User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:27:59 PM EDT
[#1]
Hypocrisy defines at least one facet of the left. When the SC refused to hear election integrity cases, the left confidently lectured us that it was a job for state legislatures. When the state legislatures try to do it, the left mocks, impugns and vilifies them.
All my life the left has been characterized by lying/dishonesty. But they used to at least try to make their lies presentable. Now they lie wildly and incoherently, certain that if anyone contradicts them twitter, FB, etc., will ban and silence that person and anyone who defends them. |
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:30:14 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: That's not a majority, and you need a majority of Senators to find Maricopa in contempt. The Senate, as a whole, isn't interested in doing that. Doesn't matter what a minority want. Maricopa knows it, which is why they are refusing to comply, and Fann knows it, which is why she hasn't engineered an emergency session to vote on it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:30:18 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Fourteen of the AZ state senate's fifteen Republicans back the audit. Politicians back things when it is politically expedient for them to do so, not because of some moral compass or sense of right and wrong. They just want to get re-elected |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:32:05 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: Politicians back things when it is politically expedient for them to do so, not because of some moral compass or sense of right and wrong. They just want to get re-elected |
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:32:40 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Hypocrisy defines at least one facet of the left. When the SC refused to hear election integrity cases, the left confidently lectured us that it was a job for state legislatures. When the state legislatures try to do it, the left mocks, impugns and vilifies them. All my life the left has been characterized by lying/dishonesty. But they used to at least try to make their lies presentable. Now they lie wildly and incoherently, certain that if anyone contradicts them twitter, FB, etc., will ban and silence that person and anyone who defends them. Post modern moral relativism at work. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:33:31 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By mikesmith13807: Is this satire? What do you think has been happening in every single thread about the election since November 3rd?  Oh the irony ! |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:36:01 PM EDT
[Last Edit: tsg68]
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Lol. The senate Democrats and their lone lapdog RINO don't want the audit. And that STILL isn't a majority. But, democracy threatens our democracy, lols… |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:37:48 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Lol. Thanks for admitting that the voters of Maricopa County want this audit. I have no doubt the majority of the Republican base wants this audit. So what? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:38:22 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Lol. Thanks for admitting that the voters of Maricopa County want this audit. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Originally Posted By Troutman84: Politicians back things when it is politically expedient for them to do so, not because of some moral compass or sense of right and wrong. They just want to get re-elected 
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:44:25 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: I have no doubt the majority of the Republican base wants this audit. So what? |
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:46:24 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Lol. Thanks for admitting that the voters of Maricopa County want this audit.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:47:03 PM EDT
[#12]
"I've fully investigated myself, and have come to the conclusion that I am totally innocent. Now drop it!"
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:48:14 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Lol. Oh, so it's just the rank and file plebes who want it; well they should be ignored and middle-fingered per usual--is that the POV? Of course not. Wanting an audit, and recognizing the results of the cyber ninja audit are politically biased, are two separate things. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:49:40 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Lol. The senate Democrats and their lone lapdog RINO don't want the audit. And that STILL isn't a majority. Then call up Fann and convince her to hold the contempt vote. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:50:09 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Layer60: Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Layer60: Originally Posted By Anydaynow: Originally Posted By Troutman84: Politicians back things when it is politically expedient for them to do so, not because of some moral compass or sense of right and wrong. They just want to get re-elected Only the left's mental gymnastical manipulation could ever associate election oversight and transparency as a threat to democracy. Do ya'll arf lefties actually believe that BS? Rhetorical question only, but I'm sure ya'll have an unlimited supply of retort. Buts its all bull$hit. |
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:51:01 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: Of course not. Wanting an audit, and recognizing the results of the cyber ninja audit are politically biased, are two separate things. Lol. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:54:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PolarBear416]
