User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:19:26 PM EDT
[#1]
No warnings, 1 lock. Cheaper Than Dirt posted asking what they could add to their catalog that people would enjoy.
I posted "integrity" - locked for a few hours by The Beekeeper. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:26:27 PM EDT
[#2]
Thanks for the answer lol
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:28:41 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You only have that one warning. Boooooring. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Any mods want to send me mine? I asked one time before and DK said I had a Warning in GD. I know I had a couple more but maybe they werent put down? Curious about it. I know its been a couple of years ago. I dont really remember what I did.  You only have that one warning. Boooooring. Is this staff endorsing violating the CoC?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:30:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For what? I know I had more than one email for something years ago. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You only have that one warning. Boooooring. For what? I know I had more than one email for something years ago. I've got 6 warnings and 2 bans. You can have mine if you want to spice that account up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:32:25 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've got 6 warnings and 2 bans. You can have mine if you want to spice that account up. Lol Im good. I skirted close to the fire a few times. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:34:12 PM EDT
[#6]
I'm afraid to ask for mine, and it won't make any difference anyway.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:38:49 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:44:18 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 10:51:43 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think i told someone who needed to go fuck himself to "go fuck yourself" and that got me a warning. never been locked though. edit: I lied. Went back and reviewed my PM's. Paul gave me a warning for telling someone who needed to fuck off to "fuck off" I think thats my only warning. Mods, am I right? Is that my only one? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:00:40 PM EDT
[#10]
Yes
Only a couple warnings Fav is "Reposted one of OP''s pics with a dick drawn over it." In my defense it was a safe thread and op was full of shit |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:10:28 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Mods, am I right? Is that my only one? Yes |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:11:44 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed.  Help! I'm Being Repressed! (Short Version) |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:12:03 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Mods, am I right? Is that my only one? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I think i told someone who needed to go fuck himself to "go fuck yourself" and that got me a warning. never been locked though. edit: I lied. Went back and reviewed my PM's. Paul gave me a warning for telling someone who needed to fuck off to "fuck off" I think thats my only warning. Mods, am I right? Is that my only one? Correct. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:18:16 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. We also try to make sure there is enough information preserved in the warning that other moderators/staff can judge for themselves whether they were justified, when considering whether a user's activity has escalated to the point of requesting a lock/ban. If, say, you get frustrated and post personal attacks regularly, it's a lot different from someone who does it with years between offenses. Also whether all of someone's warnings are from the same moderator or staff member. On the other hand, if we look and the ban and warning list is a who's who of moderators and staff members, it might not bode well for the member in question ;-) |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:23:45 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We also try to make sure there is enough information preserved in the warning that other moderators/staff can judge for themselves whether they were justified, when considering whether a user's activity has escalated to the point of requesting a lock/ban. If, say, you get frustrated and post personal attacks regularly, it's a lot different from someone who does it with years between offenses. Also whether all of someone's warnings are from the same moderator or staff member. On the other hand, if we look and the ban and warning list is a who's who of moderators and staff members, it might not bode well for the member in question ;-) Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. We also try to make sure there is enough information preserved in the warning that other moderators/staff can judge for themselves whether they were justified, when considering whether a user's activity has escalated to the point of requesting a lock/ban. If, say, you get frustrated and post personal attacks regularly, it's a lot different from someone who does it with years between offenses. Also whether all of someone's warnings are from the same moderator or staff member. On the other hand, if we look and the ban and warning list is a who's who of moderators and staff members, it might not bode well for the member in question ;-) Doh! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:24:26 PM EDT
[#16]
Don't think I have anything maybe a warning or 2.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:25:56 PM EDT
[#17]
A bunch of funny ass comments evaluated by humorless people.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:35:16 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We also try to make sure there is enough information preserved in the warning that other moderators/staff can judge for themselves whether they were justified, when considering whether a user's activity has escalated to the point of requesting a lock/ban. If, say, you get frustrated and post personal attacks regularly, it's a lot different from someone who does it with years between offenses. Also whether all of someone's warnings are from the same moderator or staff member. On the other hand, if we look and the ban and warning list is a who's who of moderators and staff members, it might not bode well for the member in question ;-) Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. We also try to make sure there is enough information preserved in the warning that other moderators/staff can judge for themselves whether they were justified, when considering whether a user's activity has escalated to the point of requesting a lock/ban. If, say, you get frustrated and post personal attacks regularly, it's a lot different from someone who does it with years between offenses. Also whether all of someone's warnings are from the same moderator or staff member. On the other hand, if we look and the ban and warning list is a who's who of moderators and staff members, it might not bode well for the member in question ;-) Can you tell me what my most current one says in the notes? When I asked how I broke the CoC, all the guy replied with was "You know what you were doing. You were stirring the pot." Edit: I think it was the most recent one, anyway. Edit 2: Nope. Not that one. PM replied to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:39:02 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. Cocaine Mitch was far more entertaining.  Another one lost behind some silly reasoning... |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:41:57 PM EDT
[#20]
I’ve been banned. I started an “is it gay” thread that maybe was a little too edgy. Not proud of it, ten years later
 It took another member to help get my account back online bc the email that I started the account with, has died. ...I still need to fix that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:42:06 PM EDT
[#21]
COC not hard to follow
