User Panel
[#1]
|
|
[#2]
|
|
[#3]
Quoted: I was expecting some dumb fucking posts from airplane pilots and….. Son I am not disappoint. View Quote 2010 Alaska C 17 crash FULL VIDEO |
|
[#4]
I was at the game and almost eye level with them. Was completely badass.
F the Karens. |
|
[#5]
|
|
[#6]
View Quote Damn. Air Force pilots crash alot. |
|
[#7]
|
|
[#8]
buddies went and said it was one of the better fly overs they've seen.
|
|
[#9]
|
|
[#10]
|
|
[#11]
Yeah, when you're flightpath splits the scoreboard and the pressbox, it's going to be "looked into it a bit further".
|
|
[#12]
|
|
[#13]
Quoted: Never did a airshow or sportsball flyover, always had other obligations. View Quote A few of us have experience in formation flying and aerial demonstrations. Many of us have lost friends and coworkers doing stupid shit in airplanes. Just because something looks awesome, and didn’t result in a mishap, doesn’t mean it was smart or won’t result in a tragic mishap next time. |
|
[#14]
Quoted: A few of us have experience in formation flying and aerial demonstrations. Many of us have lost friends and coworkers doing stupid shit in airplanes. Just because something looks awesome, and didn’t result in a mishap, doesn’t mean it was smart or won’t result in a tragic mishap next time. View Quote Well said Yup About 10 for me. Either did something stupid, bad decision, miscalculation, or something broke and they weren’t able to recover. I guess GD just thinks I’m a Karen |
|
[#15]
Quoted: A few of us have experience in formation flying and aerial demonstrations. Many of us have lost friends and coworkers doing stupid shit in airplanes. Just because something looks awesome, and didn’t result in a mishap, doesn’t mean it was smart or won’t result in a tragic mishap next time. View Quote Quoted: Well said Yup About 10 for me. Either did something stupid, bad decision, miscalculation, or something broke and they weren’t able to recover. I guess GD just thinks I’m a Karen View Quote Dang, what is it about airplanes that makes them make such bad decisions be stupid? Oh btw I have done some formation flight before. |
|
[#17]
Just curious if the pearl clutching is from fixed wing guys versus rotary?
|
|
[#18]
Quoted: Dang, what is it about airplanes that makes them make such bad decisions be stupid? Oh btw I have done some formation flight before. View Quote Aviation mishaps come in many flavors. This is an excellent book that delves into the topic of ‘rogue’ aviators if you are curious enough for a deeper dive on the subject. |
|
[#19]
Quoted: Aviation mishaps come in many flavors. This is an excellent book that delves into the topic of 'rogue' aviators if you are curious enough for a deeper dive on the subject. View Quote |
|
[#20]
Quoted: Looks low, but that would only make it more awesome IMHO... Not a pilot, but what's the harm in flying at ~300 feet vs ~1000 feet? Worst case is the helo crashes into the crowd, altitude would have been zero at that point. View Quote Thee are altitude restrictions for buildings, populated areas, crowds, etc - basically if something goes wrong you have to be able to crash somewhere else... If they are at 1000 feet, they (might) crash into the parking lot as opposed to the stands. Unless there was a waiver for the event, the video definitely shows them to be in violation of those restrictions. |
|
[#21]
|
|
[#22]
|
|
[#23]
I wish this was the story instead what we got
If someone posted I'm sorry “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.” Happy Thanksgiving, all. |
|
[#24]
Quoted: Thee are altitude restrictions for buildings, populated areas, crowds, etc - basically if something goes wrong you have to be able to crash somewhere else... If they are at 1000 feet, they (might) crash into the parking lot as opposed to the stands. Unless there was a waiver for the event, the video definitely shows them to be in violation of those restrictions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Looks low, but that would only make it more awesome IMHO... Not a pilot, but what's the harm in flying at ~300 feet vs ~1000 feet? Worst case is the helo crashes into the crowd, altitude would have been zero at that point. Thee are altitude restrictions for buildings, populated areas, crowds, etc - basically if something goes wrong you have to be able to crash somewhere else... If they are at 1000 feet, they (might) crash into the parking lot as opposed to the stands. Unless there was a waiver for the event, the video definitely shows them to be in violation of those restrictions. And those altitude restrictions include an exemption for certain types of aircraft, such as helicopters. |
|
[#25]
|
|
[#26]
Quoted: And those altitude restrictions include an exemption for certain types of aircraft, such as helicopters. View Quote I would be absolutely floored if the regulations for an aerial demonstration or flyover, even for army helicopters, allowed them to fly over the stadium at an altitude which allowed fans in the nosebleeds to look at the tops of rotor blades. |
|
[#27]
Quoted: Quoted: I was expecting some dumb fucking posts from airplane pilots and….. Son I am not disappoint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8D5v_t8Lac I walked off the flightline [immediately adjacent to the accident site] 30-minutes before that happened. That year was horrible as we lost an F-22 4-months later. |
|
[#28]
|
|
[#29]