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: Hey plebes, you can have your audit--but only if it's Democrat and Dominion approved. Lol. Would you trust an audit run by the Biden campaign though? No one is going to accept the results of this audit outside Trump's hardcore base that already believe as a matter of faith that the election was stolen (even though they have no proof). |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:54:29 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Then call up Fann and convince her to hold the contempt vote.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:54:37 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: Of course not. Wanting an audit, and recognizing the results of the cyber ninja audit are politically biased, are two separate things. |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:55:31 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: Of course not. Wanting an audit, and recognizing the results of the cyber ninja audit are politically biased, are two separate things. People have to actually SEE something to RECOGNIZE something. Are you beginning to see a problem? |
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:56:28 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Would you trust an audit run by the Biden campaign though? No one is going to accept the results of this audit outside Trump's hardcore base that already believe as a matter of faith that the election was stolen (even though they have no proof).  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:56:33 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Would you trust an audit run by the Biden campaign though? No one is going to accept the results of this audit outside Trump's hardcore base that already believe as a matter of faith that the election was stolen (even though they have no proof). There has been no evidence of election fraud in 2020 ? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:56:41 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By clutchsmoke: So politicaly biased that they'll create fraud where there is none? So you're saying they're just making all of this up? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By clutchsmoke: Originally Posted By Troutman84: Of course not. Wanting an audit, and recognizing the results of the cyber ninja audit are politically biased, are two separate things. This audit is funded in part by a PAC run by Sidney Powell. Didn't she get caught doing that a bunch of times? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 1:58:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By clutchsmoke: So politicaly biased that they'll create fraud where there is none? So you're saying they're just making all of this up? I don’t know. I just think it’s ridiculous to assume the election was a fraud, but this partisan audit bought and paid for by Trump’s campaign won’t be. But frankly, at this point, I don’t know how you can get a non-partisan look at the 2020 election. One side is going to say one thing, and the other side will say the opposite. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:00:51 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Would you trust an audit run by the Biden campaign though? No one is going to accept the results of this audit outside Trump's hardcore base that already believe as a matter of faith that the election was stolen (even though they have no proof). Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Originally Posted By Anydaynow: Hey plebes, you can have your audit--but only if it's Democrat and Dominion approved. Lol. Would you trust an audit run by the Biden campaign though? No one is going to accept the results of this audit outside Trump's hardcore base that already believe as a matter of faith that the election was stolen (even though they have no proof). There is a ton of circumstantial evidence pointing to widespread election fraud in at least 4 states. Leftwing lapdogs like yourself set the bar so high for proving fraud that you wouldn’t “believe” it even if Biden came out and admitted it. Which, he did. |
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:01:09 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: I don’t know. I just think it’s ridiculous to assume the election was a fraud, but this partisan audit bought and paid for by Trump’s campaign won’t be. But frankly, at this point, I don’t know how you can get a non-partisan look at the 2020 election. One side is going to say one thing, and the other side will say the opposite. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. One side isn't allowed to say anything. |
|
|
MT, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:01:27 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By brich2929: If only the founders had written some sort of... guidance. Yep, something like the Declaration of Independence, but it's old and out dated and that sorta action would never work. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:02:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PolarBear416]
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RancidAR: There has been no evidence of election fraud in 2020 ? Not according to the judges who ruled against Trump sixty times. Powell and Giuliani not only lost their cases, but lost in such an epic way that their law licenses got suspended for dishonesty, and they are getting sued into oblivion for defamation. Now Powell is funding this audit... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:02:24 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Would you trust an audit run by the Biden campaign though? No one is going to accept the results of this audit outside Trump's hardcore base that already believe as a matter of faith that the election was stolen (even though they have no proof). The election is not going to be overturned, |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:03:25 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Not according to the judges who ruled against Trump sixty times. Powell and Giuliani not only lost their cases, but lost in such as epic way that their law licenses got suspended for dishonesty, and they are getting sued into oblivion for defamation. Spin spin spin ! That isn't what I asked you |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:03:30 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: This audit is funded in part by a PAC run by Sidney Powell. Didn't she get caught doing that a bunch of times? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:05:07 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: I don't know. I just think it's ridiculous to assume the election was a fraud, but this partisan audit bought and paid for by Trump's campaign won't be. But frankly, at this point, I don't know how you can get a non-partisan look at the 2020 election. One side is going to say one thing, and the other side will say the opposite. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:05:37 PM EDT
