Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 3
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:25:07 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Gh-ey!

Especially the 'you will now shine your GREEN boots' crap that will undoubtedly come forward, from a force that didn't figure out that the POINT of suede boots is to NOT clean them!


Course sandpaper or a stiff brush-works great.  I have to wonder about sage-colored boots, though (as in, would excessively stiff brushes or too much sandpaper wear away the sage colored dye in the leather?) .  Might be easier to just go with coyote brown.

Rough-out leather is the only way to go.  It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

They still exist in the Army...

Waahh... I miss the black boots... I miss BDUs... This is too easy...

The funny thing is, before the Army wore black boots, IIRC, we were in rough-out brown ones...

That said, at least we don't have the AF's Man-Love-ThursdayClass-A-Monday....



 


Indeed, way back in the day, the Army and USMC wore a "low quarter" work-type boot that was worn with "leggings".  During WWI, those leggings were "wrap around", and in the inter-war years they were redesigned and made of one-piece canvas that laced up on the sides with a strap that went under the boot to hold them from riding up the leg.  The boots were made of rough-out brown leather.  

Sometime during the the early '40s-perhaps even before Pearl Harbor, the Army came up with a combat boot that laced up like the low-quarter work boot but was taller with the upper portion secured with two buckles (often called the "two buckle combat boot").  For the time period, they were absolutely bad-ass.  I believe this was probably the best boot designed for general issue of any army at the time.  The USMC continued to use the "low-quarter work boot (called "boondockers") and khaki leggings (sometimes they were OD green ).  Again, they continued to be made of rough-out brown leather.  

When my father was in the Army, he was issued the two-buckle combat boot and the practice was to "shine 'em until they took a polish".  I know, I shake my head too....

During the Korean War, the USMC started issueing a black high-top boot (for the first time) that laced all the way up to replace the WWII boondockers and leggings.  It was issued in a natural brown color but was shipped with a small bottle of black leather dye so the individual Marine could dye it himself (thus saving the govt. money).  The top couple of rows of eyelets were actually "hooks" as opposed to "lace throughs".  When this boot was adopted, the USMC also started using the elastic "blousing bands" that had been in use by Airborne units since WWII.  AFAIK, the USMC has never tucked their trousers in their boots.  I'm not sure if the Army went "black" at the same time or not, or if they did so first.  If not, they weren't far behind.  

After this boot, sometime in the late '50s or early '60s a standard "universal" service-wide black leather combat boot was issued that laced all the way up with conventional eyelets and came already dyed black.  That lasted until about 1986 when the silicone-treated (and much softer) leather combat boot with "speed laces" was issued.  This was the standard combat boot issued until the new rough-out coyote brown was adopted by the USMC in 2002 or so, and the rest is history.

In the '60s, a "jungle boot" was developed for use in SEA based somewhat on the "jungle boot" developed for use by U.S. forces fighting in the CBI Theater Of Operation during WWII.

During the '90s, the Danner cold-weather boot was adopted by some units as a "limited standard" issue item.  Both the jungle boot and cold-weather boot were constructed using leather dyed black (in addition to the green canvas of the jungle boot).  

When I went to Boot Camp in '84, there was a test "series" of recruits walking around the depot at MCRD SD wearing brown rought-out combat boots.  They were not adopted because they absorbed water easier than polished black boots, supposedly.  The idea resurfaced again when CMC Gen. James L. Jones decided he wanted a USMC specific uniform that stood out from the other services, and that would also take advantage of new textile advancements such as permanent press material and new dyes that didn't fade as quickly as they did with the old BDUs.  There were other reasons for going to the new uniform that involved supply issues, but needless to say Gen. Jones is my fucking hero, and his forward thinking ideas can only be appreciated by those who had to spend a half hour per set of utilities ironing them before showing up to formation.  

Ironing cammies and polishing boots (uniform "maintenance" in general) is the single, biggest waste of taxpayers money EVER.      

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:30:29 AM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:


...before the Army wore black boots, IIRC, we were in rough-out brown ones...

 

I think they were brown, but not rough-out (I believe the Navy wore the same or similar boots too - One of my uncles used to bitch incessantly about having to shine engine-oiled boots)
 


My neighbor when I was growing up had been a Naval Aviator in the '60s.  He showed us his flight boots and they were a low-quarter rough out brown with a black rubber sole with what looked like bits of string molded into the sole to make them wear longer.  

IIRC, they weren't polished-but then again it may have been a case of RHIP....
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:36:19 AM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Marine corps still has it straight on uniforms, don't know about ya'll.



They're the best of what's out there, but I wouldn't call a total lack of a hot weather woodland/jungle uniform 100% on and tracking.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:45:25 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Marine corps still has it straight on uniforms, don't know about ya'll.



They're the best of what's out there, but I wouldn't call a total lack of a hot weather woodland/jungle uniform 100% on and tracking.


A lighter weight material would be nice.  I doubt if it happens though.

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:51:20 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Are they so bored that they have time to fix shit that isn't broken?


pretty much.

I'm not going to tuck my fucking pants in my boots until I am fucking forced to... "It looks sharp.. but now you can look like a sloppy motherfucker by walking and talking on your cell"


just let us drink beer during our lunches again please...


Fuck I miss the AF of 6 years ago before they hit full retard.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:54:47 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
the fleece looks cool, but those boots

I'm in the Maintenance field and yes my current grren ABU boots are more black than green, but those those things look horrible.



tucking in the boots, IMHO thats gay, I had no problem using blousing straps.


you are probably like me and every other real working AF member... we dont give two fucks about the color or stains on our boots as long as the motherfuckers have a good sole on them and a steel cap to keep the heavy shit from breaking toes... am I right or wrong?


fucking desk jockeys... if we need to hire so many civilians hire out the useless fucks in the AF.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:55:38 AM EDT
[#7]
Ugh. Saw this on Portal yesterday.

I could smack the fucker who wanted velcro on uniforms...
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:59:18 AM EDT
[#8]
Jesus, this whole uniform thing is getting fucking insane.......
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 1:00:51 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Jesus, this whole uniform thing is getting fucking insane.......


why the fuck are we still awake DG84? LOL
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 1:02:02 AM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Jesus, this whole uniform thing is getting fucking insane.......


why the fuck are we still awake DG84? LOL


Isn't it like only dinner time way out that way?
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 1:14:13 AM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Jesus, this whole uniform thing is getting fucking insane.......


why the fuck are we still awake DG84? LOL


Isn't it like only dinner time way out that way?


note the location change.. I'm in Alaska for a few weeks

though the sun finally hit "dusk" mode
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 1:26:44 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Jesus, this whole uniform thing is getting fucking insane.......


why the fuck are we still awake DG84? LOL


Isn't it like only dinner time way out that way?


note the location change.. I'm in Alaska for a few weeks

though the sun finally hit "dusk" mode


HA! It's almost 2 in the afternoon here.

Dust storm time.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 2:13:17 AM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 3:26:04 AM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:
Good grief... those look like plastic GI Joe boots.  WTF?

I don't mind the sage suede boots for looks but... damn.  Those new ones look like ass.



Agreed, blech!

