User Panel
Posted: 2/1/2023 1:45:33 PM EDT
I woke up this morning feeling ill. It turns out that I have Springfield fever.
I desperately need a 1903 Springfield. I would be grateful if folks here would post pictures of their Springfield 1903s. And tell me a bit about them. |
|
Don't have the ability to post them here.
I have a 1922 SA, the rifle is amazingly simple to shoot and if you reload, it greatly improves accuracy. I know it's a pipe dream but I wish I could find a good barrel from '22 for when it needs to be replaced. Depending on the year and condition, be prepared to pay for it. |
|
Attached File
This is a later one with the receiver milled for the Pederson device. The M1 Carbine is an IBM. I don’t have a picture on my phone of just the 1903. |
|
No pics but I own a 1903, 1903mk1 and an 03a3.
All 3 are just shooters grade. I only own 1 garand fluff. |
|
next it will be a 1917, from what I understand these are like Garands
|
|
CMP South Store has had some in stock for in person purchasing.
I’ve been extremely tempted to book a flight. |
|
Quoted: 1931 SA receiver, Properly drilled and tapped. Some time in the 1960s it was rescued from obscurity and fitted with a .270 Cal Douglas Premium barrel and of course the ugly beater wood was ditched for a Fajen stock. From the looks of the work, it was done by a master gunsmith. It's about a 1moa rifle with factory ammo. I paid $200 OTD because the dealer had already sold the classic Redfield scope to someone else. In the era this rifle was saved, 1moa was considered exceptional. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/10063/20210511_061611-1937935.jpg View Quote |
|
I bought a nice 1903A3 from the CMP back in early 2003 for $400. I was a college freshman and that was about all the extra cash I had at the time. It's one of my favorites.
I'll try to post pics later. I'm not at home currently. |
|
|
I haven't seen it yet but I'm picking up a Remington 1903 from my uncle next time I stop by. He's getting too old to shoot it.
|
|
|
Sorry too lazy to take pictures and then upload.
But, I have a very nice "sub" S/N 750,000 early 1916ish Springfield, and a very nice Aug 43 Remington 03A3. Clear stamps, clear Ord inspection marks, un-bubba'd survivors (fyi, sub 750K's for Springfield and sub 200Kish for Rock Islands are exploding death traps of doom according to "experts". Pre late 1920ish heat treating was a little different regarding metallurgy of the receiver, take that as you may. Myself and many others run the low S/N units for both Springfield and Rock Island without issue for decades. But, that's your call and it's sometimes why early low S/N samples can be had for significantly less) What can you say, if you've shot or worked a Mauser then you can fit tight in with an 03. Sure the Magazine cutoff switch is a throwback to "those enlisted savages" wasting ammunition and Napoleonic tactics. Not a huge fan of the sights, regardless of the "original" leaf type or, the latter A3 WW2 configuration that more closely resembles a Type 2/Type 3 Sight for an M1 Carbine. I prefer the USMC sight hood for the blade and the Corps was correct in their assessment of it needing the "add-on" hood. If you want one get one, you can't go wrong. Personal opinion in terms of a Military Rifle of the era, I much prefer its predecessor and the 1898 30.40 Krag just for the action alone. If you know, you know. But for a bolt gun in 30.06 that was produced in parallel, Sorry but M1917 all day every day over the 03. Taking the Pattern 14 Enfield we were building for the UK and kicking it to 30.06 from .303 was brilliant. My personal issued collection fairly well goes back to the M1816 Harpers Ferry (some day 6mm Lee Navy from the USS Maine and sold from Bannermans, you will be mine), so I get a good reference point of shooters. You can't tell the story of, or immerse yourself in the shooting experience of the US issued rifle without the 03, it's a keystone rifle not an obscure footnote. But call it what it is, it's a Model (18) 92/93 7mm Mauser with some American changes. |
|
|
Quoted: Mine are both Remingtons - an early '03 from 1942 and a late '03-A3 from 1944. https://i.imgur.com/eScGotH.jpg https://i.imgur.com/KNn3YSs.jpg Both have their original Remington stocks. The small parts are a mix, but both are mostly Remington. https://i.imgur.com/evd6XPn.jpg Also, it's very important to make sure you turn your 1903s off after use. Otherwise the battery runs down. View Quote Every gun I recall you posting is cool as shit. You’ve got some nice stuff. |
|
|
Quoted: Saved many sporters that had just cut stocks. Stock fitting is not for the impatient. I have not found a drop in stock that gave proper clearances while maintaining the proper barrel tension up front. CMP games don’t allow bedding. If you fit them correctly, accuracy is excellent. https://i.imgur.com/IwZeWCM.jpg https://i.imgur.com/x3kbzY7.jpg https://i.imgur.com/DPqgG7F.jpg View Quote The stock on mine was made by Boyds, and you're right about the fitting. I don't think I can count high enough to recall the hours I have into both stocks I have for the rifle. Not so much that there was a bunch of excess to remove, but really fine amounts over large areas. |
|
|
My grandfather's WW1 service rifle turned out to have been manufactured in 1921. Oh, well...
