Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 4
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:43:54 AM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:

Who say's it would be anything like Canada or France?

You probably think socialism is vested in some authoriatrian power that choose's what's good for it's people.  That is not what socialism is defined as.  That is just how people have implemented socialism.  It doesnt mean that's what socialism is.

Don't insult my education.  You know nothing about it.  



every socialist setup always pointed at the last one that failed and said "it wont be anything like that!"

yet for some reason they all seem to end up in the same place, trying to please everyone by making free programs that are not free.  they take away the freedom of choosing what is best for yourself and replace it with a mediocre ineffective government beurocracy.  yet they keep trying it.

perhaps old Benny Franklin said it best "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. "
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:44:25 AM EDT
[#2]
Some of my friends posts on there so we can chat during the day.

www.myspace.com/nukeitall
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:44:39 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:

Quoted:

The government prints money fool,  we don't need taxes.



  And you are telling people to get an education?  FOAD.

-Dan.



The government does'nt print money?

Wow,  maybe the study was right.  College students can't even balance their checkbooks.  Because you all are dumb as rocks.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:45:38 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Who say's it would be anything like Canada or France?

You probably think socialism is vested in some authoriatrian power that choose's what's good for it's people.  That is not what socialism is defined as.  That is just how people have implemented socialism.  It doesnt mean that's what socialism is.

Don't insult my education.  You know nothing about it.  



every socialist setup always pointed at the last one that failed and said "it wont be anything like that!"

yet for some reason they all seem to end up in the same place, trying to please everyone by making free programs that are not free.  they take away the freedom of choosing what is best for yourself and replace it with a mediocre ineffective government beurocracy.  yet they keep trying it.

perhaps old Benny Franklin said it best "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. "



You don't understand. The right people haven't been in charge all those times it failed. It takes someone as intelligent as implementoftrolling to run the socialist scheme properly.

Under his / her / its leadership, socialism can't possibly fail!
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:46:31 AM EDT
[#5]
I'm going to IBTL this one...
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:46:48 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

The government prints money fool,  we don't need taxes.



  And you are telling people to get an education?  FOAD.

-Dan.



The government does'nt print money?

Wow,  maybe the study was right.  College students can't even balance their checkbooks.  Because you all are dumb as rocks.




so I guess hyperinflation in Germany post WWI and in Argentina when the governments just started printing money at will to pay debts was just a fluke?  and you speak rather badly of college students when you merely have a high school diploma?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:47:55 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Who say's it would be anything like Canada or France?

You probably think socialism is vested in some authoriatrian power that choose's what's good for it's people.  That is not what socialism is defined as.  That is just how people have implemented socialism.  It doesnt mean that's what socialism is.

Don't insult my education.  You know nothing about it.  



every socialist setup always pointed at the last one that failed and said "it wont be anything like that!"

yet for some reason they all seem to end up in the same place, trying to please everyone by making free programs that are not free.  they take away the freedom of choosing what is best for yourself and replace it with a mediocre ineffective government beurocracy.  yet they keep trying it.

perhaps old Benny Franklin said it best "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. "



You don't understand. The right people haven't been in charge all those times it failed. It takes someone as intelligent as implementoftrolling to run the socialist scheme properly.

Under his / her / its leadership, socialism can't possibly fail!



or there's the other possibility that you are unwilling to accept:  Socialism is a flawed theory that will not work regardless of who is in charge.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:49:22 AM EDT
[#8]
My idea of socialism is'nt picking what job's people do.  

I am the biggest supporter or liberty there could ever possibly be.

My idea of socialism is rewarding people for graduating high school,  college,  and staying out of trouble.  My idea of socialism would be social class's where you can work your way up the ladder of success.  You graduate high school,  you get social benefits.  You graduate a college degree program,  you get more benefits.  You work in a job that society deems more useful,  you get more money.  You need a job,  there will always be a job and free training SOMEWHERE.  You still want to sell knick knacks out of your basement,  fine.  You still want to develop your own products,  fine.  But if you have skills or need skills and a job,  you will get one.  And you will get one doing something YOU want to do.

No rat race.  No capitalism.  No greed.  No poverty.  

No authoritarian power.  

The people still control the government.

Civil rights are granted.  You can build machine guns in your basement without the government telling you that you can't.