[#33]
The best outcome from all of this would be for states to pass integrity election laws that require a post-election audit by the state's auditor (there is one in every state) after every election where the election is decided by votes within a "margin of error", say 2% or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:05:47 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By slack_out: People have to actually SEE something to RECOGNIZE something. Are you beginning to see a problem? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By slack_out: Originally Posted By Troutman84: Of course not. Wanting an audit, and recognizing the results of the cyber ninja audit are politically biased, are two separate things. People have to actually SEE something to RECOGNIZE something. Are you beginning to see a problem? Let’s fight an audit every step of the way and then use that obstruction combined with evidence spoliation to claim there is no evidence of fraud. And when indicators of fraud are found (example - thousands of mail in ballots with no folds or creases), move the goal post to “insignificant amounts of fraud, did not affect outcome” and keep obstructing further investigation. |
|
|
|
MS, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:05:56 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: I don’t know. I just think it’s ridiculous to assume the election was a fraud, but this partisan audit bought and paid for by Trump’s campaign won’t be. But frankly, at this point, I don’t know how you can get a non-partisan look at the 2020 election. One side is going to say one thing, and the other side will say the opposite. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: Originally Posted By clutchsmoke: So politicaly biased that they'll create fraud where there is none? So you're saying they're just making all of this up? I don’t know. I just think it’s ridiculous to assume the election was a fraud, but this partisan audit bought and paid for by Trump’s campaign won’t be. But frankly, at this point, I don’t know how you can get a non-partisan look at the 2020 election. One side is going to say one thing, and the other side will say the opposite. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. The ones running the show, the AZ legislature, is the only side that matters. If they decide there was fraud and act accordingly to secure future elections, that should tell you the right path forward. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:06:59 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Drakich: There is a ton of circumstantial evidence pointing to widespread election fraud in at least 4 states. Leftwing lapdogs like yourself set the bar so high for proving fraud that you wouldn’t “believe” it even if Biden came out and admitted it. Which, he did. [mikePolarTrout] "No, he never did! Taken out of context! He meant something else! What he meant when he said what he said was not what he meant to say when he said what he didn't mean to say!" [/mikePolarTrout] |
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:07:25 PM EDT
[#37]
ShareBlue, Inc.
** seen here with Google crystals **  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:07:29 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By XxbatraiderxX: The ones running the show, the AZ legislature, is the only side that matters. If they decide there was fraud and act accordingly to secure future elections, that should tell you the right path forward. I hope legislation reform is passed to secure future elections, regardless of the outcome of some audit. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:11:18 PM EDT
[Last Edit: GLHX2112]
[#39]
"Furthermore, the Maricopa County EMS (election management system) is not, and never has been, connected to the Internet; therefore, nothing related to the EMS is on the routers"
LoL, my first question would be: "Does any one/single piece of your "Election Management System" have a USB port, or for the older Voting Equipment, a Compact Flash Port ?" /ArgementOver. If it's electronic it can be fucked with and information changed. Lots of vids of older systems getting hacked via the above mentioned ports. Yes, some of the older equipment used CF Ports for transferring data and updating the machines. I know, its crazy.  Lots of Air-Gapped Iranian computer equpment out there that has never been connected to the net has been gang-banged by just about every Western intel service that exists.  Maricopa thinking they are safe/hack-proof is cute. Adorable. And Stupid. |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:13:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Anydaynow]
