Will There Be A Clear Winner Declared By Wed. Nov 3rd? - Page 2

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Will There Be A Clear Winner Declared By Wed. Nov 3rd? (Page 2 of 2)

Posted: 10/16/2004 5:20:42 AM EDT

[#1]

Quoted:
If Bush hits 320 EV, and either Florida or Ohio are won by 4% or more... no... 300 or fewer EVs and 1 or 2 points in either of those states... we're going to court again.

Yes indeed. The Dems are gearing up the corruption machine in all the big cities. Look for ALOT of racial agitation about 'disenfranchisement' in cities like Miami, Cleveland, Philadelphia, Pittsburg, Detroit, Millwaukee or any other state where the margin of victory is close.

We could be looking forward to a 2000 FLA Recount meets the 1992 Rodney King Verdict Scenario.

Get your tickets now!

Posted: 10/16/2004 5:43:41 AM EDT

[#2]

The general consensus is that there will be no "landslide" on either side...how anyone can think otherwise is beyond me.

Posted: 10/16/2004 5:44:20 AM EDT

[#3]

I think it's exciting. Really.

Posted: 10/16/2004 6:01:26 AM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
Quoted:
A significant # of people in the office are taking 3 November off because of the number of 'disenfranchised voters' that live within 2 blocks of the building. I've changed the route that I take to/from the office to avoid that area. Have setup my trunk guns and am looking at enhancing them prior to the election by DX'ing the M44 for a SAR3/WASR/Mini14. Others are doing the same.

I'm not going to be Reginald Denny the Second. We can reenact Rorke's Drift of 23 January, 1879 if required.

wganz
¶

That is just sad...you are all afraid to go to work for fear of being attacked.

Look at what the Left has done to my country...

To top it off, the liberal management just released a new policy that we are required to come to work in the event of a riot.

¿¿WTF?? I can just visualize those bastards with their Lexus's with their Edwards stickers smooth cruizing into werk that day. If the SHTF on the way to werk, I'm going to expense out my trunk gun $$$$ as a requirement to get to werk just to see the look on their faces.

wganz
¶

Posted: 10/16/2004 6:16:32 AM EDT

[#5]

I can't imagine 40% of the country support sKerry, the socialist bastard

Posted: 10/16/2004 6:19:41 AM EDT

[#6]

There's still a possibility of terrorist "disruptions" prior to or on election day. That could have an effect on numbers of people not voting, and/or concerns about validity of votes cast.

Posted: 10/16/2004 6:21:02 AM EDT

[#7]

I think most here will be pleasently supprised by the vast majority of Americans
that will pull their head out of their butt and vote for GWB

GM

Posted: 10/16/2004 6:26:14 AM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:
I think most here will be pleasently supprised by the vast majority of Americans
that will pull their head out of their butt and vote for GWB

GM

I'm still waiting for the "pleasant surprise" from 1992 and 1996.

Posted: 10/16/2004 6:56:31 AM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I think most here will be pleasently supprised by the vast majority of Americans
that will pull their head out of their butt and vote for GWB

GM

I'm still waiting for the "pleasant surprise" from 1992 and 1996.

You got me there thebeekeeper1

But this time around I think it will be different (fingers crossed)

GM

Posted: 10/16/2004 7:15:54 AM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think most here will be pleasently supprised by the vast majority of Americans
that will pull their head out of their butt and vote for GWB

GM

I'm still waiting for the "pleasant surprise" from 1992 and 1996.

You got me there thebeekeeper1

But this time around I think it will be different (fingers crossed)

GM

My creedo since November, 1996--"Never underestimate the ability of Americans to manifest extreme stupidity when in large numbers."

Posted: 10/16/2004 7:17:22 AM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:

I'm taking my stickers off my truck and the signs out of my front yard a week proir to the election..

Posted: 10/16/2004 7:33:29 AM EDT

[#12]

Quoted:
I heard on the radio this morning that the DNC lawyers are preparing court challenges in every state where the vote is within 5%. One legal analyst is projecting a repeat of Florida in 17 states!

Now consider the following:

- Dems have been registering ineligible voters all across the country
- Dems polling observers have been trained to label requests for a voter ID card or other ID as voter intimidation
- John Kerry's campaign put out a memo instructing Democratic polling observers to make
"pre-emptive" strikes with the help of NAACP officials by claiming voter intimidation even if no voter intimidation occurs (because it is certain that the Republicans will attempt to use voter intimidation to keep minorities from voting)

There is no way this will be settled on 11/3! This may come to violence before all is said and done!

I personally have seen a DNC voting training video where they tell their "volunteers" to IMMEDAITELY call the regional DNC office LAWYERS if sonmeone is denied the vote, even if it's for a (to me anyway) legitimate reasion such as no ID, no proof of residence, etc.

What has me really teed off is the whole "provisional ballot" BS.

Posted: 10/16/2004 8:25:05 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:

I personally have seen a DNC voting training video where they tell their "volunteers" to IMMEDAITELY call the regional DNC office LAWYERS if sonmeone is denied the vote, even if it's for a (to me anyway) legitimate reasion such as no ID, no proof of residence, etc.

What has me really teed off is the whole "provisional ballot" BS.

The 'provisional ballot' rule is what will guarantee chaos after/during the election count. It means that the large urban areas will have significant pools (say equal to 1% to 2% of total votes cast in states) of possibly fraudlent votes. In any state where the margin of victory is near the pool of 'provisional ballots', the Dems will insist that the provisional ballots be counted. And since they will come from precincts which are primarily minority and thus primarily Dem, they will frame it as a 'civil rights' and 'disenfranchisement' issue.