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:50:08 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: COC not hard to follow That depends on which mod is interpreting it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:57:33 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: On a related note, twice (both times on my phone) I've gotten messages asking me to confirm that I wanted to issue a Warning to someone. Apparently there's a glitch in the matrix that occasionally makes the Site think I'm a Moderator. And no, I didn't click "Confirm" either time. Every time I got that I clicked “confirm” because IDGAF. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:58:36 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No warnings, 1 lock. Cheaper Than Dirt posted asking what they could add to their catalog that people would enjoy. I posted "integrity" - locked for a few hours by The Beekeeper. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/24/2021 11:59:10 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've got 6 warnings and 2 bans. You can have mine if you want to spice that account up. Careful, NorCal is back. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:24:27 AM EDT
[#26]
Nvmd, wrong quote
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:26:43 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. yah ask any trial lawyer about a jury trial, and how juries go
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:29:12 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: COC not hard to follow  I got a stern warning for posting that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:29:41 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think at one point I held a minor record for warnings without getting banned.... since then I've found ways to not get warnings. Your avatar theft befits a ban. IMHO |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:33:52 AM EDT
[#30]
I need a copy of my transcripts.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:35:38 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 2 warnings in the same thread for admonishing Qtards. Turns out I was right.  If the guy that bet me ever pays up, I'll send you half. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:45:53 AM EDT
[#32]
One warning from an overzealous person who is anal retentive.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:48:11 AM EDT
[#33]
@deathhates who is actually Norcalleo has not banned me yet and won't tell me what is in my record. I assume it has something to do with that little demon Billy. Or maybe the hotel lounge chair he stole from me. I love that chair.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:49:08 AM EDT
[#34]
To my knowledge
I don't have one  |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 12:50:35 AM EDT
[#35]
No clue. No bans and because of the way I browse ARFCOM zoomed in you can't see message alerts anyway.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 1:56:56 AM EDT
[#36]
A few warnings and a 72h lock.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 7:04:23 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think i told someone who needed to go fuck himself to "go fuck yourself" and that got me a warning. never been locked though. edit: I lied. Went back and reviewed my PM's. Paul gave me a warning for telling someone who needed to fuck off to "fuck off" I think thats my only warning. LOL I had similar. Paul got after me for calling a fuckin troll a fuckin troll. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 7:08:07 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Cocaine Mitch was far more entertaining. Another one lost behind some silly reasoning... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why does that surprise you? Bunch of different moderators, all with different personalities and such. Same thing happens in law enforcement. Until we come up with an AI, there's always going to be differences in how moderators enforce the CoC. So the COC is open to a different interpretation depending on who reads it?? And you don't think that pretty much guarantees friction and problems?? And then you have a bunch of cops interpreting and enforcing rules those same rules?? LOL indeed. If bans are reviewed what difference do warnings make, really? There's leeway. Ask me how I know. If you are repeatedly receiving warnings for the same thing then you are wasting site resources. Nothing in life is moderated or adjudicated fairly. Such is life and the human condition. Cocaine Mitch was far more entertaining. Another one lost behind some silly reasoning... What? And illegal shit is bannable imo. Not sure if you noticed but that was GoDADDYS justification. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 7:10:01 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I’ve done some drunk posting and said some stupid stuff I’m sure but never got sanctions. Same. I did get a warning once. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 7:11:46 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Careful, NorCal is back. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I've got 6 warnings and 2 bans. You can have mine if you want to spice that account up. Careful, NorCal is back. I'm 100% positive I've been vetted. I even @him once in a thread. Staff knows I'm not a retread. Pretty sure they have my home address. Even if I had a previous account, my personality wouldn't allow me to sneak back in and pretend to be someone else. Too much work for nothing really. Not to mention my tech skills, I wouldn't know where to begin to change ips and all that shit. Also, I'm not convinced Norcal is still around. I think hes a joint account staff uses. He drops in bans a few in one night then bails. Happened twice recently. Adds to the mystique. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 7:24:03 AM EDT
[#41]
24 hour timeout for BOTD in GD back in 2009. Is there a statute of limitations?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 7:26:33 AM EDT
[#42]
I’m guessing nothing, I’m pretty boring and I find more entertaining things to do when I’m drinking.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 8:33:18 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: @deathhates who is actually Norcalleo has not banned me yet and won't tell me what is in my record. I assume it has something to do with that little demon Billy. Or maybe the hotel lounge chair he stole from me. I love that chair. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 8:37:12 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Your avatar theft befits a ban. IMHO Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I think at one point I held a minor record for warnings without getting banned.... since then I've found ways to not get warnings. Your avatar theft befits a ban. IMHO I was sporting Mcguys avatar for awhile and didnt know it. I tried to mess with him in a thread an posted his avatar. I didnt understand the cache on my phone so all I ever saw was willy. Finally he pmed me and was like wtf? Shits getting old . I'm like "what's getting old" I got a warning for being a tard. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 8:40:53 AM EDT
[#45]
1 warning
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 8:43:16 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: COC not hard to follow Its up to interpretation by mods/admin |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 9:10:21 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Its up to interpretation by mods/admin Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: COC not hard to follow Its up to interpretation by mods/admin And 99.99% of people don’t have an issue |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 9:29:06 AM EDT
[#48]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 9:31:33 AM EDT
[#49]
A couple warnings for being mean to communist pieces of shit
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/25/2021 9:32:28 AM EDT
[#50]
Only 1 warning from years ago.
I've been good. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
