Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 5
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 1:32:32 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because we invaded Germany and freed the people in the concentration camps, and took pictures of it.

1) We saw it first hand
2) It was a "white" European country, and therefore inexorably tied deeply to our own history
3) The Germans made the most efficient human extermination infrastructure known to man

Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and others just aren't as closely tied to our history.
View Quote
Germans aren't really very efficient compared to those other three.  Mao beat out Stalin for the numbers, Pol Pot went for overall percentage of the population and tried to get graded on a curve.

The Germans just took notes.  Made them seem efficient.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 1:34:47 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Germans aren't really very efficient compared to those other three.  Mao beat out Stalin for the numbers, Pol Pot went for overall percentage of the population and tried to get graded on a curve.

The Germans just took notes.  Made them seem efficient.
View Quote
The Germans killed 70% of the European Jewish population in three years.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 1:35:34 PM EDT
[#3]
The fact that the Soviet Union was our ally in WWII probably has something to do with it.  Leftover "Uncle Joe" propaganda + post-WWII American leftism = less criticism for Stalin.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 1:44:37 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The Germans killed 70% of the European Jewish population in three years.
View Quote
Pol Pot took out about 25% of Cambodia in about four.

Germany had a population around 70 million. They killed around 6 million of their own people as war dead by starting a war, and assuming 6 million that they exterminated (Jews, gypsies, dissidents, etc.), they still only managed to kill about 17% of their population.  If you go with the high estimates of 10 million in the holocaust, you're still only looking at about 22-23%.


Mind you I'm looking at this as how much human suffering they caused, not to any individual group - though I understand what you're getting at.  Even if we address it that way, though, communists are still more lethal.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 1:49:51 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The fact that the Soviet Union was our ally in WWII probably has something to do with it.  Leftover "Uncle Joe" propaganda + post-WWII American leftism = less criticism for Stalin.
View Quote
That's it, right there.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 1:56:33 PM EDT
[#6]
Amazon says communism is sexy.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:01:44 PM EDT
[#7]
They always seemed like the same guy to me. Odd that they don't get equal billing.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:08:14 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They always seemed like the same guy to me. Odd that they don't get equal billing.
View Quote
Only one of them sat next to Roosevelt as an equal.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:10:56 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stalin did not intend/set out to eradicate groups of people.
View Quote
But he did a damn good job of indescriminate murdering...
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:11:58 PM EDT
[#10]
More than a 100 million, more like 150+ million dead just in the 20th Century alone. The Chi-coms openly admit that 77 million died during their cultural revolution and the Ruskis killed around 52-55 million. That's around 130 million dead for just two commie nations. Add in Pol Pot, the Viet-cong, Kim Il Sung and Kim Jung Il, the Cubans, etc and you'll get 150+ million easy.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:14:58 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Pol Pot took out about 25% of Cambodia in about four.

Germany had a population around 70 million. They killed around 6 million of their own people as war dead by starting a war, and assuming 6 million that they exterminated (Jews, gypsies, dissidents, etc.), they still only managed to kill about 17% of their population.  If you go with the high estimates of 10 million in the holocaust, you're still only looking at about 22-23%.


Mind you I'm looking at this as how much human suffering they caused, not to any individual group - though I understand what you're getting at.  Even if we address it that way, though, communists are still more lethal.
View Quote
The Soviets starved to death and killed around 12 million Ukrainians in about 9 months.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:15:35 PM EDT
[#12]
Because the Media and Academia have always been Pinko Commie sympathizers.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:16:07 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote
Pol Potheads?
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:21:11 PM EDT
[#14]
One word...  


FLUORIDATION!!!!!


by putting fluoride into our drinking water, the Communist have sapped and contaminated our Precious Bodily Fluids...

Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:30:20 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because McCarthy was right.
View Quote
and the much hated and mocked John Birch Society.  Right or at least partially correct the whole mother fucking time.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:38:34 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
20-25 million dead that Hitler is responsible for over the course of 6 years!

Most who died were Nazis killing non-Germans. Had he had more time, Hitler would have far exceeded the communist numbers.

Communism has a high kill score because the Chinese had a large population to kill off but it took Communism 70 years to kill 100 million, the vast majority killed by their own government.