Quoted: I would be absolutely floored if the regulations for an aerial demonstration or flyover, even for army helicopters, allowed them to fly over the stadium at an altitude which allowed fans in the nosebleeds to look at the tops of rotor blades. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And those altitude restrictions include an exemption for certain types of aircraft, such as helicopters. I would be absolutely floored if the regulations for an aerial demonstration or flyover, even for army helicopters, allowed them to fly over the stadium at an altitude which allowed fans in the nosebleeds to look at the tops of rotor blades. It's essentially a blanket exemption from the altitude restrictions, for rotary wing (helicopters), weight shift (some ultralights), and paramotors (as I recall), as long as they are operated in a safe manner. A followup to the initial news report states that there were no camera wires over the stadium, and the wires people are getting worked up over, are supporting the net behind the goal post (much lower than the helicopters as they flew over). https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/titans-flyover-now-subject-of-a-pending-investigation-faa-says |
|
[#30]
Quoted: It's essentially a blanket exemption from the altitude restrictions, for rotary wing (helicopters), weight shift (some ultralights), and paramotors (as I recall), as long as they are operated in a safe manner. A followup to the initial news report states that there were no camera wires over the stadium, and the wires people are getting worked up over, are supporting the net behind the goal post (much lower than the helicopters as they flew over). https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/titans-flyover-now-subject-of-a-pending-investigation-faa-says View Quote I’m not talking about FAA regulations, or getting wound up about the wires. The Air Force has a specific set of regulations and AFIs that cover aerial demonstrations and flyovers, as well as low altitude flight over populated areas. They pretty much say you must be a certain altitude above the highest man made obstacle within a certain distance of where you are operating. I’m sure the Army has a very similar set of regulations, and as I said, I would be shocked if these Army aviation regulations permitted this flyover to occur where fans could look down on the helos inside the stadium. ETA: I’m unfamiliar with army rotary wing ops, so I could be completely wrong, but I’d be willing to bet we read a thread in GD here in a month or two detailing how the flight lead had his wings taken from him, and the other members of the formation likewise suffered some administrative discipline. |
|
[#31]
Quoted: I’m not talking about FAA regulations, or getting wound up about the wires. The Air Force has a specific set of regulations and AFIs that cover aerial demonstrations and flyovers, as well as low altitude flight over populated areas. They pretty much say you must be a certain altitude above the highest man made obstacle within a certain distance of where you are operating. I’m sure the Army has a very similar set of regulations, and as I said, I would be shocked if these Army aviation regulations permitted this flyover to occur where fans could look down on the helos inside the stadium. ETA: I’m unfamiliar with army rotary wing ops, so I could be completely wrong, but I’d be willing to bet we read a thread in GD here in a month or two detailing how the flight lead had his wings taken from him, and the other members of the formation likewise suffered some administrative discipline. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's essentially a blanket exemption from the altitude restrictions, for rotary wing (helicopters), weight shift (some ultralights), and paramotors (as I recall), as long as they are operated in a safe manner. A followup to the initial news report states that there were no camera wires over the stadium, and the wires people are getting worked up over, are supporting the net behind the goal post (much lower than the helicopters as they flew over). https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/titans-flyover-now-subject-of-a-pending-investigation-faa-says I’m not talking about FAA regulations, or getting wound up about the wires. The Air Force has a specific set of regulations and AFIs that cover aerial demonstrations and flyovers, as well as low altitude flight over populated areas. They pretty much say you must be a certain altitude above the highest man made obstacle within a certain distance of where you are operating. I’m sure the Army has a very similar set of regulations, and as I said, I would be shocked if these Army aviation regulations permitted this flyover to occur where fans could look down on the helos inside the stadium. ETA: I’m unfamiliar with army rotary wing ops, so I could be completely wrong, but I’d be willing to bet we read a thread in GD here in a month or two detailing how the flight lead had his wings taken from him, and the other members of the formation likewise suffered some administrative discipline. I wouldn't be surprised if the Army's regulations for rotary wing are significantly different from the fixed wing regulations of other branches of the military, just like the FAA's regulations have significant exceptions for rotary wing aircraft. |
|
[#32]
|
|
[#33]
|
|
[#34]
Quoted: I wouldn't be surprised if the Army's regulations for rotary wing are significantly different from the fixed wing regulations of other branches of the military, just like the FAA's regulations have significant exceptions for rotary wing aircraft. View Quote There undoubtably are differences in regulations. And there should be. But I would still be shocked if those Regs allowed a flyover of a full NFL stadium below the tops of that stadium. |
