Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Posted: 1/27/2021 5:20:30 PM EDT
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:21:26 PM EDT
[#1]
Stevie Wonder coulda seen this coming.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:21:34 PM EDT
[#2]
Joe Manchin is the most powerful man in Washington.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:23:38 PM EDT
[#3]
Yay! Full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes.
3rd world here we come!
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:23:54 PM EDT
[#4]
I lost all respect for the court after their non-action on guns and then the election. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, so this means nothing to me.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:24:00 PM EDT
[#5]
But he doesn't say mean things on Twitter so it's cool.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:24:11 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Joe Manchin is the most powerful man in Washington.
View Quote


Ain't that the damn truth.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:24:34 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Joe Manchin is the most powerful man in Washington.
View Quote



Shit.

He ain’t got shit on mittens, murkowski, and Collins
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:24:50 PM EDT
[#9]
Three branches of the Government.  

Executive.  Legislative.  Judicial.  

"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

They can be ignored and replaced by the People just like the rest of the Government.  

Your move Joe
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:26:14 PM EDT
[#10]
Where's Your God Now?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:26:28 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
But he doesn't say mean things on Twitter so it's cool.
View Quote

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:30:54 PM EDT
[#12]
The founders set up numerous checks/balances, but also relied on people in gov’t acting at least partially in good faith and under the assumption that they want the country to exist.

If he expands the Supreme Court, all bets are off in terms of red states willingness to enforce and abide by federal law. Highway money is a big lever, but blowing up a branch of gov’t may be the straw that breaks the camels back.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:31:50 PM EDT
[#13]
It was suspected, but this is despicable.  

The court has had 9 justices for 150 years, regardless of the political party controlling Congress, with both parties respecting that number, even though FDR tried to cook it.  Doing this is a dangerous precedent.  In 20 years, we could have 50 justices on it, when a future uber socialist party decides it wants to appoint a majority of uber socialist justices to override the existing super socialist majority.  It will essentially destroy the check and balance between the legislative and judicial branches by allowing the majority in the legislative to ensure the judicial is aligned with their politics.

What an absolute despicable clown show these people are.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:33:53 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Joe Manchin is the most powerful man in Washington.
View Quote


Trusting a democrat.

Bold strategy cotton.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:36:16 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Where's Your God Now?
View Quote


In heaven, allowing Free Will and not stressing over the Supreme Court.

Coming from a pro-abort, such a retarded question is not surprising.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:36:39 PM EDT
[#16]
Sounds like it isn't just SCOTUS he is looking to pack.

Trump flipped several circuit courts too. The left got too cocky and left a bunch of open seats when Barry left office, figuring Hillary would fill them.
Oops.
They are correcting that mistake and ensuring it won't happen ever again.

Interesting that they are still pushing forward with this, given that the court seems to be 7-2 in favor of Xiden (using them punting on the TX election case as a benchmark). All but two of the conservative justices seem to be Roberts clones.
Guess they plan on doing stuff that even Roberts and those like him would be all, "Wait! Holup"
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:36:51 PM EDT
[#17]
These tortillas are saltier than I care for.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:43:16 PM EDT
[#18]
Ok so the next time (yeah right) the reps get control of congress they can put 1 million supreme court justices up there? Hell, put every American up there.

There's no requirement that you have to have passed the bar I believe so why not?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:43:54 PM EDT
[#19]
We wont notice any difference if the SCOTUS had additional members from the Xiden admin. 2A cases will still get ignored and judgements will continue to favor the defendants in libtard cases.

Regardless, its FO time.

FJB
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:46:30 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We wont notice any difference if the SCOTUS had additional members from the Xiden admin. 2A cases will still get ignored and judgements will continue to favor the defendants in libtard cases.

Regardless, its FO time.