|
|
My humble CMP 1903’s. Ones a 1920’s ( something) Attached File
SA 1903A1. The other a Smith Corona 1943 Attached File Attached File |
|
|
|
I have a 11-18 made Rock Island, a 1934 made Springfield, a Remington 03A3 and a Smith Corona 03A3.
|
|
Damn I really need to get some pictures.
M1903 that was sporterized. Dates to 1929 with matching barrel. Replaced the cut down scant stock with a no finger groove S stock. M1903 MkI dated to 1920 with original barrel. Still has the original MkI modded finger groove S stock. No other MkI parts are present though. M1903A3 Smith-Corona 1943 with matching barrel adn a replacement Keystone C stock. |
|
|
Here is one of mine. This is a Remington 1903 made in 1942
I bought it at a gun show and it had a dirty barrel. When I cleaned it I found the barrel was ringed. I was lucky to find not one but two NOS barrels, Remington, both 1942 So I had both re-barreled Enjoy Attached File Attached File Attached File |
|
Mine is a A3 feom 1944 in great shape.
They suck for bump Firing |
|
|
Quoted: I woke up this morning feeling ill. It turns out that I have Springfield fever. I desperately need a 1903 Springfield. I would be grateful if folks here would post pictures of their Springfield 1903s. And tell me a bit about them. View Quote I was hunting with my girlfriend Debbie and I shot my 1st bull moose opening morning at 8am Sept 1st 1980 with my dad's sporterized 03. I finished skinning the last quarter at noon in the meat house having hauled him the mile and a half back to camp in the Coot. The cabin was full of people and we had to sleep on the floor behind the Woodstove. My hunting and shooting skills had impressed her so my day ended with a great BJ. Get an 03 maybe you could have a perfect day. |
|
Quoted: The Perfect Day I was hunting with my girlfriend Debbie and I shot my 1st bull moose opening morning at 8am Sept 1st 1980 with my dad's sporterized 03. I finished skinning the last quarter at noon in the meat house having hauled him the mile and a half back to camp in the Coot. The cabin was full of people and we had to sleep on the floor behind the Woodstove. My hunting and shooting skills had impressed her so my day ended with a great BJ. Get an 03 maybe you could have a perfect day. View Quote Now I really want one. |
|
I have a 1903 Mark I that I inherited from my grandfather. WW2 rework but it has its original barrel and stock. He may have gotten it from the DCM. Barrel is 9-18, latest I had ever seen on a Mark I and is absolutely pristine.
Last time I shot it we put a couple dozen rounds of factory AP rounds through a 1/2" steel plate. |
|
I've been wanting one for a long time. I fondled a friend's '03-A3. For a long gun, it doesn't feel long. It was also much lighter than I expected. Handles really nice.
Shit. I have money to buy one, but I really need to put it into home repairs. If I spend the evening at the Simpson Ltd web site, it will be the OP's fault. |
|
|
Quoted: For a long gun, it doesn't feel long. It was also much lighter than I expected. Handles really nice. View Quote One of the main points of the design, IIRC, was to split the difference between the traditional rifle length (32.5" for the trapdoors, 30" for the Krags) and the carbine (22" for both trapdoors and Krags). Hence no carbine (well, standard or widely issued carbine) until the semi-auto era. |
|
Fluffy wants pictures and then leaves us hanging
No comments on the pics? Voyeur maybe? |
|
View Quote How do you know it's a USMC? |
|
Quoted: https://i.imgur.com/evd6XPn.jpg Also, it's very important to make sure you turn your 1903s off after use. Otherwise the battery runs down. View Quote I only turn mine on at the command of an officer. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.