Thus the 2000 FLA Recount meets the 1992 Rodney King Verdict Scenario.

All during a time of war with the whole world watching.

At times, I hate Al Gore more than UBL. Hard to say who did more damage to our Country.

Posted: 10/16/2004 8:28:33 AM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:
i say it will be a big victory for bush, and will be followed by lawsuits for voter fraud

Yep.

Posted: 10/16/2004 8:56:57 AM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I think most here will be pleasently supprised by the vast majority of Americans
that will pull their head out of their butt and vote for GWB

GM

I'm still waiting for the "pleasant surprise" from 1992 and 1996.

Good point about 1992.

1996 - Dole never had a chance. I had absolutely NO allusions of him actually winning the election. I don't think anybody in the RNC did either.

Posted: 10/16/2004 9:09:30 AM EDT

[#16]

Quoted:
Quoted:
This may come to violence before all is said and done!

I hope you're right. *CLICK-CLACK*

Quoted:
Remember, folks.... the law says you can't carry a gun into a polling place on election day. However, it doesn't say anything about...brass knuckles, or switchblades.

Alas, Texas law does -- in general - not just polling places.

I believe "shuck-shick" is closer to the correct sound....

Posted: 10/16/2004 3:11:06 PM EDT

[#17]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Either way, there's gonna be a fight...

They're already planning to do stuff at the polls to intimidate people....

Oh yeah? Like what? How are they going to know who I'm voting for?

Remember, folks.... the law says you can't carry a gun into a polling place on election day. However, it doesn't say anything about ASP batons, pepper spray, brass knuckles, or switchblades.

rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0,1299,DRMN_36_3256347,00.html

Read all about it.... Not that it'll work mind you

Aw shucks.

I thought you meant that they were going to try and intimidate ME on Election Day. I was hoping I'd finally get a chance to use that 26" ASP.

Posted: 10/16/2004 3:15:20 PM EDT

[#18]

resounding victory by bush.

BUT.

then the hoardes of liberal lawyers will decend upon the election boards / committees and it'll end up dragging on for weeks. If it lasts more than 3 weeks, I see the UN sticking their noses in and making proclimations and decrees, and more insults from third-world shitholes about our 'unfair' election practices.

If the UN decides to actually do something about it besides make speeches, I'd be pretty dissappointed if we don't start seeing blue helmets with holes in them soon thereafter.

Posted: 10/16/2004 3:15:22 PM EDT

[#19]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Remember, folks.... the law says you can't carry a gun into a polling place on election day. However, it doesn't say anything about ASP batons, pepper spray, brass knuckles, or switchblades.

Brass nucks, and switchblades are generally illegal anywhere, anytime.

Now, a roll of quarters, or a tactical folder...

Not in Arizona.

ARS 13-3101

7. "Prohibited weapon" means, but does not include fireworks imported, distributed or used in compliance with state laws or local ordinances, any propellant, propellant actuated devices or propellant actuated industrial tools that are manufactured, imported or distributed for their intended purposes or a device that is commercially manufactured primarily for the purpose of illumination, including any of the following:

(a) Explosive, incendiary or poison gas:

(i) Bomb.

(ii) Grenade.

(iii) Rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces.

(iv) Mine.

(b) Device that is designed, made or adapted to muffle the report of a firearm.

(c) Firearm that is capable of shooting more than one shot automatically, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.

(d) Rifle with a barrel length of less than sixteen inches, or shotgun with a barrel length of less than eighteen inches, or any firearm that is made from a rifle or shotgun and that, as modified, has an overall length of less than twenty-six inches.

(e) Instrument, including a nunchaku, that consists of two or more sticks, clubs, bars or rods to be used as handles, connected by a rope, cord, wire or chain, in the design of a weapon used in connection with the practice of a system of self-defense.

(f) Breakable container that contains a flammable liquid with a flash point of one hundred fifty degrees Fahrenheit or less and that has a wick or similar device capable of being ignited.

(g) Chemical or combination of chemicals, compounds or materials, including dry ice, that are placed in a sealed or unsealed container for the purpose of generating a gas to cause a mechanical failure, rupture or bursting of the container.

(h) Combination of parts or materials that is designed and intended for use in making or converting a device into an item set forth in subdivision (a) or (f) of this paragraph.

B. The items set forth in subsection A, paragraph 7, subdivisions (a), (b), (c) and (d) of this section do not include any firearms or devices that are registered in the national firearms registry and transfer records of the United States treasury department or any firearm that has been classified as a curio or relic by the United States treasury department.

Posted: 10/17/2004 1:50:30 AM EDT

[#20]

Now that the Dems lost their election in 2000, they will forever contest all future elections. They will also try and get rid of the electoral college, because they just don't understand the reasoning behind it.

Posted: 10/17/2004 2:48:37 AM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:
Now that the Dems lost their election in 2000, they will forever contest all future elections. They will also try and get ride of the electoral college, because they just don't understand the reasoning behind it.

You know this bothers me more than anything for it is true. Given their way, it would all be decided on popular vote only and the country would find it's self regulated to hell and back by those who live in the large cities.

There are just too many things to list that are appropriate to regulate in the cities but not in the rural areas.

Scary.

Tj

Posted: 10/17/2004 3:17:23 AM EDT

[#22]

I voted Bush a clear winner because that's the truth but the libs are already desperate, will soon have nothing to lose & everything to gain, so I'm actually in the "ya ain't seen nutin yet" camp.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Will There Be A Clear Winner Declared By Wed. Nov 3rd? (Page 2 of 2)

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us