I like that fleece though, and it's a practical thing - I could see myself "whereing" that on the flightline back in the day.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 3:29:23 AM EDT
[#15]
Here is the e-mail from the 98th AF

1.  THE 98TH AF VIRTUAL UNIFORM BOARD CONVENED IN 2008.  VOTING MEMBERS
INCLUDED AIRMEN FROM ALL MAJCOMS AND MOST FUNCTIONAL COMMUNITIES.
REPRESENTATIVES FROM AAFES, DSCP/DLA, THE AF UNIFORM OFFICE, AF/A1D AND
AF/A4L ACTED AS NON-VOTING ADVISORS.  BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS WERE FORWARDED
TO THE AIR FORCE CHIEF OF STAFF FOR FINAL DECISION.

2.  APPROVED ITEMS ? EFFECTIVE AS INDICATED:

    A.  DRESS (BLUE) UNIFORM
1)  ELIMINATE WEAR OF THE METAL RANK BY ENLISTED AIRMEN ON THE
LIGHT WEIGHT BLUE JACKET; RANK MUST BE WORN USING ONLY THE
CHEVRON RANK INSIGNIA SEWN ON THE SLEEVES; EFF:  NLT 1 JAN 2010
 
    B.  UTILITY UNIFORM (APPLIES TO ABUS, BDUS, AND DCUS)
1)  TROUSERS MUST BE TUCKED INTO BOOTS AND PRESENT A BLOUSED
APPEARANCE AT ALL TIMES; EFF:  IMMEDIATELY  
2)  TUCK IN BOOT LACES; EXCESS BOOT LACES MAY BE WRAPPED AROUND
THE BOOT AND TUCKED IN.  NO ?BOWTIE? BOOT LACES; EFF:
IMMEDIATELY
3)  MAJCOMS AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE WEAR OF BLACK BOOTS WITH THE ABU ONLY IN
INDUSTRIAL AREAS IAW 132024Z FEB 09 HQ USAF/A1 MESSAGE; EFF:  AS PER
REFERENCED MESSAGE, 13 FEB 2009
4)  ELIMINATE AUTHORITY TO ATTACH ORGANIZATIONAL CAP TO BDU TROUSER; EFF:
IMMEDIATELY
5)  UPPER SLEEVE POCKET APPROVED FOR FIRE RESISTANT ABUS AUTHORIZED FOR, AND
WORN ONLY IN, THE AOR

    C.  ACCOUTREMENTS
1)  AUTHORIZE AIRMEN MEETING THE CRITERIA FOR, AND AWARDED
THE US ARMY PARACHUTE RIGGERS BADGE PERMANENT WEAR OF THAT
BADGE ON ALL AUTHORIZED UNIFORM COMBINATIONS.  WHEN WEARING THE SUBDUED
RIGGERS BADGE ON THE ABU/BDU, THE BADGE WILL BE BLUE (NOT BLACK).
WHEN WEARING THE SUBDUED BADGE ON THE DCU, THE BADGE WILL BE BROWN.

2)  AUTHORIZE PERMANENT WEAR OF BLACK U.S. ARMY AIR ASSAULT BADGE ON THE
BDU, REGARDLESS OF DUTY ASSIGNMENT, UPON GRADUATION FROM AIR ASSAULT SCHOOL

3)  AUTHORIZE WEAR OF THE AIR FORCE OFFICE OF SPECIAL  INVESTIGATIONS DUTY
BADGE ON THE SERVICE DRESS UNIFORM AND SUBDUED CLOTH DUTY BADGE ON THE ABU
   
D.  MISCELLANEOUS
1) AUTHORIZE USE OF PERSONAL CELLULAR PHONES WHILE WALKING IN UNIFORM;
CELLULAR PHONE MUST BE CONSERVATIVE IN COLOR; WEAR OF HANDS FREE DEVICES
WHILE WALKING IN UNIFORM IS PROHIBITED; CELL PHONE MAY BE WORN ON EITHER THE
LEFT OR RIGHT SIDE OF UNIFORM; MILITARY CUSTOMS AND COURTESIES APPLY AND
TAKE PRECEDENCE
 
3.  APPROVED UNIFORM/DESIGN CHANGES.  WEAR GUIDANCE AND EFFECTIVE DATES WILL
BE PROVIDED IN SUPPLEMENTAL MESSAGES.  NO ACTION REQUIRED BY MEMBERS AT THIS
TIME:

A.UTILITY UNIFORMS
1) WEAR OF FOLIAGE GREEN FLEECE AS AN OUTER GARMENT WITH ABU
2) A FLEECE LINER WITH THE ABILITY TO ZIP INTO THE APECS
3) NCREASE LENGTH OF LOWER LEG POCKET ON ABU TROUSER 1/2 INCH
4) CHANGE FEMALE ABU TROUSER FLY BUTTON?S TO MIRROR MALES
5) ADD SMALL ABU NAME TAPE WITH LAST NAME TO POCKET FLAP ON
ALL-PURPOSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLOTHING SYSTEM (APECS) LEFT SLEEVE
6) ALTER ABU SLEEVE PEN POCKET 1/2 INCHTO PREVENT
BREAKING WRITING UTENSILS OR PUNCTURES WHILE BENDING ARM

    B.  PHYSICAL TRAINING GEAR
1)  REVISE CURRENT PT GEAR WEAR GUIDANCE TO REFLECT A MORE
PROFESSIONAL IMAGE.  MAKE STANDARDS MORE IN LINE WITH THE
INTENT OF THE UNIFORM

  C.  MATERNITY UNIFORM
1)  AUTHORIZE AN ADDITION OF SIDE BUTTONS THAT UNFOLD A SMALL
PORTION OF THE MATERNITY ABU TROUSER.
   
4.  DEFERRED ITEMS AND ITEMS THAT BOARD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, BUT REQUIRE
FURTHER RESEARCH AND/OR DEVELOPMENT.  IF ANY ITEM IS LATER APPROVED BY CSAF,
WEAR GUIDANCE AND EFFECTIVE DATES WILL BE PROVIDED IN SUPPLEMENTAL MESSAGES;
NO ACTION REQUIRED BY MEMBERS AT THIS TIME:

    A.  UTILITY UNIFORM
          1)  WEAR OF GREEN CREW NECK SWEATER SIMILAR TO MARINE CORPS
UNDER THE ABU
    B.  MATERNITY UNIFORM
          1)  ADJUST MATERNITY ABU TO MIRROR REGULAR POCKET PLACEMENT
    C.  ACCOUTREMENTS
          1)  OFFICERS ASSIGNED TO COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) NODES TO WEAR
THE C2 BADGE IF APPROVED FOR AWARD BY THE FUNCTIONAL AUTHORITY