|
[#35]
Quoted: I’m not talking about FAA regulations, or getting wound up about the wires. The Air Force has a specific set of regulations and AFIs that cover aerial demonstrations and flyovers, as well as low altitude flight over populated areas. They pretty much say you must be a certain altitude above the highest man made obstacle within a certain distance of where you are operating. I’m sure the Army has a very similar set of regulations, and as I said, I would be shocked if these Army aviation regulations permitted this flyover to occur where fans could look down on the helos inside the stadium. ETA: I’m unfamiliar with army rotary wing ops, so I could be completely wrong, but I’d be willing to bet we read a thread in GD here in a month or two detailing how the flight lead had his wings taken from him, and the other members of the formation likewise suffered some administrative discipline. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It's essentially a blanket exemption from the altitude restrictions, for rotary wing (helicopters), weight shift (some ultralights), and paramotors (as I recall), as long as they are operated in a safe manner. A followup to the initial news report states that there were no camera wires over the stadium, and the wires people are getting worked up over, are supporting the net behind the goal post (much lower than the helicopters as they flew over). https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/titans-flyover-now-subject-of-a-pending-investigation-faa-says I’m not talking about FAA regulations, or getting wound up about the wires. The Air Force has a specific set of regulations and AFIs that cover aerial demonstrations and flyovers, as well as low altitude flight over populated areas. They pretty much say you must be a certain altitude above the highest man made obstacle within a certain distance of where you are operating. I’m sure the Army has a very similar set of regulations, and as I said, I would be shocked if these Army aviation regulations permitted this flyover to occur where fans could look down on the helos inside the stadium. ETA: I’m unfamiliar with army rotary wing ops, so I could be completely wrong, but I’d be willing to bet we read a thread in GD here in a month or two detailing how the flight lead had his wings taken from him, and the other members of the formation likewise suffered some administrative discipline. Do they have a specific set of regulations for ejection too? Attached File |
|
[#36]
|
|
[#37]
Quoted: There undoubtably are differences in regulations. And there should be. But I would still be shocked if those Regs allowed a flyover of a full NFL stadium below the tops of that stadium. View Quote There are no Army Flight Regulations that address the matter and the applicable Part 91 regs have already been quoted. (It's possible that additional restrictions could be addressed in Fort Campbell's supplement to 95-1 but I doubt that) Assuming that the mission was approved, appropriate risk assessed, the briefing officer signed the mission brief and the pilots complied with the parameters of the brief, they properly accomplished their assigned mission. Since the CAB Commander was the AMC, I'd suggest that all of the above were met. Retired FAA Safety Inspector Karen needs to wipe his (retired) vagina. Or, better yet, just fuck right off. If the Titans, NFL or, more appropriately, the stadium management have a problem with it then their dissatisfaction should be addressed. Has anybody heard them bitchin'? |
|
[#38]
|
|
[#40]
Quoted: I would be absolutely floored if the regulations for an aerial demonstration or flyover, even for army helicopters, allowed them to fly over the stadium at an altitude which allowed fans in the nosebleeds to look at the tops of rotor blades. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: And those altitude restrictions include an exemption for certain types of aircraft, such as helicopters. I would be absolutely floored if the regulations for an aerial demonstration or flyover, even for army helicopters, allowed them to fly over the stadium at an altitude which allowed fans in the nosebleeds to look at the tops of rotor blades. |
|
[#41]
It was fairly low but not unsafe.
Honestly if I was doing that flight back in my youth I would have actually wanted to drop it down lower once I came into the stadium. But I was young and dumb. On one hand you want to give them a good show but on the other you want to be safe and not get your shit pounded in. We did some crazy shit getting into and out of static displays sometimes. |
|
[#42]
Quoted: Do they have a specific set of regulations for ejection too? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/200878/Crash_arp_600pix_jpg-2190026.JPG View Quote If you set your altimeter to the correct reading then you might not have to eject. We briefed to set it to 0 for the airshows. |
|
[#43]
|
|
[#44]
|
|
[#46]
That's nothing
Plane fly over city skyscraper in Sydney 11-Oct-2018 |
|
[#47]
|
|
[#48]
Quoted: Quoted: That’s the first time I’ve heard of Ft. Campbell, Tennessee. Caught that too. The majority of the post and the training areas, say 75%, is in Tennessee and that's where Id say 90% of the off-post people live, in Clarksville and thereabouts. Just so happens they put the post office on the Kentucky side. The Div HQ is about 300 feet into Kentucky. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.