Both evil philosophies, but it is easy to see why Hitler is the bigger boogeyman. Also, we fought him directly. Commies are a larger threat to their own people. Nazis are a larger threat to neighboring countries.

Fighting the Nazis cost nearly 200K American lives in 3.5 years. We lost nearly 100K American lives during the next 45 years fighting the communists almost entirely in Asia, but never the Russians directly/officially.
View Quote
Economics of Peace did not evenly distribute those killings over 70 years.  They did them in spurts when necessary.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:42:56 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
People sympathetic to Communism run media and the education system. 
View Quote
This

Both should be seen as evil, no damn difference
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:44:04 PM EDT
[#18]
Some groups of people have really good PR departments.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:46:03 PM EDT
[#19]
Wouldn't it be embarrassing to admit to your children you didn't finish the job?
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:48:31 PM EDT
[#20]
Because, Propaganda.

Every time someone acts like being called a Nazi bothers them or that they need to defend against the baseless accusation they encourage the practice.

It's like being called a racist. It doesn't work unless society and the accused reacts to it.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 2:51:08 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stalin did not intend/set out to eradicate groups of people.
View Quote
Are you serious? Stalin ordered the killing /starvation of millions. Is this news to you?
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:01:48 PM EDT
[#22]
maybe because we had a rather large war with hitler. just a thought...
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:06:28 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stalin did not intend/set out to eradicate groups of people.
View Quote
Apparently your intentions matter a great deal when you're exterminating millions of people

And there are a few million Ukrainians that might disagree with you.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:19:11 PM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
Don't get me wrong Hitler was an evil man and he deserves his place in the eternal pits of hell but why isn't Communism the ultimate bogeyman instead of the Nazism?

Stalin killed way more people than Hitler.

Communism is responsible for nearly 100,000,000 deaths.
View Quote


I just honestly don't think people are as aware of Stalins crimes as they are Hitler's.  compare the number of movies and documentaries about the Nazis to that of Stalin and his henchman.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:26:47 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I never understood it either. The communist party leads the way in death toll by orders of magnitude.

Maybe it's because most people are too stupid to know the difference.

I tried to explain what Nazi actually stood for to I've of my hack liberal realatives. NS.......... National Socialist...... Their head nearly exploded...... They said that's not true.......


Mmmmkay...
View Quote
Seriously.... I knew what Nazi's were in 5th grade and had a basic understanding of their rise to power.  

Simply saying "that's not true" is childish, stupid, and just wrong.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:27:47 PM EDT
[#26]
because communism is winning and the winners get to write history?
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:29:02 PM EDT
[#27]
OP has a good point.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:29:19 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Apparently your intentions matter a great deal when you're exterminating millions of people

And there are a few million Ukrainians that might disagree with you.
View Quote
The Holodomor was perfectly intentional.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:29:54 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because McCarthy was right.
View Quote
This man wins the entire Internet for the next 4 days. 
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:31:46 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
Don't get me wrong Hitler was an evil man and he deserves his place in the eternal pits of hell but why isn't Communism the ultimate bogeyman instead of the Nazism?

Stalin killed way more people than Hitler.

Communism is responsible for nearly 100,000,000 deaths.
View Quote

Because the left is for communism and Hitler makes a good bogeyman.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:32:33 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Because the left is for communism and Hitler makes a good bogeyman.
View Quote
The Russians still call anyone that opposes them Nazis.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:39:20 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stalin did not intend/set out to eradicate groups of people.
Except for the Ukranians and the kulaks.

http://hrsu.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/4/9/11495427/5879119_orig.jpg

http://kulaks.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/8/2/38823851/7846421_orig.gif
Most of my family on my dad's side was from around Janow and lviv...  my great grandfather & grandmother got out in the 30s, but every single other person in the family got killed in about a 1yr span around '41... between the NKVD and SS.   Good times.  Something like 50 great uncles n shit were machine gunned and pushed into ditches all at once.  Idk wtf they thought they were going to do; that was the most hotly contested area in the world.  "Better stay and keep the family farms" or some shit.

I won't ever be giving my guns up, not while I draw breath.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:39:33 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because McCarthy was right.
View Quote
FPNI.