5.  DISAPPROVALS:
    A.  THE FOLLOWING INITIATIVES WERE DISAPPROVED:
1)  OPTIONAL FLIGHT CAP W/VENTING
2)  CORFAM/PATENT LEATHER LOW QUARTERS IN CLOTHING BAG
3)  FEMALE AIRMEN TO WEAR MALE BLUE PANTS
4)  MAKING LOOSER FITTING SERVICE DRESS TROUSERS
5)  CONNECTED STARS FOR 2, 3, AND 4 STAR GENERAL OFFICERS
6)  BODY SUIT STYLE SERVICE DRESS BLOUSE FOR FEMALE AIRMEN
7)  AUTHORIZE ONLY LOW QUARTERS AND BOOTS FOR FEMALE AIRMEN
WEARING SERVICE DRESS UNIFORMS
8)  AUTHORIZE WEAR OF ADDITIONAL OCCUPATIONAL BADGE 1.5? BELOW
WELT POCKET ON SERVICE DRESS COAT (THE WEAR OF ONE BADGE IN THAT
LOCATION IS STILL AUTHORIZED)
9)  MALE ?PRINCE CUT? SERVICE DRESS SHIRT SIMILAR TO FEMALE
?PRINCESS CUT? SERVICE DRESS SHIRT
10)  WEAR OF SILVER ?TERM OF SERVICE? STRIPES ON LOWER RIGHT
SLEEVE/CUFF AND ORANGE BRAID ?DISCHARGE STRIPE? ON THE SERVICE
           DRESS UNIFORM
11)  OFFICER BLACK ?GRADE? STRIPES ON LOWER SLEEVE/CUFF OF
SERVICE COAT (1=LT-CAPT; 2=MAJ-COL; 3=GEN OFFICER)
12)  WEAR OF ALL, SOME, OR NO RIBBONS ON SERVICE DRESS UNIFORM;
I.E, AIRMEN MUST CONTINUE TO WEAR ALL
13)  LONGEVITY STRIPES (HASH MARKS) ON SLEEVE OF SERVICE DRESS
AND MESS DRESS UNIFORMS
14)  WEAR OF CREW NECK UNDERSHIRT W/ANY COMBINATION OF SERVICE
          DRESS UNIFORM
15)  REPLACE BLUE TIE/TIE TAB WITH BLACK HERRINGBONE TIE/TIE TAB
16)  SMALL BOW TIE TO REPLACE FEMALE TIE TAB ON MESS DRESS
17)  ?BILLY MITCHELL? STYLE COAT W/FULL SIZE MEDALS AS
MESS DRESS UNIFORM/ELIMINATE SEMI-FORMAL UNIFORM
18)  WEAR OF AMERICAN FLAG ON THE ABU/DCU/BDU
19)  BOONIE HAT W/ABU AND BDU IN ALL GARRISON AND DEPLOYED
LOCATIONS (IAW AFI 36-2903, TAB 1.1, THEATER COMMANDERS
PRESCRIBE FOR THEATER OF OPERATIONS)
20)  DELETE REQUIREMENT TO BLOUSE UTILITY UNIFORM TROUSERS (SEE
           ITEM 2.B.1 ABOVE, TROUSERS MUST BE TUCKED INTO BOOTS)
21)  WEAR OF BRIGHT NON-SUBDUED GRADE INSIGNIA ON ABU CAP IN
NON-DEPLOYED LOCATIONS (ONLY SUBDUED PIN-ON OR SEW-ON RANK
           AUTHORIZED)
22)  WEAR OF PIN-ON OCCUPATIONAL BADGES ON ABUS FOR EASE OF
SANITIZING/CHANGING BADGES
23)  WEAR OF ENLISTED RANK ON ABU COLLAR LAPEL
24)  WEAR OF SIX-POINT UTILITY CAP
25)  PERMANENT REDUCTION OF SLEEVE LENGTH OF ABU (ACCOMPLISHED
           BY MANUFACTURER)
26)  VELCRO IN PLACE OF BUTTONS ON ABU
27)  SLANTED CHEST POCKETS ON ABU
28)  ONE PIECE UTILITY UNIFORM (SIMILAR TO FLT SUIT) TO REPLACE ABU
29)  WEAR OF BERET WITH ABU BY ALL AIRMEN (AFSCS CURRENTLY
           AUTHORIZED TO WEAR BERET MAINTAIN AUTHORIZATION IAW 36-2903)
30)  EMBROIDERED NAME ON ABU VICE NAME TAPE
31)  WEAR OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPS WITH ABU
32)  BLACK SOCKS WITH ABU (SAGE GREEN SOCKS MUST BE WORN WITH
           THE SAGE GREEN BOOT; TAN OR SAGE SOCKS MUST BE WORN WITH THE
           TAN BOOT UNTIL 2011)
33)  REMOVE TWO LOWER POCKETS ON ABU BLOUSE (TOP)
34)  WEAR OF BLUE BELT WITH ABUS
35)  REMOVE THIRD ABU CUFF BUTTON, REPLACE OTHER CUFF BUTTON
WITH HOOK AND LOOP VELCRO FASTENERS
36)  ADD NAME TAPE SIMILAR TO ABU NAMETAPE TO BACK OF ABU HAT
37) WEAR OF UNIT PATCHES ON ABU (TO INCLUDE SISTER SERVICE PATCHES)
38)  WEAR OF ARMY LIGHT GREEN FLEECE WATCH CAP WITH THE ABU
39)  DISALLOW SEWING DOWN POCKETS ON ABU (THIS MEANS AIRMEN
ARE STILL AUTHORIZED TO SEW THEM DOWN)
40)  WEAR OF ABU CAP WITH ELASTIC BAND
41)  ALLOW WEAR OF WATCH CAP WITH ABUS ALONE, VICE WITH APECS
(OUTER GARMENTS ARE STILL REQUIRED WITH THE BLACK WATCH CAP)
42)  PEN POCKET ON RIGHT SLEEVE OF ABU FOR LEFT-HANDED AIRMEN
43)  SMALL POCKET ON ABU TO ACCOMMODATE COMMON ACCESS CARD
44)  METAL ZIPPER IN LIEU OF BUTTONS ON ABU TROUSER FLY & BLOUSE
45)  ELASTIC BANDS INSIDE BOTTOM OF TROUSERS OF ABU FOR BLOUSING
46)  WEAR OF WEAPONS SCHOOL PATCH ON ABUS
47)  CREATE ABU FIELD JACKET
48)  BLACK LETTERING VICE BLUE ON NAMETAPE/USAF/OCCUPATIONAL
BADGES WORN ON ABU
49)  PERMANENT WEAR OF TAN BOOTS VICE SAGE GREEN BOOTS
50)  PIXILATED BACKGROUND FOR ENLISTED RANK ON ABU AND
ELIMINATE CREASED RANK
51)  GREEN UNDERSHIRT WITH ABU
52)  BLUE POLAR FLEECE JACKET WITH ABU
53)  TAN GLOVES WITH ABU (BLACK AND SAGE GREEN GLOVES ARE
AUTHORIZED WITH APPROPRIATE OUTER GARMENTS)
54)  WEAR OF BLACK OR DARK BLUE (MATCHING LETTERING ON
NAMETAPE, ETC) UNDERSHIRT WITH ABU
55)  WEAR OF COMMANDER?S INSIGNIA ON ABU
56)  OLIVE GREEN/BEIGE/TAN BERET IN GARRISON AND MULTI-POINT HAT
WITH ABU WHILE DEPLOYED
57)  INTERIM WEAR OF DCU UNTIL MANDATORY WEAR DATE OF ABU
58)  WEAR OF SPACE BADGE ON UTILITY UNIFORMS
59)  REPLACE PIERCED STAR ON ENLISTED CHEVRONS WITH ?US? INSIGNIA
FOR AIRMAN TIER; RESERVE PIERCED STAR FOR NCOS
60)  WEAR OF FIRST SERGEANT INSIGNIA (DIAMOND) IN THE SAME
MANNER AS COMMANDER?S INSIGNIA
61)  DELETE OPTION TO WEAR COMMANDER?S INSIGNIA AS GRADUATED
COMMANDER
62)  REPLACE CURRENT PT PANTS WITH SNAP/TEAR AWAY PANTS THAT
CAN BE ALSO USED AS SHORTS (REMOVABLE LOWER LEG)
63)  BLACK SOCKS WITH PT GEAR
64)  HOOD OF PT JACKET SAME AS HOOD ON APECS
65)  ZIP OPEN VENTS BELOW POCKETS ON BOTH SIDES OF PT PANTS
66)  SILK-FITTED HEADSCARVES WITH PT GEAR
67)  REPLACE REFLECTIVE ?V? ON BACK OF PT JACKET WITH AF SYMBOL
68)  REMOVE ELASTIC WAIST BAND ON PT JACKET
69)  CREATION OF MATERNITY PT UNIFORM
70)  ALLOW RETIRED/CIVILIAN MEMBERS TO WEAR PT GEAR WITHOUT
REGARD TO GROOMING STANDARDS
71)  AUTHORIZE BEARD/GOATEE WITH SAME INTENT AS MUSTACHE;
NEATLY TRIMMED AND TASTEFUL
72)  WEAR OF SQUARE DIAMOND EARRINGS FOR FEMALE AIRMEN
73)  ALLOW AIRMEN STATIONED OVERSEAS TO HAVE DOUBLE THE HAIR
LENGTH AND BULK CURRENTLY AUTHORIZED
74)  RESTRICT FINGERNAIL LENGTH TO NO LONGER THAN TIP OF FINGER
75)  REVISIT SUPPLEMENTAL CLOTHING ALLOWANCE PAYMENT TO
INDIVIDUALS IN SPECIAL DUTY POSITIONS NO LONGER REQUIRED
ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE DUE TO LOW MAINTENANCE OF ABU
76)  AUTHORIZE AIRMEN TO WEAR EARNED SISTER SERVICE
           PATCHES/BADGES ON ABU WHEN OPERATING WITH SISTER SERVICES