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: I don't know. I just think it's ridiculous to assume the election was a fraud, but this partisan audit bought and paid for by Trump's campaign won't be. But frankly, at this point, I don't know how you can get a non-partisan look at the 2020 election. One side is going to say one thing, and the other side will say the opposite. The truth is likely somewhere in the middle. Soros-Funded Colorado Sec. of State Moves to Eliminate Signature Verification, Protect Dead Voters and Put a Gag Order on Poll Workers https://notmainstreamnews.us/soros-funded-colorado-sec-of-state-moves-to-eliminate-signature-verification-protect-dead-voters-and-put-gag-order-on-poll-workers-hearing-today-at-1-pm/ Soros-funded Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, is moving quickly to crack down on free, fair and open elections in the state. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:16:12 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: They cheated in 2020 but they'll never do it again. You can trust Soros and the Democrats; they would never lie to you. Soros-Funded Colorado Sec. of State Moves to Eliminate Signature Verification, Protect Dead Voters and Put a Gag Order on Poll Workers https://notmainstreamnews.us/soros-funded-colorado-sec-of-state-moves-to-eliminate-signature-verification-protect-dead-voters-and-put-gag-order-on-poll-workers-hearing-today-at-1-pm/ Soros-funded Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, is moving quickly to crack down on free, fair and open elections in the state. Why would someone get rid of signature verification if they weren't really for fraudulent elections? That's what our POS SOS did and the Chief of the Claims Court ruled subsequently that that order was ILLEGAL. So, why do it if not for fraud committing reasons??? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:16:20 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Anydaynow: They cheated in 2020 but they'll never do it again. You can trust Soros and the Democrats; they would never lie to you. Soros-Funded Colorado Sec. of State Moves to Eliminate Signature Verification, Protect Dead Voters and Put a Gag Order on Poll Workers https://notmainstreamnews.us/soros-funded-colorado-sec-of-state-moves-to-eliminate-signature-verification-protect-dead-voters-and-put-gag-order-on-poll-workers-hearing-today-at-1-pm/ Soros-funded Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, is moving quickly to crack down on free, fair and open elections in the state.  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:16:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RDak]
[#43]
Oops
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:16:38 PM EDT
[#44]
I see the Share_Blue Squad is here to tamp down any enthusiasm that the republicans could actually do anything right or moral, which is ironic given how completely morally bankrupt and evil their party is.
|
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:16:41 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Troutman84: I hope legislation reform is passed to secure future elections, regardless of the outcome of some audit. They're giving you a clue here. It doesn't take a master sleuth to figure it out. |
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:18:52 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Theodoric: The best outcome from all of this would be for states to pass integrity election laws that require a post-election audit by the state's auditor (there is one in every state) after every election where the election is decided by votes within a "margin of error", say 2% or something like that. Then the Dems will just make sure to get more than 2% more votes. Remember Biden, most votes in history and more than Obumer which are both totally believable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:19:05 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryOriginally Posted By RancidAR: Originally Posted By Anydaynow: They cheated in 2020 but they'll never do it again. You can trust Soros and the Democrats; they would never lie to you. Soros-Funded Colorado Sec. of State Moves to Eliminate Signature Verification, Protect Dead Voters and Put a Gag Order on Poll Workers https://notmainstreamnews.us/soros-funded-colorado-sec-of-state-moves-to-eliminate-signature-verification-protect-dead-voters-and-put-gag-order-on-poll-workers-hearing-today-at-1-pm/ Soros-funded Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold, is moving quickly to crack down on free, fair and open elections in the state. /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/thatwasdifferent-667.gif Everyone knows that the democrats are objecting to all this stuff so much because they KNOW they will have a MUCH harder time winning if their fraudulent practices are stopped. |
|
|
|
GA, USA
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:20:59 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By RDak: Why would someone get rid of signature verification if they weren't really for fraudulent elections? That's what our POS SOS did and the Chief of the Claims Court ruled subsequently that that order was ILLEGAL. So, why do it if not for fraud committing reasons??? Mass mail-in ballots is the Democrats nirvana. Idk how blind a person would have to be not to see it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:21:38 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Not according to the judges who ruled against Trump sixty times. Powell and Giuliani not only lost their cases, but lost in such an epic way that their law licenses got suspended for dishonesty, and they are getting sued into oblivion for defamation. Now Powell is funding this audit... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2021 2:22:21 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Not according to the judges who ruled against Trump sixty times. Powell and Giuliani not only lost their cases, but lost in such an epic way that their law licenses got suspended for dishonesty, and they are getting sued into oblivion for defamation. Now Powell is funding this audit... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PolarBear416: Originally Posted By RancidAR: There has been no evidence of election fraud in 2020 ? Not according to the judges who ruled against Trump sixty times. Powell and Giuliani not only lost their cases, but lost in such an epic way that their law licenses got suspended for dishonesty, and they are getting sued into oblivion for defamation. Now Powell is funding this audit... If this isn't outing yourself..............very few of these court rulings were "ruling against Trump". The vast majority where not ruled upon on merits, nor was an evidence actually considered. The vast majority of these were rejected based on technicalities such as "lack of standing", wrong jurisdiction, etc. |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