So don't insult my intelligence.  I am not your typical socialist moron.  And I dont have the typical view of socialism that most poeple do.  And it's more complicated to explain to the idiots in this forum.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:53:15 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
I am the biggest supporter or liberty there could ever possibly be.




And everything else you post shows that to be false.

Ah, wonder how the trolls can frolic here.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:53:43 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I am the biggest supporter or liberty there could ever possibly be.




And everything else you post shows that to be false.

Ah, wonder how the trolls can frolic here.



Give me an example.  If you can give me an example on where I am in contradicion to liberty please explain yourself.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:54:34 AM EDT
[#11]
that sounds like a command economy, aka communism.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:57:18 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
that sounds like a command economy, aka communism.




Depends how you define communism.

dictionary.com
"A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members."

I don't support the collective ownership of property.  I support private property.

I do support organizing labor.  But I dont support picking what jobs people have.




Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:57:44 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
that sounds like a command economy, aka communism.




It is.
This dude has been banned umpteen times.
This is his 3rd or 4th account.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:58:39 AM EDT
[#14]
Some of my friends & I are on MySpace. I like it.
I know some bands who use it to advertize themselves.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 9:59:16 AM EDT
[#15]
I'm beating my head against a wall of ignorance here.

go move to canada or france and live your socialist paradise dream, assuming you can find a job.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:00:59 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
I'm beating my head against a wall of ignorance here.

go move to canada or france and live your socialist paradise dream, assuming you can find a job.



Those countries are a joke.  And they have nothing to do with my view of the perfect social structure.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:03:46 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I am the biggest supporter or liberty there could ever possibly be.




And everything else you post shows that to be false.

Ah, wonder how the trolls can frolic here.



Give me an example.  If you can give me an example on where I am in contradicion to liberty please explain yourself.



no.

You know why?

Because you're just a troll.

That's all you're here to do. Waste people's time, incite them, and bring a little joy to your pathetic little life by seeing the commotion you caused.

A common attention whore who can't do anything of note on his own, so he resorts to joining a board where 99% of the people disagree with his views, and then pushes his views like he knows more and the other people are just common idiots.

That's one of the sure signs of being a troll. Here, let me quote it for you;

So don't insult my intelligence. I am not your typical socialist moron. And I dont have the typical view of socialism that most poeple do. And it's more complicated to explain to the idiots in this forum.

You're so much more intelligent than the idiots on the forum, yet you feel the need to join and post here.

Which shows you're just here for the rush of all the attention you get by acting like an idiot.

Unfortunately ARFCOM has the policy of letting trolls play until the violate one of the CoC rules, which just turns the board into a cesspool of trolling until the trolls actually violate one of the rules.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:04:52 AM EDT
[#18]
Six pages and a lock.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:12:52 AM EDT
[#19]
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend yourself.





Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:14:04 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend yourself.



Oh yea?
Well you are dumb.
Want to know how I know?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:14:43 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend your view.




not falling for it. You just want me to waste  my  time on you.

Here's the concise answer:

Socialism can only be funded by denying people their economic liberty. Tada. There, done in one sentence.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:15:17 AM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend yourself.



Oh yea?
Well you are dumb.
Want to know how I know?



You may THINK i'm dumb.  I guarantee you know very little about me.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:17:06 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend yourself.



Oh yea?
Well you are dumb.
Want to know how I know?



You may THINK i'm dumb.  I guarantee you know very little about me.



I know you are dumb enough to post a link to pics of yourself.


With an face like that, one has to wonder if your mother drank while you were in the womb.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:23:40 AM EDT
[#24]
myspace is a great site to not allow your teenage kids to use.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:28:06 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend yourself.








are you going to send me to the goulag for arguing with you?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:28:16 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
myspace is a great site to not allow your teenage kids to use.



+1 on that.

It's one of those things your kids may hate you for while they're growing up, but when they're adults they'll understand.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:29:17 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

You're dumb for arguiing with me.




that's because you're nothing more than a common troll.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:33:09 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend your view.




not falling for it. You just want me to waste  my  time on you.

Here's the concise answer:

Socialism can only be funded by denying people their economic liberty. Tada. There, done in one sentence.