6.   THIS MESSAGE PROVIDES CSAF APPROVED CHANGES TO CURRENT AIR FORCE
UNIFORMS AND UNIFORM POLICY RESULTING FROM THE 98TH AIR FORCE VIRTUAL
UNIFORM BOARD.  THE CHANGES WILL BE CODIFIED IN AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION
36-2903, DRESS AND PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF AIR FORCE PERSONNEL.  ANY
QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED THROUGH YOUR LOCAL CHAIN OF COMMAND/MAJCOM
POINTS OF CONTACT.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 3:37:50 AM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
The fleece is cool except the rank/name/service.


Sorry, bud, the fleece that they are showing is the same one the Army issues with the ECWS system and it is NOT FLEECE.  It is Pimp Fur and looks and feels nasty after a few months of wear, while being less durable and insulating than real fleece.  A poor decision, IMHO.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 3:58:00 AM EDT
[#17]
Regarding the old rough out USMC boondockers-
If you've never worn a pair do yourself a favor and pick up some repros. Some of the most comfortable shoes in the world.

I don't know how they were worn by infantry though. Supposedly the grunts would get them double soled to stand up to more abuse. The leggings were often cast aside in the Pacific campaign.

You can see Steve MacQeen wearing his in The Great Escape.

I wore the old lace to top black when I was in, how I wish we had the new rough-outs. And the old poplins were the shit for hot weather.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 6:58:52 AM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.


That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 7:12:39 AM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
Where'd you get this info? Everything I've read said that tucking your pants into your boots was effective immediately not 1 Oct '10.


http://tinyurl.com/mtf6oz
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 7:15:53 AM EDT
[#20]
nowadays that is the only way to get promoted.  Glad i'm recently retired.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 7:33:04 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone here at mountain home afb?


Im sent


Yep.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 8:43:37 AM EDT
[#22]



Quoted:


Here is the e-mail from the 98th AF








   

4)  ELIMINATE AUTHORITY TO ATTACH ORGANIZATIONAL CAP TO BDU TROUSER; EFF:

IMMEDIATELY  What the fuck do I do with my hat now?  Shove it up my ass?



   

    B.  PHYSICAL TRAINING GEAR

1)  REVISE CURRENT PT GEAR WEAR GUIDANCE TO REFLECT A MORE

PROFESSIONAL IMAGE.  MAKE STANDARDS MORE IN LINE WITH THE

INTENT OF THE UNIFORM  I cannot wait to see this clusterfuck.  Something tells me the Al Udeid PT gear Nazis are going to cream their panties over this one.



 





   

5.  DISAPPROVALS:

    A.  THE FOLLOWING INITIATIVES WERE DISAPPROVED:



3)  FEMALE AIRMEN TO WEAR MALE BLUE PANTS  Whose idea was that?  Let me guess, she's fat?

9)  MALE ?PRINCE CUT? SERVICE DRESS SHIRT SIMILAR TO FEMALE

?PRINCESS CUT? SERVICE DRESS SHIRT  What the fuck is a "prince cut" shirt and who in my Air Force came up with that idea?  Don't ask, don't tell!

10)  WEAR OF SILVER ?TERM OF SERVICE? STRIPES ON LOWER RIGHT

SLEEVE/CUFF AND ORANGE BRAID ?DISCHARGE STRIPE? ON THE SERVICE

           DRESS UNIFORM  We wouldn't want to look like a military organization, would we?

13)  LONGEVITY STRIPES (HASH MARKS) ON SLEEVE OF SERVICE DRESS

AND MESS DRESS UNIFORMS  We wouldn't want to look like a military organization, would we?

14)  WEAR OF CREW NECK UNDERSHIRT W/ANY COMBINATION OF SERVICE

          DRESS UNIFORM  The visible chest hair fetish lives on.  Ugh!

19)  BOONIE HAT W/ABU AND BDU IN ALL GARRISON AND DEPLOYED

LOCATIONS (IAW AFI 36-2903, TAB 1.1, THEATER COMMANDERS

PRESCRIBE FOR THEATER OF OPERATIONS) Who the fuck would want to wear a hat that protects you from the sun, rain and snow?

22)  WEAR OF PIN-ON OCCUPATIONAL BADGES ON ABUS FOR EASE OF

SANITIZING/CHANGING BADGES  Good thing EOD, OSI, SF, etc. that go outside the wire can wear ACUs.

27)  SLANTED CHEST POCKETS ON ABU  I loved how my shirt pockets were rendered useless while wearing Interceptor body armor in the AOR.

29)  WEAR OF BERET WITH ABU BY ALL AIRMEN (AFSCS CURRENTLY

           AUTHORIZED TO WEAR BERET MAINTAIN AUTHORIZATION IAW 36-2903)  The asshole that entertained this idea should be flogged.  In public.  By all Airmen.

32)  BLACK SOCKS WITH ABU (SAGE GREEN SOCKS MUST BE WORN WITH

           THE SAGE GREEN BOOT; TAN OR SAGE SOCKS MUST BE WORN WITH THE

           TAN BOOT UNTIL 2011)  Well, if we have to tuck in our pants now, how the fuck are they going to know that I'm wearing knee-high Strawberry Shortcake pink-striped socks?

63)  BLACK SOCKS WITH PT GEAR  Another bright idea from an asshole that needs to receive fifty lashes.

69)  CREATION OF MATERNITY PT UNIFORM  If she's that pregnant, should she even be working out?





Would someone please remind me why I reenlisted?

I'll have 18 years at the end of this term.




 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 8:46:40 AM EDT
[#23]







Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:






Quoted:
Quoted:



It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  







Yeah fuck that!!!



 

No fucking shit!
Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)



We can't have that now can we?








The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?
Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!
We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...
Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...
Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...
 

The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.
I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.



This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.



Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.
I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.
Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.




