone turns 18 the day or week before an election, then they are able to register ahead of time so they can vote in that election for which they would be eligible. I think the language needs to be more specific and allowing teens to register at 16 is too much though. It should be like up to 90 days before the election, or whenever the registration cut off is. I.e. if you turn 18 on election day, you should still be able to register to vote beforehand, by whenever they registration cut off date is. |
|
[#31]
Quoted: That text does not appear anywhere in the linked document. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: (a) Protections For Errors In Registration.An individual shall not be prosecuted under any Federal or State law, adversely affected in any civil adjudication concerning immigration status or naturalization, or subject to an allegation in any legal proceeding that the individual is not a citizen of the United States on any of the following grounds: That text does not appear anywhere in the linked document. I copied and pasted it straight from the linked bill. |
|
[#32]
Quoted: I can kind of see that one. If someone turns 18 the day or week before an election, then they are able to register ahead of time so they can vote in that election for which they would be eligible. I think the language needs to be more specific and allowing teens to register at 16 is too much though. It should be like up to 90 days before the election, or whenever the registration cut off is. I.e. if you turn 18 on election day, you should still be able to register to vote beforehand, by whenever they registration cut off date is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: WTF? States have to accept registrations from people who aren't even allowed to vote yet? Fortunately, it's not trying to force them to allow minors to vote, as the next paragraph says as much. I can kind of see that one. If someone turns 18 the day or week before an election, then they are able to register ahead of time so they can vote in that election for which they would be eligible. I think the language needs to be more specific and allowing teens to register at 16 is too much though. It should be like up to 90 days before the election, or whenever the registration cut off is. I.e. if you turn 18 on election day, you should still be able to register to vote beforehand, by whenever they registration cut off date is. I get the being 18 on election day bit. There's already provisions in a lot of states for such instances. Being able to submit at 16 is ridiculous and makes me think they intend to do voter registration drives at high schools. Oh wait! That's in there too. Section 1091 provides funds so that high schools can help seniors learn how to register to vote, for a one year pilot program that will undoubtedly be continued. |
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
I figure lots of bills go nowhere if not sponsored by one of the cool kids in Congress.
Will wait till I hear more. |
|
[#36]
Wow. This is just the biggest dim wishlist ever isn't it? Section 5102 is public funding of candidates. They'll choose a few states, wherein voters get a $25 voucher to contribute to whoever's campaign they want, in increments of $5.
Oh look. Section 2411 establishes federal rules on redistricting. Have to create a commission of 6, who then choose 9 additional members for the panel. This 15 member panel will then have to "ensure that the membership is representative of the demographic groups (including racial, ethnic, economic, and gender) and geographic regions of the State, and provides racial, ethnic, and language minorities protected under the Voting Rights Act of 1965" This whole bill is one big mess. |
|
[#37]
Quoted: I get the being 18 on election day bit. There's already provisions in a lot of states for such instances. Being able to submit at 16 is ridiculous and makes me think they intend to do voter registration drives at high schools. Oh wait! That's in there too. Section 1091 provides funds so that high schools can help seniors learn how to register to vote, for a one year pilot program that will undoubtedly be continued. View Quote I mean fuck, if you get to your senior year of high school and you didn't learn how to register to vote in your 8th grade civics class, I don't think you should be allowed to graduate high school. |
|
[#39]
I just thought of a great poison pill to add to this...
Since many of the sections in this bill refer to different agencies as being contributing Federal agencies for the automatic voter registration; someone should add The Selective Service System to that list, that way as soon as every male turns 18 they get their selective service card AND their voter registration card automatically. Then we'll have a lot more men that are automatically registered. |
|
[#40]
|
|
[#41]
Quoted: They wasted no time on this one. I'm sure it will pass with bipartisan support. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22hr1%22%5D%7D&r=1&s=1 Summary: Internet voter registration. Automatic voter registration. Same day voter registration. Voting by mail Allowing sworn written statements as ID for voter application Ballot drop boxes Curbside voting View Quote Okay, no problem. RNC orders up a couple hundred million (or billion) pre-filled ballots to place in convenient ballot drop boxes. Get with the fucking program. What's the question? |
|
[#42]
So what will they do when the pendulum swings back the other way?
it always does. |
|
[#43]
|
|
[#44]
|
|
[#45]
Quoted: Okay, no problem. RNC orders up a couple hundred million (or billion) pre-filled ballots to place in convenient ballot drop boxes. Get with the fucking program. What's the question? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They wasted no time on this one. I'm sure it will pass with bipartisan support. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22hr1%22%5D%7D&r=1&s=1 Summary: Internet voter registration. Automatic voter registration. Same day voter registration. Voting by mail Allowing sworn written statements as ID for voter application Ballot drop boxes Curbside voting Okay, no problem. RNC orders up a couple hundred million (or billion) pre-filled ballots to place in convenient ballot drop boxes. Get with the fucking program. What's the question? "But we have tegrity" In all seriousness you and I both know the GOP ain't gonna do that and even if they did elections would just become a total fucking circus with whoever controls the military at that time declaring themselves the winner. |
|
[#46]
They've proven there's no need to generate bogus ballots when you can just alter the count via algorithms.
If voting mattered they wouldn't let us do it. |
|
[#47]
|
|
[#48]
|
|
[#49]
|
|
[#50]
If this becomes law, it alone will be more egregious than all of King George’s doing combined.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.