FJB
View Quote
I'd like to have some of what you're smoking. If the Left packs the court the only 2A cases we see will be anti 2A cases and the court will gladly accept them and rule according to the Leftists plans.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:48:25 PM EDT
[#21]
And he will be in the Communists crosshairs. Just like Rep. Massa.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:49:21 PM EDT
[#22]
Don't get too mad at Joe.  He's just doing what his handlers are telling him to do.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:50:52 PM EDT
[#23]
Basically America’s Hugo Chavez.  Stack the courts with corruption, change the interpretation of the Constitution and cripple the legislature.  This is how you get Venezuela.

Democracy is also the installation tool of tyrants.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:53:10 PM EDT
[#24]
We warned that this shit was going to happen, the Dems kept saying, "We won't do that", and people fell for it.

Dems lie. After so many years of being lied to, when will people finally realize it?

I know, I know...never.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:53:25 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Don't get too mad at Joe.  He's just doing what his handlers are telling him to do.
View Quote


Considering it would require congress to pass a law, you should be mostly mad at Lin Wood.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:54:04 PM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It was suspected, but this is despicable.  

The court has had 9 justices for 150 years, regardless of the political party controlling Congress, with both parties respecting that number, even though FDR tried to cook it.  Doing this is a dangerous precedent.  In 20 years, we could have 50 justices on it, when a future uber socialist party decides it wants to appoint a majority of uber socialist justices to override the existing super socialist majority.  It will essentially destroy the check and balance between the legislative and judicial branches by allowing the majority in the legislative to ensure the judicial is aligned with their politics.

What an absolute despicable clown show these people are.
View Quote


Agreed.

In my observation, and what the ultimate warning should be is that while conservative justices generally (looking at you FCJJR) opine or rule based on their understanding of the constitutional intent (in cases where Constitutionality is not black and white), whereas "Liberal" justices opine and rule based solely on what their party desires.  Stacking the USSC would surely result in rulings that further court restructuring would be verboden.

The mere thought that the left will pack the court with collectivist, lock-stepping, party-before-all rubber stamping Marxists should send shivers down everyones spine.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:54:16 PM EDT
[#27]
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:55:23 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I lost all respect for the court after their non-action on guns and then the election. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, so this means nothing to me.
View Quote

Same here.  The SC, with only a couple Justices as exceptions, has shown to be an anti-freedom, anti-American body that could give a fuck about our freedoms or the Constitution.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:55:51 PM EDT
[#29]
SCOTUS pretty much made themselves irrelevant when they refused to hear the election fraud cases.

Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:56:45 PM EDT
[#30]
NO WAY!?!?!!!!!

Waiting on the indigent morons spouting how FDR set the precedent and support equals patriotism.

Let see how John Roberts handles this.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:56:48 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We warned that this shit was going to happen, the Dems kept saying, "We won't do that", and people fell for it.

Dems lie. After so many years of being lied to, when will people finally realize it?

I know, I know...never.
View Quote

Shit, I never knew they ever said "we won't do that".

The people who voted for this absolute moronic communist clown are without question going to destroy America.

Why, because as we all know........that is exactly what they want.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:57:27 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm skeptical that anything will come of this.
View Quote

Well I hope the SCOTUS grows a set and at least takes this fucking case eventually if they try.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:58:10 PM EDT
[#33]
Good thing the USSC didn’t step in and hear those cases, Biden might have packet the USSC making it impotent.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:59:10 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It was suspected, but this is despicable.  

The court has had 9 justices for 150 years, regardless of the political party controlling Congress, with both parties respecting that number, even though FDR tried to cook it. Doing this is a dangerous precedent. In 20 years, we could have 50 justices on it, when a future uber socialist party decides it wants to appoint a majority of uber socialist justices to override the existing super socialist majority. It will essentially destroy the check and balance between the legislative and judicial branches by allowing the majority in the legislative to ensure the judicial is aligned with their politics.

What an absolute despicable clown show these people are.
View Quote

I feel the same way. It's going to start a very stupid back and forth between the political parties and administrations.

"12 justices? We're raising it to 18." "Fuck you, we're raising it to 32!" "48!" "52!" "64!"

(300 years later of this bullshit)

"I hereby propose we raise the number of supreme court justices to 5,849."

"Look, we literally can't put any more people on the supreme court. Everyone that qualifies is already a justice."