It's all a matter of perception....
We are currently STILL trying to purge the above mentality from the ranks...
'Right' can be anything... Fortunately, someone changed the definition that actually made sense...
Given what the 'right' aopearance was for civillians back in the 40s/50s, you could sort-of justify the military uniform custom of the day (wear class-As to work)....
Now?
PTs or ACUs off post works just fine, and the ACU looks just fine when worn as intended...
There was simply NO point to the pressing/ironing/shining - it wasted soliders time, simply to meet a definition of 'sharp' that could be changed with a simple addition to the regs....





And in the Army's case, YES, it is actually a violation of written regulations to starch the ACU. In the case of Ft Lewis, it is a violation of post policy (CG's policy letter on uniform appearance) to even iron it.
 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 8:54:10 AM EDT
[#24]
Quoted:
That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 9:26:23 AM EDT
[#25]



Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:




Quoted:

It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  



Yeah fuck that!!!

 




No fucking shit!



Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)

We can't have that now can we?







The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?



Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!



We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...



Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...



Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...





 




The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.



I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.

This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.

Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.



I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.



Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.




That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


Because contrary to popular belief, there IS some common sense in the Army...



Those 2 uniforms are the 2 that are actually worn on duty... Requiring a troop to keep (and change into) a set of civvies just to go off post for whatever reason they may need to prior to COB, would be retarded... Class As get worn no more than 4x per year (Thank GOD!)....



We also (GASP!) allow troops to mix PT gear with civilian clothes when off duty...
 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 9:27:01 AM EDT
[#26]



Quoted:



Quoted:

That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.




Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.



And not all troops are on meal cards...



Many folks eat off post...
 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 9:39:12 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.

And not all troops are on meal cards...

Many folks eat off post...


 


Drive through.

Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.

I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...

But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 9:50:14 AM EDT
[#28]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:

That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.




Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.



And not all troops are on meal cards...



Many folks eat off post...





 




Drive through.



Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.



I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...



But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.


Are you even actually in the military?





 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 9:54:30 AM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.


That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


The ACU is the "public face" of the Army.  Even recruiters and other office workers wear it.  The ridiculous restrictions placed on Marines for wearing of the uniform off post are... ridiculous.  It only makes sense for force protection reasons, and probably dates back to an era when khakis were the daily wear uniform and fatigues were only worn in the field.

Nobody seems to know why the rule is what it is, only that to not follow it bakes you a "rag bag."  A Soldier or a Marine can and will look like a rag bag in ANY uniform, and can look sharp in ANY uniform.  One need only looks at how the navy wears they same khaki shirt or 8-pointed hat as the Marines to see that HOW a uniform item is worn is as important as WHAT uniform item is worn.

I have been in schools with Marines, and the lengths they had to go through to go to lunch with us was sad.

FWIW, the further you go from an actual Marine Corps base, the more likely you will see Marines in cammies off post.  Reservists do it, a lot.

Personally, I think it is good PR - it advertises the presence of a local Marine Reserve unit.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 9:55:55 AM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.

And not all troops are on meal cards...

Many folks eat off post...


 


Drive through.

Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.

I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...

But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.

Are you even actually in the military?

 


Major USMC, and you?
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:10:29 AM EDT
[#31]
Quoted:
That boot really looks like crap. I am still wearing my desert boots I got issued back in 98 because I can't stand the sage boots. And the fleece...really? I don't think the fleece should be an outer garment outside of your immediate work area. If you are cold or are going to get wet while outside, wear the freaking jacket. Tucking trousers into your boots? Mine have so much extra material in the legs that there would not be enough room in the boot, plus it looks like crap (IMO) when they are tucked in for normal day to day wear. Field conditions, sure.


Not all of us are in Wyoming, sport. Sometimes, a light fleece is nice to wear around. Try hitting an Army post sometime, you might find it common practice. It's also comfortable. Tucking in for day to day ops os stupid as hell, kinda like the whole ABU. I hate it.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:15:39 AM EDT
[#32]
"The Air Force has decided to let airmen where fleece jackets, provided they have detachable embroidered cloth tapes with "Air Force," rank insignia and last name."

I quit reading after that.  Fing moron.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:19:38 AM EDT
[#33]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:

That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.




Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.



And not all troops are on meal cards...



Many folks eat off post...





 




Drive through.



Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.



I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...



But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.


The problem is, that's another 'rules for the sake of making rules' situation...



Wasting soldier's time... Nothing more, nothing less...



It is one of the most pathetic things that leadership does in the service, bar none...



Fortunately, the war seems to have reduced it in the Army, somewhat...



Of course, as soon as we have another 80s/90s '10 years with no combat' period, the garrison weenies and their 'special rules' will be back, full retard... Because apparently, the only way to know how 'good' someone is at being a solider, without combat, is to haze the fuck out of them with stupid-ass time-wasting rules (That serve NO purpose other than to add another 'chore' to the list of things a 'good' troop must do), and see how good they are at keeping up....







 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:21:51 AM EDT
[#34]



Quoted:



Quoted:

That boot really looks like crap. I am still wearing my desert boots I got issued back in 98 because I can't stand the sage boots. And the fleece...really? I don't think the fleece should be an outer garment outside of your immediate work area. If you are cold or are going to get wet while outside, wear the freaking jacket. Tucking trousers into your boots? Mine have so much extra material in the legs that there would not be enough room in the boot, plus it looks like crap (IMO) when they are tucked in for normal day to day wear. Field conditions, sure.





Not all of us are in Wyoming, sport. Sometimes, a light fleece is nice to wear around. Try hitting an Army post sometime, you might find it common practice. It's also comfortable. Tucking in for day to day ops os stupid as hell, kinda like the whole ABU. I hate it.


Yep... Fleece-as-jacket is very common practice for us...



Makes sense, as it's much more functional than the gore-tex for moderately-cold weather....
 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:22:17 AM EDT
[#35]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:

That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.




Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.



And not all troops are on meal cards...



Many folks eat off post...





 




Drive through.



Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.



I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...



But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.


Are you even actually in the military?



 




Major USMC, and you?


SSgt USAF



Sir you ever think that maybe not everybody wants to hang out on or around base during their, most likely one break they'll get during their 12-14 hour shift they've been on?



 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:29:03 AM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.


That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


The ACU is the "public face" of the Army.  Even recruiters and other office workers wear it.  The ridiculous restrictions placed on Marines for wearing of the uniform off post are... ridiculous.  It only makes sense for force protection reasons, and probably dates back to an era when khakis were the daily wear uniform and fatigues were only worn in the field.

Nobody seems to know why the rule is what it is, only that to not follow it bakes you a "rag bag."  A Soldier or a Marine can and will look like a rag bag in ANY uniform, and can look sharp in ANY uniform.  One need only looks at how the navy wears they same khaki shirt or 8-pointed hat as the Marines to see that HOW a uniform item is worn is as important as WHAT uniform item is worn.

I have been in schools with Marines, and the lengths they had to go through to go to lunch with us was sad.

FWIW, the further you go from an actual Marine Corps base, the more likely you will see Marines in cammies off post.  Reservists do it, a lot.

Personally, I think it is good PR - it advertises the presence of a local Marine Reserve unit.