After fall of Communism and the KGB archives were opened up, they all vindicated McCarthy.  Turns out our State Department, Hollywood, etc WERE chock full of Soviet agents and sympathizers.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:42:49 PM EDT
[#34]
The truth is most Americans are stupid.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:45:15 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stalin did not intend/set out to eradicate groups of people.
View Quote
I dare you to stand in the middle of a crowded street in Kiev and shout that.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:49:39 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
People sympathetic to Communism run media and the education system. 
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:52:35 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
FPNI.

After fall of Communism and the KGB archives were opened up, they all vindicated McCarthy.  Turns out our State Department, Hollywood, etc WERE chock full of Soviet agents and sympathizers.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Because McCarthy was right.
FPNI.

After fall of Communism and the KGB archives were opened up, they all vindicated McCarthy.  Turns out our State Department, Hollywood, etc WERE chock full of Soviet agents and sympathizers.
Unfortunately they still are
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:56:03 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
People sympathetic to Communism run media and the education system. 
View Quote
Spot on post.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:56:28 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Russians still call anyone that opposes them Nazis.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Because the left is for communism and Hitler makes a good bogeyman.
The Russians still call anyone that opposes them Nazis.
I think part of it is because Hitler is a known evil person.   Nobody even close to main stream is going to say Hitler was a good person.   It's easier to demonize a person like Hitler and then paint everyone else w/ that brush.   The left has worked hard to keep that from happening w/ Communism even w/ Che, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, ...
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:57:33 PM EDT
[#40]
Because dead Commies aren't real people and don't count?
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 3:58:46 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


FPNI.

After fall of Communism and the KGB archives were opened up, they all vindicated McCarthy.  Turns out our State Department, Hollywood, etc WERE chock full of Soviet agents and sympathizers.
View Quote
And they covered much of it up. Same in East Germany, they made the decision that if they actually told people who was ratting them out to the Stasi, reunification would be fucked as Germans sought revenge. The sad thing is many of the commies ended back up on top of the transition government.

After WWII Antifa helped the Soviets and East German authorities weed out anti-communists. They helped build the Iron Curtain.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 4:00:20 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because we fought a massive war directly against Hitler.  We only fought Stalin by proxy and quietly in back rooms.
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 4:06:54 PM EDT
[#43]
The Liberal's idol Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his wife loved Communists.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 4:09:55 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Liberal's idol Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his wife loved Communists.
View Quote
And he was a segregationist even though she tried to get him to give it up...
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 4:24:20 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Because McCarthy was right.
View Quote
Go back and research those days the answer is right there out in the open.
It is not a politically correct answer however.
Senator Joe and his colleagues did not tread lightly and dug up a horde which overwhelmed them.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 4:29:45 PM EDT
[#46]
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 5:29:00 PM EDT
[#47]
Not mine, saw it online somewhere:

The difference between nazis and communists is that you when you point out how horrible nazis have been, no one says "...well, real nazisim has never really been tried..."

My thoughts:

Communism has really been given a pass by academia, and in turn, the public, because they like to believe in the idealistic claims that a communist society will supposedly bring. (commies claim:) more equality, giving the benefits of wealth production to the workers themselves, eliminate the influence of the wealthy on society, etc. Now, I don't believe that communists or socialists ever deliver on these claims, but it's a pitch that brings people in. You know all of the pitches they use when they extol the virtues of communism and extreme socialism. And some out of work or underprivileged person buys into it, thinking... yes, all this inequality caused by the wealthy... "we can do better".

And so, many in the public have bought into the fairy tale of what communism will bring. The utopia of health care for all in Cuba, the elimination of the influence of the wealthy in politics. Equitable distribution of things for all. A paradise.

Except in practice, it does not work. It has never worked, except possibly in some small communities where every member has full bought into it. These 'isms always require massive shifts in power from the people to the state, and once the state has that power, the individual does not have it so well anymore after all, and, then, the people no longer have a choice about it. And then, if the individual complains about the issue, the promises undelivered, they become an enemy of the state, an enemy of the revolution.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 7:27:17 PM EDT
[#48]
Hiltler killed people we gave a shit about.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 7:28:26 PM EDT
[#49]
maybe because they infiltrated some of the school systems with socialist communist leaning professors.
Link Posted: 8/20/2017 7:32:07 PM EDT
[#50]
OP, please don't try to use facts in this debate. The left doesn't like it.
Page / 5
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top