"Drop the age requirement."

Maybe it'll be like that silly elvis impersonator prediction and over half of all humans living in the united states will be supreme court justices.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:59:28 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stevie Wonder coulda seen this coming.
View Quote


Well, they said they were going to, months ago.

I make it a habit to trust liberals when they say they are going to do that will hurt America.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 5:59:59 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I lost all respect for the court after their non-action on guns and then the election. The Constitution doesn't mean anything anymore, so this means nothing to me.
View Quote


This. It's been an activist court for some time now. It's silly to pretend the number of Justices matters. It doesn't, and there are more important things to concern yourself with while the simulation unravels.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:00:28 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Considering it would require congress to pass a law, you should be mostly mad at Lin Wood.
View Quote


Dude, pass the pipe. The Dems have the majority to do just that. Question is, will they break the filibuster rule to do so to get to 60.

I’m of the opinion we need the left to act on all their batshit crazy plans.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:00:56 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm skeptical that anything will come of this.
View Quote



Let's hope that penguin intuition > penguin flight characteristics.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:01:00 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Three branches of the Government.  

Executive.  Legislative.  Judicial.  

"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

They can be ignored and replaced by the People just like the rest of the Government.  

Your move Joe
View Quote

The time isn’t right. He have to take the high road and stay the gray man.
Once they seize our guns and get us locked into camps, we will have them right where we want them.

It is then we can pounce and take back the country!
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:03:17 PM EDT
[#40]
"Bipartisan"



Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:03:34 PM EDT
[#41]
"Bipartisan"



Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:04:06 PM EDT
[#42]
Everything hinges upon the filibuster. If Manchin and the cunt from AZ fold, then the Democrats won't be able to control themselves. And I fully expect those two to fold, as the pressure from their party will be unimaginable.

If the filibuster goes, the republic is finally dead. It's time to start getting serious about secession if they actually go there.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:05:04 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Basically America’s Hugo Chavez.  Stack the courts with corruption, change the interpretation of the Constitution and cripple the legislature.  This is how you get Venezuela.

Democracy is also the installation tool of tyrants.
View Quote

How long did it take Venezuela to tank?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:05:23 PM EDT
[#44]
...and then the reps will pack again when they are in power.

Looking forward to the 1064 judge court.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:06:35 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'm skeptical that anything will come of this.
View Quote


Did'ja ever think a bunch of citizens would lark around in the capitol building and take a shit in someone's desk?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:08:38 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
...and then the reps will pack again when they are in power.

Looking forward to the 1064 judge court.
View Quote

Didn't you know, that's what Trump just did. Rs won't be doing shit.
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:10:10 PM EDT
[#47]
That screwball is not that smart... I wonder who is pulling the strings
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:10:12 PM EDT
[#48]
Maybe some of the red states should send a few extra Senators and Reps to DC. At this point why not?
Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:10:49 PM EDT
[#49]
This will go far beyond court packing, trust me.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-promises-commission-on-overhauling-supreme-court/2020/10/22/4465ead6-121d-11eb-ba42-ec6a580836ed_story.html

In his comments Thursday, Biden agreed with activists that the current system is "getting out of whack" but reiterated that he does not favor the idea of simply adding justices and filling those slots with liberals.


"The last thing we need to do is turn the Supreme Court into just a political football [and] whoever has the most votes gets whatever they want," Biden said in excerpts of the "60 Minutes" interview. "Presidents come and go. Supreme Court justices stay for generations."

Biden has signaled that he instead wants broader changes that could incorporate the views of conservatives. Legal experts have proposed everything from term limits for justices to rotating them on and off the court to imposing a rough ideological balance to guaranteeing each president at least two nominations.


"It's not about court-packing," Biden said. "There's a number of other things that our constitutional scholars have debated, and I've looked to see what recommendations that commission might make."

Link Posted: 1/27/2021 6:12:09 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
...and then the reps will pack again when they are in power.

Looking forward to the 1064 judge court.
View Quote

laughs in dominion, we just had our last chance and the reps didn't do shit because orangeman was mean to people on twatter
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top