Totally disagree with ya BA.  I think the above mentioned reason of looking like shit-bags in public while wearing the utility uniform is a valid argument.  Of course, the flip-side to that is the shit-bags that dress in inappropriate civilian attire when off base until someone steps up and tells him to pull his head out of his ass.  I wasn't a fashion nazi about it when going to the mall with the wife, as you can't tell who's a Marine and who isn't sometimes but restricting what is worn out in town makes sense.  There is no "off-duty" in the USMC.  You are a Marine 24 / 7 and you will conduct yourself as such.  With that said, I think it also minimizes the chances that a Marines will be engaged in misconduct on "libbo" while wearing the uniform-an embarrasing situation for the rest of us.  Instead of restricting what businesses a Marine is restricted from entering (such as bars and strip clubs) while in uniform and debating the subject to death, just restrict the Marine to proper civilian attire and be done with it.  You also blend in well with the rest of the civilian community without the "us" and "them" issues that make an appearance from time to time when you live in a "service town".

Finally, restricting what a Marine can wear on liberty is another "tool in the box" for discipline.  If I had my way, E-3s and below would be restricted to the "charlie" uniform for off-base liberty until being promoted to the rank of Cpl.  I didn't used to feel this way, but over the years I've come to the conclusion that young Marines need to earn the right to wear proper civilian attire so they don't take their off-base libbo for granted.  There's a metric shit-ton of us that feel the same way.  Liberty is a privalege, not a right.  Too many Marines fail to understand that.  It's all part of policing up our own and while you may consider our culture overly restrictive, you'd understand it once you became part of it.  We push our Marines pretty hard, so they have a tendency to want to blow off steam accordingly.  That's the part that needs to be put back in "check fire".  It's a minor adjustment for a small percentage of non-conformists, but those that can't get with the program stand out in the eyes of the public.  That sucks for the rest of us.

I've been to a few Army schools, and always felt wierd going to Hooters (for example) with Army classmates that were wearing their BDUs.  They were ironed and starched and looked squared away, but we were all SNCOs so they didn't act like drunken fools.  Changing over to "civies" and back takes five minutes.  It's not that big of a deal.      

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:29:09 AM EDT
[#37]



Quoted:



Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:




Quoted:


Quoted:

That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.




Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.



And not all troops are on meal cards...



Many folks eat off post...





 




Drive through.



Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.



I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...



But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.


Are you even actually in the military?



 




Major USMC, and you?


Didn't a large number of Marines recently get shit on in and around San Diego for looking like dirt bags off base?  Many mil members have that "out of sight, out of mind" mentality when off base.



 
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:43:41 AM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.


The old slant pocket OD green (OG Shade 107) Vietnam-era poplin "jungle" utilities were one of the best field uniforms ever issued.  Plain, boring green is very effective at hiding the wearer in a field enviornment.  The slant pockets were practical and looked good.  That particular uniform pattern was developed from the airborne uniform pattern first introduced in WWII-there were about three major variations of it while it was being introduced back in the '60s.  It was used by certain Army (Airborne, Rangers, GBs) units until supplies were exhausted back in the '80s.  There was huge controversy in the Army at the time (from Vietnam on) as to whether to sew the name tapes on the shirt horizontally or along the top of the pocket flaps at an angle.  That shit (the debate) went on forever ("You don't read the name tapes with your head slanted, so sew the tapes on horizontally").  I'm sure that's why the Army ACUs don't have the same slanted pockets designed into the new uniform.  

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:44:49 AM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.

And not all troops are on meal cards...

Many folks eat off post...


 


Drive through.

Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.

I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...

But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.

Are you even actually in the military?

 


Major USMC, and you?

Didn't a large number of Marines recently get shit on in and around San Diego for looking like dirt bags off base?  Many mil members have that "out of sight, out of mind" mentality when off base.
 


If they did ("get shit on"), then good.  Someone's doing their job.

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 10:47:11 AM EDT
[#40]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.


That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


The ACU is the "public face" of the Army.  Even recruiters and other office workers wear it.  The ridiculous restrictions placed on Marines for wearing of the uniform off post are... ridiculous.  It only makes sense for force protection reasons, and probably dates back to an era when khakis were the daily wear uniform and fatigues were only worn in the field.

Nobody seems to know why the rule is what it is, only that to not follow it bakes you a "rag bag."  A Soldier or a Marine can and will look like a rag bag in ANY uniform, and can look sharp in ANY uniform.  One need only looks at how the navy wears they same khaki shirt or 8-pointed hat as the Marines to see that HOW a uniform item is worn is as important as WHAT uniform item is worn.

I have been in schools with Marines, and the lengths they had to go through to go to lunch with us was sad.

FWIW, the further you go from an actual Marine Corps base, the more likely you will see Marines in cammies off post.  Reservists do it, a lot.

Personally, I think it is good PR - it advertises the presence of a local Marine Reserve unit.


Totally disagree with ya BA.  I think the above mentioned reason of looking like shit-bags in public while wearing the utility uniform is a valid argument.  Of course, the flip-side to that is the shit-bags that dress in inappropriate civilian attire when off base until someone steps up and tells him to pull his head out of his ass.  I wasn't a fashion nazi about it when going to the mall with the wife, as you can't tell who's a Marine and who isn't sometimes but restricting what is worn out in town makes sense.  There is no "off-duty" in the USMC.  You are a Marine 24 / 7 and you will conduct yourself as such.  With that said, I think it also minimizes the chances that a Marines will be engaged in misconduct on "libbo" while wearing the uniform-an embarrasing situation for the rest of us.  Instead of restricting what businesses a Marine is restricted from entering (such as bars and strip clubs) while in uniform and debating the subject to death, just restrict the Marine to proper civilian attire and be done with it.  You also blend in well with the rest of the civilian community without the "us" and "them" issues that make an appearance from time to time when you live in a "service town".

Finally, restricting what a Marine can wear on liberty is another "tool in the box" for discipline.  If I had my way, E-3s and below would be restricted to the "charlie" uniform for off-base liberty until being promoted to the rank of Cpl.  I didn't used to feel this way, but over the years I've come to the conclusion that young Marines need to earn the right to wear proper civilian attire so they don't take their off-base libbo for granted.  There's a metric shit-ton of us that feel the same way.  Liberty is a privalege, not a right.  Too many Marines fail to understand that.  It's all part of policing up our own and while you may consider our culture overly restrictive, you'd understand it once you became part of it.  We push our Marines pretty hard, so they have a tendency to want to blow off steam accordingly.  That's the part that needs to be put back in "check fire".  It's a minor adjustment for a small percentage of non-conformists, but those that can't get with the program stand out in the eyes of the public.  That sucks for the rest of us.

I've been to a few Army schools, and always felt wierd going to Hooters (for example) with Army classmates that were wearing their BDUs.  They were ironed and starched and looked squared away, but we were all SNCOs so they didn't act like drunken fools.  Changing over to "civies" and back takes five minutes.  It's not that big of a deal.      



Isn't your desire to prevent "us" and "them" issues off post contradicted by your belief that junior Marines should be in Charlies on liberty?

I agree that troops tend to behave better the more they dress up, so I do see some of the logic in it.

This still points right back to the uniquely Marine Corps belief that somehow the utility uniform is unfit for public display (only other environment I have seen such a mentality against letting people see you fatigues is in foreign countries, or even with foreign soldiers in the US)
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 11:04:53 AM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


Lunch?  Not all bases have a chow hall.

And not all troops are on meal cards...

Many folks eat off post...


 


Drive through.

Plus, I've been on a base or two and just about all of them have places to eat whether it's a chow hall or a Robin Hood, or whatever.

I understand your point, but when you allow troops to do that, then you end up with what you have- troops walking around malls and other places in broken uniforms looking like "rag bags" as the other guy put it up above.  See it all the time.  Except around Marine bases, where we dont' seem to have a problem not looking like ass and getting lunch...