Explain to me how my view of socialism would deny people their economic liberty.  I support private business.  I don't want to break up Microsoft or the energy companies.  I just want a foundation where poeple can get free education and a job.  There is no reason an organized job pool and private business can't work together.  The closest thing we have is the Military.  The US government is already the major employer in the US.  Obviously because of it's size,  but also for other reason's having to do with the faults in our society like people not being able to afford college,  no job's, lack of skills,  or the government being the only employer in fields like social work etc.

There are only so many thing's people can do in society.  Realistically we don't need millions of poeple with bachelors degree's in chemistry or physics.  The government needs to step in and organize job's for everyone if they wanted them,  even if we don't necessarily need them.

Im sure the government already does this.  Setting up front business to stimulate the economy and giving people job's.

How many graphics designers do we need?  How many webpage makers do we need?  How many business managers do we need?  How many chemists do we need?  How many psychologists do we need?  How many nurse's?  How many doctors?

if we have a billion radioologists,  there isnt a demand for them to utilize their skills.  We need the socialist foundation as something to lean back on.  Give people free will,   but also setup the bucket to collect the runoff.

And there is nothing wrong with free education.  And yes the government does'nt need funding,  they can fund themselves.  The treasury department can just say we are printing a trillion dollars to promote economic health.  If other countrie's devalue the dollar,  fine.  It will get rid of our trade deficit and isolate this country to be more self sufficient.

All good things.

Nothing I said contradicts liberty.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:34:41 AM EDT
[#29]
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:37:50 AM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:37:56 AM EDT
[#31]
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:42:57 AM EDT
[#32]
Have you graduated high school yet, or what?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:45:40 AM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.



this is the most ignorant idea I've ever heard.  
google German Hyperinflation, that's what happens when you just print money.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:46:21 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
Have you graduated high school yet, or what?



A long time ago.  And my higher education is private.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:46:50 AM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.



You print your money when you need it?

Economics 101 is calling your name.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:48:42 AM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.



this is the most ignorant idea I've ever heard.  
google German Hyperinflation, that's what happens when you just print money.



Explain why and how you think there would be inflation and I will correct you.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:49:26 AM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.



You print your money when you need it?

Economics 101 is calling your name.



Explain yourself or keep your faulted opinion to yourself.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:49:49 AM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
It's true.  Most people are dumb.

You're dumb for arguiing with me.

If you can't see enlightenment on your own.  You're dumb.

It's not in my personality to explain myself to you.  There is a great chance I don't respect you enough for me to want to.

Thanks bastiat for explaining to me how my view contradicted liberty,  I was'nt expecting you to.  Thanks for pulling the troll card when you could'nt defend your view.




not falling for it. You just want me to waste  my  time on you.

Here's the concise answer:

Socialism can only be funded by denying people their economic liberty. Tada. There, done in one sentence.



Explain to me how my view of socialism would deny people their economic liberty.  I support private business.  I don't want to break up Microsoft or the energy companies.  I just want a foundation where poeple can get free education and a job.  There is no reason an organized job pool and private business can't work together.  The closest thing we have is the Military.  The US government is already the major employer in the US.  Obviously because of it's size,  but also for other reason's having to do with the faults in our society like people not being able to afford college,  no job's, lack of skills,  or the government being the only employer in fields like social work etc.

There are only so many thing's people can do in society.  Realistically we don't need millions of poeple with bachelors degree's in chemistry or physics.  The government needs to step in and organize job's for everyone if they wanted them,  even if we don't necessarily need them.

Im sure the government already does this.  Setting up front business to stimulate the economy and giving people job's.

How many graphics designers do we need?  How many webpage makers do we need?  How many business managers do we need?  How many chemists do we need?  How many psychologists do we need?  How many nurse's?  How many doctors?

if we have a billion radioologists,  there isnt a demand for them to utilize their skills.  We need the socialist foundation as something to lean back on.  Give people free will,   but also setup the bucket to collect the runoff.

And there is nothing wrong with free education.  And yes the government does'nt need funding,  they can fund themselves.  The treasury department can just say we are printing a trillion dollars to promote economic health.  If other countrie's devalue the dollar,  fine.  It will get rid of our trade deficit and isolate this country to be more self sufficient.

All good things.

Nothing I said contradicts liberty.



Here are the options:

1. You don't believe this crap and you're just trolling for fun.

or:

2. You really do believe the moronic BS you spout here, and are trolling because you really think you can change somebody's mind by constantly spouting stupid crap.

Either way it's pathetic.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:50:18 AM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Have you graduated high school yet, or what?