But you're right, it will be pretty silly if the AF starts making the Airmen shine their green boots.  LOL.

The problem is, that's another 'rules for the sake of making rules' situation...

Wasting soldier's time... Nothing more, nothing less...

It is one of the most pathetic things that leadership does in the service, bar none...

Fortunately, the war seems to have reduced it in the Army, somewhat...

Of course, as soon as we have another 80s/90s '10 years with no combat' period, the garrison weenies and their 'special rules' will be back, full retard... Because apparently, the only way to know how 'good' someone is at being a solider, without combat, is to haze the fuck out of them with stupid-ass time-wasting rules (That serve NO purpose other than to add another 'chore' to the list of things a 'good' troop must do), and see how good they are at keeping up....


 


Dave, if you stay in long enough, you're going to understand that there's a method to the madness....

Shining boots and garrison-type uniform maintenance as we knew it (starch and an ironing board) is hopefully gone forever, but not everyone can be left with free time without close supervision.  Not everyone in uniform is as bright as you are, including some of the leadership.  If they were, there wouldn't be any need for NCO and SNCO supervision and officer leadership.  In a large orgnaization of people, someone will stand out as a royal fuck-up or even just a marginal performer (in a best case scenerio), and you will drug down to their lowest common denominator.  Job performance is just one aspect of evaluating an individual's potential.  Personal conduct, appearance, PME (which will probably replace "busy work" more and more as time goes on). and other criteria will have to be used to judge you on your worth as a Soldier to the rest of the Army.  You're being groomed not to be the best helo-mechanic in the Army (that's assuming you plan on staying in that MOS or even in the Army), but to be a top-notch SNCO of Soldiers.  It's hard to judge a person's value to the larger organization as a whole simply by how you do your job.  Excelling at your job is a minimum requirement.  It's expected of you.  The other aspects of being a good soldier aren't as obvious as opening TM and reading it in black and white.

Right now, you're in the "practical phase" of your career-we all go through it I think.  The trick is not to lose it as you "climb the ladder" of promotions and become a "product of your ('garrison') enviornment" as my Army classmates at ANCOC used to say.  Change can be a good thing, if it's done for the right reason.  Not everything should be done because it's easier, however.  

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 11:12:46 AM EDT
[#42]
I'm glad they shot down the idea of wearing a crew neck with any combination of service dress, notably short sleeve blues.  



But we can talk on our cell phones and walk now!  
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 11:19:45 AM EDT
[#43]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:

Quoted:
It just bewilders me that anyone would want to go back to polishing a fucking boot.  

Yeah fuck that!!!
 


No fucking shit!

Someone might mistake you for some kind of seriously squared away military type! (YUK!!!)
We can't have that now can we?



The 'squared away military' appearance has changed so many times in history, why not let it change again?

Finally wake up, and let form FOLLOW function, instead of the other way around!

We have dress uniforms for 'look cool' events...

Work uniforms should be wash & wear... Boots should be maintainance-free...

Getting wrapped up in uniform appearance, beyond wearing it all & being in the right uniform, is the sort of garrison bullshit that leads to CSM PTBeltNazi types wandering around FOBs in Iraq looking for victims...


 


The problem is when service men go off base in that "wash & wear " shit looking like rag bags.

I was 11B and had 2 groups of uniforms and boots. Field (the majority) and a couple of barracks uniforms.
This was all the way back when we still had the glorious cool, comfortable, cotton OD Green slant pocket jungle fatigues.
Those fuckers looked sharp starched and ironed too. Wasn't hard to keep the jungle boots shiny either.

I'm starting to think ze Germans got it right the first time with nice general issue uniforms and cammo coveralls for the field.

Anyone playing dress-right-dress in a war zone should be sent out as a Polish land mine detector.


That's the problem right there.  Why the Army, AF, etc. allow their troops to go off base to the mall and wherever else they want in cammies or PT gear is beyond me.  You look like rag bags and it's your own fault for being undisciplined, not because of the uniform designs.


The ACU is the "public face" of the Army.  Even recruiters and other office workers wear it.  The ridiculous restrictions placed on Marines for wearing of the uniform off post are... ridiculous.  It only makes sense for force protection reasons, and probably dates back to an era when khakis were the daily wear uniform and fatigues were only worn in the field.

Nobody seems to know why the rule is what it is, only that to not follow it bakes you a "rag bag."  A Soldier or a Marine can and will look like a rag bag in ANY uniform, and can look sharp in ANY uniform.  One need only looks at how the navy wears they same khaki shirt or 8-pointed hat as the Marines to see that HOW a uniform item is worn is as important as WHAT uniform item is worn.

I have been in schools with Marines, and the lengths they had to go through to go to lunch with us was sad.

FWIW, the further you go from an actual Marine Corps base, the more likely you will see Marines in cammies off post.  Reservists do it, a lot.

Personally, I think it is good PR - it advertises the presence of a local Marine Reserve unit.


Totally disagree with ya BA.  I think the above mentioned reason of looking like shit-bags in public while wearing the utility uniform is a valid argument.  Of course, the flip-side to that is the shit-bags that dress in inappropriate civilian attire when off base until someone steps up and tells him to pull his head out of his ass.  I wasn't a fashion nazi about it when going to the mall with the wife, as you can't tell who's a Marine and who isn't sometimes but restricting what is worn out in town makes sense.  There is no "off-duty" in the USMC.  You are a Marine 24 / 7 and you will conduct yourself as such.  With that said, I think it also minimizes the chances that a Marines will be engaged in misconduct on "libbo" while wearing the uniform-an embarrasing situation for the rest of us.  Instead of restricting what businesses a Marine is restricted from entering (such as bars and strip clubs) while in uniform and debating the subject to death, just restrict the Marine to proper civilian attire and be done with it.  You also blend in well with the rest of the civilian community without the "us" and "them" issues that make an appearance from time to time when you live in a "service town".

Finally, restricting what a Marine can wear on liberty is another "tool in the box" for discipline.  If I had my way, E-3s and below would be restricted to the "charlie" uniform for off-base liberty until being promoted to the rank of Cpl.  I didn't used to feel this way, but over the years I've come to the conclusion that young Marines need to earn the right to wear proper civilian attire so they don't take their off-base libbo for granted.  There's a metric shit-ton of us that feel the same way.  Liberty is a privalege, not a right.  Too many Marines fail to understand that.  It's all part of policing up our own and while you may consider our culture overly restrictive, you'd understand it once you became part of it.  We push our Marines pretty hard, so they have a tendency to want to blow off steam accordingly.  That's the part that needs to be put back in "check fire".  It's a minor adjustment for a small percentage of non-conformists, but those that can't get with the program stand out in the eyes of the public.  That sucks for the rest of us.

I've been to a few Army schools, and always felt wierd going to Hooters (for example) with Army classmates that were wearing their BDUs.  They were ironed and starched and looked squared away, but we were all SNCOs so they didn't act like drunken fools.  Changing over to "civies" and back takes five minutes.  It's not that big of a deal.      



Isn't your desire to prevent "us" and "them" issues off post contradicted by your belief that junior Marines should be in Charlies on liberty?

I agree that troops tend to behave better the more they dress up, so I do see some of the logic in it.

This still points right back to the uniquely Marine Corps belief that somehow the utility uniform is unfit for public display (only other environment I have seen such a mentality against letting people see you fatigues is in foreign countries, or even with foreign soldiers in the US)


A valid question, but you answered yourself when you pointed out that service members tend to behave themselves better in a dress uniform.  Being a good "ambassador" to the civilian community is just one benefit, but the rule would serve primarily to keep junior Marines on their best behavior rather than keeping the civilians out in town happier.  One however, would follow as a consequence of the other.