A long time ago.  And my higher education is private.






Private?
You might want to get your money back!
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:50:34 AM EDT
[#40]
I didnt bring up the argument.  Some idiot did when he read my myspace profile.

I did'nt come here advertising my beleif.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:51:49 AM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Have you graduated high school yet, or what?



A long time ago.  And my higher education is private.




i10.photobucket.com/albums/a103/thedoctors308/motivator56da0143a8bd825e49b94bcebd.jpg

Private?
You might want to get your money back!



That's funny.  Who are the troll's here?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:52:10 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.



You print your money when you need it?

Economics 101 is calling your name.



Explain yourself or keep your faulted opinion to yourself.



It's simple economics. When the money supply increases, the supply curve for $$ shifts drastically to the right. This drives down the ability to buy anything. You'll have to keep printing obscene amounts of $$ to even buy a loaf of bread. Like TRH said, check out hyperinflation in Germany and the picture of people hauling wheelbarrows of Deutchmarks to go shopping for basic items.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:54:11 AM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:
I didnt bring up the argument.  Some idiot did when he read my myspace profile.

I did'nt come here advertising my beleif.



Au contraire, mon ami!
How do I file suit against the US government - by Implement of War

Good for a laugh.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:55:31 AM EDT
[#44]
Maaaaaybe 8 pages and a lock.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 10:59:42 AM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
how would you fund it?  or are all the teachers and doctors going to just donate their services for charity?



We fund ourself.

Money is just paper,  it is only worth what we say it's worth.  We print what we need,  and give it the value we think is appropiate.  If other countries don't agree or devalue our currency,   F THEM.  I don't support foreign trade.  I support  self sufficiency.

We don't need oil.  There are technologies that can replace oil.  And we certainly don't need cheap overseas products.  If we were more socialist then our society would be able to afford to pay our own labor.



You print your money when you need it?

Economics 101 is calling your name.



Explain yourself or keep your faulted opinion to yourself.



It's simple economics. When the money supply increases, the supply curve for $$ shifts drastically to the right. This drives down the ability to buy anything. You'll have to keep printing obscene amounts of $$ to even buy a loaf of bread. Like TRH said, check out hyperinflation in Germany and the picture of people hauling wheelbarrows of Deutchmarks to go shopping for basic items.



Negative.  You mean supply can't keep up with demand and prices rise?  If that is the case,  then more bread companies take shape and it stimulates.   Or those companies grow.

Or you think the bread companies will say "Since there is so much money now,  we will charge 100$ for a loaf of bread,  because we want to have more money and be more greedy".

The federal government can always regulate trade by price setting.  If the price setting is reasonable for the companies to exist,  and everyone makes a decent wage.  What's the problem?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 11:00:17 AM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:
Nada, never heard of it.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 11:00:48 AM EDT
[#47]
no he means that the supply of money increases therefore its value drops.  

have you ever taken an economics class?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 11:04:33 AM EDT
[#48]

Quoted:
no he means that the supply of money increases therefore its value drops.  

have you ever taken an economics class?



The value drop's how?  In the international market?  Who cares that's their choosing,  we need to stop foreign trade alltogether.  If they don't respect our currency,  fine.  We should be the sole economic superpower anyways with superior products that they WANT to trade with us.  We dont devalue France's currency or Germany's.  We have been reasonable with them,  I'm sure they would be reasonable with us.

We set the value of our currency.  There is no mystical law of physics that regulates our curency value.  We have the free willl to choose the value of our currency.

We will set the reasonable value of our currency for society to operate healthy.

If companies price gouge then competition enters into that market genre and balance's prices.


Link Posted: 2/10/2006 11:09:33 AM EDT
[#49]
to point out the flaw in your misguided logic, consider this:

why has the price of real estate gone up so much recently?  because the supply of money availible for it has increased through cheap loans.  there is no international pressure on the real estate market, at least for single family units.  

the same thing would happen to everything in your economy, if you keep printing money and declare that the value was the same, then everyone will have a basement full of currency and everyone will be filthy rich, but that wont happen.  money keeps its value through being fairly scarce with a static or very slowly expanding supply.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 11:15:03 AM EDT
[#50]
lol thats the greatest thing to adore about this site..... A topic can start out as a "What is my space"  and end up being "American economics 101"
Page / 4
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top