Giving young Marines a chance to earn the privalege of wearing civies while out in town is a strong incentive to behave themselves.  It's unfortunent that the majority (of E-3s and below) would suffer for the actions of a few, but the benefits in the long run would be pretty significant.  Protecting the image of our Corps is more important than whether PFC Benotz has the freedom to hit the bars and clubs of Jacksonville, NC in Levis, a belt, and a button-up shirt....

It may be a bad idea.  There may be more problems with it than benefits.  It's not my intent to make anyone's life miserable.  The issue has probably been discussed to death at the Sgt Majs. symposiam every year for all I know.  Perhaps I've got it all wrong and the policy needs to be implemented against those guilty of misconduct out in town on a selective basis as opposed to a blanket policy against the rest of those who don't deserve it (the majority).  

Damn, maybe I need to be recalibrated.  


Link Posted: 6/14/2009 11:26:37 AM EDT
[#44]
Quoted:
...
It may be a bad idea.  There may be more problems with it than benefits.  It's not my intent to make anyone's life miserable.  The issue has probably been discussed to death at the Sgt Majs. symposiam every year for all I know.  Perhaps I've got it all wrong and the policy needs to be implemented against those guilty of misconduct out in town on a selective basis as opposed to a blanket policy against the rest of those who don't deserve it (the majority).  

Damn, maybe I need to be recalibrated.  




One of the more memorable experience in my younger years was when then MG Honore wanted to do just that for discipline cases in Korea - let them on liberty, but Class A uniform only.

The Division JAG told him that would be illegal.

He about had a fit, and told her in a very colorful way that her job was to find out how to meet his intent in a manner that would be legal, not to just keep saying "Sir, you can't do that."

Apparently, this JAG off. had been famous for this.

Anyway, I later learned that this was apparently common practice in the 70s in the Army - to require certain soldiers to stay in either Class A or B uniform on liberty.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 11:54:16 AM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
Quoted:
That boot really looks like crap. I am still wearing my desert boots I got issued back in 98 because I can't stand the sage boots. And the fleece...really? I don't think the fleece should be an outer garment outside of your immediate work area. If you are cold or are going to get wet while outside, wear the freaking jacket. Tucking trousers into your boots? Mine have so much extra material in the legs that there would not be enough room in the boot, plus it looks like crap (IMO) when they are tucked in for normal day to day wear. Field conditions, sure.


Not all of us are in Wyoming, sport. Sometimes, a light fleece is nice to wear around. Try hitting an Army post sometime, you might find it common practice. It's also comfortable. Tucking in for day to day ops os stupid as hell, kinda like the whole ABU. I hate it.


I agree that the fleece is comfortable as an outer garment, and have worn one as such, but I still think that it should not be worn outside of your work area for normal day to day activities. And yes, I have worked on an Army post for five years in a unit you may be familiar with since you are SF; 421st Combat Training Squadron, Fort Dix.

Just my opinion, but I think if you are going to be out and about in public, that you should present a decent appearance by wearing matching tops and bottoms.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:18:37 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
Quoted:
...
It may be a bad idea.  There may be more problems with it than benefits.  It's not my intent to make anyone's life miserable.  The issue has probably been discussed to death at the Sgt Majs. symposiam every year for all I know.  Perhaps I've got it all wrong and the policy needs to be implemented against those guilty of misconduct out in town on a selective basis as opposed to a blanket policy against the rest of those who don't deserve it (the majority).  

Damn, maybe I need to be recalibrated.  




One of the more memorable experience in my younger years was when then MG Honore wanted to do just that for discipline cases in Korea - let them on liberty, but Class A uniform only.

The Division JAG told him that would be illegal.

He about had a fit, and told her in a very colorful way that her job was to find out how to meet his intent in a manner that would be legal, not to just keep saying "Sir, you can't do that."

Apparently, this JAG off. had been famous for this.

Anyway, I later learned that this was apparently common practice in the 70s in the Army - to require certain soldiers to stay in either Class A or B uniform on liberty.


Gen. Honore was / is a good man.  His conduct during the Katrina disaster reflected very well upon those in uniform.  His leadership was a great credit to his service.  I'll always respect the hell out of him for not allowing his Soldiers to participate in gun confiscations once he found out that they were participating in it.  

He's a patriotic American.

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:31:13 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
...
It may be a bad idea.  There may be more problems with it than benefits.  It's not my intent to make anyone's life miserable.  The issue has probably been discussed to death at the Sgt Majs. symposiam every year for all I know.  Perhaps I've got it all wrong and the policy needs to be implemented against those guilty of misconduct out in town on a selective basis as opposed to a blanket policy against the rest of those who don't deserve it (the majority).  

Damn, maybe I need to be recalibrated.  




One of the more memorable experience in my younger years was when then MG Honore wanted to do just that for discipline cases in Korea - let them on liberty, but Class A uniform only.

The Division JAG told him that would be illegal.

He about had a fit, and told her in a very colorful way that her job was to find out how to meet his intent in a manner that would be legal, not to just keep saying "Sir, you can't do that."

Apparently, this JAG off. had been famous for this.

Anyway, I later learned that this was apparently common practice in the 70s in the Army - to require certain soldiers to stay in either Class A or B uniform on liberty.


Gen. Honore was / is a good man.  His conduct during the Katrina disaster reflected very well upon those in uniform.  His leadership was a great credit to his service.  I'll always respect the hell out of him for not allowing his Soldiers to participate in gun confiscations once he found out that they were participating in it.  

He's a patriotic American.



Working under him was definitely one of the highpoints of my time in.  Incidentally, the guy I later worked for - who put my career on a two year detour detour (which probably would have had me out of the Army if we weren't so short handed these days) - used to publicly talk shit about him.  That man wouldn't know leadership if it bit him in the ass.
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:47:15 PM EDT
[#48]
They want a more professional image in the PT uniform but they mandate we tuck our pants into our boots and allow us to walk and talk on cell phones

Funny how the AF news says mandate date of Oct 2010 for the tucking in the pants but the official memorandum states effective immediately, how I wish it was 2010 because it looks like ASS!!
Link Posted: 6/14/2009 12:58:22 PM EDT
[#49]
Quoted:
They want a more professional image in the PT uniform but they mandate we tuck our pants into our boots and allow us to walk and talk on cell phones

Funny how the AF news says mandate date of Oct 2010 for the tucking in the pants but the official memorandum states effective immediately, how I wish it was 2010 because it looks like ASS!!


Tucking the trouser leg into a high-top boot looks worse than a sack of smashed assholes.  Most of the folks that do so end up looking like peg-legged farmers.  Elastic blousing bands are far, far more professional looking (and not with any of the silly garrison bullshit Brigade Quartermaster sells that makes your trousers look like you're wearing coffee cans inside your pant legs, either).

I'll wager a bet that it doesn't last long, or that it'll be loosely enforced.  When the USAF went to the BDU uniform back in the mid '80s the topic was discussed at length.  Good Lord, do these senior people have nothing else to debate?

I predict it won't last long.

Link Posted: 6/14/2009 1:09:20 PM EDT
[#50]
Our 1st Shirt was walking around making sure everyone had their pants tucked in with a bloused appearance.  The commander even said it looked dumb but rules are rules.
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top